Re: Google and Seamonkey

2010-09-10 Thread Ed Mullen

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

S. Beaulieu wrote:


Ray_Net a écrit :

Last week, i typed the search string into the input zone then click
on the "Google Search" button.

 From now ... i never need to touch this button who dissapeared as
soon i type. The search is done immediately and modified at each
character typed.


Isn't that's Google's announced new behaviour?


Yes it is - they call it "Instant". It's been in all the news for the
last couple of days, and the subject of a number of threads here and
elsewhere. (Disabling JavaScript makes it go away...)

http://www.google.com/search?q=google+instant



You can turn it off in Search Settings.

--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
Very funny Scotty - now beam down my clothes.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: DO NOT MAKE *TEST* POSTS IN THIS GROUP

2010-09-10 Thread JeffM
>JeffM wrote:
>>In this hierarchy, the test group is mozilla.test.
>>
FMurtz wrote:
>if there was a problem with this specific group,
>would exactly the same problem occur with mozilla.test?
>
If the *server* is offline, that will be revealed.
If you can get to the server,
there is a high probability there is NOT a problem with the group.

I have only seen ONE example of a test to a non-*test* group
that was justified--and then it was only because
the hostmaster on that server was doing weird shit.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.electronics.repair/msg/37ef53482dfdfe83?q=*-*-*-*-*-filtered-by-a-bot+zz-zz+flood+inappropriate+*-reference-to-*-*-*-*-*-*-*+qq+an-example+discard

>>If you want a second opinion on whether your post went through, go to
>>http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey/topics
>
**THAT** is the real nugget to take away from this.
There are ways of doing things without being a pest.
http://google.com/search?q=cache:aetkKiLDUawJ:lipas.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/testpost.html+Please-don't-do-this+better.solution+alt.test+annoying+Zen+tens-of-thousands-*-*+misc.test
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: DO NOT MAKE *TEST* POSTS IN THIS GROUP

2010-09-10 Thread FMurtz

JeffM wrote:

FMurtz wrote:

gjvjhv


Subject line changed from "test".

DO NOT made test posts
to any group which does not have *test* in its name.
In this hierarchy, the test group is mozilla.test.

If you want a second opinion on whether your post went through, go to
http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey/topics
if there was a problem with this specific group,would exactly the same 
problem occur with mozilla.test?

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Google and Seamonkey

2010-09-10 Thread d...@kd4e.com

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Yes it is - they call it "Instant". It's been in all the news for the
last couple of days, and the subject of a number of threads here and
elsewhere. (Disabling JavaScript makes it go away...)

http://www.google.com/search?q=google+instant


Blocking everything "google" may be an even better way to keep
their script-critters out of your machine ... it is OK to live
without google ... despite what they seem to want people to
believe.

--

Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E
"Communicators must defend free speech
or risk losing freedom entirely."
A Search Engine & More! http://ixquick.com
|_|___|_|
| | & | |
   /\  {|
  /  \ {|
 /\{|
/   @  \   {|
|   |~_||
|   -| ||
\ # http://KD4E.com
Have an http://ultrafidian.com day!
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Google and Seamonkey

2010-09-10 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
S. Beaulieu wrote:

> Ray_Net a écrit :
>> Last week, i typed the search string into the input zone then click
>> on the "Google Search" button. 
>> 
>> From now ... i never need to touch this button who dissapeared as
>> soon i type. The search is done immediately and modified at each
>> character typed.
> 
> Isn't that's Google's announced new behaviour?

Yes it is - they call it "Instant". It's been in all the news for the
last couple of days, and the subject of a number of threads here and
elsewhere. (Disabling JavaScript makes it go away...)

http://www.google.com/search?q=google+instant

-- 
   -bts
   -Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Google and Seamonkey

2010-09-10 Thread JeffM
Ray_Net wrote:
>The search is done immediately and modified at each character typed.
>
This has been a topic here multiple times this week:
http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey/browse_frm/thread/00fababfd6305fb1
http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey/browse_frm/thread/d570b06c73dd7ad2

http://google.com/search?q=intitle:Google-Instant&hl=all

> I have the old behaviour with IE8.
>
Cookies.

> Any idea of what is going on ? (i prefer the old behaviour)
>
At Google, set your Preferences.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Google and Seamonkey

2010-09-10 Thread JeffM
Ray_Net wrote:
>The search is done immediately and modified at each character typed.
>
This has been a topic here multiple time this week:
http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey/browse_frm/thread/00fababfd6305fb1
http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey/browse_frm/thread/d570b06c73dd7ad2

http://google.com/search?q=intitle:Google-Instant&hl=all

> I have the old behaviour with IE8.
>
Cookies.

> Any idea of what is going on ? (i prefer the old behaviour)
>
At Google, set your Preferences.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


7 years waiting for a simple developement action in 30 seconds

2010-09-10 Thread Ray_Net

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218258

No changes from 7 years ago.

The request is already coded when we do a forward.

So it should be easy to implement it when doing a reply.

I don't understand why developpers works on what they want instead of 
what we need ... evenwhile the work is a minimum task 

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: configuration for googlemail

2010-09-10 Thread Terry R.

On 9/10/2010 12:59 PM On a whim, Klaus Weber pounded out on the keyboard


Hello,

since recently I cannot receive mails from my Google account.
My configuration:
Account name: n...@googlemail.com
email address: n...@googlemail.com
Pop mail server: pop.googlemail.com port: 995
user name: n...@googlemail.com
connection safety: SSL/TLS

Moreover I cannot sent mails anymore from any of my accounts

What may be wrong?

Regards
Klaus Weber


But in case you want to stick with POP:
http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=13287


Terry R.
--
Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.
Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: configuration for googlemail

2010-09-10 Thread Terry R.

On 9/10/2010 12:59 PM On a whim, Klaus Weber pounded out on the keyboard


Hello,

since recently I cannot receive mails from my Google account.
My configuration:
Account name: n...@googlemail.com
email address: n...@googlemail.com
Pop mail server: pop.googlemail.com port: 995
user name: n...@googlemail.com
connection safety: SSL/TLS

Moreover I cannot sent mails anymore from any of my accounts

What may be wrong?

Regards
Klaus Weber


Hi Klaus,

Why use POP when Gmail supports IMAP?  Here is how to configure it for IMAP:

http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=78799

You can set it to store offline also if desired.


Terry R.
--
Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.
Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Google and Seamonkey

2010-09-10 Thread S. Beaulieu

Ray_Net a écrit :

Last week, i typed the search string into the input zone then click on
the "Google Search" button.

 From now ... i never need to touch this button who dissapeared as soon
i type. The search is done immediately and modified at each character
typed.



Isn't that's Google's announced new behaviour?

S.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Google and Seamonkey

2010-09-10 Thread Ray_Net

Strange behaviour of google with SM ...

Last week, i typed the search string into the input zone then click on 
the "Google Search" button.


From now ... i never need to touch this button who dissapeared as soon 
i type. The search is done immediately and modified at each character typed.


I have the old behaviour with IE8.

Any idea of what is going on ? (i prefer the old behaviour)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: configuration for googlemail

2010-09-10 Thread Smiles

Klaus Weber wrote:

Hello,

since recently I cannot receive mails from my Google account.
My configuration:
Account name: n...@googlemail.com
email address: n...@googlemail.com
Pop mail server: pop.googlemail.com port: 995
user name: n...@googlemail.com
connection safety: SSL/TLS

Moreover I cannot sent mails anymore from any of my accounts

What may be wrong?

Regards
Klaus Weber

what are you using for SMTP account
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


configuration for googlemail

2010-09-10 Thread Klaus Weber
Hello,

since recently I cannot receive mails from my Google account.
My configuration:
Account name: n...@googlemail.com
email address: n...@googlemail.com
Pop mail server: pop.googlemail.com port: 995
user name: n...@googlemail.com
connection safety: SSL/TLS

Moreover I cannot sent mails anymore from any of my accounts

What may be wrong?

Regards
Klaus Weber
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Stable version of Seamonkey

2010-09-10 Thread Bill Davidsen

David E. Ross wrote:

On 9/9/10 4:31 PM, baitman wrote:

Hello, What version of SeaMonkey  can be use with window 98se  that is
stable.
thanks
Baitmn


SeaMonkey 1.1.19

Barring someone brainwashing Robert and beating him with stacks of money, I 
would say it is beyond stable all the way to petrified. The 1.1.x series has hit 
EOL and won't have new releases.


--
Bill Davidsen 
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Migration doesn't work in 2.0.7?

2010-09-10 Thread Bill Davidsen

Jens Hatlak wrote:

Bill Davidsen wrote:

trying to migrate a system to 2.0.7, with multiple profiles. Linux x86.

Started the new SM, asked about migration, picked a profile, migration
worked, all was well. Then tried to migrate another, using directions
from several sources, multiple postings on the list, magazine articles,
and my own notes.

seamonkey -P NewName -migrate gives a list of existing profiles

seamonkey -createProfile NewName creates a new profile
seamonkey -P NewName -migrate starts the new profile - totally default
migration manager never starts.

All sources agree that should work, it doesn't.


I wonder which sources these would be since they are either all wrong or
you read/copied it incorrectly.

, Known
Issues, point 2 links to
 which clearly
(and correctly) states that the command line option which is to be used
in connection with "-P" is called "-migration", not "-migrate".

I noted that in my followup post about 18 hours before your post, the lines were 
typed from memory.


I further note that while 1.1.x supported profile names containing blanks, they 
get an invalid path warning in 2.0.7, at least when trying the two step process 
from command line. I have not attempted any other procedures, since I had to 
restore the whole .mozilla directory after the failure, to be sure I was back to 
working configuration.


--
Bill Davidsen 
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


DO NOT MAKE *TEST* POSTS IN THIS GROUP

2010-09-10 Thread JeffM
FMurtz wrote:
>gjvjhv

Subject line changed from "test".

DO NOT made test posts
to any group which does not have *test* in its name.
In this hierarchy, the test group is mozilla.test.

If you want a second opinion on whether your post went through, go to
http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey/topics
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Migration doesn't work in 2.0.7?

2010-09-10 Thread Jens Hatlak

Bill Davidsen wrote:

trying to migrate a system to 2.0.7, with multiple profiles. Linux x86.

Started the new SM, asked about migration, picked a profile, migration
worked, all was well. Then tried to migrate another, using directions
from several sources, multiple postings on the list, magazine articles,
and my own notes.

seamonkey -P NewName -migrate gives a list of existing profiles

seamonkey -createProfile NewName creates a new profile
seamonkey -P NewName -migrate starts the new profile - totally default
migration manager never starts.

All sources agree that should work, it doesn't.


I wonder which sources these would be since they are either all wrong or 
you read/copied it incorrectly.


, Known 
Issues, point 2 links to 
 which clearly 
(and correctly) states that the command line option which is to be used 
in connection with "-P" is called "-migration", not "-migrate".


HTH

Jens

--
Jens Hatlak 
SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker 
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Google Instant

2010-09-10 Thread Larry

David Wilkinson wrote:

Has anybody gotten Google Instant to work on SeaMonkey 2?

It works for me on IE8 and Chrome, but not on SeaMonkey or FireFox
(which may explain why spoofing FireFox is not helping me here). It's
supposed to work on FireFox 3...



Worked for me yesterday and just now.  Vista / SM207

Larry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Google Instant

2010-09-10 Thread David Wilkinson

Has anybody gotten Google Instant to work on SeaMonkey 2?

It works for me on IE8 and Chrome, but not on SeaMonkey or FireFox (which may 
explain why spoofing FireFox is not helping me here). It's supposed to work on 
FireFox 3...


--
David Wilkinson
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Crashes after 2.0.7 update - possible fix

2010-09-10 Thread robert . gault

Robert Kaiser wrote:

Hi,

If you are seeing a crash (probably when profile manager should come up)
after getting an update to 2.0.7, please try to go into the SeaMonkey
application/install folder, find a subfolder named "components" and
remove the "compreg.dat" file inside it.

If that works, please tell us here so we can produce and deploy a 2.0.8
as fast as possible to fix this for everyone!

Thanks and sorry for any problems,

Robert Kaiser



This crash occurs when trying to start profile manager but not when starting a 
profile with ex.

"D:\Program Files\seamonkey2\seamonkey.exe" -P "Robert" -browser

I was not aware there was a problem with 2.0.7 until reading these messages. The 
fix of deleting or renaming the .dat file does work.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: test

2010-09-10 Thread Daniel

FMurtz wrote:

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

FMurtz wrote:


gjvjhv


Yes, your posts are reaching the newsgroup. You posted your question
about 'importing killfiles' twice in a few minutes. Don't worry; when
someone comes along who has an answer, they will respond. This isn't a
chatroom. ;-)


The posts did not appear for ages that is why the repeated posts,I was
beginning to wonder if the group is moderated.


I read in one of the groups here that Giganews that provides this server 
is now (as of yesterday or day before) also hosting several Usenet 
servers, which was slowing things down for a while. But they've done 
something that's fixed the speed.


HTH

Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Crashes after 2.0.7 update - possible fix

2010-09-10 Thread Sebastian
On 9 Sep., 02:16, Robert Kaiser  wrote:
> If you are seeing a crash (probably when profile manager should come up)
> after getting an update to 2.0.7, please try to go into the SeaMonkey
> application/install folder, find a subfolder named "components" and
> remove the "compreg.dat" file inside it.
>
> If that works, please tell us here so we can produce and deploy a 2.0.8
> as fast as possible to fix this for everyone!


HI Roland, thanks for quick help in Forum and working on Seamonkey all
the time!!
Yes, i had that problem, and your fix described above worked fine and
easy for me. (Being cautious with deleting files, i renamed
compreg.dat first instead of deleting it. However solution works as
well).

best regards.

Sebastian





___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey