Re: [pfSense Support] PPPOE Connection / Packages are getting lost || tcpdump

2007-02-20 Thread Richard
Hi Tim,

thanks for the answer and your effort to help me.
I finally gave up. Now i'm using ubuntu6.10 server with iptables and
pppoe. Everything works perfectly for every client in every operating
system. Still the same server is using the same hardware in the same
network.

Not using pfsense is the only solution which works for me.

Regards,

Richard


Am Montag, den 19.02.2007, 15:34 -0500 schrieb Tim Allender:
 Richard wrote: 
  Hello,
  
  thanks for your answer.
  

   You can ping or traceroute snort.org all day long from anywhere in the 
   world and your not going to get through.
   63.240.198.67 (where you stop) is your first hop in the SourceFire 
   network. And, they don't pass ICMP traffic.
   
  
  I know, my can not reach snort.org was realted to www though a
  browser.
  

   You have verified that an MTU of 1500 is too large for your pppoe 
   connection.
   So, verify that you have set the MTU for all interfaces (the router 
   lan/wan and all the boxes in question) to 1400.
   
  

 The largest frame on the wire in your dumps is 1214. I don't know
 why, you've indicated you'd set 1300 on your client host and 1400 on
 your pfsense box.
 Try dropping them all down to MTU 1200.
  Okay, i changed every interface who is involved:
  
  Client:
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ifconfig eth0
  eth0  Protokoll:Ethernet  Hardware Adresse 00:C0:9F:30:37:EF  
inet Adresse:192.168.150.50  Bcast:192.168.150.255  
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1300  Metric:1
  
  Firewall:
  
  (extern)
  
  xl0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1400
  
  (pppoe)
  
  ng0: flags=88d1UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1400
  inet6 fe80::20b:6aff:fe85:1745%ng0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xa 
  inet 212.51.25.1 -- 212.51.31.92 netmask 0x 
  
  (intern)
  
  dc0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1400
  options=8VLAN_MTU
  inet 192.168.150.254 netmask 0xff00 broadcast192.168.150.255
  media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
  status: active
  
  

   If you're still not getting the web page in your browser, verify the MTU 
   on both interfaces of the router, start full content dumps on both your 
   wan and lan ports, go to one of the afflicted hosts and verify MTU on 
   it's interface.
   
  
  I did, as you can see in the ifconfig quoted above.
  Please find attached tcpdumps from intern extern and pppoe interfaces.
  

   Establish the telnet connection, like before:
   
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ telnet snort.org 80
  Trying 199.107.65.177...
  Connected to snort.org.
  Escape character is '^]'.
  GET / HTTP/1.1
  
  HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
  Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:09:41 GMT
  Server: Apache
  Content-Length: 226
  Connection: close
  Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
  
  !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN
  htmlhead
  title400 Bad Request/title
  /headbody
  h1Bad Request/h1
  pYour browser sent a request that this server could not
  understand.br /
  /p
  /body/html
  Connection closed by foreign host.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ 
  
  (note i did copy your GET command and did hit enter twice)
  

   (Note that you hit enter twice, an empty newline transmits).
   Make a note of the response.
   
  

 By the way, note that, sites that have virtual hosts setup also
 require you specify the host, like so:
 GET / HTTP/1.1
 Host: snort.org
 
 That's the reason for your error here. 
From your dumps, on the wan side dump, single out all snort.org 
   traffic; on the lan side dump, single out all traffic to/from the host 
   you were using.
   Post those dumps.
   
  
  Dumps from all interfaces are attached.
  
  I'm really looking forward to your next mail.
  Thanks a lot for taking the time!
  

 Your dumps are not full content: Packet size limited during transfer:
 HTTP Truncated. Which means, what? Besides the fact that we can't
 visually verify expected server responses, there are no tcp checksums
 available for frames larger than 96 bytes, which could indicate a
 faulty NIC somewhere, or other problems. But, no big deal.
 
 Besides that, you obviously have some issues. 
 I'm not so familiar with pppoe these days. It's been years since I had
 to deal with it. However, I see your pppoe frames are 10 bytes smaller
 than the ethernet frames. 
 I guess that's normal (null header 4 bytes, ethernet 14, 14-4=10). So
 it doesn't look like anythings getting lost there.
 Ultimately, your side is resetting the sessions, getting lots of
 duplicate acks and crap. So... ya gotta try something.
 
 Have you tried doing what Scott suggested to you?
 Start with an MTU of 500 and see if that works, first. And then start
 raising it until it doesn't. Find the threshold. And then set it to
 the largest MTU that works.
 Since your largest pppoe frames are 1204, I would think your looking
 for 1200. But, play 

RE: [pfSense Support] supported Hardware?

