Re: [pfSense Support] throughput tuning in 2.0

2011-03-01 Thread David Burgess
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Seth Mos  wrote:

> I'm routing it from one interface to another although it's destination is
> also a VLAN on that other interface. Maybe that's where the issue lies.

It would be unfortunate if vlan-vlan traffic on a given interface has
its maximum throughput reduced by almost half. I would be interested
to see how your throughput would differ using two distinct physical
interfaces, all else being equal.

db

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] throughput tuning in 2.0

2011-03-01 Thread Seth Mos

Op 2-3-2011 3:44, David Burgess schreef:

2.0-RC1 (amd64)
built on Tue Mar 1 15:52:28 EST 2011

Core i3 550 3.2 GHz
4GB RAM
Intel GBE


I'm seeing atleast 600mbit of iscsi throughput through a Dell R310 with 
this processor, 4 port igb card and 2 bce onboard.


I'm routing it from one interface to another although it's destination 
is also a VLAN on that other interface. Maybe that's where the issue lies.


I have not performed testing from one interface to another without 
vlans. I am seeing roughly 200mbit sustained during the backups at night.


Regards,

Seth

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] throughput tuning in 2.0

2011-03-01 Thread Moshe Katz
I am not sure how/where you would check this but maybe the card is
operating in simplex mode in which case I believe it makes sense you
are getting approximately half of gigabit.  Someone please correct me
if I am wrong.

Moshe


On Tuesday, March 1, 2011, David Burgess  wrote:
> 2.0-RC1 (amd64)
> built on Tue Mar 1 15:52:28 EST 2011
>
> Core i3 550 3.2 GHz
> 4GB RAM
> Intel GBE
>
> I've just set this system up doing some crude throughput testing with
> iperf. The most I can push through this box from LAN to WAN is a
> steady 503-520 mbps, using the default mtu (higher mtu values produce
> no throughput on iperf for reasons I haven't looked into. I'm
> suspecting no support in the switch). top -SH is showing ~25%
> interrupt usage and 30%+ idle on both cores. Hyperthreading is
> disabled. I'm using a single NIC with vlans, but testing in only one
> direction, so the NIC is sending and receiving a total of about 530
> mbit x2 during the test.
>
> iperf test machines show minimal CPU usage during the test, and have
> no other significant network activity happening concurrently. The
> switch is a Netgear ProSafe GS108E, which is ostensibly non-blocking.
>
> I expected better throughput than that. Any ideas what is holding this
> thing back, or where I could look to find out?
>
> Thanks,
>
> db
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
> For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
>
> Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
>
>

-- 
--
Moshe Katz
KatzNet Computers
-- mo...@ymkatz.net
-- kohenk...@gmail.com
-- mk...@zment.com
-- mmk...@umd.edu
-- kohenk...@aim.com
-- moshek...@verizon.net
-- kohenk...@inbox.com
-- kohenk...@protonic.com
-- +1(301)867-3732

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org