Re: [freenet-support] attention users of both freenet networks

2011-02-25 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:27:01 +0100 (CET), Nomen Nescio wrote:
>
> you have a right to know
> 
> USK@1WZPo6qZmlCpi6rZWjtz~kig1gcpcnzh5drmqpW9L8Q,ksaFFDkSJfnOXB3ppYhQ2R14z3WQCYxGqXNERCYcHD0,AQACAAE/wordsoftoad/-1/

I can't access this freesite. Despite hours of trying. (Other freesites
seem to work fine.)

"
Freenet was unable to retrieve this file.
Data not found: No USK found
"
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [freenet-support] msdnsdiscovery

2011-02-25 Thread David ‘Bombe’ Roden
On Friday 25 February 2011 21:45:26 folkert wrote:

> I wonder why is msdnsdiscovery announcing itself on 192.168.64.1/24:

My guess is that the plugin does not know too much about Freenet’s 
configuration and simply announces on the first interface it can find. For 
more details, read the source. :)


> Folkert van Heusden

David


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

[freenet-support] msdnsdiscovery

2011-02-25 Thread folkert
I wonder why is msdnsdiscovery announcing itself on 192.168.64.1/24:
Service NameMachine Address Parameters
Freenet 0,7 Fproxy server -=next-20110211=- mauer.local.  
192.168.64.1: path=/
Freenet 0,7 FCP server -=next-20110211=-mauer.local.  
192.168.64.1:9482 
Freenet 0,7 Node server -=next-20110211=-   mauer.local.  
192.168.64.1:52644

while it is doing all things on 172.29.0.0/24:
mauer:/usr/local/FreeNet/freenet# grep 172.29.0 freenet.ini 
fproxy.bindTo=172.29.0.1
fcp.bindTo=172.29.0.1

?

Especially since there are loads of other interfaces on the system as
well:
mauer:/usr/local/FreeNet/freenet# ifconfig | grep 'inet addr'
  inet addr:192.168.64.1  Bcast:192.168.64.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
  inet addr:192.168.178.2  Bcast:192.168.178.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
  inet addr:172.29.0.1  Bcast:172.29.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
  inet addr:192.168.59.1  P-t-P:192.168.59.121  Mask:255.255.255.255
  inet addr:192.168.61.1  P-t-P:192.168.61.121  Mask:255.255.255.255
  inet addr:192.168.18.2  Bcast:192.168.18.255  Mask:255.255.255.0


Folkert van Heusden

-- 
--
Phone: +31-6-41278122, PGP-key: 1F28D8AE, www.vanheusden.com
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [freenet-support] idea

2011-02-25 Thread folkert
> > > What about that the freenet daemon periodically
> > > (configurable/disable-ble of course) announces itself on the lan(s) to
> > > which it is connected? That way freenet-nodes can interconnect and
> > > speed up distribution of data.
> 
> There is a plugin:
> MDNSDiscovery.
> This uses it to announce FCP, but you still need to open FCP to the LAN...

Or plugin to avahi.

> > Data distribution on Freenet doesn't work like that. Data segments are
> > actually spread all across Freenet, ideally with no particular peer
> > having a large portion of a large splitfile. I don't think having fast
> > random LAN connections would speed things up -- the bottleneck will
> > still be the LAN's connection to the Internet. (Not to mention the fact
> > that it would be at least somewhat less secure. (Better chance of
> > traffic analysis and such tricks against you.))
> 
> We did think about an "is the lan trusted?" option some time ago. This would 
> both announce and open FCP and Fproxy. Unfortunately defining "the lan" is 
> hard, when big untrusted NATed networks (e.g. ISPs in russia etc) often use 
> private address space, and autodetecting it *reliably* is also hard.

You could make it configurable. Default: do not trust.

> You should however peer with the other computers on your LAN, if you know 
> their operators, of course. Which hopefully you do if the LAN is trusted!

Troublesome if everybody's on dhcp.


Folkert van Heusden

-- 
MultiTail na wan makriki wrokosani fu tan luku den logfile nanga san
den commando spiti puru. Piki puru spesrutu sani, wroko nanga difrenti
kroru, tya kon makandra, nanga wan lo moro.
http://www.vanheusden.com/multitail/
--
Phone: +31-6-41278122, PGP-key: 1F28D8AE, www.vanheusden.com
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe