Re: [pfSense Support] Re: PPTP and NAT

2008-07-23 Thread Ermal Luçi
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 1:48 AM, Ugo Bellavance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Tim Dickson wrote:

 Yes


Grab a 1.2.1 snapshot after 1 hour or so and test it.


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-- 
Ermal

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [pfSense Support] Re: PPTP and NAT

2008-07-22 Thread Tim Dickson
Yes ;)

-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ugo Bellavance
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 3:50 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Re: PPTP and NAT

Chris Buechler wrote:
 Ugo Bellavance wrote:
 Hi,

 Is there a way to make it possible to have computers behind a 
 Natting pfsense to connect to a PPTP server on the net?  More than one 
 concurrent PPTP connection?
 

http://www.pfsense.org/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=40Itemid=4
3 
 
 PPTP and GRE Limitation - The state tracking code in pf for the GRE 
 protocol can only track a single session per public IP per external 
 server. This means if you use PPTP VPN connections, only one internal 
 machine can connect simultaneously to a PPTP server on the Internet. A 
 thousand machines can connect simultaneously to a thousand different 
 PPTP servers, but only one simultaneously to a single server. The only 
 available work around is to use multiple public IPs on your firewall, 
 one per client, or to use multiple public IPs on the external PPTP 
 server. This is not a problem with other types of VPN connections. A 
 solution for this is currently under development. 

Ok, will a 1-to-1 NAT work?

Regards,


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Re: PPTP and NAT

2008-07-22 Thread Ermal Luçi
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:42 AM, Ugo Bellavance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Ugo Bellavance wrote:

 Hi,

Is there a way to make it possible to have computers behind a Natting
 pfsense to connect to a PPTP server on the net?  More than one concurrent
 PPTP connection?

 I forgot to add that we're using PPTP to connect remotely.  We could
 probably find another way to connect if we would need to make outgoing PPTP
 work.


Actually i have the fix for multiple outgoing PPTP to the same site
just tracing a problem it has for redirecting the PPTP connections if
you want to test it i will be happy to supply something.


 Regards,

 Ugo


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-- 
Ermal

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [pfSense Support] Re: PPTP and NAT

2008-07-21 Thread Tim Dickson
Find another method, or set up an outside IP for every client.
-Tim

-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ugo Bellavance
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 3:43 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Re: PPTP and NAT

Ugo Bellavance wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Is there a way to make it possible to have computers behind a 
 Natting pfsense to connect to a PPTP server on the net?  More than one 
 concurrent PPTP connection?

I forgot to add that we're using PPTP to connect remotely.  We could 
probably find another way to connect if we would need to make outgoing 
PPTP work.

Regards,

Ugo


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]