On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:01:06 +0100, you wrote: > > Freenet 0.5 had opennet, and yet it was a failure. >
Ok, I gotta know this. How is 0.5 considered a failure. I use it daily and it works flawlessly, Frost messages flow as well as ever, as do downloads of splitfiles. Yesterday I retrieved a freesite that had not been updated in two years and it was 100% intact. To me, that spells success. "And now back to Frost" > On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 08:44:42PM -0000, Hartmut Folter wrote: > > Freenet 0.7 is nothing more than yet another in a series of Freenet > > failures-in-waiting until it proves itself, IMHO, by emerging out of alpha > > with open-net. > -- > Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ > ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. Crash [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]