[pfSense Support] Diagnostics: DHCP leases v0.88
Hi, I noticed that on the Diagnostics: DHCP leases page all static leases (I have only this kind) shows as offline. I am using v.88 CF image on a PC (Bao's image), but I guess that this is not Cf dependent. Best regards Imre -- This is Linux Land. In silent nights you can hear the windows machines rebooting pgp7CPA3Zzihz.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [pfSense Support] Diagnostics: DHCP leases v0.88
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 19:07:05 -0500 Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: _all_ of them? Even the one for the machine you are connecting to the admin interface from? The online/offline comes directly from the Yes all. Even the one I'm connecting to admin interface. Than was the strange. ARP cache of the firewall - online really just means it's active, but In the ARP table the machines are showing correctly. active was already taken (and I couldn't come up with a better name for what active did). If someone can come up with better wording for the 'active' lease, which is just a lease that isn't expired (ie. someone actually has a valid lease on it), then I'll change the online/offline text to active/inactive (which really makes more sense for what it's checking). --Bill -- This is Linux Land. In silent nights you can hear the windows machines rebooting pgpHAqsrSJ2At.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [pfSense Support] Compact Flash images!
Hi Bao, It's the ad0. On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:34:58 -0700 (PDT) Bao C. Ha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Imre, Which image did you use? The ad0 or ad2 ones? I don't see the tty error message so I am not sure what was happening. -- This email is made from 100% recycled electrons This is Linux Land- In silent nights you can hear the windows machines rebooting pgpav6slPjTGh.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [pfSense Support] Compact Flash images!
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:50:24 -0500 Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe that's a known bug in 0.86.4. We just released 0.88 today, if I understand what Bao is doing, you should be able to upgrade to it using the Full Update. --Bill Is a ull upgrade possible? That would be great. I'll try it this evening :) Imre -- This email is made from 100% recycled electrons This is Linux Land- In silent nights you can hear the windows machines rebooting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Compact Flash images!
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 08:37:20 +0200 Imre Ispanovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is a ull upgrade possible? That would be great. I'll try it this evening :) ^^ ... hmm. I mean full update ... -- This email is made from 100% recycled electrons This is Linux Land- In silent nights you can hear the windows machines rebooting pgpJB1W7BsIhz.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [pfSense Support] Compact Flash images!
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:50:24 -0500 Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe that's a known bug in 0.86.4. We just released 0.88 today, if I understand what Bao is doing, you should be able to upgrade to it using the Full Update. --Bill No, update doesn't work. On the webgui: Firmware image missing or other error, please try again. In the logs: kernel: pid 8731 (php), uid 0 inumber 80 on /tmp: filesystem full It seems to me that due to the image size it is not possible. So I have to wait until a new image comes out. Not a big problem, now that I disabled the web access from the wan. Best regards Imre -- This email is made from 100% recycled electrons This is Linux Land- In silent nights you can hear the windows machines rebooting pgpVmDgTYisYS.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [pfSense Support] Compact Flash images!
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:56:23 -0700 (PDT) Bao C. Ha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Imre, I'll update the images later today, for you to test them. Thanks. Bao many, many thanks :) Imre -- This email is made from 100% recycled electrons This is Linux Land- In silent nights you can hear the windows machines rebooting pgp9ywdPXQVfu.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [pfSense Support] Compact Flash images!
Hi Bao, I have tried the new 0.88 image without success :( When booting there are bthe following messeges: Booting 'pfSense' root (hd0,3,a) Filesystem type is ufs2 type 0xa5 kernel /boot/loader Error 15 : File not found --- I have written the image several times with the same result. Other: I can confirm the Shell tty message on 0.86.4, but ... it is working despite of the message. Best regrds Imre On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 13:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Bao C. Ha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Alan. No, I did not notice the tty error message. Anyway, I have re-uploaded the files. For Hacom or Lex systems, which boot the CF from the secondary IDE master, /dev/ad2, please use the following images: http://shopping.hacom.net/catalog/pub/pfsense/pfSense-0.88-128-ad2.img.gz http://shopping.hacom.net/catalog/pub/pfsense/pfSense-0.88-256-ad2.img.gz http://shopping.hacom.net/catalog/pub/pfsense/pfSense-0.88-512-ad2.img.gz http://shopping.hacom.net/catalog/pub/pfsense/pfSense-0.88-1gb-ad2.img.gz For generic PC systems, which boot the CF from the primary IDE master, /dev/ad0, please use the following images: http://shopping.hacom.net/catalog/pub/pfsense/pfSense-0.88-128-ad0.img.gz http://shopping.hacom.net/catalog/pub/pfsense/pfSense-0.88-256-ad0.img.gz http://shopping.hacom.net/catalog/pub/pfsense/pfSense-0.88-512-ad0.img.gz http://shopping.hacom.net/catalog/pub/pfsense/pfSense-0.88-1gb-ad0.img.gz Please let me know how they work. Thanks. Bao -- This email is made from 100% recycled electrons This is Linux Land- In silent nights you can hear the windows machines rebooting pgpWuWptKvTZO.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [pfSense Support] Compact Flash images!
Hi Bao, On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Bao C. Ha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I uploaded new compact flash images, version 0.86.4. Are these now only for Hacom or also for generic pc as well? Best regards Imre -- This email is made from 100% recycled electrons This is Linux Land- In silent nights you can hear the windows machines rebooting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Compact Flash images!
Hi Bao, On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Bao C. Ha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I uploaded new compact flash images, version 0.86.4. Please test them and let me know how it works. I've just installed the 128MB img on to an old Compaq sff PC. It loads fine, with one exception. The admin name and password can't be neither changed nor restored with the backup config. Practically it gets corrupted. Only resetting webgui password on the console helps. Otherwise its works fine for until now. Thank you for this cf image. Best regards Imre -- This email is made from 100% recycled electrons This is Linux Land- In silent nights you can hear the windows machines rebooting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] CF Installation options limitations
Hi, Have a look on to this thread http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion@pfsense.com/msg00499.html I'm using this (the 128MB image) on a generic PC with a 128MB CF card for weeks now without problem. Its great. best regards Imre Ispanovits On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 22:43:34 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I've been struggling trying to install pfSense on my system for several days now. My system only has 1 IDE channel. I am planning on running off of a Compact Flash through an IDE adapter. This way, my system will have no moving parts but the Fan on the processor. I have attempted to download the CF image file for the WRAP, but that apparently doesn't boot because it's missing VGA. Then I tried to install by using a USB CF adapter and CDROM on the IDE channel. I was able to boot off of the CD, however it says that it requires 300 MB to install. I was trying to do the install on a 256 MB CF. So I'm confused as to why the LiveCD install requires so much space in compared to the CF image for the WRAP. Is it possible to create a Generic PC CF image similar to the one that is put out for monowall? I'd prefer not to buy another CF card. Also, I think it makes sense to put space requirements for hard drive installation on the Hardware FAQ page. Am I missing something obvious, or is there no way to install pfSense on a 256 MB CF for a Generic PC. Also, it would be really nice if it could be installed via either PXE or boot floppy for systems that don't have a CDROM drive. Thanks, Joe. -- This email is made from 100% recycled electrons - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] unexpected dhcp lease
Hi, I have a problem with pfSense's dhcp server since 0.85.x (I guess it wasn't an issue in 0.84.6). I have two lan interfaces and both serves as dhcp server, of course not overlapping. My problem is that on lan2 (opt2 - xl0) a dynamic ip address is always issued despite it shouldn't be because only fixed leases expected. This is the only address I have to configure for the dhcp servers range. What's more strange for that mac address (00:12:79:ad:c6:fc) is a fixed lease reserved on the other (fxp0) interface. Which as I see in the logs once offered, but the other address picked up. This never happened on the other interface. In syslog I have: Sep 28 14:35:04 last message repeated 2 times Sep 28 14:35:03 kernel: arp: 192.168.2.254 is on xl0 but got reply from 00:12:79:ad:c6:fc on fxp0 Sep 28 14:34:49 last message repeated 5 times Sep 28 14:34:36 dhcpd: send_packet: Invalid argument and in dhcp logs: Sep 28 14:35:03 dhcpd: DHCPNAK on 192.168.2.254 to 00:12:79:ad:c6:fc via fxp0 Sep 28 14:35:03 dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.2.254 (192.168.2.4) from 00:12:79:ad:c6:fc (TRC-dc5100) via fxp0: wrong network. Sep 28 14:35:03 dhcpd: DHCPACK on 192.168.2.254 to 00:12:79:ad:c6:fc (TRC-dc5100) via xl0 Sep 28 14:35:03 dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.2.254 (192.168.2.4) from 00:12:79:ad:c6:fc (TRC-dc5100) via xl0 Sep 28 14:35:03 dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 192.168.0.22 to 00:12:79:ad:c6:fc via fxp0 Sep 28 14:35:03 dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:12:79:ad:c6:fc via fxp0 Sep 28 14:35:03 dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 192.168.2.254 to 00:12:79:ad:c6:fc (TRC-dc5100) via xl0 Sep 28 14:35:03 dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:12:79:ad:c6:fc via xl0 Sep 28 14:34:51 dhcpd: DHCPRELEASE of 192.168.2.254 from 00:12:79:ad:c6:fc via fxp0 (found) Sep 28 14:34:51 dhcpd: DHCPRELEASE of 192.168.2.254 from 00:12:79:ad:c6:fc (TRC-dc5100) via xl0 (found) Sep 28 14:34:49 dhcpd: send_packet: Invalid argument Sep 28 14:34:49 dhcpd: DHCPACK on 192.168.2.254 to 00:12:79:ad:c6:fc (TRC-dc5100) via fxp0 Sep 28 14:34:49 dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.2.254 from 00:12:79:ad:c6:fc (TRC-dc5100) via fxp0 Sep 28 14:34:49 dhcpd: send_packet: Invalid argument ## My two lan inrefaces are as below: interfaces lan iffxp0/if ipaddr192.168.0.3/ipaddr subnet24/subnet media/ mediaopt/ bridge/ bandwidth100/bandwidth bandwidthtypeMb/bandwidthtype /lan opt2 descrLAN2/descr ifxl0/if bridge/ enable/ bandwidth100/bandwidth bandwidthtypeMb/bandwidthtype ipaddr192.168.2.4/ipaddr subnet24/subnet gateway/ spoofmac/ mtu/ /opt2 /interfaces and dhcp servers : dhcpd lan range from192.168.0.250/from to192.168.0.250/to /range defaultleasetime/ maxleasetime/ denyunknown/ failover_peerip/ gateway/ staticmap mac00:14:c2:0b:95:49/mac ipaddr192.168.0.21/ipaddr descrlvc-felsorec/descr /staticmap staticmap mac00:08:02:d8:1f:eb/mac ipaddr192.168.0.130/ipaddr descrI.I. nc6000/descr /staticmap staticmap mac00:12:79:ad:c6:fc/mac ipaddr192.168.0.22/ipaddr descrdc5100 teszt/descr /staticmap staticarp/ enable/ dnsserver192.168.1.5/dnsserver dnsserver192.168.1.1/dnsserver /lan opt2 range from192.168.2.254/from to192.168.2.254/to /range defaultleasetime/ maxleasetime/ failover_peerip/ gateway/ staticmap mac00:08:02:d8:ae:23/mac ipaddr192.168.2.130/ipaddr descrKris nc6000/descr /staticmap staticarp/ denyunknown/ enable/ dnsserver192.168.3.3/dnsserver dnsserver192.168.3.1/dnsserver /opt2 /dhcpd -- This email is made from 100% recycled electrons
Re: [pfSense Support] unexpected dhcp lease
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:26:28 -0500 Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are these two logical networks on the same physical network? I'm noticing the request came in on both fxp0 and xl0 - that seems kinda odd. Yes, both network cards are connected to the same switch, but I guess as the deny unknown clients option is enabled on both interfaces (static arp as well) this shouldn't happen. (Not to mention the netmasks.) Sep 28 14:35:03 dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.2.254 (192.168.2.4) from 00:12:79:ad:c6:fc (TRC-dc5100) via fxp0: wrong network. Sep 28 14:35:03 dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.2.254 (192.168.2.4) from 00:12:79:ad:c6:fc (TRC-dc5100) via xl0 --Bill -- This email is made from 100% recycled electrons - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] dyndns and wifi problems in V0.85.2
Hi All, I am testing 0.85.2 installed on a 6GB HD on an old Compaq Deskpro EN SFF (PII 350 Mhz) with 2 x fxp nic and an atheros card. I found 2 problems on this config. 1.) WiFi doesn't work in wep mode if only I isssue an ifconfig ath0 authmode shared command. No matter that I set on the gui the authentication as Shared key (this left empty the authmode in config file). I have tried to insert manually anauthmodeSHARED/authmode line into the wireless section of the config file, without success. I 've tried also to insert a shellcmd in to the config, but maybe I put in the wrong place (at the end of it) because it had no effect. 2.) When I set up DynDNS (I'm using pppoe adsl with dynamic ip's) the system hangs for more then 5 minutes at boot time at starting dyndns client, but what's worst after that it boots up no client can reach the internet. As soon as I disabled dyndns, the net was reachable again. Best regards Imre Ispanovits -- This email is made from 100% recycled electrons - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
