Re: smaller print (font?) in mail client

2011-04-03 Thread Stanimir Stamenkov 

Sat, 2 Apr 2011 20:38:54 -0700 (PDT), /Pete Caritis/:

Seamonkey is the only mail client I use and the small print for 
sending messages is where it manifests itself. All other Win 7 
applications work well including Microsoft Office Apps. When 
sending messages via email, the address line and subject lines are 
normal but when I try to type a message the cursor is very tiny 
and the print that follows is tiny as well. I am truly baffled by 
this one.


Are you using HTML or plain text composition?  Does the problem 
appear when you start in Safe Mode [1]? Does the problem appear 
trying with a fresh new profile [2]? Does holding the Ctrl key while 
rolling the mouse wheel make any difference for you?  Try locating 
and deleting (better renaming, for backup) the "localstore.rdf" file 
in your profile [3] while SeaMonkey is shut down, then see if 
there's any difference after starting it again.


[1] 
, 


[2] 
[3] , 



--
Stanimir
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Browser unsupported ?

2011-04-03 Thread Ray_Net 

David E. Ross wrote:

On 4/2/11 10:52 AM, Ray_Net wrote:

David E. Ross wrote:

On 4/1/11 12:41 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

David E. Ross wrote:

On 3/31/11 7:20 AM, Ray_Net wrote:

J. Weaver Jr. wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

This is what i got when i try to go on my google/gmail profile.
https://profiles.google.com/not-supported/

my browser signature is:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.10


Apparently, they now want to see "Firefox 3.6". -JW


May be, may be :-)

You can test your configuration using this link:
https://profiles.google.com/u/0/me?tab=mr


Apparently the server is not only sniffing but also parsing the UA
string.  Thefails with
 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.18)
Gecko/20110320 SeaMonkey/2.0.13, NOT Firefox/3.6.16
but works okay with
 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.16)
Gecko/20110319 Firefox/3.6.16



To be sure, i put:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Firefox/3.6.16

AND it doesnot work !!!


Is that identifier what you see when you select [Help>   About SeaMonkey]
from the menu bar?


Yes.


Hmmm.  The Gecko version -- rv:1.9.1.15 -- and the Gecko date --
20101027 -- do not match Firefox 3.6.16.  They should be rv:1.9.2.16 and
20101027, respectively.

I can think of two possibilities:

As I reported earlier, Google's server appears not only to be sniffing
the UA string but also parsing it.  Perhaps, the mismatch between Gecko
and Firefox versions is causing problems.

Or perhaps the server is sniffing for a particular version of Gecko
rather than for the string "Firefox".  It might want something like
1.9.2 instead of 1.9.1.

Either of these two would explain why my spoofing of Firefox 3.6.16
worked while yours did not work.


I cannot change my gecko version with about:config 
Anyway ... Google must accept SeaMonkey  but g...
they wrote somewhere a sentence like: "We do not discuss about other 
browsers".

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.13 Security Update

2011-04-03 Thread Daniel 

Ray_Net wrote:

Daniel wrote:

Chris Ilias wrote:

On 11-04-01 4:27 AM, Daniel wrote:

Chris Ilias wrote:

On 11-03-30 8:59 PM, Daniel wrote:

Chris Ilias wrote:

On 11-03-30 5:49 AM, Daniel wrote:






Chris, what are *YOU* calling the "Home" button, if, as I said, I start
in the Mail & Newsgroups screen??


The home button in the browser. Screenshot:
.

When you said "So, the first time round, the "Home" setting is *NOT* the
"Home" page!!" what were you referring to?



Chris, as I said, I start in Mail & Newsgroup, so what I am referring to
as the "Home" button is, more correctly, the Browser button down in the
bottom left of the Mail & Newsgroup screen.

But, even if I click on this "Browser" button, I don't see any "Home"
button on my Browser screen!! If I click on "Go" in the "File Edit View"
bar, there is a "Home" but no button. Do you have an extension or
something installed, Chris??


In my browser i have a "Home" button (first icon) on the third bar ...
perhaps your third bar is closed/minimized ...


Ahhh!!, so you have it on the Personal Toolbar, then!!

Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Is there any way to compact offline newsgroups (reduce the size of the mbox file)?

2011-04-03 Thread P. 
Hello.

I have installed SeaMonkey v2.0.13 but I cannot find a way to expire
articles (physically reduce the size
of the mbox file in which newsgroups messages are stored) in offline
newsgroups.

Using the "Retention" option does remove articles from view but the
mbox file remains untouched
(and steadily growing in size).


Thanks.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Send link feature in SM2.0.x

2011-04-03 Thread Keith Whaley 

Question:
Thruout the following post, URL is repeatedly shown as 'URI' or some such.
The L in URL stands for Locator, and I'm wondering why all acronyms in here 
show up as 'URI', even in the RFC quote.


keith whaley

David E. Ross wrote:
> On 4/2/11 5:24 AM, Ant wrote:
>> On 4/2/2011 2:08 AM PT, Jens Hatlak typed:
>>
>> What's the reasons for < and > ? They don't make sense to me.
>> What's wrong without them since most programs convert http to
>> links just fine?

> The use of < and > to delimit URIs is per Appexdix C of RFC 3986.
>
> The delimiters serve human purposes, not software.  As indicated in
> another reply in this thread, they provide for URIs that wrap from one
> line to another and yet remain understandable by human eyes.  (I get
> E-mail messages with URIs that wrap to 3-4 lines.)
>
> To quote the RFC:
>>URIs are often transmitted through formats that do not provide a
>>clear context for their interpretation.  For example, there are many
>>occasions when a URI is included in plain text; examples include text
>>sent in email, USENET news, and on printed paper.  In such cases, it
>>is important to be able to delimit the URI from the rest of the text,
>>and in particular from punctuation marks that might be mistaken for
>>part of the URI.
>
> Also while blank spaces are not supposed to appear in a URI, I do see
> such URIs.  Delimiters help humans to see that the first blank space
> does not end such URIs.
>

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Sending mail to trash in SM 2.0.x

2011-04-03 Thread Patrick Crumhorn 


Hi - hope this isn't dumb question time, but I'm stumped.  When I delete items from my mail inbox, 
some of them go into the trash folder, while others just disappear.  All messages flagged as "junk" 
are sent to trash, but deleted non-junk messages just vanish, it seems.  This is occasionally 
inconvenient when I want to recover a deleted message from the trash.  I can't find any setting that 
allows me to control this behavior.  Help?

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: autoloading of SM 1.1.18

2011-04-03 Thread Mark Hansen 
On 4/2/2011 7:14 PM, Norvin wrote:
>> 
> Bill, this file does not show up in MSCONFIG, althou the file 
> SKDAEMON.EXE does and this is what creates the sksmaild file which 
> causes me the problem. I have a keyboard with the "rapid access keys" 
> across the top and I need the DAEMON file to run this feature. And yes I 
> do need this feature for some operator needs.

Then talk to the vendor of that software and find out why it is launching
the browser without your requesting it.

Why do you think this is a SeaMonkey issue?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Send link feature in SM2.0.x

2011-04-03 Thread Ant 

On 4/2/2011 11:17 AM PT, Paul B. Gallagher typed:


Yeh. I get plenty of plain-text emails where wrapping by the sending
program breaks a link and I have to reassemble it before using it. This
is especially bothersome when the message has been through several reply
iterations. Most but not all programs will respect angle brackets and
not break URLs.


Ah. I notice that too, but didn't know < and > fix that problem.



If you don't like them in outgoing mail, use HTML, which doesn't need them.


Ugh, I hate those fancy formats. I still love plain texts. Yes, I am old 
school.

--
"The shadows now so long do grow,... That brambles like tall cedars 
show,... Molehills seem mountains, and the ant... Appears a monstrous 
elephant." --Charles Cotton's poem

   /\___/\ Phil./Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
  / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
 | |o   o| |
\ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
 ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed.
Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Send link feature in SM2.0.x

2011-04-03 Thread Jamey Fletcher 

Keith Whaley wrote:


Question: Thruout the following post, URL is repeatedly shown as
'URI' or some such. The L in URL stands for Locator, and I'm
wondering why all acronyms in here show up as 'URI', even in the RFC
quote.


