Re: [pfSense Support] I should know better !
Keith Steensma wrote: I'm using a 500 mHz Celeron w/128M RAM with a Realtek 8139 chipset as 192.168.254.1 LAN interface and a 3Com 3C905B as 192.168.1.100 WAN interface. The hardware does work Can you ping the WAN iface from the lan? Can you ping an external host(ip) from the pfsense box? At the point you have described, it should work as a gateway. Providing that the ip settings are correct. Mogamat - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] I should know better !
On 5/14/08, Mogamat Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Keith Steensma wrote: I'm using a 500 mHz Celeron w/128M RAM with a Realtek 8139 chipset as 192.168.254.1 LAN interface and a 3Com 3C905B as 192.168.1.100 WAN interface. The hardware does work Can you ping the WAN iface from the lan? Can you ping an external host(ip) from the pfsense box? At the point you have described, it should work as a gateway. Providing that the ip settings are correct. Mogamat your PC should have its gateway set to the firewalls interface ip address. the subnet mask for both should be the same. sai
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors
Chris, I noticed there were two images in this directory. Besides one being a day newer than the other what is the difference and should I pick one over the other? Thanks. Wade B On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:56 PM, tester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, there is a special build of pfSense 1.2 based on FreeBSD 6.3 instead of 6.2. A user in the forum said that he experiences much less problem with wireless. Yeah try this: http://cvs.pfsense.org/~sullrich/testing_images/6/FreeBSD_RELENG_6_3/pfSense_RELENG_1_2/ and there is also a thread somewhere on the forum with someone who fixed this adjusting a sysctl, I don't recall the details and don't have time to look for it for at least a couple days. search and you should find it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Wade Blackwell Integrity is often more painful and always more profitable than perception management - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] Broadcom BCM5722
I recently posted asking for help because I had an Intel Pro 1000 VT NIC that wasn't working. Chris kindly provided a build on FreeBSD 6.3 and the Intel works great however I've now found that it doesn't like the embedded Broadcom NetXtreme Dual Gigabit BCM5722. Is there anybody that can help? Cheers Adam __ This email has been scanned by the SecuraProtect Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.securaprotect.com
[pfSense Support] Traffic Shaper queues
Good morning all, I am wondering what I should see on the queues status page when a SIP-AIX2 call is placed. I used the traffic shaper wizard, the Trixbox sits on it's own network and was specified in the wizard config. I have had some voice quality issues on my AIX2 trunk to VOIPstreet and I want to make sure that the QOS/shaper config is as it should be. Thanks. Wade B Sample of network and call VOIP Subnet---PF---WAN---Inet-Voipstreet--PSTN | | -- Lan Subnet Call originates from a SIP phone on the LAN subnet, terminates SIP on a trixbox on VOIP subnet and call is routed out to VOIPstreet via AIX2 trunk and onto the PSTN from there. Wade Blackwell Integrity is often more painful and always more profitable than perception management
[pfSense Support] RRD errors
Good afternoon, Yesterday I re-imaged my primary PF box with 1.2RC2 and then upgraded to 1.2-RELEASE. My RRD graphs are broken and the RRD page says look at the log. Upon looking at the logs I see the following; May 14 13:52:27 php: /status_rrd_graph_img.php: Failed to create graph with error code 1, the error is: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libpng.so.5 not found, required by rrdtool May 14 13:52:27 php: /status_rrd_graph_img.php: Failed to create graph with error code 1, the error is: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libpng.so.5 not found, required by rrdtool May 14 13:52:27 php: /status_rrd_graph_img.php: Failed to create graph with error code 1, the error is: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libpng.so.5 not found, required by rrdtool May 14 13:52:27 php: /status_rrd_graph_img.php: Failed to create graph with error code 1, the error is: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libpng.so.5 not found, required by rrdtool May 14 13:52:26 php: /status_rrd_graph_img.php: Failed to create graph with error code 1, the error is: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libpng.so.5 not found, required by rrdtool May 14 13:52:26 php: /status_rrd_graph_img.php: Failed to create graph with error code 1, the error is: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libpng.so.5 not found, required by rrdtool What can be done? TIA. -W Wade Blackwell Integrity is often more painful and always more profitable than perception management smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
RE: [pfSense Support] RRD errors
why didnt you go straight to 1.2-RELEASE? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: support@pfsense.com Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 13:55:20 -0700 Subject: [pfSense Support] RRD errors RRD errors Good afternoon, Yesterday I re-imaged my primary PF box with 1.2RC2 and then upgraded to 1.2-RELEASE. My RRD graphs are broken and the RRD page says look at the log. Upon looking at the logs I see the following; May 14 13:52:27 php: /status_rrd_graph_img.php: Failed to create graph with error code 1, the error is: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libpng.so.5 not found, required by rrdtool May 14 13:52:27 php: /status_rrd_graph_img.php: Failed to create graph with error code 1, the error is: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libpng.so.5 not found, required by rrdtool May 14 13:52:27 php: /status_rrd_graph_img.php: Failed to create graph with error code 1, the error is: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libpng.so.5 not found, required by rrdtool May 14 13:52:27 php: /status_rrd_graph_img.php: Failed to create graph with error code 1, the error is: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libpng.so.5 not found, required by rrdtool May 14 13:52:26 php: /status_rrd_graph_img.php: Failed to create graph with error code 1, the error is: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libpng.so.5 not found, required by rrdtool May 14 13:52:26 php: /status_rrd_graph_img.php: Failed to create graph with error code 1, the error is: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libpng.so.5 not found, required by rrdtool What can be done? TIA. -W Wade Blackwell Integrity is often more painful and always more profitable than perception management _ With Windows Live for mobile, your contacts travel with you. http://www.windowslive.com/mobile/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Refresh_mobile_052008
RE: [pfSense Support] RRD errors
Because when I removed my Atheros wifi card PF was unable to remove an line in the config, After that anything I tried to do on the console resulted in an XML error and all I had was the RC2 CD. Short answer I killed the box and had limited tools. Is this an easy answer/fix? If not and I need to install fresh again I can do that. Not my 1st choice but I can do it. -W Wade Blackwell Integrity is often more painful and always more profitable than perception management -Original Message- From: Sean Cavanaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 2:47 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] RRD errors why didnt you go straight to 1.2-RELEASE? http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/?p=1155 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: support@pfsense.com Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 13:55:20 -0700 Subject: [pfSense Support] RRD errors Good afternoon, Yesterday I re-imaged my primary PF box with 1.2RC2 and then upgraded to 1.2-RELEASE. My RRD graphs are broken and the RRD page says look at the log. Upon looking at the logs I see the following; May 14 13:52:27 php: /status_rrd_graph_img.php: Failed to create graph with error code 1, the error is: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libpng.so.5 not found, required by rrdtool May 14 13:52:27 php: /status_rrd_graph_img.php: Failed to create graph with error code 1, the error is: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libpng.so.5 not found, required by rrdtool May 14 13:52:27 php: /status_rrd_graph_img.php: Failed to create graph with error code 1, the error is: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libpng.so.5 not found, required by rrdtool May 14 13:52:27 php: /status_rrd_graph_img.php: Failed to create graph with error code 1, the error is: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libpng.so.5 not found, required by rrdtool May 14 13:52:26 php: /status_rrd_graph_img.php: Failed to create graph with error code 1, the error is: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libpng.so.5 not found, required by rrdtool May 14 13:52:26 php: /status_rrd_graph_img.php: Failed to create graph with error code 1, the error is: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libpng.so.5 not found, required by rrdtool What can be done? TIA. -W Wade Blackwell Integrity is often more painful and always more profitable than perception management With Windows Live for mobile, your contacts travel with you. Connect on the go. http://www.windowslive.com/mobile/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Refresh_m obile_052008 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
[pfSense Support] Problem with site2site ipsec tunnels with L2TP ipsec server behind the gateway
Hi All, I'm loving PFSense and have just deployed the embedded version on some ALIX boards for several SOHO users and in the office. My thanks to everyone who has supported/worked on the project. My question is how to configure the the firewall to allow for site to site IPSec tunnels at the gateway and not kill access to the L2TP/IPSec server sitting behind the office gateway. If I forward UDP 500 to the L2TP server (OS X Tiger), L2TP clients work fine but the site to site IPSec tunnels cease functioning (no response from the office gateway). If I turn of the rule, the tunnels work fine but the L2TP clients can't connect (no response). I was using a couple of Snapgear gateways before and like magic (because I'm ignorant about exactly how it worked) both the site to site and L2TP tunnels worked (with UDP 500 forwarded to the L2TP server). I'm assuming that the gateway was inspecting the UDP 500 traffic and only forwarding L2TP traffic that was not related to tunnels on the gateway. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, John P.S. I first posted this question on the PFSense forum on May 11th but no one has responded. http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,9394.0.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors
Waiting Chris's answer, I tell you I've used the latest one (see date) to do a full update on a box from 1.2rc4 to this special build. I don't know further details, but it seems to work at the moment (note that I haven't done extensive tests yet, so surprise might be behind the corner). Bye! --- Wade Blackwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris, I noticed there were two images in this directory. Besides one being a day newer than the other what is the difference and should I pick one over the other? Thanks. Wade B On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:56 PM, tester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, there is a special build of pfSense 1.2 based on FreeBSD 6.3 instead of 6.2. A user in the forum said that he experiences much less problem with wireless. Yeah try this: http://cvs.pfsense.org/~sullrich/testing_images/6/FreeBSD_RELENG_6_3/pfSense_RELENG_1_2/ and there is also a thread somewhere on the forum with someone who fixed this adjusting a sysctl, I don't recall the details and don't have time to look for it for at least a couple days. search and you should find it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Wade Blackwell Integrity is often more painful and always more profitable than perception management - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Sent from Yahoo! Mail. A Smarter Email http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Intel Pro 1000 VT
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 5:34 AM, Adam Costello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's good news and bad news. Good news: That install fixed the issue with the Intel Pro 1000VT and when I stick the cable link status says UP Bad News: The onboard Broadcom NetXtreme Dual Gigabit NIC is not working. If I stick a cable in that it doesn't even notice even though I have lights on the NIC and switch port. Did it work with the official 1.2 version? This might be something that's not supported until FreeBSD 7, in which case we can't help you at the moment. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] setting time
Not sure if this is resolved, I was reminded today of the BIOS reports of the system status - especially the voltages, a failing power supply might also cause this problem, check the voltages from the boot BIOS. Do let us know the outcome. Kind regards David Hingston - Original Message - From: Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: support@pfsense.com Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 2:47 AM Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] setting time You likely have faulty hardware. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
