Re: "Stop animation"
Jens Hatlak wrote: I used "obvious" as a synonym for "self-evident" here, i.e. a rational person would first try the Stop button and see that is has no effect, then try Esc and succeed. Hmm, I think that depends on one's perception of what "Stop" does, Jens. I had assumed until your message that it operated at the http: level, and "stopped" any outstanding http: transfers; it had never occurred to me that it might be capable of "stopping" some activity for which the http: transfer had already completed. Philip Taylor ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: "Copy completed" pop-up stay visible
Ray_Net wrote: TMitchell wrote, On 09/05/2012 14:23: Ray_Net wrote: Ray_Net wrote, On 07/05/2012 22:54: The "Copy Completed" pop-up windows did not end - We are obliged to click on "cancel" or obliged to close the window. I suppose that this issue was already filled in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ but i cannot find it with the "copy completed" string to search. It occur intermittenly, but when the attachement (10 photos per exemple) is near 10 MB, i am pretty sure that i can reproduce "at will". Is there someone that can correct this bug ? Could someone point me to the related bugzilla entry ? I get this problem when the message being copied is large or has attachments. That's also my case - so the problem is reproductible and can be corrected. However we need a bugzilla entry - and the search tool did not permit me to find it. Should we open a "duplicate" ? (duplicate, because i believe that this issue was already submitted) Ray, I went to Bugzilla, and entered Copy Complete in the search field and got bucket-loads of Bugs which seemed to have nothing to do with Copy or Complete, but one of them was https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724511 which does have to do with Copy complete. Only two entries!! Check it out -- Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Lost Mail
Larry S. wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Larry wrote: Just upgraded from 2.8 to 2.9.1. I'm using the same profile I had before the change, and all seems well except that I was forced to set up new mail and news accounts, even though the mail folders are right there in my profile but apparently aren't recognized. Consequently, I have no mail history including a few important archives. So, how did that happen? What can I do about it? All advice will be gratefully received! Check if you're using the same profile as before. If not, see if the Profile Manager will let you access the old one. If so, set that as default and delete the new one. Switched to the old profile, and got some mail back. However, that profile (and thus the mail) was older, so not an ideal solution. Then, I set up a new profile, emptied it out (just two small files), and pasted into it the contents of my backup copy (made immediately before the upgrade). That worked! Thank you for the suggestion, which set me on the correct path. You and others in this group are a great resource! Larry, have a look at Tools->Switch Profiles. Do you see any profiles there that you didn't know you had?? If so, switch to them and see if they contain your missing e-mails. If not, report back for more advice!! -- Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Lost Mail
Test wrote: Larry wrote, On 5/8/2012 10:02 PM: Just upgraded from 2.8 to 2.9.1. I'm using the same profile I had before the change, and all seems well except that I was forced to set up new mail and news accounts, even though the mail folders are right there in my profile but apparently aren't recognized. Consequently, I have no mail history including a few important archives. So, how did that happen? What can I do about it? All advice will be gratefully received! I also had an issue with emails not appearing when I upgraded to 2.9.1 I have done a restore and reinstalled 2.33 and most emails are back but a few are still not there or are a mess. Test, have a look at Tools->Switch Profiles. Do you see any profiles there that you didn't know you had?? If so, switch to them and see if they contain your missing e-mails. If not, report back for more advice!! -- Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: If "Newsgroup" populated in e-mail compose window, "Send" is dysfunctional.
Philip TAYLOR wrote: Attempting to "Reply /all" to Mark Berger's immediately preceding message, "Send" failed to have any effect. I closed Seamonkey and re-launched, then tried again. Same (null) effect. I then thought to de-populate the "Newsgroup: " field, whereupon "Send" functioned normally. This used not to be the case at (say) Seamoney 2.7.x. Does anyone know why "Send" is now dysfunctional in such circumstances ? Philip Taylor Phillip, is it possible that you're trying to send to a newsgroup via an account that does not have newsgroup access, sort of thing?? Reply /all could be the problem!! -- Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: If "Newsgroup" populated in e-mail compose window, "Send" is dysfunctional.