URLs are a subset of URIs - Uniform Resource Identifiers.  Computer
Scientists and Library/Information Science Majors work with URIs -
everyone else is just having enough trouble coping with URLs.

Call it a University vs. Vo-Tech thing.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: autoloading of SM 1.1.18

2011-04-03 Thread William Morrison 



Mark Hansen wrote:

On 4/2/2011 7:14 PM, Norvin wrote:
   
   

Bill, this file does not show up in MSCONFIG, althou the file
SKDAEMON.EXE does and this is what creates the sksmaild file which
causes me the problem. I have a keyboard with the "rapid access keys"
across the top and I need the DAEMON file to run this feature. And yes I
do need this feature for some operator needs.
 

Then talk to the vendor of that software and find out why it is launching
the browser without your requesting it.

Why do you think this is a SeaMonkey issue?
   


Then this sounds like you have one of Rapid Access Keys set to launch 
Seamonkey and you may have a faulty keyboard activating that key and 
launching Seamonkey. Either way it's not a SM problem.



--
Big Bill


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Send link feature in SM2.0.x

2011-04-03 Thread David E. Ross 
On 4/3/11 5:24 AM, Keith Whaley wrote:
> Question:
> Thruout the following post, URL is repeatedly shown as 'URI' or some such.
> The L in URL stands for Locator, and I'm wondering why all acronyms in here 
> show up as 'URI', even in the RFC quote.
> 
> keith whaley
> 
> David E. Ross wrote:
>  > On 4/2/11 5:24 AM, Ant wrote:
>  >> On 4/2/2011 2:08 AM PT, Jens Hatlak typed:
>  >>
>  >> What's the reasons for < and > ? They don't make sense to me.
>  >> What's wrong without them since most programs convert http to
>  >> links just fine?
> 
>  > The use of < and > to delimit URIs is per Appexdix C of RFC 3986.
>  >
>  > The delimiters serve human purposes, not software.  As indicated in
>  > another reply in this thread, they provide for URIs that wrap from one
>  > line to another and yet remain understandable by human eyes.  (I get
>  > E-mail messages with URIs that wrap to 3-4 lines.)
>  >
>  > To quote the RFC:
>  >>URIs are often transmitted through formats that do not provide a
>  >>clear context for their interpretation.  For example, there are many
>  >>occasions when a URI is included in plain text; examples include text
>  >>sent in email, USENET news, and on printed paper.  In such cases, it
>  >>is important to be able to delimit the URI from the rest of the text,
>  >>and in particular from punctuation marks that might be mistaken for
>  >>part of the URI.
>  >
>  > Also while blank spaces are not supposed to appear in a URI, I do see
>  > such URIs.  Delimiters help humans to see that the first blank space
>  > does not end such URIs.
>  >
> 

See RFC 3986 at .  URIs
are defined in Section 1.  Subsection 1.1.3 distinguishes between URIs
and URLs.  The latter is a subset of the former.

(I added the < > brackets manually to the URI pointing to the RFC.)

-- 

David E. Ross


On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages
posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent
because of spam from that source.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: smaller print (font?) in mail client

2011-04-03 Thread Stan 

Pete Caritis wrote:

I just bough a new computer and installed SM 2.0.13.  I'm having a
problem with the email client in that the size of typed text for
messages is very small.  I'm using Win 7 on the new computer but on my
old XP everything is normal sized text when sending email.  On Win 7,
the size of the text is very small, maybe a 6 or 7 font size.  I've
clicked on every tab in SM and Win 7 that deals with display,
appearance, fonts, etc. but nothing seems to work.  Any suggestions
would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Pete


I don't know about Windows 7, but I do know tha a few years ago I had 
unsatisfactory font sizes and darkness.


I can't remember which settings fixed fonts in the mail client but I 
will list the places I made adjustments:


1. In SM Edit/Preferences/Appearence/Fonts.  In the three Size fields I 
use 16, 16, and 18. May have changed the font choices, don't remember.


2. In the Start/Settings/Control Panel/Personalization/Adjust Font Size. 
I set to Larger Scale DPI (125%)


3. In the Start/Settings/Control Panel/Personalization/Windows Color and 
Appearance/ I use Windows Standard and then select Advanced.  On 
Advanced Appearance window, I modified a few Item settings. One of those 
that I remember as helping a lot was Message Box which I have set to 
NimbusSanT and a size of 11, and B (bold).  I'm not sure if I had to 
make any other changes, maybe Menu set the same way.



Hope maybe something in here helps you.  I do remember that in #3 the 
Message Box setting affected a lot of text other than just what was in a 
message box.


Stan
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: smaller print (font?) in mail client

2011-04-03 Thread Pete Caritis 
On Apr 3, 3:59 pm, Stan  wrote:
> Pete Caritis wrote:
> > I just bough a new computer and installed SM 2.0.13.  I'm having a
> > problem with the email client in that the size of typed text for
> > messages is very small.  I'm using Win 7 on the new computer but on my
> > old XP everything is normal sized text when sending email.  On Win 7,
> > the size of the text is very small, maybe a 6 or 7 font size.  I've
> > clicked on every tab in SM and Win 7 that deals with display,
> > appearance, fonts, etc. but nothing seems to work.  Any suggestions
> > would be appreciated.
>
> > Thanks,
> > Pete
>
> I don't know about Windows 7, but I do know tha a few years ago I had
> unsatisfactory font sizes and darkness.
>
> I can't remember which settings fixed fonts in the mail client but I
> will list the places I made adjustments:
>
> 1. In SM Edit/Preferences/Appearence/Fonts.  In the three Size fields I
> use 16, 16, and 18. May have changed the font choices, don't remember.
>
> 2. In the Start/Settings/Control Panel/Personalization/Adjust Font Size.
> I set to Larger Scale DPI (125%)
>
> 3. In the Start/Settings/Control Panel/Personalization/Windows Color and
> Appearance/ I use Windows Standard and then select Advanced.  On
> Advanced Appearance window, I modified a few Item settings. One of those
> that I remember as helping a lot was Message Box which I have set to
> NimbusSanT and a size of 11, and B (bold).  I'm not sure if I had to
> make any other changes, maybe Menu set the same way.
>
> Hope maybe something in here helps you.  I do remember that in #3 the
> Message Box setting affected a lot of text other than just what was in a
> message box.
>
> Stan

Home run Stan!  Playing with the different font sizes in combination
is the answer.  I've got it where it is now tolerable and all I have
to do is get the right combination of font sizes.  Its strange but the
regular font sizes in the browser are also affected depending on the
combination that I choose.  Going to the different sites that I visit
shows that the text size there is about 125% larger than normal, but
the text size in the mail client is only about 90% of what is normal.
So clearly, you have provided the answer and I will continue mixing
the font boxes until I get that happy medium.  Thank you and all
others who have helped me through this problem.  All of you are great
and I am deeply indebted to all of you.  Wish I could buy you a beer
Stan.  Thanks!!

Pete
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.13 Security Update

2011-04-03 Thread Ray_Net 

Daniel wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

Daniel wrote:

Chris Ilias wrote:

On 11-04-01 4:27 AM, Daniel wrote:

Chris Ilias wrote:

On 11-03-30 8:59 PM, Daniel wrote:

Chris Ilias wrote:

On 11-03-30 5:49 AM, Daniel wrote:






Chris, what are *YOU* calling the "Home" button, if, as I said, I
start
in the Mail & Newsgroups screen??


The home button in the browser. Screenshot:
.

When you said "So, the first time round, the "Home" setting is *NOT*
the
"Home" page!!" what were you referring to?



Chris, as I said, I start in Mail & Newsgroup, so what I am referring to
as the "Home" button is, more correctly, the Browser button down in the
bottom left of the Mail & Newsgroup screen.

But, even if I click on this "Browser" button, I don't see any "Home"
button on my Browser screen!! If I click on "Go" in the "File Edit View"
bar, there is a "Home" but no button. Do you have an extension or
something installed, Chris??


In my browser i have a "Home" button (first icon) on the third bar ...
perhaps your third bar is closed/minimized ...


Ahhh!!, so you have it on the Personal Toolbar, then!!


I never put this there :-) It should be a default ...
In the bottom left of SM window i did not have a home button, just a 
browser button.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Tab Browsing

2011-04-03 Thread Danny Kile 
Tab Browsing, my browser use to open a new tab to the right of the 
active tab. It now open all the way to the right. I can not seem to find 
the setting where I controlled this. Any help would be appreciated.


