[pfSense Support] R: [pfSense Support] Publishing over 2 WAN connections

2007-05-10 Thread Quirino Santilli
As I wrote: OPT1: 192.168.0.200/24, so this is not the lan interface, but the 
OPT1...

-Messaggio originale-
Da: sai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Inviato: martedì 8 maggio 2007 10.43
A: support@pfsense.com
Oggetto: Re: [pfSense Support] Publishing over 2 WAN connections

172.16.0.2:80 - 192.168.0.200:80 - 192.168.0.36:4196
SYN_SENT:ESTABLISHED.

This is a connection from your LAN not from OPT.

sai

On 5/8/07, Quirino Santilli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi All,



 I'm dealing again with the task of publishing my servers' services over two
 different internet connections (in conjuncion with load balancing outgoing
 traffic over the same internet connections).



 Now I'll give you more detailed informations.



 My firewall is a pc with pfsense upgraded at the latest version available
 (pfSense-Full-Update-1.2-BETA-1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-05-02-07).
 It has three interfaces Lan, Wan and Opt1:



 LAN: 172.16.0.1/24

 WAN: 217.x.x.202/27 - with gw 217.x.x.193

 OPT1: 192.168.0.200/24 - with gw 192.168.0.1



 In my internal network I have a web server with the ip address 172.16.0.2.



 I NAT'ed the port 80 using Port Forward on both WAN and OPT1 using the
 address of the internal web server (172.16.0.2).

 The strange thing is that if i try  to access my web server from the WAN ip
 address, everything works correctly and I can browse my web pages, but if i
 try to browse the web server using the OPT1 address, both using telnet on
 port 80 and internet explorer, the connection times out. The content of the
 firewall states related to this problem is: 172.16.0.2:80 -
 192.168.0.200:80 - 192.168.0.36:4196 SYN_SENT:ESTABLISHED.



 Furthermore, even if I explicitly deny the ICMP traffic on the OPT1
 interface, it replies to ping requests.



 All the described problems doesn't happen if I remove the gateway from the
 OPT1's interface configuration (but this is needed for policy routing in
 multi wan environments)



 Can you help me?



 Regards



 r3N0oV4



 P.S.: This is the second post of my question because no one answered to me.
 There's something wrong in it?



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[pfSense Support] Publishing over 2 WAN connections

2007-05-08 Thread Quirino Santilli
Hi All,

 

I'm dealing again with the task of publishing my servers' services over
two different internet connections (in conjuncion with load balancing
outgoing traffic over the same internet connections).

 

Now I'll give you more detailed informations.

 

My firewall is a pc with pfsense upgraded at the latest version
available (pfSense-Full-Update-1.2-BETA-1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-05-02-07). It
has three interfaces Lan, Wan and Opt1:

 

LAN: 172.16.0.1/24

WAN: 217.x.x.202/27 - with gw 217.x.x.193

OPT1: 192.168.0.200/24 - with gw 192.168.0.1

 

In my internal network I have a web server with the ip address
172.16.0.2.

 

I NAT'ed the port 80 using Port Forward on both WAN and OPT1 using the
address of the internal web server (172.16.0.2).

The strange thing is that if i try  to access my web server from the WAN
ip address, everything works correctly and I can browse my web pages,
but if i try to browse the web server using the OPT1 address, both using
telnet on port 80 and internet explorer, the connection times out. The
content of the firewall states related to this problem is: 172.16.0.2:80
- 192.168.0.200:80 - 192.168.0.36:4196 SYN_SENT:ESTABLISHED.

 

Furthermore, even if I explicitly deny the ICMP traffic on the OPT1
interface, it replies to ping requests.

 

All the described problems doesn't happen if I remove the gateway from
the OPT1's interface configuration (but this is needed for policy
routing in multi wan environments)

 

Can you help me?

 

Regards

 

r3N0oV4

 

P.S.: This is the second post of my question because no one answered to
me. There's something wrong in it?

 



Re: [pfSense Support] Publishing over 2 WAN connections

2007-05-08 Thread sai

172.16.0.2:80 - 192.168.0.200:80 - 192.168.0.36:4196
SYN_SENT:ESTABLISHED.

This is a connection from your LAN not from OPT.

sai

On 5/8/07, Quirino Santilli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi All,



I'm dealing again with the task of publishing my servers' services over two
different internet connections (in conjuncion with load balancing outgoing
traffic over the same internet connections).



Now I'll give you more detailed informations.



My firewall is a pc with pfsense upgraded at the latest version available
(pfSense-Full-Update-1.2-BETA-1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-05-02-07).
It has three interfaces Lan, Wan and Opt1:



LAN: 172.16.0.1/24

WAN: 217.x.x.202/27 – with gw 217.x.x.193

OPT1: 192.168.0.200/24 – with gw 192.168.0.1



In my internal network I have a web server with the ip address 172.16.0.2.



I NAT'ed the port 80 using Port Forward on both WAN and OPT1 using the
address of the internal web server (172.16.0.2).

The strange thing is that if i try  to access my web server from the WAN ip
address, everything works correctly and I can browse my web pages, but if i
try to browse the web server using the OPT1 address, both using telnet on
port 80 and internet explorer, the connection times out. The content of the
firewall states related to this problem is: 172.16.0.2:80 -
192.168.0.200:80 - 192.168.0.36:4196 SYN_SENT:ESTABLISHED.



Furthermore, even if I explicitly deny the ICMP traffic on the OPT1
interface, it replies to ping requests.



All the described problems doesn't happen if I remove the gateway from the
OPT1's interface configuration (but this is needed for policy routing in
multi wan environments)



Can you help me?



Regards



r3N0oV4



P.S.: This is the second post of my question because no one answered to me.
There's something wrong in it?




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[pfSense Support] Publishing over 2 WAN connections

2007-05-04 Thread Quirino Santilli
Hi All,

 

I'm dealing again with the task of publishing my servers' services over
two different internet connections (in conjuncion with load balancing
outgoing traffic over the same internet connections).

 

Now I'll give you more detailed informations.

 

My firewall is a pc with pfsense upgraded at the latest version
available (pfSense-Full-Update-1.2-BETA-1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-05-02-07). It
has three interfaces Lan, Wan and Opt1:

 

LAN: 172.16.0.1/24

WAN: 217.x.x.202/27 - with gw 217.x.x.193

OPT1: 192.168.0.200/24 - with gw 192.168.0.1

 

In my internal network I have a web server with the ip address
172.16.0.2.

 

I NAT'ed the port 80 using Port Forward on both WAN and OPT1 using the
address of the internal web server (172.16.0.2).

The strange thing is that if i try  to access my web server from the WAN
ip address, everything works correctly and I can browse my web pages,
but if i try to browse the web server using the OPT1 address, both using
telnet on port 80 and internet explorer, the connection times out. The
content of the firewall states related to this problem is: 172.16.0.2:80
- 192.168.0.200:80 - 192.168.0.36:4196 SYN_SENT:ESTABLISHED.

 

Furthermore, even if I explicitly deny the ICMP traffic on the OPT1
interface, it replies to ping requests.

 

All the described problems doesn't happen if I remove the gateway from
the OPT1's interface configuration (but this is needed for policy
routing in multi wan environments)

 

Can you help me?

 

Regards

 

r3N0oV4

 



Re: [pfSense Support] Publishing over 2 WAN Connections

2007-05-03 Thread sai

You mean that you can access the web site using one IP address, but
not the other IP address? Or are you using the domain name?

What does the states page show about the connections that are made/attempted?

sai


On 5/2/07, Quirino Santilli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hello,

I was trying to publish a web server over both my 2 wan connections, but
only one is working properly.

It's important to say that I already created a balancer pool that seems to
work correctly.

I also tried to change the gateway in the allow rules, but nothing changed.

Is there something I missed?



Regards



r3N0oV4


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[pfSense Support] R: [pfSense Support] Publishing over 2 WAN Connections

2007-05-03 Thread Quirino Santilli
My Firewall states underline the fact that the connection between the client 
and the web server remains pending.
I already encountered a similar situation, and the problem was related with the 
web server which was not using the publishing firewall as the default gateway.
Now the default gateway is right but I really don't know what to change in the 
firewall configuration to make the web server's answer packets come backup 
through the same public interface...

Regards

r3n0ov4
-Messaggio originale-
Da: sai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Inviato: giovedì 3 maggio 2007 10.41
A: support@pfsense.com
Oggetto: Re: [pfSense Support] Publishing over 2 WAN Connections

You mean that you can access the web site using one IP address, but
not the other IP address? Or are you using the domain name?

What does the states page show about the connections that are made/attempted?

sai


On 5/2/07, Quirino Santilli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello,

 I was trying to publish a web server over both my 2 wan connections, but
 only one is working properly.

 It's important to say that I already created a balancer pool that seems to
 work correctly.

 I also tried to change the gateway in the allow rules, but nothing changed.

 Is there something I missed?



 Regards



 r3N0oV4

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[pfSense Support] Publishing over 2 WAN Connections

2007-05-02 Thread Quirino Santilli
Hello,

 

I was trying to publish a web server over both my 2 wan connections, but
only one is working properly.

It's important to say that I already created a balancer pool that seems
to work correctly.

I also tried to change the gateway in the allow rules, but nothing
changed.

Is there something I missed?

 

Regards

 

r3N0oV4