Re: [pfSense Support] Questions about Load Balancing

2005-09-30 Thread Moacyr Leite da Silva
Title: Re: [pfSense Support] Questions about Load Balancing



Hi There,

Well Bill already reply to the Wesley question. 
Anybody could help please with ftp helper and incoming via 
other interfaces like OPT1=WAN1and OPT2=WAN2?
I follow the tips on PfSense blog without 
success.

Thanks,Moacyr Leite da 
Silva

AKADNYX | Segurança | Infraestrutura | Storage | VoIP+55 
19 3241-5688+55 19 9730-1712[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.akadnyx.com.br


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Wesley K. Joyce 

  To: support@pfsense.com 
  Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 10:40 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Questions 
  about Load Balancing
  
  
  
  Hey Moacry, do you notice 
  if itappropriately distributes the load?
  
  I just had a thoughti, if I 
  set the bandwith on the interface to the actual broadband service rate as 
  oppposed to NIC connection speed, would that affect the load 
  balancing?
  
  
  From: Moacyr Leite da Silva 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thu 9/29/2005 8:55 
  PMTo: support@pfsense.comSubject: Re: [pfSense Support] 
  Questions about Load Balancing
  
  Hi Wesley,
  
  I have one box with 3 WAN using load balancing.
  
  WAN ADSL 2MB
  WAN1 FR 1MB
  WAN2 FR 512K
  
  We even dont have this issue now. But we had hard time with 
  ftp-helper, I cant connect with any site. 
  I have issues with HTTPS and policy routing for outgoing 
  connection forced via the WAN (default) interface solved it.
  Also Icould not have policy routing working for 
  incoming connections using WAN1 or WAN2.
  
  my current version is 0.85.6
  
  Any tip?
  
  Thanks,
  Moacyr Leite da Silva
  
  AKADNYX | Segurança | Infraestrutura | Storage | VoIP+55 
  19 3241-5688+55 19 9730-1712[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.akadnyx.com.br
  
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: Wesley K. Joyce 
To: support@pfsense.com 
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 8:41 
PM
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] 
Questions about Load Balancing


Hi Scott, is there a 
solution to this? Am I unique in that I have multiple WAN connections 
of different capacities?

Anyone have another solution?

Thanks




From: Scott Ullrich 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thu 9/29/2005 7:20 
PMTo: support@pfsense.comSubject: 
Re: [pfSense Support] Questions about Load Balancing

Load balancing uses round robin.ScottOn 
9/29/05, Wesley K. Joyce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings, I 
have a Squid PROXY server that I want to use two DSL connections 
that I have with. However, one of them is a 1 megabit 
connection and the other is a 512kbps connections. Based on what I 
have read on the list, I am concerned that the load balancing 
algorithm will NOT distribute 2/3 and 1/3 of the combined 1.5mbps 
for the outgoing traffic over the two connections 
respectively. Am I incorrect in this? Will it maximize each 
connection if they are of difference capacities? 
- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For 
additional commands, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]-To 
unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]For additional 
commands, e-mail: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[pfSense Support] ftp helper using 0.85.6

2005-09-30 Thread Moacyr Leite da Silva
I was unable to access any site with ftp using PfSense 0.85.6

Tested many configurations:

just LAN and WAN
no outgoing load balance
add one rule (first) to allow ftp 
use just the default lan access

Even reset to factory defaults and reconfiguration didnt work for me. 

Any tip or sugestion?

Thanks
Moacyr

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Questions about Load Balancing

2005-09-29 Thread Moacyr Leite da Silva
Title: Re: [pfSense Support] Questions about Load Balancing



Hi Wesley,

I have one box with 3 WAN using load balancing.

WAN ADSL 2MB
WAN1 FR 1MB
WAN2 FR 512K

We even dont have this issue now. But we had hard time with 
ftp-helper, I cant connect with any site. 
I have issues with HTTPS and policy routing for outgoing 
connection forced via the WAN (default) interface solved it.
Also Icould not have policy routing working for incoming 
connections using WAN1 or WAN2.

my current version is 0.85.6

Any tip?

Thanks,
Moacyr Leite da Silva

AKADNYX | Segurança | Infraestrutura | Storage | VoIP+55 
19 3241-5688+55 19 9730-1712[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.akadnyx.com.br



  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Wesley K. Joyce 

  To: support@pfsense.com 
  Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 8:41 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Questions 
  about Load Balancing
  
  
  Hi Scott, is there a 
  solution to this? Am I unique in that I have multiple WAN connections of 
  different capacities?
  
  Anyone have another solution?
  
  Thanks
  
  
  
  
  From: Scott Ullrich 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thu 9/29/2005 7:20 
  PMTo: support@pfsense.comSubject: 
  Re: [pfSense Support] Questions about Load Balancing
  
  Load balancing uses round robin.ScottOn 
  9/29/05, Wesley K. Joyce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings, I 
  have a Squid PROXY server that I want to use two DSL connections that 
  I have with. However, one of them is a 1 megabit connection and 
  the other is a 512kbps connections. Based on what I have read on 
  the list, I am concerned that the load balancing algorithm will NOT 
  distribute 2/3 and 1/3 of the combined 1.5mbps for the outgoing 
  traffic over the two connections respectively. Am I incorrect in 
  this? Will it maximize each connection if they are of difference 
  capacities? 
  - 
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional 
  commands, e-mail: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]-To 
  unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]For additional 
  commands, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [pfSense Support] Upgrade from m0n0 to pfSense?

2005-08-23 Thread Moacyr Leite da Silva
Hi Holger,

I could not have multiwan work here. Tryed with OPT1 and OPT2 for wan, can
you have some example of configuration?

Thanks
Moacyr


- Original Message - 
From: Holger Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 9:15 AM
Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] Upgrade from m0n0 to pfSense?


Hi,

first: pfSense isn't able to do 2 pppoe at the moment. A workaround is to
use a router in front of the second wan of the pfsense and set the pfsense's
second wan ip as dmz in this router.

second: if you want to use loadbalancing I have to disappoint you too. It
needs some work still but should be implemented soon. multiwan however works
(sending out traffic type a via wan1 and type b via wan2).

third: I think nobody has tested uploading a pfsense-image to the m0n0
webgui. It might be possible if you raise the php-upload-size of the m0n0
first to accept the larger image and if you have enough room to upload it.
there will be a much smaller cf-image with one of the next versions, so you
might just want to wait for that.

Holger

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. August 2005 11:52
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: [pfSense Support] Upgrade from m0n0 to pfSense?


Hi,

is it possible to upgrade from a CF-Card Version of m0n0wall to pfSense?
pfSense seems to be more reasonable to me, due to need of two PPPoE
Connections...

Regards,

Tim

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Upgrade from m0n0 to pfSense?

2005-08-23 Thread Moacyr Leite da Silva
I did this with 0.74 and 0.76 but no sucess.

I have one LAN and three WAN.
put gateway in the OPT1 and OPT2 interfaces
created nat outbound for lan via WAN OPT1 and OPT2
created rules for http for each interface

by now reading again the post of multi-wan in the blogspot I have doubt
about the rules. I can have outgoing http for X machines via WAN and other
rule for Y machines via OPT1?

I will test this again.

Thanks
Moacyr



- Original Message - 
From: Holger Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Moacyr Leite da Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]; support@pfsense.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 10:11 AM
Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] Upgrade from m0n0 to pfSense?


http://pfsense.blogspot.com/2005/06/multi-wan.html

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Moacyr Leite da Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. August 2005 14:30
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: Re: [pfSense Support] Upgrade from m0n0 to pfSense?


Hi Holger,

I could not have multiwan work here. Tryed with OPT1 and OPT2 for wan, can
you have some example of configuration?

Thanks
Moacyr


- Original Message - 
From: Holger Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 9:15 AM
Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] Upgrade from m0n0 to pfSense?


Hi,

first: pfSense isn't able to do 2 pppoe at the moment. A workaround is to
use a router in front of the second wan of the pfsense and set the pfsense's
second wan ip as dmz in this router.

second: if you want to use loadbalancing I have to disappoint you too. It
needs some work still but should be implemented soon. multiwan however works
(sending out traffic type a via wan1 and type b via wan2).

third: I think nobody has tested uploading a pfsense-image to the m0n0
webgui. It might be possible if you raise the php-upload-size of the m0n0
first to accept the larger image and if you have enough room to upload it.
there will be a much smaller cf-image with one of the next versions, so you
might just want to wait for that.

Holger

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. August 2005 11:52
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: [pfSense Support] Upgrade from m0n0 to pfSense?


Hi,

is it possible to upgrade from a CF-Card Version of m0n0wall to pfSense?
pfSense seems to be more reasonable to me, due to need of two PPPoE
Connections...

Regards,

Tim

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]