[pfSense Support] pfsense and DDOS

2011-02-01 Thread David Burgess
An article popped up on /. today, and although it's a poorly written
article, some of the ensuing discussion did provoke some thought.

http://it.slashdot.org/story/11/02/01/181200/Firewalls-Make-DDoS-Attacks-Worse

I think the article is mostly just scare marketing, but it raises the
question of how a firewall would best react to a DDOS scenario. I
recently read a page in the pfsense docs (can't find it in the wiki or
FAQ now), which I believe quoted the pfsense book (don't have it),
where cmb states that pfsense is the best open source firewall, and
one of the best firewalls at handling DDOS attacks.

So the thing I'm wondering now, is best practice in terms of hardening
pfsense against DDOS. Acknowledging that DDOS is best handled in
cooperation with your provider, what can we do at our end? Or are the
default firewall settings pretty tight in that regard? Is there
anything one might do that would inadvertently expose one's pfsense to
DDOS-related troubles?

db

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense and DDOS

2011-02-01 Thread Charles N Wyble
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 02/01/2011 11:25 AM, David Burgess wrote:
 An article popped up on /. today, and although it's a poorly written
 article, some of the ensuing discussion did provoke some thought.
 
 http://it.slashdot.org/story/11/02/01/181200/Firewalls-Make-DDoS-Attacks-Worse

Firewalls do make DDOS attacks worse in front of a large web farm. The
state tables get exhausted very quickly. The various large web farms out
there don't have a firewall in front of them. Just run limited ports.

Of course they also have load balancers, packet sprayers, CDN etc. Not
your typical environment.



 
 
 So the thing I'm wondering now, is best practice in terms of hardening
 pfsense against DDOS. 

If it's a well executed DDOS, they can take you out with just a few
thousand pps. Just gotta know how to flood the session/state tables.
Granted with pfsense and an x86 box with lots of ram/cpu you'll probably
be fine for quite a while.

Do some research into the hardware router/firewall vs software based one
(in particular Linux based firewalling/routing) and you'll find all
sorts of material. BSD seems more mature.

- -- 
Charles N Wyble (char...@knownelement.com)
Systems craftsman for the stars
http://www.knownelement.com
Mobile: 626 539 4344
Office: 310 929 8793
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=Nb1x
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense and DDOS

2011-02-01 Thread Chris Buechler
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 2:25 PM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
 An article popped up on /. today, and although it's a poorly written
 article, some of the ensuing discussion did provoke some thought.

 http://it.slashdot.org/story/11/02/01/181200/Firewalls-Make-DDoS-Attacks-Worse

 I think the article is mostly just scare marketing, but it raises the
 question of how a firewall would best react to a DDOS scenario.

The article would be more accurate to say network components that are
inadequately sized or configured to handle a DDoS attack make them
worse. I've seen DDoS attacks with a packet rate to kill a Cisco
router at the edge with as simple of a routing configuration as can
possibly exist, but not nearly enough to kill the firewall sitting
behind it. For most of us, it matters none, we simply don't have
enough bandwidth, unless it's a lame attacker or you have a 10 Gb
Internet pipe (even that wouldn't be nearly enough for some attacks).

From experience fighting a number of DDoS attacks, what generally
happens is they'll throw enough at you to knock you offline, whatever
that takes. If you're running with a default 1 state table that
doesn't take much. Increase that and the attack gets bigger. At which
point you may max out your hardware's ability to handle states. Drop
in a box with more RAM and a much bigger state table, PF state timer
tweaks that can help when you have very high rates of state insertions
and deletions, and the attack gets bigger still - usually at this
point exhausting your Internet bandwidth. At which point you're stuck,
your ISP has to help you, nothing you put in place is going to relieve
the fact that your pipe is full. Usually they'll blackhole route the
affected IP so all your other IPs can function normally, and may do
other things depending on their infrastructure and the specific
attack. That's oversimplified a bit, but they've all followed that
same line.

If not properly sized and configured to handle a DDoS of the scale you
may see in your environment, yes your firewall is probably going to be
the first thing to fall over (unless you have an inadequate router in
front of it). But it really doesn't matter as if it does stand up,
experience at the level that virtually all of us are responsible for
(1-2 Gb Internet at most), they're going to kill your connection
regardless of what you have behind it.

If you're Google, Facebook, Yahoo, etc. yeah, you don't want firewalls
in front of your web farm. If you have a few hundred servers or less
(varying depending on specifics of the environment), it virtually
never matters, make sure you have decent settings in place to handle
as much as possible, and have a good relationship with your provider
and discuss with them in advance what they will do to help if you're
hit with a DDoS, and don't worry about it. Having a firewall as a
single ingress and egress point into small to mid sized hosting
environments is beneficial for many reasons, and properly sized and
configured it's not going to leave you any worse off when under DDoS
attack than you're going to be anyway.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense and DDOS

2011-02-01 Thread Sean Cavanaugh

sorry for top post.

Some better ISPs have options for rate limiting your connection in the event 
of a DDOS, meaning their systems will take the brunt of the hit and not 
route it to your firewall. this can vary from temporarily offlining you to 
absorb the packet storm or dropping connection attempts after a set pps 
level.


then again, this is also what right sizing your system load to handle and 
making proper systems to handle the load. there has to be some set level at 
which you will just stop trying to stay online and just offline yourself so 
as not to be absorbing useless traffic.


In general I disagree with the idea as some servers/services are harder to 
recover from DDOS attacks than the firewall filling its state table and 
slowly dumping them. I've seen webservers going into full kernel panics 
where a firewall/router taking the hit would have just locked up for a 
minute or so.


In general it should be a multi-staged approach, not a single piece of 
wondergear doing everything.


-Sean

-Original Message- 
From: Charles N Wyble

Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 6:39 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense and DDOS

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 02/01/2011 11:25 AM, David Burgess wrote:

An article popped up on /. today, and although it's a poorly written
article, some of the ensuing discussion did provoke some thought.

http://it.slashdot.org/story/11/02/01/181200/Firewalls-Make-DDoS-Attacks-Worse


Firewalls do make DDOS attacks worse in front of a large web farm. The
state tables get exhausted very quickly. The various large web farms out
there don't have a firewall in front of them. Just run limited ports.

Of course they also have load balancers, packet sprayers, CDN etc. Not
your typical environment.






So the thing I'm wondering now, is best practice in terms of hardening
pfsense against DDOS.


If it's a well executed DDOS, they can take you out with just a few
thousand pps. Just gotta know how to flood the session/state tables.
Granted with pfsense and an x86 box with lots of ram/cpu you'll probably
be fine for quite a while.

Do some research into the hardware router/firewall vs software based one
(in particular Linux based firewalling/routing) and you'll find all
sorts of material. BSD seems more mature.

- -- 
Charles N Wyble (char...@knownelement.com)

Systems craftsman for the stars
http://www.knownelement.com
Mobile: 626 539 4344
Office: 310 929 8793
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=Nb1x
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org