RE: [pfSense Support] Wanted: Tips for a VLAN capable switch (for home use)
I use HP Procurve 2626 switches around 350 on ebay most days From: Nelson Papel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 2:28 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Wanted: Tips for a VLAN capable switch (for home use) A Nortel Baystack 450-24, they are dirt cheap on Ebay ($15-30). I used one for a couple years with no faults. Also the Cisco 2924 and 2950, but those are a bit pricier. From: Victor Padro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 0:46 To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Wanted: Tips for a VLAN capable switch (for home use) I'm about to buy one myself, cos my old 1900 Catalyst can't handle VLANs properly. Anyone has experienced 3com baseline 2226 switch? I was even thinking of getting the Linksys SLM2008 for its cheap price, any suggestions? P.S. here in mexico I can't find the HP Procurve switches for less than 560 dls. Saludos. Victor. On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Espen Johansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not for those swtiches they are EOL and you can get it with any cisco login. On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Paul Mansfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Espen Johansen wrote: all. And most of them come with Enterprise Image (if you need the newest image, email me offlist and I'll get it for you. erm, IOS updates are a commercial service from Cisco, so it's probably not a wise move to offer this kind of help on a public mailing list! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE: [pfSense Support] Port forward nating confusion (non html)
I was able to solve all of my issues except one. I have a second pfsense unit with an (remote lan is 192.168.2.0 ) ipsec sa covering the Opt 1 subnet I have 69.28.70.72 nated to 192.168.19.3 I need to connect to connect from a pc 192.168.2.5 to 69.28.70.72 but I can't figure out what rule I need. -Original Message- From: Ryan L. Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 9:53 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Port forward nating confusion (non html) Sorry about the HTML From: Ryan L. Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 9:52 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: [pfSense Support] Port forward nating confusion I have what I thought is a simple setup, I am sure I am missing something please help WAN = 209.208.9.205/255.255.255.252 LAN = 192.168.19.0/255.255.255.0 OPT 1 = 69.28.70.64/255.255.255.224 I have machines on both LAN and OPT1 which can connect out and receive connections (appropriately per rules) however I have been unable to nat the address 69.28.70.70 to 192.168.19.3 (https) no matter what I do the connection times out, is there a prior post dealing with this setup I could be pointed to. If not I would value the groups assistance . Thank you Ryan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] Port forward nating confusion
I have what I thought is a simple setup, I am sure I am missing something please help WAN = 209.208.9.205/255.255.255.252 LAN = 192.168.19.0/255.255.255.0 OPT 1 = 69.28.70.64/255.255.255.224 I have machines on both LAN and OPT1 which can connect out and receive connections (appropriately per rules) however I have been unable to nat the address 69.28.70.70 to 192.168.19.3 (https) no matter what I do the connection times out, is there a prior post dealing with this setup I could be pointed to. If not I would value the groups assistance . Thank you Ryan
RE: [pfSense Support] Port forward nating confusion (non html)
Sorry about the HTML From: Ryan L. Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 9:52 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: [pfSense Support] Port forward nating confusion I have what I thought is a simple setup, I am sure I am missing something please help WAN = 209.208.9.205/255.255.255.252 LAN = 192.168.19.0/255.255.255.0 OPT 1 = 69.28.70.64/255.255.255.224 I have machines on both LAN and OPT1 which can connect out and receive connections (appropriately per rules) however I have been unable to nat the address 69.28.70.70 to 192.168.19.3 (https) no matter what I do the connection times out, is there a prior post dealing with this setup I could be pointed to. If not I would value the groups assistance . Thank you Ryan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] pfSense custom build using FreeBSD 7-Current
I know this is unsupported however on my own I would like to build and test this configuration specifically to test vlan support in the vr driver. Has anyone successfully operated pfSense in this configuration before. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] SOEKRIS NET5501
I am new to Freebsd in general and pfSense I am using 1.2RC2 embedded on a Soekris Net5501, the unit has 4 nics which default to the vr driver. This is reporting as no vlan support an suggestions Soekris indicated these nics should support vlans. Can this be worked around at this time or do I need to look into Intel Pro+ adapters?
RE: [pfSense Support] SOEKRIS NET5501
Thanks using your link I noticed in R7 this is supported is there anyway I can upgrade my unit to release 7 (I know its prerlease) -Original Message- From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 10:27 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] SOEKRIS NET5501 Per http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=vlanapropos=0sektion=0manpath=FreeBSD+6.2-RELEASEformat=html vr(4) doesn't support oversize frames. Without this support your firewall will fragment frames - due to the issues this causes, we do not support vlan configurations on hardware that isn't listed on the vlan(4) man page. --Bill On 10/10/07, Ryan L. Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am new to Freebsd in general and pfSense I am using 1.2RC2 embedded on a Soekris Net5501, the unit has 4 nics which default to the vr driver. This is reporting as no vlan support an suggestions Soekris indicated these nics should support vlans. Can this be worked around at this time or do I need to look into Intel Pro+ adapters? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
