[pfSense Support] Problem with Polish provider
Hello, as i ask the List Year, i still have the Problem with an Polish Provider and the Hardware. I have a PFsense wall with a Jetway Board (1,2 GHz 2x GB Ethernet). The Provider uses dhcp and the PRovider inteface has 100 mBit Full-Duplex. No PPoE or something, direct IP via DHCP (auth is done via MAC, because only one MAC works). Last i thought, the Problem could be solve by manully set the media opt (ifconfig re0 media 100BaseTX mediaopt full-duplex) This doesn't work. The Link chages from up to down every 30 seconds which causes 100% CPU Time. I figured out that deactivating dhcp on WAN interface solve this issue. But if the Provider change the IP (which happened twice a Year). If this happen, ican not access the Wall and i don't like to fly from germany to polish for changing an IP address. So my question is, did you have any Idea why this happen with dhcp ? My Pfxense Version is: 1.2-BETA-2 built on Mon Jul 2 20:37:34 EDT 2007 Greetings Markus -- __ Dipl. Inf. (FH) Markus Helfrich Fachhochschule Kaiserslautern Standort Zweibrücken Amerikastr. 1 66482 Zweibrücken Tel.: +49 6332 914 154 Fax.: +49 6332 914 155 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP KeyID 0x47B902D0 _ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] Making a VPN Connection
Hi Jeroen, OK. I have the router being configured for IPSec. Are there any tips or tricks to getting this to work? Thanks. From: Jeroen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 6:42 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Making a VPN Connection On Jan 10, 2008 10:33 PM, Ron Lemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good Afternoon, I have a pfSense 1.2RC3 box that is working quite well on a dual PIII 800. I have managed to get my routed block of IPs working correctly but I am note sure how to make a permanent VPN connection to our other site which currently has a Cisco router. I am able to connect to the router using the MS VPN client but I am not sure how to do it with pfSense. Use IPSEC; this is the best way to connect a Cisco to pfSense. If you are not familiar with Cisco, ask someone to do it for you because it's not really a piece of cake. -- Jeroen
Re: [pfSense Support] Making a VPN Connection
Here's a link to the best documentation currently available that I know of. http://doc.m0n0.ch/handbook/examplevpn.html#id2606293 Curtis
Re: [pfSense Support] Problem with Polish provider
Markus, Have you tried hooking up a typical laptop (xp, vista, linux) to the network connection and gotten a reliable connection with dhcp? Curtis
RE: [pfSense Support] PPPOE with static IP
Thanks for the replys. First, i corrected the issue with the lack of a second DNS last week. My internet is up and working. The thing is that i am not getting the same IP address i used to. I think this is yet another stupid change. I tried a cheap linksys router that lets me manually put in an IP address in the PPPoe settings and it all works well. I put the IP into the Virtual IP settings, but it doesn't work. I tried it as an ARP and Other. Then i went to the NAT settings and setup a 1:1 nat with my machine and it doesnt want to work. Im not sure what else to try. Argg, Why did Att have to change things? Everything worked fine. I am very much looking for a new ISP. Maybe I'll get a Real ISP this time. -Original Message- From: Curtis LaMasters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 6:01 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] PPPOE with static IP Check out http://blog.pfsense.org. One of the latest posts I believe fixes your problem. Curtis On Jan 15, 2008 3:33 PM, Ryan Rodrigue mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i have a dsl account with a pppoe connection and a static ip address given by att. unfortunatly, the pppoe doesn't get the correct ip address. a ceap linksys router i have lets me put the ip address in and everything works as expected. Is there a way to do this in pfsense? I'd much rather not have this linksys router on my network. Thanks, Ryan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Curtis LaMasters http://www.curtis-lamasters.com http://www.builtnetworks.com
Re: [pfSense Support] PPPOE with static IP
It appears you are on an older version of pfSense. Try upgrading to 1.2rc3or wait till 1.2rc4 comes out within the next couple of weeks. Curtis On Jan 16, 2008 9:27 AM, Ryan Rodrigue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the replys. First, i corrected the issue with the lack of a second DNS last week. My internet is up and working. The thing is that i am not getting the same IP address i used to. I think this is yet another stupid change. I tried a cheap linksys router that lets me manually put in an IP address in the PPPoe settings and it all works well. I put the IP into the Virtual IP settings, but it doesn't work. I tried it as an ARP and Other. Then i went to the NAT settings and setup a 1:1 nat with my machine and it doesnt want to work. Im not sure what else to try. Argg, Why did Att have to change things? Everything worked fine. I am very much looking for a new ISP. Maybe I'll get a Real ISP this time. -Original Message- *From:* Curtis LaMasters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, January 15, 2008 6:01 PM *To:* support@pfsense.com *Subject:* Re: [pfSense Support] PPPOE with static IP Check out http://blog.pfsense.org. One of the latest posts I believe fixes your problem. Curtis On Jan 15, 2008 3:33 PM, Ryan Rodrigue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i have a dsl account with a pppoe connection and a static ip address given by att. unfortunatly, the pppoe doesn't get the correct ip address. a ceap linksys router i have lets me put the ip address in and everything works as expected. Is there a way to do this in pfsense? I'd much rather not have this linksys router on my network. Thanks, Ryan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Curtis LaMasters http://www.curtis-lamasters.com http://www.builtnetworks.com -- Curtis LaMasters http://www.curtis-lamasters.com http://www.builtnetworks.com
RE: [pfSense Support] Making a VPN Connection
Thanks Curtis I will give it ago as soon as they tell me my IP Sec is ready. Ron From: Curtis LaMasters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 10:02 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Making a VPN Connection Here's a link to the best documentation currently available that I know of. http://doc.m0n0.ch/handbook/examplevpn.html#id2606293 Curtis
RE: [pfSense Support] PPPOE with static IP
I am on 1.2-RC3 built on Wed Nov 7 19:02:16 EST 2007 why do you say that? is the ability to put ip in PPPOE supposed to be added? -Original Message- From: Curtis LaMasters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 9:31 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] PPPOE with static IP It appears you are on an older version of pfSense. Try upgrading to 1.2rc3 or wait till 1.2rc4 comes out within the next couple of weeks. Curtis On Jan 16, 2008 9:27 AM, Ryan Rodrigue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the replys. First, i corrected the issue with the lack of a second DNS last week. My internet is up and working. The thing is that i am not getting the same IP address i used to. I think this is yet another stupid change. I tried a cheap linksys router that lets me manually put in an IP address in the PPPoe settings and it all works well. I put the IP into the Virtual IP settings, but it doesn't work. I tried it as an ARP and Other. Then i went to the NAT settings and setup a 1:1 nat with my machine and it doesnt want to work. Im not sure what else to try. Argg, Why did Att have to change things? Everything worked fine. I am very much looking for a new ISP. Maybe I'll get a Real ISP this time. -Original Message- From: Curtis LaMasters [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 6:01 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] PPPOE with static IP Check out http://blog.pfsense.org. One of the latest posts I believe fixes your problem. Curtis On Jan 15, 2008 3:33 PM, Ryan Rodrigue mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i have a dsl account with a pppoe connection and a static ip address given by att. unfortunatly, the pppoe doesn't get the correct ip address. a ceap linksys router i have lets me put the ip address in and everything works as expected. Is there a way to do this in pfsense? I'd much rather not have this linksys router on my network. Thanks, Ryan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Curtis LaMasters http://www.curtis-lamasters.com http://www.builtnetworks.com -- Curtis LaMasters http://www.curtis-lamasters.com http://www.builtnetworks.com
Re: [pfSense Support] Problem with Polish provider
Hi, not a laptop but Zyxcel Router with dhcp enabled. This appliance works with no problems Markus Curtis LaMasters schrieb: Markus, Have you tried hooking up a typical laptop (xp, vista, linux) to the network connection and gotten a reliable connection with dhcp? Curtis -- __ Dipl. Inf. (FH) Markus Helfrich Fachhochschule Kaiserslautern Standort Zweibrücken Amerikastr. 1 66482 Zweibrücken Tel.: +49 6332 914 154 Fax.: +49 6332 914 155 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP KeyID 0x47B902D0 _ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] PPPOE with static IP
I guess i shouldn't have assumed that you were on an older version, but your reference to how you added the IP addresses arp and other, were more like the terms used for 1.01 and not 1.2rc2 and 1.2rc3 where proxy arp, carp and ip were the options. Sorry for the misinformation. Curtis On Jan 16, 2008 10:10 AM, Ryan Rodrigue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am on *1.2-RC3* built on Wed Nov 7 19:02:16 EST 2007 why do you say that? is the ability to put ip in PPPOE supposed to be added? -Original Message- *From:* Curtis LaMasters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, January 16, 2008 9:31 AM *To:* support@pfsense.com *Subject:* Re: [pfSense Support] PPPOE with static IP It appears you are on an older version of pfSense. Try upgrading to 1.2rc3 or wait till 1.2rc4 comes out within the next couple of weeks. Curtis On Jan 16, 2008 9:27 AM, Ryan Rodrigue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the replys. First, i corrected the issue with the lack of a second DNS last week. My internet is up and working. The thing is that i am not getting the same IP address i used to. I think this is yet another stupid change. I tried a cheap linksys router that lets me manually put in an IP address in the PPPoe settings and it all works well. I put the IP into the Virtual IP settings, but it doesn't work. I tried it as an ARP and Other. Then i went to the NAT settings and setup a 1:1 nat with my machine and it doesnt want to work. Im not sure what else to try. Argg, Why did Att have to change things? Everything worked fine. I am very much looking for a new ISP. Maybe I'll get a Real ISP this time. -Original Message- *From:* Curtis LaMasters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, January 15, 2008 6:01 PM *To:* support@pfsense.com *Subject:* Re: [pfSense Support] PPPOE with static IP Check out http://blog.pfsense.org. One of the latest posts I believe fixes your problem. Curtis On Jan 15, 2008 3:33 PM, Ryan Rodrigue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i have a dsl account with a pppoe connection and a static ip address given by att. unfortunatly, the pppoe doesn't get the correct ip address. a ceap linksys router i have lets me put the ip address in and everything works as expected. Is there a way to do this in pfsense? I'd much rather not have this linksys router on my network. Thanks, Ryan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Curtis LaMasters http://www.curtis-lamasters.com http://www.builtnetworks.com -- Curtis LaMasters http://www.curtis-lamasters.com http://www.builtnetworks.com -- Curtis LaMasters http://www.curtis-lamasters.com http://www.builtnetworks.com
Re: [pfSense Support] Problem with Polish provider
With pfSense in place did you get any wierd log messages relating to arp? How is your ISP delivering their connectivity to you? Curtis On Jan 16, 2008 10:02 AM, Markus Helfrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, not a laptop but Zyxcel Router with dhcp enabled. This appliance works with no problems Markus Curtis LaMasters schrieb: Markus, Have you tried hooking up a typical laptop (xp, vista, linux) to the network connection and gotten a reliable connection with dhcp? Curtis -- __ Dipl. Inf. (FH) Markus Helfrich Fachhochschule Kaiserslautern Standort Zweibrücken Amerikastr. 1 66482 Zweibrücken Tel.: +49 6332 914 154 Fax.: +49 6332 914 155 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP KeyID 0x47B902D0 _ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Curtis LaMasters http://www.curtis-lamasters.com http://www.builtnetworks.com
[pfSense Support] Pfsense + OpenVPN + Kvpnc with certificates
Hi, did anyone install pfsense with such configuration? I am using it with the Windows GUI (Mathias one, very good indeed) but I am unable to configure it using KVPNC on Fedora. Could anyone help? TIA, Giuseppe Marullo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] 1.2-RC4 released!
The pfSense development team is happy to bring you the final release candidate in the 1.2 series! Info here: http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=164 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!
Has anyne downloaded this successfully? I have, but i keep getting an error. unexpected end of archive. Im using WinRar which has always worked in the past. I even tried from different mirrors. -Original Message- From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 12:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released! The pfSense development team is happy to bring you the final release candidate in the 1.2 series! Info here: http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=164 __ NOD32 2798 (20080116) Information __ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!
Full ISO extracted fine from the untouchable mirror, using both gnu tar and file roller. Same with the update from nhlue.edu.tw. On Jan 16, 2008 2:34 PM, Ryan Rodrigue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyne downloaded this successfully? I have, but i keep getting an error. unexpected end of archive. Im using WinRar which has always worked in the past. I even tried from different mirrors. -Original Message- From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 12:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released! The pfSense development team is happy to bring you the final release candidate in the 1.2 series! Info here: http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=164 __ NOD32 2798 (20080116) Information __ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!
On Jan 16, 2008 5:34 PM, Ryan Rodrigue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyne downloaded this successfully? I have, but i keep getting an error. unexpected end of archive. Im using WinRar which has always worked in the past. I even tried from different mirrors. This seems to occur every release. Are you using IE? If so, then IE automatically decompresses the file and forgets to change the filename suffix. Scott PS: If you are using IE, try firefox.
RE: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!
using forefox. i will try IE -Original Message- From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 4:36 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released! On Jan 16, 2008 5:34 PM, Ryan Rodrigue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyne downloaded this successfully? I have, but i keep getting an error. unexpected end of archive. Im using WinRar which has always worked in the past. I even tried from different mirrors. This seems to occur every release. Are you using IE? If so, then IE automatically decompresses the file and forgets to change the filename suffix. Scott PS: If you are using IE, try firefox.
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!
On Jan 16, 2008 5:57 PM, Ryan Rodrigue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: using forefox. i will try IE I have yet to see this behavior with Firefox. Scott
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!
On Jan 16, 2008 11:35 PM, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This seems to occur every release. Are you using IE? If so, then IE automatically decompresses the file and forgets to change the filename suffix. Scott PS: If you are using IE, try firefox. Same here with FF. Downloaded from http://pfsense.iserv.nl/updates/. -- Jeroen
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!
On Jan 16, 2008 5:39 PM, Jeroen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Same here with FF. Downloaded from http://pfsense.iserv.nl/updates/. Sigh. I'll gzip -d the file on the server and allow the .iso to be populated to the mirros without any type of compression. Sorry ISP's! Scott
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!
On Jan 16, 2008 11:50 PM, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 16, 2008 5:39 PM, Jeroen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Same here with FF. Downloaded from http://pfsense.iserv.nl/updates/. Sigh. I'll gzip -d the file on the server and allow the .iso to be populated to the mirros without any type of compression. Sorry ISP's! It's not a problem with the browser. I just downloaded it using wget and un-tarred it on my linux box. This works. When I open the file (the exact same file via SMB) using winRar it failes. So i think winrar can't handle the file. Why? Haven't got a clue, first time I experienced this. -- Jeroen
RE: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!
At least its not just me. I think i'll get it from my house tonight. I have cable there. um.. I was trying to get the update, not the full install. Thanks for your help. Ryan -Original Message- From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 4:51 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released! On Jan 16, 2008 5:39 PM, Jeroen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Same here with FF. Downloaded from http://pfsense.iserv.nl/updates/. Sigh. I'll gzip -d the file on the server and allow the .iso to be populated to the mirros without any type of compression. Sorry ISP's! Scott
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!
On Jan 16, 2008 5:57 PM, Jeroen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's not a problem with the browser. I just downloaded it using wget and un-tarred it on my linux box. This works. When I open the file (the exact same file via SMB) using winRar it failes. So i think winrar can't handle the file. Why? Haven't got a clue, first time I experienced this. Can you try 7zip for kicks? It's free. Scott
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!
On Jan 17, 2008 12:01 AM, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you try 7zip for kicks? It's free. Sure, just tried and it works. Strange behaviour on winrar's part. First time I ever encountered this. -- Jeroen
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!
On Jan 16, 2008 6:16 PM, Ryan Rodrigue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At least its not just me. I think i'll get it from my house tonight. I have cable there. um.. I was trying to get the update, not the full install. Thanks for your help. Ryan You do not need to extract the update file. Simply feed it to pfSense's webConfigurator. Scott
RE: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!
alright. Im goofy. I guess i just got used to decompressing the image before burning to cd. And the 7zip works fine for the ISO. thanks, Ryan -Original Message- From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 5:03 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released! On Jan 16, 2008 6:16 PM, Ryan Rodrigue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At least its not just me. I think i'll get it from my house tonight. I have cable there. um.. I was trying to get the update, not the full install. Thanks for your help. Ryan You do not need to extract the update file. Simply feed it to pfSense's webConfigurator. Scott
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!
Just installed it on my home router and at first glance works like a charm (as always). Thanks to the team for all your effort. pfSense is great product and I have been using it for many years now. -- Jeroen
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!
On Jan 17, 2008 12:35 AM, Ryan Rodrigue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: alright. Im goofy. I guess i just got used to decompressing the image before burning to cd. And the 7zip works fine for the ISO. thanks, Ryan Not really, it's also just smart to check whether the archive is in mint condition before you feed it to the box :) pfSense will probably also double-check it, but you never know. Time to go to sleep. Will report if I find any bugs tomorrow. -- Jeroen
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!
i did the firmware upgrade with the update, I don't see that it has been upgraded? How can you see if the upgrade was successful? Thanks Sangye On 17/01/2008, Jeroen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 17, 2008 12:35 AM, Ryan Rodrigue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: alright. Im goofy. I guess i just got used to decompressing the image before burning to cd. And the 7zip works fine for the ISO. thanks, Ryan Not really, it's also just smart to check whether the archive is in mint condition before you feed it to the box :) pfSense will probably also double-check it, but you never know. Time to go to sleep. Will report if I find any bugs tomorrow. -- Jeroen
[pfSense Support] Wifi NIC
I have an Airlink 101 MIMO XR PCI and am trying to use it as the WAN. The first problem is pfSense doesn't show it's match as an option, if there is a fix for this, I could problably take it from there. Is this possible if so, how. I'm running the latest greatest RC4. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] 802.11x
Does anyone know if 802.11x is enabled on the WAN? I have really slow speeds on comcrap, and I know this is an issue if your running windows.
