[freenet-support] Re: Memory usage...

2006-03-21 Thread Matthew Toseland 
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 11:09:54AM +0100, Evert wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> My JVM is:
> 
> java -version
>   java version "1.5.0_06"
>   Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_06-b05)
>   Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_06-b05, mixed mode)
> 
> 
> My freenet-version is:  eehh... How do I determine this?
> My freenet.jar is made on November 23rd 2005.
> 
> Ah, -Xmx... There it is! Found in /etc/conf.d/freenet:
>   JAVA_OPTIONS="-Xmx256M"
> 
> So this is the variable that actually controls the memory usage of freenet? 
> Not any of the variables in freenet.conf?

Yes.
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:

[freenet-support] Re: Memory usage...

2006-03-21 Thread Evert 
Hi!

My JVM is:

java -version
  java version "1.5.0_06"
  Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_06-b05)
  Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_06-b05, mixed mode)


My freenet-version is:  eehh... How do I determine this?
My freenet.jar is made on November 23rd 2005.

Ah, -Xmx... There it is! Found in /etc/conf.d/freenet:
JAVA_OPTIONS="-Xmx256M"

So this is the variable that actually controls the memory usage of freenet? Not 
any of the variables in freenet.conf?



Regards,
  Evert


Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 02:16:46PM +0100, Evert wrote:
>> After a couple of days:
>>
>> 23330 freenet   24   1  546m 267m 4960 S  0.0 26.5 105:17.81 java
>>
>> RES is now almost double...   :-?
>>
>> What could be the cause of this...?
> 
> Bugs, either in the JVM (what version?) or in Freenet itself, or a high
> -Xmx. You are using Freenet 0.5, correct? What is the -Xmx parameter set
> to? If it is 128M, then there is a JVM bug.
>>
>> Regards,
>>   Evert
>>
>> 
>>
>> ___
>> Support mailing list
>> Support at freenetproject.org
>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
>> Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

[freenet-support] Re: Memory usage...

2006-03-21 Thread Evert 
Hi!

My JVM is:

java -version
  java version 1.5.0_06
  Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_06-b05)
  Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_06-b05, mixed mode)


My freenet-version is:  eehh... How do I determine this?
My freenet.jar is made on November 23rd 2005.

Ah, -Xmx... There it is! Found in /etc/conf.d/freenet:
JAVA_OPTIONS=-Xmx256M

So this is the variable that actually controls the memory usage of freenet? Not 
any of the variables in freenet.conf?



Regards,
  Evert


Matthew Toseland wrote:
 On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 02:16:46PM +0100, Evert wrote:
 After a couple of days:

 23330 freenet   24   1  546m 267m 4960 S  0.0 26.5 105:17.81 java

 RES is now almost double...   :-?

 What could be the cause of this...?
 
 Bugs, either in the JVM (what version?) or in Freenet itself, or a high
 -Xmx. You are using Freenet 0.5, correct? What is the -Xmx parameter set
 to? If it is 128M, then there is a JVM bug.

 Regards,
   Evert

 

 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Re: Memory usage...

2006-03-20 Thread Matthew Toseland 
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 02:16:46PM +0100, Evert wrote:
> After a couple of days:
> 
> 23330 freenet   24   1  546m 267m 4960 S  0.0 26.5 105:17.81 java
> 
> RES is now almost double...   :-?
> 
> What could be the cause of this...?

Bugs, either in the JVM (what version?) or in Freenet itself, or a high
-Xmx. You are using Freenet 0.5, correct? What is the -Xmx parameter set
to? If it is 128M, then there is a JVM bug.
> 
> 
> Regards,
>   Evert
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:

[freenet-support] Re: Memory usage...

2006-03-20 Thread Evert 
After a couple of days:

23330 freenet   24   1  546m 267m 4960 S  0.0 26.5 105:17.81 java

RES is now almost double...   :-?

What could be the cause of this...?


Regards,
  Evert



Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 01:06:51PM +0100, Evert wrote:
>> And will RES remain more or less constant, or will it increase with uptime?
> 
> It should be stable.
>> Regards,
>>   Evert
>>
>> Matthew Toseland wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 15:25 +0100, Evert wrote:
 Hi all!

 I have a newbie(?) question about memory use of Freenet. From top:

 PIDuserPR  NI VIRT RES   SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND
 6801 freenet   26   1  524m 140m  10m S 10.2 13.9   3:59.21 java

 Why is VIRT 524m? That seems like quite a bit for a freenet-config that is 
 set to use 101M, or am I wrong?
>>> You are wrong. VIRT has very little to do with the actual memory usage;
>>> it's RES that matters. Which is reasonable - 101M plus JVM overheads.
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Support mailing list
>>> Support at freenetproject.org
>>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
>>> Unsubscribe at 
>>> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>>> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

[freenet-support] Re: Memory usage...

2006-03-16 Thread Matthew Toseland 
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 01:06:51PM +0100, Evert wrote:
> And will RES remain more or less constant, or will it increase with uptime?

It should be stable.
> 
> Regards,
>   Evert
> 
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 15:25 +0100, Evert wrote:
> >> Hi all!
> >>
> >> I have a newbie(?) question about memory use of Freenet. From top:
> >>
> >> PIDuserPR  NI VIRT RES   SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND
> >> 6801 freenet   26   1  524m 140m  10m S 10.2 13.9   3:59.21 java
> >>
> >> Why is VIRT 524m? That seems like quite a bit for a freenet-config that is 
> >> set to use 101M, or am I wrong?
> > 
> > You are wrong. VIRT has very little to do with the actual memory usage;
> > it's RES that matters. Which is reasonable - 101M plus JVM overheads.
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:

[freenet-support] Re: Memory usage...

2006-03-16 Thread Evert 
And will RES remain more or less constant, or will it increase with uptime?

Regards,
  Evert


Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 15:25 +0100, Evert wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> I have a newbie(?) question about memory use of Freenet. From top:
>>
>> PIDuser  PR  NI VIRT RES   SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND
>> 6801 freenet   26   1  524m 140m  10m S 10.2 13.9   3:59.21 java
>>
>> Why is VIRT 524m? That seems like quite a bit for a freenet-config that is 
>> set to use 101M, or am I wrong?
> 
> You are wrong. VIRT has very little to do with the actual memory usage;
> it's RES that matters. Which is reasonable - 101M plus JVM overheads.
> ___
> Support mailing list
> Support at freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
>

[freenet-support] Re: Memory usage...

2006-03-16 Thread Evert 
And will RES remain more or less constant, or will it increase with uptime?

Regards,
  Evert


Matthew Toseland wrote:
 On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 15:25 +0100, Evert wrote:
 Hi all!

 I have a newbie(?) question about memory use of Freenet. From top:

 PIDuser  PR  NI VIRT RES   SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND
 6801 freenet   26   1  524m 140m  10m S 10.2 13.9   3:59.21 java

 Why is VIRT 524m? That seems like quite a bit for a freenet-config that is 
 set to use 101M, or am I wrong?
 
 You are wrong. VIRT has very little to do with the actual memory usage;
 it's RES that matters. Which is reasonable - 101M plus JVM overheads.
 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Memory usage...

2006-03-16 Thread Matthew Toseland 
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 01:06:51PM +0100, Evert wrote:
 And will RES remain more or less constant, or will it increase with uptime?

It should be stable.
 
 Regards,
   Evert
 
 Matthew Toseland wrote:
  On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 15:25 +0100, Evert wrote:
  Hi all!
 
  I have a newbie(?) question about memory use of Freenet. From top:
 
  PIDuserPR  NI VIRT RES   SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND
  6801 freenet   26   1  524m 140m  10m S 10.2 13.9   3:59.21 java
 
  Why is VIRT 524m? That seems like quite a bit for a freenet-config that is 
  set to use 101M, or am I wrong?
  
  You are wrong. VIRT has very little to do with the actual memory usage;
  it's RES that matters. Which is reasonable - 101M plus JVM overheads.
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]