RE: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib
This has been added to the next version of bsnmp from what I understand (see Sumer of Code patches for bsnmp) but the new version of bsnmpd hasn’t been released yet. I also don’t have a ETA. From: John Cianfarani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 7:01 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib Is there a mib for polling CPU on pfsense, I went through the entire walk and tried some of the standard ones but couldn’t find it. John
Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib
In addition the SoC patches was crashing our build so we backed them out. On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > This has been added to the next version of bsnmp from what I understand (see > Sumer of Code patches for bsnmp) but the new version of bsnmpd hasn't been > released yet. I also don't have a ETA. > > > > > > > From: John Cianfarani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 7:01 PM > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > > > Is there a mib for polling CPU on pfsense, I went through the entire walk > and tried some of the standard ones but couldn't find it. > > > > John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib
At 02:59 PM 1/17/2006, you wrote: In addition the SoC patches was crashing our build so we backed them out. Honestly, you're SO picky! :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib
Yea, I need to follow up on that. I think Harti addressed the buildworld issues, but I'm not sure. I recall there were some fixes added when he imported it to his bsnmp vendor tree. -Original Message- From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:59 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib In addition the SoC patches was crashing our build so we backed them out. On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > This has been added to the next version of bsnmp from what I understand (see > Sumer of Code patches for bsnmp) but the new version of bsnmpd hasn't been > released yet. I also don't have a ETA. > > > > > > > From: John Cianfarani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 7:01 PM > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > > > Is there a mib for polling CPU on pfsense, I went through the entire walk > and tried some of the standard ones but couldn't find it. > > > > John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib
Should we be using this "vendor" tree of theirs instead? On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yea, I need to follow up on that. I think Harti addressed the buildworld > issues, but I'm not sure. I recall there were some fixes added when he > imported it to his bsnmp vendor tree. > > -Original Message- > From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:59 PM > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > In addition the SoC patches was crashing our build so we backed them > out. > > On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > This has been added to the next version of bsnmp from what I > understand (see > > Sumer of Code patches for bsnmp) but the new version of bsnmpd hasn't > been > > released yet. I also don't have a ETA. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: John Cianfarani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 7:01 PM > > To: support@pfsense.com > > Subject: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > > > > > > > Is there a mib for polling CPU on pfsense, I went through the entire > walk > > and tried some of the standard ones but couldn't find it. > > > > > > > > John > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib
My thoughts are no unless we control when we do checkouts, meaning we keep a private bsnmp tree and somehow add it to the fbsd tree when we kick off a buildworld. My feeling is the vendor tree is sort of like tracking current, where it could be broken at any point in time. What do you think? -Original Message- From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 2:11 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib Should we be using this "vendor" tree of theirs instead? On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yea, I need to follow up on that. I think Harti addressed the buildworld > issues, but I'm not sure. I recall there were some fixes added when he > imported it to his bsnmp vendor tree. > > -Original Message- > From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:59 PM > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > In addition the SoC patches was crashing our build so we backed them > out. > > On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > This has been added to the next version of bsnmp from what I > understand (see > > Sumer of Code patches for bsnmp) but the new version of bsnmpd hasn't > been > > released yet. I also don't have a ETA. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: John Cianfarani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 7:01 PM > > To: support@pfsense.com > > Subject: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > > > > > > > Is there a mib for polling CPU on pfsense, I went through the entire > walk > > and tried some of the standard ones but couldn't find it. > > > > > > > > John > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib
Sure. I'm testing building bsnmpd from -current now. On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My thoughts are no unless we control when we do checkouts, meaning we > keep a private bsnmp tree and somehow add it to the fbsd tree when we > kick off a buildworld. My feeling is the vendor tree is sort of like > tracking current, where it could be broken at any point in time. > > What do you think? > > -Original Message- > From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 2:11 PM > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > Should we be using this "vendor" tree of theirs instead? > > On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yea, I need to follow up on that. I think Harti addressed the > buildworld > > issues, but I'm not sure. I recall there were some fixes added when he > > imported it to his bsnmp vendor tree. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:59 PM > > To: support@pfsense.com > > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > > > In addition the SoC patches was crashing our build so we backed them > > out. > > > > On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > This has been added to the next version of bsnmp from what I > > understand (see > > > Sumer of Code patches for bsnmp) but the new version of bsnmpd > hasn't > > been > > > released yet. I also don't have a ETA. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: John Cianfarani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 7:01 PM > > > To: support@pfsense.com > > > Subject: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there a mib for polling CPU on pfsense, I went through the entire > > walk > > > and tried some of the standard ones but couldn't find it. > > > > > > > > > > > > John > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib
Oh btw my community patch is in head so it shouldn't be needed. -Original Message- From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 3:42 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib Sure. I'm testing building bsnmpd from -current now. On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My thoughts are no unless we control when we do checkouts, meaning we > keep a private bsnmp tree and somehow add it to the fbsd tree when we > kick off a buildworld. My feeling is the vendor tree is sort of like > tracking current, where it could be broken at any point in time. > > What do you think? > > -Original Message- > From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 2:11 PM > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > Should we be using this "vendor" tree of theirs instead? > > On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yea, I need to follow up on that. I think Harti addressed the > buildworld > > issues, but I'm not sure. I recall there were some fixes added when he > > imported it to his bsnmp vendor tree. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:59 PM > > To: support@pfsense.com > > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > > > In addition the SoC patches was crashing our build so we backed them > > out. > > > > On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > This has been added to the next version of bsnmp from what I > > understand (see > > > Sumer of Code patches for bsnmp) but the new version of bsnmpd > hasn't > > been > > > released yet. I also don't have a ETA. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: John Cianfarani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 7:01 PM > > > To: support@pfsense.com > > > Subject: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there a mib for polling CPU on pfsense, I went through the entire > > walk > > > and tried some of the standard ones but couldn't find it. > > > > > > > > > > > > John > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib
Doh. Let me mark that out. On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh btw my community patch is in head so it shouldn't be needed. > > -Original Message- > From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 3:42 PM > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > Sure. I'm testing building bsnmpd from -current now. > > On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My thoughts are no unless we control when we do checkouts, meaning we > > keep a private bsnmp tree and somehow add it to the fbsd tree when we > > kick off a buildworld. My feeling is the vendor tree is sort of like > > tracking current, where it could be broken at any point in time. > > > > What do you think? > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 2:11 PM > > To: support@pfsense.com > > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > > > Should we be using this "vendor" tree of theirs instead? > > > > On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Yea, I need to follow up on that. I think Harti addressed the > > buildworld > > > issues, but I'm not sure. I recall there were some fixes added when > he > > > imported it to his bsnmp vendor tree. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:59 PM > > > To: support@pfsense.com > > > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > > > > > In addition the SoC patches was crashing our build so we backed them > > > out. > > > > > > On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This has been added to the next version of bsnmp from what I > > > understand (see > > > > Sumer of Code patches for bsnmp) but the new version of bsnmpd > > hasn't > > > been > > > > released yet. I also don't have a ETA. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: John Cianfarani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 7:01 PM > > > > To: support@pfsense.com > > > > Subject: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there a mib for polling CPU on pfsense, I went through the > entire > > > walk > > > > and tried some of the standard ones but couldn't find it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib
Just so we're clear, it need to stay in the pfSense builds unless you start using bsnmp head. :) -Original Message- From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 3:46 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib Doh. Let me mark that out. On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh btw my community patch is in head so it shouldn't be needed. > > -Original Message- > From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 3:42 PM > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > Sure. I'm testing building bsnmpd from -current now. > > On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My thoughts are no unless we control when we do checkouts, meaning we > > keep a private bsnmp tree and somehow add it to the fbsd tree when we > > kick off a buildworld. My feeling is the vendor tree is sort of like > > tracking current, where it could be broken at any point in time. > > > > What do you think? > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 2:11 PM > > To: support@pfsense.com > > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > > > Should we be using this "vendor" tree of theirs instead? > > > > On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Yea, I need to follow up on that. I think Harti addressed the > > buildworld > > > issues, but I'm not sure. I recall there were some fixes added when > he > > > imported it to his bsnmp vendor tree. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:59 PM > > > To: support@pfsense.com > > > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > > > > > In addition the SoC patches was crashing our build so we backed them > > > out. > > > > > > On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This has been added to the next version of bsnmp from what I > > > understand (see > > > > Sumer of Code patches for bsnmp) but the new version of bsnmpd > > hasn't > > > been > > > > released yet. I also don't have a ETA. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: John Cianfarani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 7:01 PM > > > > To: support@pfsense.com > > > > Subject: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there a mib for polling CPU on pfsense, I went through the > entire > > > walk > > > > and tried some of the standard ones but couldn't find it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib
Thast what I am planningon doing if it works (ship currents bsnmpd) On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just so we're clear, it need to stay in the pfSense builds unless you > start using bsnmp head. :) > > -Original Message- > From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 3:46 PM > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > Doh. Let me mark that out. > > > On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oh btw my community patch is in head so it shouldn't be needed. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 3:42 PM > > To: support@pfsense.com > > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > > > Sure. I'm testing building bsnmpd from -current now. > > > > On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > My thoughts are no unless we control when we do checkouts, meaning > we > > > keep a private bsnmp tree and somehow add it to the fbsd tree when > we > > > kick off a buildworld. My feeling is the vendor tree is sort of like > > > tracking current, where it could be broken at any point in time. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 2:11 PM > > > To: support@pfsense.com > > > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > > > > > Should we be using this "vendor" tree of theirs instead? > > > > > > On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > Yea, I need to follow up on that. I think Harti addressed the > > > buildworld > > > > issues, but I'm not sure. I recall there were some fixes added > when > > he > > > > imported it to his bsnmp vendor tree. > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:59 PM > > > > To: support@pfsense.com > > > > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > > > > > > > In addition the SoC patches was crashing our build so we backed > them > > > > out. > > > > > > > > On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This has been added to the next version of bsnmp from what I > > > > understand (see > > > > > Sumer of Code patches for bsnmp) but the new version of bsnmpd > > > hasn't > > > > been > > > > > released yet. I also don't have a ETA. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: John Cianfarani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 7:01 PM > > > > > To: support@pfsense.com > > > > > Subject: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there a mib for polling CPU on pfsense, I went through the > > entire > > > > walk > > > > > and tried some of the standard ones but couldn't find it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib
Cool. -Original Message- From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 4:07 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib Thast what I am planningon doing if it works (ship currents bsnmpd) On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just so we're clear, it need to stay in the pfSense builds unless you > start using bsnmp head. :) > > -Original Message- > From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 3:46 PM > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > Doh. Let me mark that out. > > > On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oh btw my community patch is in head so it shouldn't be needed. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 3:42 PM > > To: support@pfsense.com > > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > > > Sure. I'm testing building bsnmpd from -current now. > > > > On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > My thoughts are no unless we control when we do checkouts, meaning > we > > > keep a private bsnmp tree and somehow add it to the fbsd tree when > we > > > kick off a buildworld. My feeling is the vendor tree is sort of like > > > tracking current, where it could be broken at any point in time. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 2:11 PM > > > To: support@pfsense.com > > > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > > > > > Should we be using this "vendor" tree of theirs instead? > > > > > > On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > Yea, I need to follow up on that. I think Harti addressed the > > > buildworld > > > > issues, but I'm not sure. I recall there were some fixes added > when > > he > > > > imported it to his bsnmp vendor tree. > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:59 PM > > > > To: support@pfsense.com > > > > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > > > > > > > In addition the SoC patches was crashing our build so we backed > them > > > > out. > > > > > > > > On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This has been added to the next version of bsnmp from what I > > > > understand (see > > > > > Sumer of Code patches for bsnmp) but the new version of bsnmpd > > > hasn't > > > > been > > > > > released yet. I also don't have a ETA. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: John Cianfarani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 7:01 PM > > > > > To: support@pfsense.com > > > > > Subject: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there a mib for polling CPU on pfsense, I went through the > > entire > > > > walk > > > > > and tried some of the standard ones but couldn't find it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > &g
