Re: [pfSense Support] DHCP Leases Not Displaying?
Tim Nelson schreef: Greetings all- I apologize if this problem has been fixed in a later version and I've not seen it yet... I have a box running pfSense 1.2.2 (Full version) and whenever a DHCP leases is handed out, there is a 50/50 chance it will actually show up in the Statis--DHCP Leases table. If I check the Status--System Logs--DHCP log, the proper information is shown (DHCPREQUEST,DHCPACK,DHCPINFORM,etc..). Is this a bug? Has it been fixed in later versions? Maybe it works fine for everyone else but not me for some reason? Is this on a carp cluster? If so, the other box will show the lease. Regards, Seth - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
Re: [pfSense Support] DHCP Leases Not Displaying?
- Seth Mos seth@xs4all.nl wrote: Tim Nelson schreef: Greetings all- I apologize if this problem has been fixed in a later version and I've not seen it yet... I have a box running pfSense 1.2.2 (Full version) and whenever a DHCP leases is handed out, there is a 50/50 chance it will actually show up in the Statis--DHCP Leases table. If I check the Status--System Logs--DHCP log, the proper information is shown (DHCPREQUEST,DHCPACK,DHCPINFORM,etc..). Is this a bug? Has it been fixed in later versions? Maybe it works fine for everyone else but not me for some reason? Is this on a carp cluster? If so, the other box will show the lease. Regards, Seth Nope, no CARP clustering used. Not sure if it's helpful or not, but I've just seen the behavior on a 1.2.1 Full box as well. Tim Nelson Systems/Network Support Rockbochs Inc. (218)727-4332 x105 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
[pfSense Support] do we support ipsec-nat ?
Hi ! Do we support IPsec-NAT ? We had a discussion today about monitoring some clients systems with identical client subnets... Does pfsense support natting ipsec tunnels ? a colleague told me that for example cisco, wg, etc... does a 1:1 nat for translating the remote subnets... Regards, martin
[pfSense Support] nic performance affected
Hi! I have two pfSense boxes connected to the same net segment where we have 4-10Mb/s (up to 5kps) stream of small udp multicast packets. pfSense1 is connected to this segment via VLAN (em3) - this pfSense is overloaded. pfSense2 is connected to this segment via LAN interface (em0) - this pfSense is ok. I am not very good at FreeBSD internals so my question is why do I have that drastic difference in performance. Basically all em3's load is caused by this udp stream because if it stops the load goes to normal 'almost 100% free'. Is VLAN tagging affecting performance that bad? pfSense1 - last pid: 7245; load averages: 0.20, 0.28, 0.31up 0+05:23:40 15:20:24 105 processes: 5 running, 81 sleeping, 19 waiting CPU: 0.2% user, 0.0% nice, 6.5% system, 0.2% interrupt, 93.2% idle Mem: 52M Active, 32M Inact, 58M Wired, 308K Cache, 24M Buf, 3365M Free Swap: 8192M Total, 8192M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 13 root1 171 ki31 0K 8K CPU1 1 315:09 100.00% idle: cpu1 11 root1 171 ki31 0K 8K CPU3 3 312:52 100.00% idle: cpu3 12 root1 171 ki31 0K 8K CPU2 2 282:52 96.29% idle: cpu2 14 root1 171 ki31 0K 8K RUN0 231:47 84.38% idle: cpu0 34 root1 -68- 0K 8K - 0 90:24 16.26% em3 taskq 31 root1 -68- 0K 8K - 2 36:51 7.28% em0 taskq 29 root1 8- 0K 8K - 3 9:19 1.37% thread taskq 32 root1 -68- 0K 8K - 0 1:35 1.17% em1 taskq 37 root1 -68- 0K 8K WAIT 2 1:42 0.10% irq25: bge0 18 root1 44- 0K 8K - 2 0:48 0.00% yarrow 16 root1 -32- 0K 8K WAIT 3 0:46 0.00% swi4: clock s 3633 root1 40 46120K 20760K accept 1 0:27 0.00% php 33 root1 -68- 0K 8K - 2 0:22 0.00% em2 taskq - pfSesnse2 - last pid: 84582; load averages: 0.15, 0.18, 0.16up 1+22:51:13 15:20:24 92 processes: 5 running, 65 sleeping, 22 waiting CPU states: 0.3% user, 0.0% nice, 0.3% system, 2.4% interrupt, 97.0% idle Mem: 32M Active, 11M Inact, 39M Wired, 19M Buf, 3426M Free Swap: 8192M Total, 8192M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 10 root1 171 52 0K 8K CPU3 0 0:00 99.02% idle: cpu3 12 root1 171 52 0K 8K CPU1 0 0:00 99.02% idle: cpu1 13 root1 171 52 0K 8K RUN0 45.3H 93.36% idle: cpu0 11 root1 171 52 0K 8K CPU2 2 43.0H 86.28% idle: cpu2 14 root1 -44 -163 0K 8K WAIT 2 65:26 9.47% swi1: net 29 root1 -68 -187 0K 8K WAIT 2 7:20 0.68% irq65: em3 25 root1 -68 -187 0K 8K WAIT 0 5:14 0.05% irq39: em0 1144 root1 40 6048K 5408K kqread 0 1:35 0.05% lighttpd 81785 root1 40 15896K 13324K accept 0 0:04 0.05% php 15 root1 -32 -151 0K 8K WAIT 0 4:58 0.00% swi4: clock s 33 root1 -64 -183 0K 8K WAIT 0 2:54 0.00% irq19: uhci1 30 root1 -64 -183 0K 8K WAIT 2 1:45 0.00% irq16: uhci0 26 root1 -68 -187 0K 8K WAIT 2 1:41 0.00% irq36: em1 Thank you! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
[pfSense Support] Outgoing PPTP
I'm really sorry if this has been answered in other places, I tried searching but couldn't find anything. We have a Windows 2003 server that handles the PPTP so I have pfSense configured to redirect PPTP to the server's IP and that all works great. Now one of our people needs to be able to VPN into an external network and for some reason it is not working. I found some information on trying to setup a Virtual IP address and configuring advanced outbound NAT so PPTP traffic is mapped onto the virtual IP but that didn't work. Does anyone have any advice on other options to try? _ Windows 7: It works the way you want. Learn more. http://www.microsoft.com/Windows/windows-7/default.aspx?ocid=PID24727::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WWL_WIN_evergreen2:102009
Re: [pfSense Support] Outgoing PPTP
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Adam Van Ornum greatb...@hotmail.com wrote: I'm really sorry if this has been answered in other places, I tried searching but couldn't find anything. We have a Windows 2003 server that handles the PPTP so I have pfSense configured to redirect PPTP to the server's IP and that all works great. Now one of our people needs to be able to VPN into an external network and for some reason it is not working. I found some information on trying to setup a Virtual IP address and configuring advanced outbound NAT so PPTP traffic is mapped onto the virtual IP but that didn't work. Does anyone have any advice on other options to try? NATing to a different IP will work. http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/What_are_the_limitations_of_PPTP_in_pfSense%3F - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
Re: [pfSense Support] do we support ipsec-nat ?
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Fuchs, Martin martin.fu...@trendchiller.com wrote: Hi ! Do we support IPsec-NAT ? No, PF can't do it. See a recent thread on freebsd-net for details. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
[pfSense Support] Multiple Filenames for Diskless Boot On LAN
Hi Can multiple file names be specified for diskless boot on LAN functionality in pfSense on the same LAN? (e.g. thin clients and fat clients from same or different servers on same LAN)