Re: [pfSense Support] 802.11x
On Jan 16, 2008 8:04 PM, Richard Sperry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know if 802.11x is enabled on the WAN? I have really slow speeds on comcrap, and I know this is an issue if your running windows. Not that I'm aware of and I've never had issues with either of my current Comcast wans on the 1.2 RC's. --Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] 802.11x
I get all 16 mbit of my comcast connection here. if anything pfsense runs BETTER than crappy linksys/netgear/dlink/belkin standalone routers for broadband connections. windows systems have no issue -Sean From: Richard Sperry Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 9:04 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: [pfSense Support] 802.11x Does anyone know if 802.11x is enabled on the WAN? I have really slow speeds on comcrap, and I know this is an issue if your running windows.
Re: [pfSense Support] 802.11x
I guess I'm failing to put this together802.11x is a wireless standard that has not yet been defined...and 802.1x is network access control...does Comcast require this? Curtis
Re: [pfSense Support] 802.11x
On Jan 16, 2008 10:06 PM, Curtis LaMasters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess I'm failing to put this together802.11x is a wireless standard that has not yet been defined...and 802.1x is network access control...does Comcast require this? Good point...I kinda assumed the 1x was meant and not the wireless standard. :) And no, Comcast doesn't require it. --Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] 802.11x
That's kind of what I was thinking. Curtis
[pfSense Support] Traffic Graph kills FireFox 2.0.0.11
I see some earlier discussion of either the same or a similar problem on the forum, but with no resolution. I upgraded to 1.2-RC4 and still have crashes trying to display the traffic graph. I would install the Adobe viewer, but see that it is scheduled for end of life. Any work around for this? Chuck Benson - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!
Meh. I ran the upgrade from 1.2-RC3 and DNS got hosed. I've swapped it over to my dev server in the meantime, but the problem is that nothing is actually listening on UDP 53. On 1/16/08, Ngawang Sangye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i did the firmware upgrade with the update, I don't see that it has been upgraded? How can you see if the upgrade was successful? Thanks Sangye On 17/01/2008, Jeroen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 17, 2008 12:35 AM, Ryan Rodrigue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: alright. Im goofy. I guess i just got used to decompressing the image before burning to cd. And the 7zip works fine for the ISO. thanks, Ryan Not really, it's also just smart to check whether the archive is in mint condition before you feed it to the box :) pfSense will probably also double-check it, but you never know. Time to go to sleep. Will report if I find any bugs tomorrow. -- Jeroen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Graph kills FireFox 2.0.0.11
On Jan 16, 2008 11:53 PM, Chuck Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see some earlier discussion of either the same or a similar problem on the forum, but with no resolution. I upgraded to 1.2-RC4 and still have crashes trying to display the traffic graph. I would install the Adobe viewer, but see that it is scheduled for end of life. Any work around for this? I cannot duplicate this behavior on OSX nor on Windows Xp. Anyone else? Scott
Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Graph kills FireFox 2.0.0.11
On Jan 16, 2008 10:22 PM, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I cannot duplicate this behavior on OSX nor on Windows Xp. Anyone else? OSX negative - both the full graph and the embedded ones (5 concurrent) in the Dashboard package. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Graph kills FireFox 2.0.0.11
RB wrote: On Jan 16, 2008 10:22 PM, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I cannot duplicate this behavior on OSX nor on Windows Xp. Anyone else? OSX negative - both the full graph and the embedded ones (5 concurrent) in the Dashboard package. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only additions I can make right now, are that I did try with a priv account with all extensions disabled. The fault occurs in ivplugin.dll. Chuck Benson
Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Graph kills FireFox 2.0.0.11
On Jan 17, 2008 1:24 AM, Chuck Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only additions I can make right now, are that I did try with a priv account with all extensions disabled. The fault occurs in ivplugin.dll. Good ol' Norton Internet Security installed?? Scott