Thank you, Danny
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Tab Browsing

2011-04-03 Thread Jens Hatlak 

Danny Kile wrote:

Tab Browsing, my browser use to open a new tab to the right of the
active tab. It now open all the way to the right. I can not seem to find
the setting where I controlled this. Any help would be appreciated.


Use this extension:


SM 2.1 will have this built in (configurable through Preferences/Tabbed 
Browsing).


HTH

Jens

--
Jens Hatlak 
SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker 
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

sidebar

2011-04-03 Thread Simon 

Why do I see my sidebar in english while I use Dutch version?

using seamonkey 2.0.13

tia

Simon


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Tab Browsing

2011-04-03 Thread Danny Kile 

Jens Hatlak wrote:

Danny Kile wrote:

Tab Browsing, my browser use to open a new tab to the right of the
active tab. It now open all the way to the right. I can not seem to find
the setting where I controlled this. Any help would be appreciated.


Use this extension:


SM 2.1 will have this built in (configurable through Preferences/Tabbed
Browsing).

HTH

Jens



I use to have it maybe that was back in 1.18 not sure when it was. Or 
perhaps it was a manual edit of the config file.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Tab Browsing

2011-04-03 Thread Rufus 

Jens Hatlak wrote:

Danny Kile wrote:

Tab Browsing, my browser use to open a new tab to the right of the
active tab. It now open all the way to the right. I can not seem to find
the setting where I controlled this. Any help would be appreciated.


Use this extension:


SM 2.1 will have this built in (configurable through Preferences/Tabbed
Browsing).

HTH

Jens



Is this specific to Theme, perhaps?

I use the SM Modern Theme and it works as the OP describes/would like.

--
 - Rufus
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Browser unsupported ?

2011-04-03 Thread JD 

Ray_Net wrote:

David E. Ross wrote:

On 4/2/11 10:52 AM, Ray_Net wrote:

David E. Ross wrote:

On 4/1/11 12:41 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

David E. Ross wrote:

On 3/31/11 7:20 AM, Ray_Net wrote:

J. Weaver Jr. wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

This is what i got when i try to go on my google/gmail profile.
https://profiles.google.com/not-supported/

my browser signature is:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.10


Apparently, they now want to see "Firefox 3.6". -JW


May be, may be :-)

You can test your configuration using this link:
https://profiles.google.com/u/0/me?tab=mr


Apparently the server is not only sniffing but also parsing the UA
string. The fails with
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.18)
Gecko/20110320 SeaMonkey/2.0.13, NOT Firefox/3.6.16
but works okay with
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.16)
Gecko/20110319 Firefox/3.6.16



To be sure, i put:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Firefox/3.6.16

AND it doesnot work !!!


Is that identifier what you see when you select [Help> About SeaMonkey]
from the menu bar?


Yes.


Hmmm. The Gecko version -- rv:1.9.1.15 -- and the Gecko date --
20101027 -- do not match Firefox 3.6.16. They should be rv:1.9.2.16 and
20101027, respectively.

I can think of two possibilities:

As I reported earlier, Google's server appears not only to be sniffing
the UA string but also parsing it. Perhaps, the mismatch between Gecko
and Firefox versions is causing problems.

Or perhaps the server is sniffing for a particular version of Gecko
rather than for the string "Firefox". It might want something like
1.9.2 instead of 1.9.1.

Either of these two would explain why my spoofing of Firefox 3.6.16
worked while yours did not work.


I cannot change my gecko version with about:config 
Anyway ... Google must accept SeaMonkey  but g...
they wrote somewhere a sentence like: "We do not discuss about other
browsers".


I use an add-on called PrefBar which allows me to spoof the User Agent.

http://prefbar.tuxfamily.org/

And I was able to defeat Google profile's browser sniff.

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

SeaMonkey 2.1 en-US String Freeze TONIGHT

2011-04-03 Thread Justin Wood (Callek) 
As of tonight (April 3rd) at Midnight PDT, SeaMonkey will be locked 
under string freeze.


