Re: [pfSense Support] Trouble accessing console via serial connection
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Jonathan Wanak wrote: I see the pfSense boot-up and shut-down messages in HyperTerminal. However, once I get to the line "Bootup complete" I can't seem to do anything. I was expecting to see the main console screen at this point, but nothing further appears. When I reboot via the web configurator, I see the shutdown messages in HyperTerminal. It sounds like the console is being set to the serial port (look in /boot.config), but that no getty is being spawned on the console. To make it "just work" for now, manually edit /etc/ttys and stick something like this on the proper serial line: ttyd0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" vt102 on secure Then "kill -HUP 1" to have the file re-read. Charles Thanks, Jon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] Trouble accessing console via serial connection
Hi,
I'm trying to get the serial console to work. I'm running pfSense RC2, on the
hard drive on a PII Dell Optiplex, connected to my Windows XP machine with a
null modem cable. Connection settings are 9600/8/N/1/HW handshaking. I have
verified 2-way communication between the firewall box and the XP machine ('echo
"xx" > ttyxx' appears in HT; 'more ttyxx' displays text typed into HT), and
disconnected the keyboard, mouse, and monitor from the router. Here's my
problem:
I see the pfSense boot-up and shut-down messages in HyperTerminal. However,
once I get to the line "Bootup complete" I can't seem to do anything. I was
expecting to see the main console screen at this point, but nothing further
appears. When I reboot via the web configurator, I see the shutdown messages
in HyperTerminal. I've tried TTY, VT100, ANSI, and auto emulation modes. I've
also tried playing around with the flow control settings, but haven't seen any
difference. I'm guessing I have some kind of terminal misconfiguration, but
don't know where to go from here.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Jon
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] USP & NAT Reflection
Same here have ired this forsome time with no success From: Rob Terhaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 August 2006 18:35 To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] USP & NAT Reflection On 8/1/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8/2/06, Tim Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes I have the NAT reflection box unchecked. Have you tested reflection with > UDP yet? I just upgraded to RC2 and have the same issue. I have tried > removing the forwarding and adding it back in case something is getting > mangled between versions now. I have not tested UDP, only TCP. Anyone else with problems with UDP reflection? Scott confirmed, UDP reflection is not working for my DNS lookups ether: dig @ google.com (nothing) dig +tcp @< my.external.facing.dns.ip> google.com (good results)
Re: [pfSense Support] End of Hackatron ?
On 8/3/06, Holger Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Scott & dev team, may be somewhat off topic in a certain sense but possibly of interest to more people (or i simply missed something here): Did you finish your hackatron by now and by releasing RC2? Or are we expecting further bunch of fixes in the nearer future due to "heavy development" during the hackatron? By browsing through the typical places (Blog, website, mail archive) i wasn't able to find any info... We will be posting a wrapup blog post soon. All of us have been extremely busy with RC2. Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] End of Hackatron ?
Hi Scott & dev team, may be somewhat off topic in a certain sense but possibly of interest to more people (or i simply missed something here): Did you finish your hackatron by now and by releasing RC2? Or are we expecting further bunch of fixes in the nearer future due to "heavy development" during the hackatron? By browsing through the typical places (Blog, website, mail archive) i wasn't able to find any info... Thanks, Holger
Re: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load Balancing Failover
Scott Williamson schrieb: Next Question, has anyone had experiences running pfsense on Sun X2100 Servers? It should work. (FreeBSD i386). I run FreeBSD 6.1 on the Tyan GT20 NForce barebone, a "cousin" of the X2100. Note that my GT20 allowed me to install a 3Ware RAID-card instead of the included Nfore RAID - the X2100 only has one PCIe slot, IIRC. cheers, Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load Balancing Failover
Scott Ullrich wrote: On 8/3/06, Gary Buckmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Aren't those Opteron based? If so, then you're out of luck, because pfSense is currently not an x64 platform. Opterons will run just fine on 32 bit as well as 64 bit. One of our builder servers is a dual Opteron. Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] My mistake. String me up. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load Balancing Failover
On 8/3/06, Gary Buckmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Aren't those Opteron based? If so, then you're out of luck, because pfSense is currently not an x64 platform. Opterons will run just fine on 32 bit as well as 64 bit. One of our builder servers is a dual Opteron. Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RES: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load Balancing Failover
I run pfsense in Sun Ultra20 -Mensagem original- De: Gary Buckmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada em: quinta-feira, 3 de agosto de 2006 13:39 Para: support@pfsense.com Assunto: Re: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load Balancing Failover Aren't those Opteron based? If so, then you're out of luck, because pfSense is currently not an x64 platform. -Gary Scott Williamson wrote: > Next Question, has anyone had experiences running pfsense on Sun X2100 > Servers? > > Regards > > There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can read binary, > and those who cannot. > > -Original Message- > From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 9:56 AM > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load Balancing Failover > > Not only that bridging won't work for CARP it won't work with > policybased routing (as the name already says) and/or loadblalancing > either. How many public IPs do your T1s have? You need at least 3 IPs at > each T1 that you can use to set up CARP correctly. The subnet between > the pfSenses and the ASA shouldn't be the problem. Just use a subnet > that is not used anywhere else in your local network (LAN, DMZ, remote > VPN LANs, ...). Btw, you'll have some problems using 1:1 NAT for this > kind of setup as you can't 1:1 NAT the same IP (of the ASA) to different > WANs (that would be 2:1 what is not possible). You need to go along with > portforwards at WAN and at WAN2 to the ASA. Then the state will handle > which is the right interface to send out the reply. > > Holger > > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Scott Williamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 4:46 PM >> To: support@pfsense.com >> Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load >> Balancing Failover >> >> >> 1:1 Nat Accept ALL:ALL? >> >> There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can read binary, >> and those who cannot. >> -Original Message- >> From: Gary Buckmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 9:44 AM >> To: support@pfsense.com >> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load >> Balancing Failover >> >> Scott, >> >> Bridging and CARP don't play nicely together, so you're going >> to have to >> >> go another route. >> >> -Gary >> >> Scott Williamson wrote: >> >>> Ok so here is the question, I have 2 Wan Links Sprint 3MB connection >>> >> and >> >>> Verizon 1.5 MB connection. I am wanting to Load Balance across both >>> connections and use a secondary pfsense firewall for failover. The >>> company I work for mad a sizeable investment in 2 Cisco ASA 5520's >>> >> that >> >>> we are throwing into the picture as well. Here is a rough >>> >> diagram of >> >>> what I would like to do: >>> >>> >>> Sprint T1's||Verizon T1 >>> | | >>> || >>> PFSENSE Main - Standby PFSENSE >>> | >>> | >>>ASA 5520 - Standby 5520 >>> | | | >>> DMZLAN DMZ2 >>> >>> >>> I am just wanting to bridge all traffic and the external >>> >> IP's through >> >>> the PFSENSE and allow the ASA 5520's to do the firewalling and VPN. >>> >> Is >> >>> this possible or is there a better soulution? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Scott Williamson >>> >>> >>> There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can >>> >> read binary, >> >>> and those who cannot. >>> >>> >>> DISCLAIMER: >>> >>> This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it >>> >> is addressed >> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this >> e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then >> delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it >> for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person without >> the consent of the sender. Unless expressly stated herein to the >> contrary, only agreements in writing, signed by an authorized >> officer of >> the Company, may be enforced against it. >> >>> >>> >>> >> - >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -
Re: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load Balancing Failover
Aren't those Opteron based? If so, then you're out of luck, because pfSense is currently not an x64 platform. -Gary Scott Williamson wrote: Next Question, has anyone had experiences running pfsense on Sun X2100 Servers? Regards There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can read binary, and those who cannot. -Original Message- From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 9:56 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load Balancing Failover Not only that bridging won't work for CARP it won't work with policybased routing (as the name already says) and/or loadblalancing either. How many public IPs do your T1s have? You need at least 3 IPs at each T1 that you can use to set up CARP correctly. The subnet between the pfSenses and the ASA shouldn't be the problem. Just use a subnet that is not used anywhere else in your local network (LAN, DMZ, remote VPN LANs, ...). Btw, you'll have some problems using 1:1 NAT for this kind of setup as you can't 1:1 NAT the same IP (of the ASA) to different WANs (that would be 2:1 what is not possible). You need to go along with portforwards at WAN and at WAN2 to the ASA. Then the state will handle which is the right interface to send out the reply. Holger -Original Message- From: Scott Williamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 4:46 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load Balancing Failover 1:1 Nat Accept ALL:ALL? There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can read binary, and those who cannot. -Original Message- From: Gary Buckmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 9:44 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load Balancing Failover Scott, Bridging and CARP don't play nicely together, so you're going to have to go another route. -Gary Scott Williamson wrote: Ok so here is the question, I have 2 Wan Links Sprint 3MB connection and Verizon 1.5 MB connection. I am wanting to Load Balance across both connections and use a secondary pfsense firewall for failover. The company I work for mad a sizeable investment in 2 Cisco ASA 5520's that we are throwing into the picture as well. Here is a rough diagram of what I would like to do: Sprint T1's||Verizon T1 | | || PFSENSE Main - Standby PFSENSE | | ASA 5520 - Standby 5520 | | | DMZLAN DMZ2 I am just wanting to bridge all traffic and the external IP's through the PFSENSE and allow the ASA 5520's to do the firewalling and VPN. Is this possible or is there a better soulution? Regards, Scott Williamson There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can read binary, and those who cannot. DISCLAIMER: This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person without the consent of the sender. Unless expressly stated herein to the contrary, only agreements in writing, signed by an authorized officer of the Company, may be enforced against it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load Balancing Failover
Next Question, has anyone had experiences running pfsense on Sun X2100 Servers? Regards There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can read binary, and those who cannot. -Original Message- From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 9:56 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load Balancing Failover Not only that bridging won't work for CARP it won't work with policybased routing (as the name already says) and/or loadblalancing either. How many public IPs do your T1s have? You need at least 3 IPs at each T1 that you can use to set up CARP correctly. The subnet between the pfSenses and the ASA shouldn't be the problem. Just use a subnet that is not used anywhere else in your local network (LAN, DMZ, remote VPN LANs, ...). Btw, you'll have some problems using 1:1 NAT for this kind of setup as you can't 1:1 NAT the same IP (of the ASA) to different WANs (that would be 2:1 what is not possible). You need to go along with portforwards at WAN and at WAN2 to the ASA. Then the state will handle which is the right interface to send out the reply. Holger > -Original Message- > From: Scott Williamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 4:46 PM > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load > Balancing Failover > > > 1:1 Nat Accept ALL:ALL? > > There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can read binary, > and those who cannot. > -Original Message- > From: Gary Buckmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 9:44 AM > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load > Balancing Failover > > Scott, > > Bridging and CARP don't play nicely together, so you're going > to have to > > go another route. > > -Gary > > Scott Williamson wrote: > > Ok so here is the question, I have 2 Wan Links Sprint 3MB connection > and > > Verizon 1.5 MB connection. I am wanting to Load Balance across both > > connections and use a secondary pfsense firewall for failover. The > > company I work for mad a sizeable investment in 2 Cisco ASA 5520's > that > > we are throwing into the picture as well. Here is a rough > diagram of > > what I would like to do: > > > > > > Sprint T1's||Verizon T1 > > | | > > || > > PFSENSE Main - Standby PFSENSE > > | > > | > >ASA 5520 - Standby 5520 > > | | | > > DMZLAN DMZ2 > > > > > > I am just wanting to bridge all traffic and the external > IP's through > > the PFSENSE and allow the ASA 5520's to do the firewalling and VPN. > Is > > this possible or is there a better soulution? > > > > Regards, > > Scott Williamson > > > > > > There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can > read binary, > > and those who cannot. > > > > > > DISCLAIMER: > > > > This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it > is addressed > and may contain confidential information. If you have received this > e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then > delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it > for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person without > the consent of the sender. Unless expressly stated herein to the > contrary, only agreements in writing, signed by an authorized > officer of > the Company, may be enforced against it. > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load Balancing Failover
Not only that bridging won't work for CARP it won't work with policybased routing (as the name already says) and/or loadblalancing either. How many public IPs do your T1s have? You need at least 3 IPs at each T1 that you can use to set up CARP correctly. The subnet between the pfSenses and the ASA shouldn't be the problem. Just use a subnet that is not used anywhere else in your local network (LAN, DMZ, remote VPN LANs, ...). Btw, you'll have some problems using 1:1 NAT for this kind of setup as you can't 1:1 NAT the same IP (of the ASA) to different WANs (that would be 2:1 what is not possible). You need to go along with portforwards at WAN and at WAN2 to the ASA. Then the state will handle which is the right interface to send out the reply. Holger > -Original Message- > From: Scott Williamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 4:46 PM > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load > Balancing Failover > > > 1:1 Nat Accept ALL:ALL? > > There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can read binary, > and those who cannot. > -Original Message- > From: Gary Buckmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 9:44 AM > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load > Balancing Failover > > Scott, > > Bridging and CARP don't play nicely together, so you're going > to have to > > go another route. > > -Gary > > Scott Williamson wrote: > > Ok so here is the question, I have 2 Wan Links Sprint 3MB connection > and > > Verizon 1.5 MB connection. I am wanting to Load Balance across both > > connections and use a secondary pfsense firewall for failover. The > > company I work for mad a sizeable investment in 2 Cisco ASA 5520's > that > > we are throwing into the picture as well. Here is a rough > diagram of > > what I would like to do: > > > > > > Sprint T1's||Verizon T1 > > | | > > || > > PFSENSE Main - Standby PFSENSE > > | > > | > >ASA 5520 - Standby 5520 > > | | | > > DMZLAN DMZ2 > > > > > > I am just wanting to bridge all traffic and the external > IP's through > > the PFSENSE and allow the ASA 5520's to do the firewalling and VPN. > Is > > this possible or is there a better soulution? > > > > Regards, > > Scott Williamson > > > > > > There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can > read binary, > > and those who cannot. > > > > > > DISCLAIMER: > > > > This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it > is addressed > and may contain confidential information. If you have received this > e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then > delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it > for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person without > the consent of the sender. Unless expressly stated herein to the > contrary, only agreements in writing, signed by an authorized > officer of > the Company, may be enforced against it. > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load Balancing Failover
1:1 Nat Accept ALL:ALL? There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can read binary, and those who cannot. -Original Message- From: Gary Buckmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 9:44 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load Balancing Failover Scott, Bridging and CARP don't play nicely together, so you're going to have to go another route. -Gary Scott Williamson wrote: > Ok so here is the question, I have 2 Wan Links Sprint 3MB connection and > Verizon 1.5 MB connection. I am wanting to Load Balance across both > connections and use a secondary pfsense firewall for failover. The > company I work for mad a sizeable investment in 2 Cisco ASA 5520's that > we are throwing into the picture as well. Here is a rough diagram of > what I would like to do: > > > Sprint T1's| |Verizon T1 >| | >|| > PFSENSE Main - Standby PFSENSE > | > | >ASA 5520 - Standby 5520 >| | | > DMZLAN DMZ2 > > > I am just wanting to bridge all traffic and the external IP's through > the PFSENSE and allow the ASA 5520's to do the firewalling and VPN. Is > this possible or is there a better soulution? > > Regards, > Scott Williamson > > > There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can read binary, > and those who cannot. > > > DISCLAIMER: > > This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person without the consent of the sender. Unless expressly stated herein to the contrary, only agreements in writing, signed by an authorized officer of the Company, may be enforced against it. > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load Balancing Failover
Scott, Bridging and CARP don't play nicely together, so you're going to have to go another route. -Gary Scott Williamson wrote: Ok so here is the question, I have 2 Wan Links Sprint 3MB connection and Verizon 1.5 MB connection. I am wanting to Load Balance across both connections and use a secondary pfsense firewall for failover. The company I work for mad a sizeable investment in 2 Cisco ASA 5520's that we are throwing into the picture as well. Here is a rough diagram of what I would like to do: Sprint T1's||Verizon T1 | | || PFSENSE Main - Standby PFSENSE | | ASA 5520 - Standby 5520 | | | DMZLAN DMZ2 I am just wanting to bridge all traffic and the external IP's through the PFSENSE and allow the ASA 5520's to do the firewalling and VPN. Is this possible or is there a better soulution? Regards, Scott Williamson There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can read binary, and those who cannot. DISCLAIMER: This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person without the consent of the sender. Unless expressly stated herein to the contrary, only agreements in writing, signed by an authorized officer of the Company, may be enforced against it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load Balancing Failover
Ok so here is the question, I have 2 Wan Links Sprint 3MB connection and Verizon 1.5 MB connection. I am wanting to Load Balance across both connections and use a secondary pfsense firewall for failover. The company I work for mad a sizeable investment in 2 Cisco ASA 5520's that we are throwing into the picture as well. Here is a rough diagram of what I would like to do: Sprint T1's||Verizon T1 | | || PFSENSE Main - Standby PFSENSE | | ASA 5520 - Standby 5520 | | | DMZLAN DMZ2 I am just wanting to bridge all traffic and the external IP's through the PFSENSE and allow the ASA 5520's to do the firewalling and VPN. Is this possible or is there a better soulution? Regards, Scott Williamson There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can read binary, and those who cannot. DISCLAIMER: This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person without the consent of the sender. Unless expressly stated herein to the contrary, only agreements in writing, signed by an authorized officer of the Company, may be enforced against it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
