[pfSense Support] Why DHCP and portal logs are limited to 65535 octets?
Hello, in /var/log/ the DHCP and portal auth logs are limited to 65535 octets. So I can't read lot connections! Is it possible to bypass the limitation (without syslog server) ? thank you - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Why DHCP and portal logs are limited to 65535 octets?
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 3:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, in /var/log/ the DHCP and portal auth logs are limited to 65535 octets. So I can't read lot connections! Is it possible to bypass the limitation (without syslog server) ? That's the first I've heard of this. Can you be more specific - what does it show? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Why DHCP and portal logs are limited to 65535 octets?
As I have many connections, I can only see the last DHCP leases of the day. But I must be able to visualize the connections up to 1 year. On Fri, 16 May 2008 04:04:29 -0400, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 3:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, in /var/log/ the DHCP and portal auth logs are limited to 65535 octets. So I can't read lot connections! Is it possible to bypass the limitation (without syslog server) ? That's the first I've heard of this. Can you be more specific - what does it show? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Virtualizing pfSense
Make Windows Vista more reliable and secure with Windows Vista Service I thought it was one of those witty tag-lines along Make Vista more http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2146586273/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Why DHCP and portal logs are limited to 65535 octets?
This is intentional as part of the design of m0n0wall, which pfSense inherited. pfSense uses clog for system logging and all logs are kept in a circular format so as not to consume limited disk space available to embedded systems. The work-around for this is to use a remote syslog. -Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As I have many connections, I can only see the last DHCP leases of the day. But I must be able to visualize the connections up to 1 year. On Fri, 16 May 2008 04:04:29 -0400, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 3:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, in /var/log/ the DHCP and portal auth logs are limited to 65535 octets. So I can't read lot connections! Is it possible to bypass the limitation (without syslog server) ? That's the first I've heard of this. Can you be more specific - what does it show? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Why DHCP and portal logs are limited to 65535 octets?
Gary Buckmaster wrote: This is intentional as part of the design of m0n0wall, which pfSense inherited. pfSense uses clog for system logging and all logs are kept in a circular format so as not to consume limited disk space available to embedded systems. The work-around for this is to use a remote syslog. it's also possible to install syslog-ng which binds to the sync or lan IP, make syslog bind to just 127.0.0.1, then make it syslog remote syslog to that new instance of syslog-ng so that you can keep full files locally and also remote log again to your log server. search the mailing lists for more details. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors
Following up to see what the difference in the images are, Thanks all. -W Wade Blackwell Integrity is often more painful and always more profitable than perception management -Original Message- From: Wade Blackwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 7:48 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors Chris, I noticed there were two images in this directory. Besides one being a day newer than the other what is the difference and should I pick one over the other? Thanks. Wade B On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:56 PM, tester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, there is a special build of pfSense 1.2 based on FreeBSD 6.3 instead of 6.2. A user in the forum said that he experiences much less problem with wireless. Yeah try this: http://cvs.pfsense.org/~sullrich/testing_images/6/FreeBSD_RELENG_6_3/p fSense_RELENG_1_2/ and there is also a thread somewhere on the forum with someone who fixed this adjusting a sysctl, I don't recall the details and don't have time to look for it for at least a couple days. search and you should find it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Wade Blackwell Integrity is often more painful and always more profitable than perception management smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Wade Blackwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris, I noticed there were two images in this directory. Besides one being a day newer than the other what is the difference and should I pick one over the other? Thanks. not sure, Scott would know. It's probably essentially the same, though the 500K size diff indicates it's not identical. Use the newer one, I know it works. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors
Sweet thanks. -W On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Wade Blackwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris, I noticed there were two images in this directory. Besides one being a day newer than the other what is the difference and should I pick one over the other? Thanks. not sure, Scott would know. It's probably essentially the same, though the 500K size diff indicates it's not identical. Use the newer one, I know it works. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Wade Blackwell Integrity is often more painful and always more profitable than perception management - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors
On 5/16/08, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: not sure, Scott would know. It's probably essentially the same, though the 500K size diff indicates it's not identical. Use the newer one, I know it works. Yeah, use the newest image. I am simply copying newer images into the directory similar to how our snapshot server does it. Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Why DHCP and portal logs are limited to 65535 octets?
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 4:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As I have many connections, I can only see the last DHCP leases of the day. But I must be able to visualize the connections up to 1 year. Oh, you're talking about the log rotation. That wasn't evident to me from your first message. Yeah this is normal, you'll need an external syslog server if you want to retain more logs. This is something we're looking to change in the future. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors
Hi - Original Message - From: Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: support@pfsense.com support@pfsense.com Sent: Fri May 16 14:23:49 2008 Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors On 5/16/08, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: not sure, Scott would know. It's probably essentially the same, though the 500K size diff indicates it's not identical. Use the newer one, I know it works. Yeah, use the newest image. I am simply copying newer images into the directory similar to how our snapshot server does it. Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors
Sorry about that, replied to the wrong message.