I was tempted to spin builds tonight for our b3 with l10nMerge, but I 
decided after skimming the l10n dashboard and seeing the number of 
strings that landed in our tree this past week (not to mention today), 
that I will tag/spin builds for beta3 Monday evening, around 9pm PDT or 
a bit later.


Consider this a request to update locales/request further sign off, etc.

We are basing SeaMonkey 2.1b3 against Gecko 2.0 (mozilla-2.0) for those 
of you who wish to build locally to test.


After tonight, we expect aproximately a month until 2.1 final, and en-US 
will remain frozen for SeaMonkey.


If there is a strong need for any en-US string changes, those will be 
evaluated on a case-by-case basis, with very strong reasons needed to 
accept. If we do chose to accept, I'll send along an l10n-note to this 
newsgroup.


The l10n tree we are using is the mozilla-2.0 l10n tree. Though the 
suite/ specific l10n files should be usable for comm-central-trunk 
(SeaMonkey 2.2) as well at the moment.


Followup-To set to m.d.l10n, if there are any questions feel free to 
contact me there.


--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Browser unsupported ?

2011-04-03 Thread Henry 

JD wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:


David E. Ross wrote:


On 4/2/11 10:52 AM, Ray_Net wrote:


David E. Ross wrote:


On 4/1/11 12:41 PM, Ray_Net wrote:


David E. Ross wrote:


On 3/31/11 7:20 AM, Ray_Net wrote:


J. Weaver Jr. wrote:


Ray_Net wrote:


This is what i got when i try to go on my google/gmail profile.
https://profiles.google.com/not-supported/

my browser signature is:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.10



Apparently, they now want to see "Firefox 3.6". -JW



May be, may be :-)

You can test your configuration using this link:
https://profiles.google.com/u/0/me?tab=mr



Apparently the server is not only sniffing but also parsing the UA
string. The fails with
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.18)
Gecko/20110320 SeaMonkey/2.0.13, NOT Firefox/3.6.16
but works okay with
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.16)
Gecko/20110319 Firefox/3.6.16



To be sure, i put:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Firefox/3.6.16

AND it doesnot work !!!



Is that identifier what you see when you select [Help> About 
SeaMonkey]

from the menu bar?


Yes.



Hmmm. The Gecko version -- rv:1.9.1.15 -- and the Gecko date --
20101027 -- do not match Firefox 3.6.16. They should be rv:1.9.2.16 and
20101027, respectively.

I can think of two possibilities:

As I reported earlier, Google's server appears not only to be sniffing
the UA string but also parsing it. Perhaps, the mismatch between Gecko
and Firefox versions is causing problems.

Or perhaps the server is sniffing for a particular version of Gecko
rather than for the string "Firefox". It might want something like
1.9.2 instead of 1.9.1.

Either of these two would explain why my spoofing of Firefox 3.6.16
worked while yours did not work.


I cannot change my gecko version with about:config 
Anyway ... Google must accept SeaMonkey  but g...
they wrote somewhere a sentence like: "We do not discuss about other
browsers".



I use an add-on called PrefBar which allows me to spoof the User Agent.

http://prefbar.tuxfamily.org/

And I was able to defeat Google profile's browser sniff.

Does just the new version of Seamonkey have problems with Google?  Should I 
install an earlier version?


Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Browser unsupported ?

2011-04-03 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty 
Henry wrote:

> Does just the new version of Seamonkey have problems with Google?

It's actually Google with the problem. Their browser sniffer is out of
date. Browser sniffers are unnecessary, and only used by clueless
authors.

> Should I install an earlier version?

No.

-- 
   -bts
   -Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Tab Browsing

2011-04-03 Thread Danny Kile 

Rufus wrote:

Jens Hatlak wrote:

Danny Kile wrote:

Tab Browsing, my browser use to open a new tab to the right of the
active tab. It now open all the way to the right. I can not seem to find
the setting where I controlled this. Any help would be appreciated.


Use this extension:


SM 2.1 will have this built in (configurable through Preferences/Tabbed
Browsing).

HTH

Jens



Is this specific to Theme, perhaps?

I use the SM Modern Theme and it works as the OP describes/would like.

I have always used SkyPilot theme and it worked. I switched to SM Modern 
just to test and it still does not work as it use to.


Danny
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey