Re: [pfSense Support] Plugins

2010-01-22 Thread Jim Pingle
On 1/22/2010 7:41 PM, Fabian Abplanalp wrote:
[snip - I don't use siproxd or spamd so I can't comment there]
> OpenVPN is also a lot that should be improved asap, for testing purposes
> I've installed an endian box (which has other ugly limitations), but at
> least SIP and OpenVPN work as expected with a nice GUI.

What exactly do you think needs "improved" in OpenVPN? Have you tried
the 2.0 beta to see if the improvements have already been made?

OpenVPN has always been solid for me and my customers, between the GUI
options and custom options boxes I have been able to make most anything
work. The 2.0 GUI and Certificate Manager make it even better, too.

If you want to offer criticism, please be much more specific.

Jim

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



[pfSense Support] Plugins

2010-01-22 Thread Fabian Abplanalp

Hi Mailinglist

Just a small comment about the Plugins:
spamd and sipproxy are some "musts" for many of my installations, but 
the current state of those are very bad.
Usually I have to reboot the pfSense box to get a stable SIP connection, 
and also SPAMD doesn't work as espected ("useless" buttons etc... mostly 
it's used as a filter/forwarder to a m$ exchange server)... It would be 
very nice if some people find time to fix them.
OpenVPN is also a lot that should be improved asap, for testing purposes 
I've installed an endian box (which has other ugly limitations), but at 
least SIP and OpenVPN work as expected with a nice GUI.
I am only a sysadmin, not a programmer, so I am sorry that I can't help 
you on this.


Greetings,
Fabian

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] Pfsense ad vmware

2010-01-22 Thread Remko Lodder



On Jan 23, 2010, at 7:17 PM, Eddy Ruiz Azcuy wrote:

> Hi friends
> 
> I've being experiencing some problems installing pfsense under vmware in 
> Windows XP, the problem is that pfsense only detects one interface.one le0 
> and one plip0, Please help me .Thanks in advance.
> 
> 

Add more interfaces by editting the VMware settings for your machine.

-- 
/"\   Best regards,| re...@freebsd.org
\ /   Remko Lodder  | re...@efnet
Xhttp://www.evilcoder.org/|
/ \   ASCII Ribbon Campaign| Against HTML Mail and News


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] Fwd: bogon filter update required

2010-01-22 Thread Chris Buechler
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Paul Mansfield
 wrote:
>
> just a heads-up really about new IPv4 blocks now in use, so check your
> bogon filter update scripts are working and you don't drop 1/8 and 27/8
>

They update automatically and already have those removed.

1./8 finally assigned, knew it would happen eventually. For whatever
reason I've seen a few networks using 1./8 as "private" address space.
Connectivity problems are coming soon for those networks. Of course
I've also seen networks using random assigned and active public IP
space as their "private" IP space. Why I don't know, in those cases
I've always been helping people who inherited a network wreck and
helping clean it up.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



[pfSense Support] Pfsense ad vmware

2010-01-22 Thread Eddy Ruiz Azcuy

Hi friends

I've being experiencing some problems installing pfsense under vmware in 
Windows XP, the problem is that pfsense only detects one interface.one 
le0 and one plip0, Please help me .Thanks in advance.




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



[pfSense Support] Fwd: bogon filter update required

2010-01-22 Thread Paul Mansfield

just a heads-up really about new IPv4 blocks now in use, so check your
bogon filter update scripts are working and you don't drop 1/8 and 27/8

Paul
-- Forwarded message --
From: Leo Vegoda
Date: 2010/1/21

Hi,

The IANA IPv4 registry has been updated to reflect the allocation
of two /8 IPv4 blocks to APNIC in January 2010: 1/8 and
27/8. You can find the IANA IPv4 registry at:

http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ipv4-address-space.xml
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ipv4-address-space.xml
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ipv4-address-space.txt

Please update your filters as appropriate.

The IANA free pool contains 24 unallocated unicast IPv4 /8s.

Regards,

Leo Vegoda
Number Resources Manager, IANA
ICANN

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] Certificate Errors (Safari and Internet Explorer) using GoDaddy Wildcard SSL Certificates for Captive Portal SSL Login Page

2010-01-22 Thread Yehuda Katz
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Chris Buechler  wrote:

> That's a problem with the cert. That means the CA that signed your
> cert isn't trusted by those browsers. That's what you get at times
> with cut rate CAs like Godaddy, though that's where we get our certs
> and I haven't seen any such issues on ours, I have on other certs I've
> gotten from Godaddy in the past. I would contact them and complain,
> any cert you pay for should be recognized by all the major browsers.
>
> I thought I might correct this misconception about why certificate chains
exist.
GoDaddy and other CAs have a master certificate which is installed in
browsers.
If they would use this master certificate to sign regular certificates and
it would be compromised, they would need to have the certificate removed
from everywhere it is installed (not an simple task).
Instead, they create several other certificates and use those to generate
regular certificates.
Then, if there is a problem, they can revoke the sub-certificate.
So your browser almost certainly has the GoDaddy root certificate installed,
it just does not know the chain.

The way I solved this problem (I get certs from StartSSL, and almost no one
has the intermediate certificates from them) was by pasting the intermediate
cert i nthe regular certificate box in the admin area.
I am not sure if that is supposed to work, but I have not had any problems
with it.
- YK


AW: [pfSense Support] About promiscuous mode

2010-01-22 Thread Fuchs, Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Koray AGAYA [mailto:insanad...@gmail.com] 
Gesendet: Freitag, 22. Januar 2010 14:38
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: [pfSense Support] About promiscuous mode

Hi,

I use 1.2.3-RELEASE  Pfsense, System log have a error,  I dont
understand What is problem ?

Jan 22 15:29:01 kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode disabled
Jan 22 15:29:01 kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode enabled
Jan 22 15:28:58 kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode disabled
Jan 22 15:28:57 kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode enabled
Jan 22 15:28:54 kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode disabled
Jan 22 15:28:54 kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode enabled
Jan 22 15:28:51 kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode disabled
Jan 22 15:28:51 kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode enabled
Jan 22 15:28:48 kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode disabled
Jan 22 15:28:48 kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode enabled
Jan 22 15:28:45 kernel: vge1: promiscuous mode disabled
Jan 22 15:28:45 kernel: vge1: promiscuous mode enabled
Jan 22 15:28:42 kernel: vge1: promiscuous mode disabled
Jan 22 15:28:41 kernel: vge1: promiscuous mode enabled
Jan 22 15:28:38 kernel: vge1: promiscuous mode disabled
Jan 22 15:28:38 kernel: vge1: promiscuous mode enabled
Jan 22 15:28:35 kernel: vge1: promiscuous mode disabled
Jan 22 15:28:35 kernel: vge1: promiscuous mode enabled
Jan 22 15:28:33 kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode disabled
Jan 22 15:28:33 kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode enabled



---

Do you have the rate package installed ?
Then it's this...

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] About promiscuous mode

2010-01-22 Thread Jim Pingle
On 1/22/2010 8:38 AM, Koray AGAYA wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I use 1.2.3-RELEASE  Pfsense, System log have a error,  I dont
> understand What is problem ?
> 
> Jan 22 15:29:01   kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode disabled

This is a part of how the Rate package operates. In that scenario, it's
harmless log spam, there is no problem.

Jim

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



[pfSense Support] DNS: domain override for PTR records

2010-01-22 Thread Hans Maes

Hello,

I'm using a redundant pfsense CARP cluster for providing 
firewall/DHCP/DNS to several servers and clients.
To have more control over local DNS records, I have setup a powerdns 
daemon on a linux server behind the pfsense cluster and entered a domain 
override for a test domain in the DNS forwarder configuration page on 
both pfsense boxes.


This works flawlessly, the pfsense forwards requests for the local 
domains to my linux box, while still using my ISP DNS servers for 
internet DNS lookups.


However, I can't seem to add a domain override for my internal ip ranges 
reverse dns lookups (PTR records)


My local network is a 10.150.0.0/16 divided in lots of /24 chunks using 
vlans.
If I put 150.10.in-addr.arpa in the pfsense DNS domain override, it 
seems to have no effect.
My powerdns server on my linux box is never receiving any queries from 
the pfsense boxes.
(Tested using tcpdump, and also direct PTR queries to my powerdns work 
as they should)



I know I could just hand out the ip of the powerdns server to the 
clients through dhcp, but that would cripple my redundant setup.
As long as the powerdns only handles internal requests, internet 
connectivity won't be affected if the single powerdns server goes down 
for some reason.
And setting up a secundary local DNS server and keeping it in sync with 
the primary, just for this purpose, just seems a bit overkill.



What is the correct way to override the DNS server setup for local 
reverse dns lookups ?



Thanks!

Hans

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] About promiscuous mode

2010-01-22 Thread Remko Lodder

On Jan 22, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Koray AGAYA wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I use 1.2.3-RELEASE  Pfsense, System log have a error,  I dont
> understand What is problem ?
> 
> Jan 22 15:29:01   kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode disabled
> Jan 22 15:29:01   kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode enabled
> Jan 22 15:28:58   kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode disabled
> Jan 22 15:28:57   kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode enabled
> Jan 22 15:28:54   kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode disabled
> Jan 22 15:28:54   kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode enabled
> Jan 22 15:28:51   kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode disabled
> Jan 22 15:28:51   kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode enabled
> Jan 22 15:28:48   kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode disabled
> Jan 22 15:28:48   kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode enabled
> Jan 22 15:28:45   kernel: vge1: promiscuous mode disabled
> Jan 22 15:28:45   kernel: vge1: promiscuous mode enabled
> Jan 22 15:28:42   kernel: vge1: promiscuous mode disabled
> Jan 22 15:28:41   kernel: vge1: promiscuous mode enabled
> Jan 22 15:28:38   kernel: vge1: promiscuous mode disabled
> Jan 22 15:28:38   kernel: vge1: promiscuous mode enabled
> Jan 22 15:28:35   kernel: vge1: promiscuous mode disabled
> Jan 22 15:28:35   kernel: vge1: promiscuous mode enabled
> Jan 22 15:28:33   kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode disabled
> Jan 22 15:28:33   kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode enabled
> 



Could it be that you have a status, where the current active IP's are listed?
I know that there is one feature that has this, but I do not instantly remember 
it's name (pftop or something).

Cheers,
REmko

-- 
/"\   Best regards,| re...@freebsd.org
\ /   Remko Lodder  | re...@efnet
Xhttp://www.evilcoder.org/|
/ \   ASCII Ribbon Campaign| Against HTML Mail and News


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



[pfSense Support] About promiscuous mode

2010-01-22 Thread Koray AGAYA
Hi,

I use 1.2.3-RELEASE  Pfsense, System log have a error,  I dont
understand What is problem ?

Jan 22 15:29:01 kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode disabled
Jan 22 15:29:01 kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode enabled
Jan 22 15:28:58 kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode disabled
Jan 22 15:28:57 kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode enabled
Jan 22 15:28:54 kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode disabled
Jan 22 15:28:54 kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode enabled
Jan 22 15:28:51 kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode disabled
Jan 22 15:28:51 kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode enabled
Jan 22 15:28:48 kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode disabled
Jan 22 15:28:48 kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode enabled
Jan 22 15:28:45 kernel: vge1: promiscuous mode disabled
Jan 22 15:28:45 kernel: vge1: promiscuous mode enabled
Jan 22 15:28:42 kernel: vge1: promiscuous mode disabled
Jan 22 15:28:41 kernel: vge1: promiscuous mode enabled
Jan 22 15:28:38 kernel: vge1: promiscuous mode disabled
Jan 22 15:28:38 kernel: vge1: promiscuous mode enabled
Jan 22 15:28:35 kernel: vge1: promiscuous mode disabled
Jan 22 15:28:35 kernel: vge1: promiscuous mode enabled
Jan 22 15:28:33 kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode disabled
Jan 22 15:28:33 kernel: vge0: promiscuous mode enabled

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] Certificate Errors (Safari and Internet Explorer) using GoDaddy Wildcard SSL Certificates for Captive Portal SSL Login Page

2010-01-22 Thread Merul Patel
On 21 Jan 2010, at 22:14, Tancinco, Jon wrote:

> Thanks for your help Lyle.  I’ve seen this solution...
>  
> SSLEngine On
> SSLCertificateFile /etc/httpd/ssl/*.serverdensity.com.crt
> SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/httpd/ssl/*.serverdensity.com.key
> SSLCertificateChainFile /etc/httpd/ssl/gd_bundle.crt
>  
> But since pfSense uses lighttpd, I don’t know how to add this line.  And it 
> get’s overwritten by the xml config file during reboot.
>  
>  
> -Jon

Jon,

I use Lighttpd for other production sites  and also use GoDaddy for their SSL 
certs.

Here's the relevant section from my lighttpd config

$SERVER["socket"] == "XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:443" {
ssl.engine = "enable",
ssl.pemfile = "/etc/apache2/ssl/DOMAIN.ucc.pem"
ssl.ca-file = "/etc/apache2/ssl/gd_intermediate_bundle.crt"
}

BR

Merul



Re: [pfSense Support] Squid Stopping

2010-01-22 Thread Fahmi Syafrizal
squid need gateway, if use multi gateway, there must be a tcp_outgoing address 
defined on config squid.conf  (squid.inc), if not define, squid use default 
gateway
manual squid : 
http://www1.il.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.7/cfgman/tcp_outgoing_address.html




From: Rafael Cristian 
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 5:25 AM
To: support@pfsense.com 
Subject: [pfSense Support] Squid Stopping


HI guys,

 

 I'm having problems with the PFsense in version 1.2.2 in one of my clients. 
There are more or less installed pfsense squid  2.7.8.1 ,with squidguard+ 
1.3.2, and load balance 2 adsl links. There are 2 days behind the pfsense 
caught when he called again and had lost all settings. I did the restore from a 
backup, but as there was no backup settings load balance had to redo it. I 
reversed, I made a little different, I left a link with adls PPPoE and the 
other adls with the router. OK But the problem is that from time to time my 
users complain that the internet connection drops. and after about 2 minutes it 
returns. What I could identify q is the service squid and squidguard are 
stopping.  

There is some problem in pfsense to do with pfsense loadbalance doing pppoe and 
other connected to a router?

Has anyone had this problem or guide me what can I do?

 

[]'s

Rafael Ávila



__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4791 (20100120) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4791 (20100120) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com