>> It would be nice if there was some consistency in how builds/versions were named. 
>My freenet node is telling me 
>> it's version 0.5, even though it is 0.5.0.3 and the build number doesn't increment 
>every time. Should I be going 
>> by the CVS Revision to know if I have the latest? If so, then announcements maybe 
>should use those numbers since 
>> the web gateway does display it correctly.
>The build number is the important thing; maybe it should have been
>incremented for 0.5.0.3. Traditionally the build number has only gone up
>when the node behaviour changes, as opposed to the minor fixes that went
>into 0.5.0.3 (anon filter fixes, and a fix for the luser mp3 wipe bug,
>which won't affect existing successfully installed users).

this may be true, but it's too confusing to have more than one release of a software 
with the same version number.
so you can name Win95 = 98 = 98SE = ME, because they just re-bundled it, fixed some 
bugs and plugges some progs into it....

please do me, anyone else, and especially you and freenet the favour to have *ONE* 
release number, which will ++ every time you change something. even 
when you change a dot to a comma! the program has changed, so it has to get a new 
identification (CHK are content hash keys, too, like version numbers, 
so 
a red picture does not have the same CHK as a blue picture!) btw.. it helps debugging 
by making clear which version of fred the user runs...

____________________________________________________________

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is 
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in 
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended 
recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and 
delete the material from any computer.






_______________________________________________
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support

Reply via email to