Re: [pfSense Support] PFSense VLAN Tagging on the WAN Port

[Chris Buechler]

Scott Williamson wrote:


Devs,

Can this be done now …

should be able to, I know there are people running several WANs on VLANs 
for lack of physical ports.



and if not can it be bought, and if it can be bought, would $1000 US 
cover it,


If there is some issue that needs to be corrected, I would guess that 
would cover it. But it should work as is.




and could we get Multi-User capability in the same price.



I'll throw this one in free for everyone! ;) Actually it's already in 
the development branch for 1.3 thanks to Scott, Centipede Networks 
sponsoring the work, and others who also chipped in. In addition to 
multi-user, it'll also authenticate from any LDAP server (Active 
Directory, eDirectory, etc.) and you can define pfSense admin groups in 
your directory services. That'll all be in 1.3, several of us have test 
boxes running this way now.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [pfSense Support] PFSense VLAN Tagging on the WAN Port

[Richard Sperry]

Your NIC must support VLAN tagging.  I'm sure the dev's would love to take your 
money, any open source project could use support (although I don't think this 
is GPL or other, I thinks it is directly under Scott Ulrich) .  There is 
commercial support avail.  
http://centipedenetworks.com/products_support_pfsense.php

As far as multi-user, are you meaning multi-admin?  And do you mean that you 
need ACL logging per SAS70/ GBL standards?

Personally I would love to see OSSIM.net integration for Snort, SQUID, and VPN, 
and misc other logs as well as uptime.

--Richard


From: Curtis LaMasters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 3:21 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] PFSense VLAN Tagging on the WAN Port

I believe that you can VLAN pretty much any interface you want as long as you 
apply that VLAN to the appropriate interface.  What do you mean by multi user?

Curtis








DISCLAIMER:

This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may 
contain confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, 
please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from 
your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its 
contents to any other person without the consent of the sender. Unless 
expressly stated herein to the contrary, only agreements in writing, signed by 
an authorized officer of the Company, may be enforced against it.



--
Curtis LaMasters
http://www.curtis-lamasters.com
http://www.builtnetworks.com

[pfSense Support] Filtering, etc

[Richard Sperry]

I have a client that needs to play god over their employees.  I need to create 
a 6 site IPSEC mesh and I need Content filtering along with IM filtering.

IPSec seemed to have an issue on my test, but I think that may be the server 
itself. As the carp failover peer went offline. I would like to limit upstream 
content to SMB/CIFS/DNS/HTTP/etc/  I can only figure how to block on the 
receiving end, and could cause me to have a large bandwidth cost as I am billed 
per what goes up the pipe, not what I accept.

The issue on content filtering was that the upstream provider has latency 
issues and squid returned a basic 404 instead of trying  a few times like IE or 
FF.

Also IMspector had no log and throws an err of missing mysql. Even thou I want 
it locally for now.  ( a central point like OSSIM.net would kick arse.

Any thoughts?

--Richard




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [pfSense Support] PFSense VLAN Tagging on the WAN Port

[Curtis LaMasters]

I believe that you can VLAN pretty much any interface you want as long as
you apply that VLAN to the appropriate interface.  What do you mean by multi
user?

Curtis

>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> DISCLAIMER:
>
> This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and
> may contain confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in
> error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this
> message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes,
> or disclose its contents to any other person without the consent of the
> sender. Unless expressly stated herein to the contrary, only agreements in
> writing, signed by an authorized officer of the Company, may be enforced
> against it.
>



-- 
Curtis LaMasters
http://www.curtis-lamasters.com
http://www.builtnetworks.com

[pfSense Support] PFSense VLAN Tagging on the WAN Port

[Scott Williamson]

Devs,

Can this be done now ... and if not can it be bought, and if it can be bought, 
would $1000 US cover it, and could we get Multi-User capability in the same 
price.  Thanks for the awesome software!






DISCLAIMER:

This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may 
contain confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, 
please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from 
your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its 
contents to any other person without the consent of the sender. Unless 
expressly stated herein to the contrary, only agreements in writing, signed by 
an authorized officer of the Company, may be enforced against it.

[pfSense Support] ifconfig -v ath0 scan borken?

[Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn]

According to this:

  
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-wireless.html

29.3.3.1.1 How to Find Access Points

"To scan for networks, use the ifconfig command. This request may take a
few moments to complete as it requires that the system switches to each
available wireless frequency and probes for available access points."

and:

"Note: You must mark the interface up before you can scan. Subsequent scan
requests do not require you to mark the interface up again."

If I do:

  # ifconfig -v ath0 down
  # ifconfig -v ath0 up scan

I get results in a jiffy.  But any subsequent:

  # ifconfig -v ath0 scan

never returns :(

Is there something I'm missing?  Is there a better way?


-- 
Cristian

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

AW: [pfSense Support] nut package

[Fuchs, Martin]

http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,6872.0.html

but it does not work for me :-(

regards,

Martin


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: D.Pageau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. Januar 2008 21:13
An: support@pfsense.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [pfSense Support] nut package

nut package look broken on 1.2-RC3 & 1.2-RC4

System logs: System

php: nut: Service failed to start: check configuration

# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/nut.sh start
starting genericups
Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.2.0
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/libexec/nut/upsdrvctl: Undefined symbol 
"__sbmaskrune"
genericups failed to start
#

--
Dominic


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[pfSense Support] nut package

[D.Pageau]

nut package look broken on 1.2-RC3 & 1.2-RC4

System logs: System

php: nut: Service failed to start: check configuration

# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/nut.sh start
starting genericups
Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.2.0
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/libexec/nut/upsdrvctl: Undefined symbol 
"__sbmaskrune"

genericups failed to start
#

--
Dominic


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[pfSense Support] OpenVPN questions

[Jeppe Øland]

Hi all,

I'm looking at installing OpenVPN to service some "road warrior" clients.
The pfSense installation has multiple external IP's, and the "road
warriors" need to access a few internal services, as well as a few
external services that do IP checking - so they need to go back out to
the internet after coming in using the tunnel.

I've had a few problems setting this up so far, so here goes a couple questions:

Can I control what IP OpenVPN is listening on?
(Multiple external IPs, and I would like to run the OpenVPN server on
one of the "virtual" IPs. Possibly even running several servers - one
on each IP, and preferably all on the standard port)
So far I have been unable to make OpenVPN accept connections on
anything but the primary WAN IP.

What side of the firewall will the OpenVPN clients appear on?
The rule to allow VPN connections in should be on the WAN port, but is
"any" destination right? Can I use the external IP/VirtualIP as the
destination?

What parts of my network will clients get access to?
I do not want to make the entire private network available to them.
Do I need to add rules to allow them access to the LAN/DMZ/WAN?

If I want to allow the OpenVPN clients to be able to access the
internet via the tunnel, what entries do I add in NAT/Rules to allow
that?
(Since I'm not sure what "interface" they are on, I'm not sure how I
should do this.)

Regards,
-Jeppe

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[pfSense Support] OpenVPN questions

[Jeppe Øland]

Hi all,

I'm looking at installing OpenVPN to service some "road warrior" clients.
The pfSense installation has multiple external IP's, and the "road
warriors" need to access a few internal services, as well as a few
external services that do IP checking - so they need to go back out to
the internet after coming in using the tunnel.

I've had a few problems setting this up so far, so here goes a couple questions:

Can I control what IP OpenVPN is listening on?
(Multiple external IPs, and I would like to run the OpenVPN server on
one of the "virtual" IPs. Possibly even running several servers - one
on each IP, and preferably all on the standard port)
So far I have been unable to make OpenVPN accept connections on
anything but the primary WAN IP.

What side of the firewall will the OpenVPN clients appear on?
The rule to allow VPN connections in should be on the WAN port, but is
"any" destination right? Can I use the external IP/VirtualIP as the
destination?

What parts of my network will clients get access to?
I do not want to make the entire private network available to them.
Do I need to add rules to allow them access to the LAN/DMZ/WAN?

If I want to allow the OpenVPN clients to be able to access the
internet via the tunnel, what entries do I add in NAT/Rules to allow
that?
(Since I'm not sure what "interface" they are on, I'm not sure how I
should do this.)

Regards,
-Jeppe

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2-RC2 beta1 -> 1.2-RC4 upgrade

[Ngawang Sangye]

Ok - well not everyone has the same hardware or config, my system wouldn't
start up properly after the update. That is valid, observable information
... just trying to save people time. I didn't mean to assume the upgrade
would work for no-one, but early on when the RC4 came out I wasn't the only
one on this support mail saying the upgrade didn't work. I have many sites
with Pfsense, ipcop etc running so I can make reasonable observations.

My system has 4 nics, and I am making use of many features. Perhaps it was
the presence of add-ons that cause the problem, who knows. I have seen
people posting much more trivial information that advice that the upgrade
doesn't always work.

I look forward to trying the next upgrade when the 1.2 final comes.

Thanks

Sangye


On 23/01/2008, Ryan Rodrigue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  My firware upgrade worked great.  Been up 6 days and 14 hours.  Not even
> anything resembling a problem here.  I haven't read too many problems with
> the upgrade.  Im sure if there was a real problem, many people would have
> posted about it by now.  Have faith in the PFsense team.  Backup your image
> first.  and go ahead and download the full iso if you want.  That being
> said, id still do the upgrade.
>
> -Original Message-
> *From:* Ngawang Sangye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 23, 2008 4:17 AM
> *To:* support@pfsense.com
> *Subject:* Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2-RC2 beta1 -> 1.2-RC4 upgrade
>
> The upgrade to 1.2RC4 didn't work - via firmware upload. I backed up the
> settings, installed fresh from ISO image I downloaded of RC4 and restored
> the settings and it was a good result.
>
> So I recommend you avoid the firmware upgrade.
>
> Regards
>
> Sangye
>
>
> On 23/01/2008, Gabriel Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all:
> >
> > I have 1.2RC2-beta1 on a PC installed to HD and want to upgrade to
> > 1.2-RC2.  However, after picking the appropriate interfaces, the LiveCD
> > halts on "Configuring WAN interface..." - I try ALT+FunctionKeys to see
> > debugging information; nothing.  Then I also tried Ctrl+Alt+Del; again
> > nothing.
> >
> > LAN card is fxp0
> > WAN card is rl0
> >
> > Any ideas?  Can I use the "firmware upgrade" option (even though, as
> > such, there is no "firmware" on a PC; only a HDD.)
> >
> > Thanks -
> > Gabe
> >
>
>

Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2-RC2 beta1 -> 1.2-RC4 upgrade

[RB]

On 1/23/08, Ryan Rodrigue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> alright.  Im stupid.  What is FUD?

I doubt it was pointed at you, more at Ngawang Sangye, but...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear%2C_uncertainty_and_doubt

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [pfSense Support] 1.2-RC2 beta1 -> 1.2-RC4 upgrade

[Ryan Rodrigue]

alright.  Im stupid.  What is FUD?

-Original Message-
From: Gary Buckmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 8:34 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2-RC2 beta1 -> 1.2-RC4 upgrade


Please stop spreading FUD (this is the second request).  The firmware
upgrade is working very well for almost everyone.  You had a specific
issue, we would have been interested to know the details of your issue
so it could have been resolved.  Simply because you, personally, had an
issue doesn't mean that an otherwise functional component should be avoided.

-Gary

Ngawang Sangye wrote:
> The upgrade to 1.2RC4 didn't work - via firmware upload. I backed up
> the settings, installed fresh from ISO image I downloaded of RC4 and
> restored the settings and it was a good result.
>
> So I recommend you avoid the firmware upgrade.
>
> Regards
>
> Sangye
>
>
> On 23/01/2008, *Gabriel Green* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> Hi all:
>
> I have 1.2RC2-beta1 on a PC installed to HD and want to upgrade to
> 1.2-RC2.  However, after picking the appropriate interfaces, the
> LiveCD halts on "Configuring WAN interface..." - I try
> ALT+FunctionKeys to see debugging information; nothing.  Then I
> also tried Ctrl+Alt+Del; again nothing.
>
> LAN card is fxp0
> WAN card is rl0
>
> Any ideas?  Can I use the "firmware upgrade" option (even though,
> as such, there is no "firmware" on a PC; only a HDD.)
>
> Thanks -
> Gabe
>
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


__ NOD32 2817 (20080123) Information __

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2-RC2 beta1 -> 1.2-RC4 upgrade

[Gary Buckmaster]

Please stop spreading FUD (this is the second request).  The firmware 
upgrade is working very well for almost everyone.  You had a specific 
issue, we would have been interested to know the details of your issue 
so it could have been resolved.  Simply because you, personally, had an 
issue doesn't mean that an otherwise functional component should be avoided.


-Gary

Ngawang Sangye wrote:
The upgrade to 1.2RC4 didn't work - via firmware upload. I backed up 
the settings, installed fresh from ISO image I downloaded of RC4 and 
restored the settings and it was a good result.
 
So I recommend you avoid the firmware upgrade.
 
Regards


Sangye

 
On 23/01/2008, *Gabriel Green* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> wrote:


Hi all:

I have 1.2RC2-beta1 on a PC installed to HD and want to upgrade to
1.2-RC2.  However, after picking the appropriate interfaces, the
LiveCD halts on "Configuring WAN interface..." - I try
ALT+FunctionKeys to see debugging information; nothing.  Then I
also tried Ctrl+Alt+Del; again nothing.

LAN card is fxp0
WAN card is rl0

Any ideas?  Can I use the "firmware upgrade" option (even though,
as such, there is no "firmware" on a PC; only a HDD.)

Thanks -
Gabe





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [pfSense Support] 1.2-RC2 beta1 -> 1.2-RC4 upgrade

[Ryan Rodrigue]

My firware upgrade worked great.  Been up 6 days and 14 hours.  Not even
anything resembling a problem here.  I haven't read too many problems with
the upgrade.  Im sure if there was a real problem, many people would have
posted about it by now.  Have faith in the PFsense team.  Backup your image
first.  and go ahead and download the full iso if you want.  That being
said, id still do the upgrade.

-Original Message-
From: Ngawang Sangye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 4:17 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2-RC2 beta1 -> 1.2-RC4 upgrade


The upgrade to 1.2RC4 didn't work - via firmware upload. I backed up the
settings, installed fresh from ISO image I downloaded of RC4 and restored
the settings and it was a good result.

So I recommend you avoid the firmware upgrade.

Regards

Sangye


On 23/01/2008, Gabriel Green < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi all:

I have 1.2RC2-beta1 on a PC installed to HD and want to upgrade to 1.2-RC2.
However, after picking the appropriate interfaces, the LiveCD halts on
"Configuring WAN interface..." - I try ALT+FunctionKeys to see debugging
information; nothing.  Then I also tried Ctrl+Alt+Del; again nothing.

LAN card is fxp0
WAN card is rl0

Any ideas?  Can I use the "firmware upgrade" option (even though, as such,
there is no "firmware" on a PC; only a HDD.)

Thanks -
Gabe

Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2-RC2 beta1 -> 1.2-RC4 upgrade

[Curtis LaMasters]

Very strange.  I have done 5 upgrades now on different hardware with no
problems.  Sometimes things happen, otherwise we wouldn't have jobs.  :)

Curtis

On Jan 23, 2008 4:17 AM, Ngawang Sangye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The upgrade to 1.2RC4 didn't work - via firmware upload. I backed up the
> settings, installed fresh from ISO image I downloaded of RC4 and restored
> the settings and it was a good result.
>
> So I recommend you avoid the firmware upgrade.
>
> Regards
>
> Sangye
>
>
> On 23/01/2008, Gabriel Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all:
> >
> > I have 1.2RC2-beta1 on a PC installed to HD and want to upgrade to
> > 1.2-RC2.  However, after picking the appropriate interfaces, the LiveCD
> > halts on "Configuring WAN interface..." - I try ALT+FunctionKeys to see
> > debugging information; nothing.  Then I also tried Ctrl+Alt+Del; again
> > nothing.
> >
> > LAN card is fxp0
> > WAN card is rl0
> >
> > Any ideas?  Can I use the "firmware upgrade" option (even though, as
> > such, there is no "firmware" on a PC; only a HDD.)
> >
> > Thanks -
> > Gabe
> >
>
>


-- 
Curtis LaMasters
http://www.curtis-lamasters.com
http://www.builtnetworks.com

Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2-RC2 beta1 -> 1.2-RC4 upgrade

[Scott Ullrich]

On 1/23/08, Ron Lemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have had a similar slow boot process with 1.2RC4 when my WAN
> connection (which uses DHCP) is unavailable.  It took almost 15 minutes
> to boot the other day.  When it finally came up I noticed no WAN IP so I
> reset my ISPs device got an IP then rebooted pfSense and it came right
> up.  So if it is supposed to be fixed in 1.2RC4 what else might cause
> this issue?

I believe that was fixed after 1.2-RC4.  Upgrade to a recent snapshot
if this is a problem for you.

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [pfSense Support] 1.2-RC2 beta1 -> 1.2-RC4 upgrade

[Ron Lemon]

I have had a similar slow boot process with 1.2RC4 when my WAN
connection (which uses DHCP) is unavailable.  It took almost 15 minutes
to boot the other day.  When it finally came up I noticed no WAN IP so I
reset my ISPs device got an IP then rebooted pfSense and it came right
up.  So if it is supposed to be fixed in 1.2RC4 what else might cause
this issue?

Thanks,

Ron. 

-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 10:20 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2-RC2 beta1 -> 1.2-RC4 upgrade

Gabriel Green wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I have 1.2RC2-beta1 on a PC installed to HD and want to upgrade to 
> 1.2-RC2.  However, after picking the appropriate interfaces, the 
> LiveCD halts on "Configuring WAN interface..." - I try
> ALT+FunctionKeys to see debugging information; nothing.  Then I also
> tried Ctrl+Alt+Del; again nothing.

There was an issue if your WAN was configured for DHCP and there were no

DHCP servers available, it would sit there for 20 minutes waiting for a 
timeout. That's fixed in the updated releases here:
http://snapshots.pfsense.org/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1_2/updates/
http://snapshots.pfsense.org/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1_2/iso/

You can either do the firmware upgrade or reinstall. The firmware 
upgrade works fine.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2-RC2 beta1 -> 1.2-RC4 upgrade

[Chris Buechler]

Gabriel Green wrote:

Hi all:

I have 1.2RC2-beta1 on a PC installed to HD and want to upgrade to 
1.2-RC2.  However, after picking the appropriate interfaces, the 
LiveCD halts on "Configuring WAN interface..." - I try 
ALT+FunctionKeys to see debugging information; nothing.  Then I also 
tried Ctrl+Alt+Del; again nothing.


There was an issue if your WAN was configured for DHCP and there were no 
DHCP servers available, it would sit there for 20 minutes waiting for a 
timeout. That's fixed in the updated releases here:

http://snapshots.pfsense.org/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1_2/updates/
http://snapshots.pfsense.org/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1_2/iso/

You can either do the firmware upgrade or reinstall. The firmware 
upgrade works fine.




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2-RC2 beta1 -> 1.2-RC4 upgrade

[Ngawang Sangye]

The upgrade to 1.2RC4 didn't work - via firmware upload. I backed up the
settings, installed fresh from ISO image I downloaded of RC4 and restored
the settings and it was a good result.

So I recommend you avoid the firmware upgrade.

Regards

Sangye


On 23/01/2008, Gabriel Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all:
>
> I have 1.2RC2-beta1 on a PC installed to HD and want to upgrade to 1.2-RC2.
> However, after picking the appropriate interfaces, the LiveCD halts on
> "Configuring WAN interface..." - I try ALT+FunctionKeys to see debugging
> information; nothing.  Then I also tried Ctrl+Alt+Del; again nothing.
>
> LAN card is fxp0
> WAN card is rl0
>
> Any ideas?  Can I use the "firmware upgrade" option (even though, as such,
> there is no "firmware" on a PC; only a HDD.)
>
> Thanks -
> Gabe
>

Re: [pfSense Support] Intermediate CA in pfSense Captive Portal

[Paul M]

Richard Sperry wrote:
> FYI Godaddy has certs for 14.95USD vs verisign, etc at 150ish.  Other than 
> making sure the chain is right, I have had no issues.


I bought a wildcard ssl cert for not much more than that, and so I could
use in all my firewalls as well as mail servers etc.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]