2007-02-20 Thread Holger Bauer
Try the suggestions from
http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=BootOptions and
http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=BootTroubleShooting
 
Holger




From: Abdul Aziz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 7:47 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] supported Hardware?


Dear Sir,

i'm trying to install pfSense-1.0.1-LIVE-CD on hard
disk(ata3-master SATA150) with ASUS AM2 [M2V-TVM]- VIA(r) K8M890 +
VIA(r) VT8237R Plus Chipset (64 bit)
but can't install default setup after that try safeMode
successfully installed but after reboot the system  
error 128 lba 42173327
 invalid format

 again reboot

ad6: TIMEOUT-READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=4781234

than continuesly reboot

which problem? plz define me

Regards: 
aaziz






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[pfSense Support] Snort whitelist

2007-02-20 Thread Samer Chaer
Hi,

 

I want to whitelist my WAN address in snort, is it correct if I put my IP
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/32 my WAN subnet is 255.255.255.0 and my WAN IP is assigned
by DHCP only 1 IP address.

 

Thanks,

 

Sam. 

 

 

 



[pfSense Support] Some stuff I really need

2007-02-20 Thread mirso klepic
Hi folks,

OK I don't wanna waste your time with some intros, so:

- Does pfsense provide support for SMP (Xeons and Opterons)?
- Does pfsense provide NIC aggregation (I need to aggregate 2 NICs -
2x100Mbps)?
- I see package FreeRADIUS - what is that, is it complete FRee RADIUS 
or something else?
- Can anybody create tutorial: how to configure pfsense with 
external FreeRADIUS or explane to me how to do that - I see the similar 
tutorial but with WIndows2003 AD/IAS.


Thanks in advance
Mirsad
 
-
Looking for earth-friendly autos? 
 Browse Top Cars by Green Rating at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.  

Re: [pfSense Support] Some stuff I really need

2007-02-20 Thread Vasile Cristescu
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 14:14, mirso klepic wrote:
 Hi folks,

 OK I don't wanna waste your time with some intros, so:

 - Does pfsense provide support for SMP (Xeons and Opterons)?

I have compiled a SMP kernel on a FreeBSD box , copyed it on the pfSense Box 
and works fine.

 - Does pfsense provide NIC aggregation (I need to aggregate 2 NICs -
 2x100Mbps)?

Load Balancing ?

 - I see package FreeRADIUS - what is that, is it complete FRee RADIUS
 or something else?
 - Can anybody create tutorial: how to configure pfsense with
 external FreeRADIUS or explane to me how to do that - I see the similar
 tutorial but with WIndows2003 AD/IAS.
You mean ... haveing freeRadius installed on another box ?


 Thanks in advance
 Mirsad

 -
 Looking for earth-friendly autos?
  Browse Top Cars by Green Rating at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.

-- 
In case something goes worong use :
BOFH excuse #397:

T1's congested due to porn traffic to the news server

PGP: http://new-order.org/public.key


pgp6xgMGVuPke.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [pfSense Support] Snort whitelist

2007-02-20 Thread Tim Korves

Hi there,

I want to whitelist my WAN address in snort, is it correct if I put my 
IP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/32 my WAN subnet is 255.255.255.0 and my WAN IP is 
assigned by DHCP only 1 IP address.


if you try to list an IP address with it's subnet, you might fail also, 
as we did. We whitelisted our subnet in snort, but snort wasn't 
interested in the whitelist entry if a subnet was mentioned too... So it 
blocked some of our hosts, which had been on the whitelist... The host 
IPs without any subnet declaration worked all just fine...


Tim

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [pfSense Support] Some stuff I really need

2007-02-20 Thread Holger Bauer
pfSense has an SMP kernel by default, no need to compile your own
kernel.
Bonding 2 nics to one pipe is not supported.

Holger 

 -Original Message-
 From: Vasile Cristescu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 2:24 PM
 To: support@pfsense.com
 Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Some stuff I really need
 
 On Tuesday 20 February 2007 14:14, mirso klepic wrote:
  Hi folks,
 
  OK I don't wanna waste your time with some intros, so:
 
  - Does pfsense provide support for SMP (Xeons and Opterons)?
 
 I have compiled a SMP kernel on a FreeBSD box , copyed it on 
 the pfSense Box and works fine.
 
  - Does pfsense provide NIC aggregation (I need to aggregate 
 2 NICs - 
  2x100Mbps)?
 
 Load Balancing ?
 
  - I see package FreeRADIUS - what is that, is it complete 
 FRee RADIUS 
  or something else?
  - Can anybody create tutorial: how to configure pfsense 
 with external 
  FreeRADIUS or explane to me how to do that - I see the similar 
  tutorial but with WIndows2003 AD/IAS.
 You mean ... haveing freeRadius installed on another box ?
 
 
  Thanks in advance
  Mirsad
 
  -
  Looking for earth-friendly autos?
   Browse Top Cars by Green Rating at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.
 
 --
 In case something goes worong use :
 BOFH excuse #397:
 
 T1's congested due to porn traffic to the news server
 
 PGP: http://new-order.org/public.key
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[pfSense Support] Loading Full pfSense onto CompactFlash cards

2007-02-20 Thread William Somerset

I'm aware of the dangers of loading a CompactFlash with the full version of
pfSense but I'm wanting to put packages on the device.  Is there any method
for getting this loaded?  I tried doing a normal install with VMWare writing
directly to the card for a hard drive but when I put it into the machine, it
doesn't work.

Can anyone point me to a tutorial or anything that would provide me with a
method for doing this?


RE: [pfSense Support] Loading Full pfSense onto CompactFlash cards

2007-02-20 Thread Holger Bauer
This is unsupported but
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,2811.msg22278.html#msg22278
might help you if you really want to go this way.
 
Holger




From: William Somerset [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 4:37 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Loading Full pfSense onto
CompactFlash cards


I'm aware of the dangers of loading a CompactFlash with the full
version of pfSense but I'm wanting to put packages on the device.  Is
there any method for getting this loaded?  I tried doing a normal
install with VMWare writing directly to the card for a hard drive but
when I put it into the machine, it doesn't work. 

Can anyone point me to a tutorial or anything that would provide
me with a method for doing this?




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [pfSense Support] supported Hardware?

2007-02-20 Thread Tim Dickson
Unless I've missed an update along the way... 64bit is not supported.

-Tim

 

  _  

From: Abdul Aziz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 10:47 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] supported Hardware?

 

Dear Sir,

i'm trying to install pfSense-1.0.1-LIVE-CD on hard disk(ata3-master
SATA150) with ASUS AM2 [M2V-TVM]- VIA(r) K8M890 + VIA(r) VT8237R Plus
Chipset (64 bit)
but can't install default setup after that try safeMode successfully
installed but after reboot the system  
error 128 lba 42173327
 invalid format

 again reboot

ad6: TIMEOUT-READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=4781234

than continuesly reboot

which problem? plz define me

Regards: 
aaziz





RE: [pfSense Support] Loading Full pfSense onto CompactFlash cards

2007-02-20 Thread Craig FALCONER
Works fine for me - a 256 Mb CF card is relatively cheap, and when it does
die they'll be even cheaper.
 
I did a full install from CD by adding a CD drive temporarily to my machine.
Because you're using another machine, it may be detecting the wrong or a
weird disk geometry.  Try using CHS rather than LBA mode.
 
Or do the install on the target machine if you can.
 
Also - what brand of CF card are you using?  Some of the uber-fast ones
don't work so good.  It pays to buy a cheaper CF card for pfSense.

-Original Message-
From: William Somerset [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, 21 February 2007 4:37 a.m.
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Loading Full pfSense onto CompactFlash cards


I'm aware of the dangers of loading a CompactFlash with the full version of
pfSense but I'm wanting to put packages on the device.  Is there any method
for getting this loaded?  I tried doing a normal install with VMWare writing
directly to the card for a hard drive but when I put it into the machine, it
doesn't work. 

Can anyone point me to a tutorial or anything that would provide me with a
method for doing this?




Re: [pfSense Support] PPPOE Connection / Packages are getting lost || tcpdump

2007-02-20 Thread Tim Allender

Ubuntu is nice. Will give you a lot more options.
Then again, straight up FreeBSD gives you a lot more options.
Toss Webmin on either and, wallah! It's like an uncapped pfsense
If carp was ever an interest to you, there's ucarp.
Both those platforms offer a lot more support as well.

pfSense doesn't really compare.
It's advantage is the size and stripped / locked down nature mixed with 
convenience.

You can't run Ubuntu or FreeBSD from a 50Mb CF card.

It's a shame this didn't sort out for you. Really weird.
I can only imagine, ultimately, it was a driver problem. I've 
encountered those on pfsense before.
I mean, I don't use pppoe myself, but apparently others are using it 
without this problem.


Good luck!

Richard wrote:

Hi Tim,

thanks for the answer and your effort to help me.
I finally gave up. Now i'm using ubuntu6.10 server with iptables and
pppoe. Everything works perfectly for every client in every operating
system. Still the same server is using the same hardware in the same
network.

Not using pfsense is the only solution which works for me.

Regards,

Richard


Am Montag, den 19.02.2007, 15:34 -0500 schrieb Tim Allender:
  
Richard wrote: 


Hello,

thanks for your answer.

  
  
You can ping or traceroute snort.org all day long from anywhere in the 
world and your not going to get through.
63.240.198.67 (where you stop) is your first hop in the SourceFire 
network. And, they don't pass ICMP traffic.



I know, my can not reach snort.org was realted to www though a
browser.

  
  
You have verified that an MTU of 1500 is too large for your pppoe 
connection.
So, verify that you have set the MTU for all interfaces (the router 
lan/wan and all the boxes in question) to 1400.


  
  

The largest frame on the wire in your dumps is 1214. I don't know
why, you've indicated you'd set 1300 on your client host and 1400 on
your pfsense box.
Try dropping them all down to MTU 1200.


Okay, i changed every interface who is involved:

Client:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ifconfig eth0
eth0  Protokoll:Ethernet  Hardware Adresse 00:C0:9F:30:37:EF  
  inet Adresse:192.168.150.50  Bcast:192.168.150.255  
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1300  Metric:1


Firewall:

(extern)

xl0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1400

(pppoe)

ng0: flags=88d1UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1400
inet6 fe80::20b:6aff:fe85:1745%ng0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xa 
inet 212.51.25.1 -- 212.51.31.92 netmask 0x 


(intern)

dc0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1400
options=8VLAN_MTU
inet 192.168.150.254 netmask 0xff00 broadcast192.168.150.255
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
status: active


  
  
If you're still not getting the web page in your browser, verify the MTU 
on both interfaces of the router, start full content dumps on both your 
wan and lan ports, go to one of the afflicted hosts and verify MTU on 
it's interface.



I did, as you can see in the ifconfig quoted above.
Please find attached tcpdumps from intern extern and pppoe interfaces.

  
  

Establish the telnet connection, like before:



[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ telnet snort.org 80
Trying 199.107.65.177...
Connected to snort.org.
Escape character is '^]'.
GET / HTTP/1.1

HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:09:41 GMT
Server: Apache
Content-Length: 226
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1

!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN
htmlhead
title400 Bad Request/title
/headbody
h1Bad Request/h1
pYour browser sent a request that this server could not
understand.br /
/p
/body/html
Connection closed by foreign host.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ 


(note i did copy your GET command and did hit enter twice)

  
  

(Note that you hit enter twice, an empty newline transmits).
Make a note of the response.


  
  

By the way, note that, sites that have virtual hosts setup also
require you specify the host, like so:
GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: snort.org

That's the reason for your error here. 

 From your dumps, on the wan side dump, single out all snort.org 
traffic; on the lan side dump, single out all traffic to/from the host 
you were using.

Post those dumps.



Dumps from all interfaces are attached.

I'm really looking forward to your next mail.
Thanks a lot for taking the time!

  
  

Your dumps are not full content: Packet size limited during transfer:
HTTP Truncated. Which means, what? Besides the fact that we can't
visually verify expected server responses, there are no tcp checksums
available for frames larger than 96 bytes, which could indicate a
faulty NIC somewhere, or other problems. But, no big deal.

Besides that, you obviously have some issues. 
I'm not so familiar with pppoe these days. It's been years since I had

to deal with it. However, I see your pppoe frames 

RE: [pfSense Support] HEADS UP -- IPSEC Filtering now in recent snapshots

2007-02-20 Thread John Cianfarani
Catching up on the list here and I saw this, that awesome work!
Curious does this mean we are any closer to doing NAT for traffic in/out of
a IPSec tunnel.

Thanks
John

-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 2:01 PM
To: support @ pfsense. com
Subject: [pfSense Support] HEADS UP -- IPSEC Filtering now in recent
snapshots

HEADS UP!

IPSEC Filtering is now present in the 1.0.X branch first appearing in
todays snapshot.

By default on upgrade we will install a default PASS rule for the
IPSEC interface to permit traffic.  So basically anyone upgrading will
not see a difference.  However, you can edit the default rule and
introduce fine grain control of the IPSEC tunnels if you wish.

The feature will appear in todays snapshot which is currently building
located at http://snapshots.pfsense.com/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1/updates/

Have fun!

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]