Daniel wrote: Philip TAYLOR wrote: Attempting to "Reply /all" to Mark Berger's immediately preceding message, "Send" failed to have any effect. I closed Seamonkey and re-launched, then tried again. Same (null) effect. I then thought to de-populate the "Newsgroup: " field, whereupon "Send" functioned normally. This used not to be the case at (say) Seamoney 2.7.x. Does anyone know why "Send" is now dysfunctional in such circumstances ? Philip Taylor Phillip, is it possible that you're trying to send to a newsgroup via an account that does not have newsgroup access, sort of thing?? Yes indeed : I make no use of Usenet news, so the a/c is not configured for nntp: access. But that was not really the point : on clicking "Send", absolutely nothing happens; in earlier versions of Seamonkey, there would have been a diagnostic, and an offer to remove nntp: ccs from subsequent replies. Philip Taylor ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Lost Mail
Daniel wrote, On 5/10/2012 6:20 AM: Test wrote: Larry wrote, On 5/8/2012 10:02 PM: Just upgraded from 2.8 to 2.9.1. I'm using the same profile I had before the change, and all seems well except that I was forced to set up new mail and news accounts, even though the mail folders are right there in my profile but apparently aren't recognized. Consequently, I have no mail history including a few important archives. So, how did that happen? What can I do about it? All advice will be gratefully received! I also had an issue with emails not appearing when I upgraded to 2.9.1 I have done a restore and reinstalled 2.33 and most emails are back but a few are still not there or are a mess. Test, have a look at Tools->Switch Profiles. Do you see any profiles there that you didn't know you had?? If so, switch to them and see if they contain your missing e-mails. If not, report back for more advice!! Deleting the msf file and letting Seamonkey remake it seem to have fixed my lost email problem. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Lost Mail
Test wrote: Daniel wrote, On 5/10/2012 6:20 AM: Test wrote: Larry wrote, On 5/8/2012 10:02 PM: Just upgraded from 2.8 to 2.9.1. I'm using the same profile I had before the change, and all seems well except that I was forced to set up new mail and news accounts, even though the mail folders are right there in my profile but apparently aren't recognized. Consequently, I have no mail history including a few important archives. So, how did that happen? What can I do about it? All advice will be gratefully received! I also had an issue with emails not appearing when I upgraded to 2.9.1 I have done a restore and reinstalled 2.33 and most emails are back but a few are still not there or are a mess. Test, have a look at Tools->Switch Profiles. Do you see any profiles there that you didn't know you had?? If so, switch to them and see if they contain your missing e-mails. If not, report back for more advice!! Deleting the msf file and letting Seamonkey remake it seem to have fixed my lost email problem. O.K., good. -- Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Lost Mail
Daniel wrote: Test wrote: Daniel wrote, On 5/10/2012 6:20 AM: Test wrote: Larry wrote, On 5/8/2012 10:02 PM: Just upgraded from 2.8 to 2.9.1. I'm using the same profile I had before the change, and all seems well except that I was forced to set up new mail and news accounts, even though the mail folders are right there in my profile but apparently aren't recognized. Consequently, I have no mail history including a few important archives. So, how did that happen? What can I do about it? All advice will be gratefully received! I also had an issue with emails not appearing when I upgraded to 2.9.1 I have done a restore and reinstalled 2.33 and most emails are back but a few are still not there or are a mess. Test, have a look at Tools->Switch Profiles. Do you see any profiles there that you didn't know you had?? If so, switch to them and see if they contain your missing e-mails. If not, report back for more advice!! Deleting the msf file and letting Seamonkey remake it seem to have fixed my lost email problem. O.K., good. The ultimate songs -> Chris Isaak regards, -- ~Vink ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Tab Display
Jens Hatlak wrote: Larry S. wrote: David E. Ross wrote: The preference variable in "about:config" is browser.tabs.loadInBackground. The value is "true" to have the new tab behind the old one and "false" to have the new tab in front. Hmm . . . It's set to "false", which I would expect from my Preferences. However, there's another setting, "services.sync.prefs.sync.browser.tabs.loadInBackground;true", which would seem to conflict. Possible? The pref you cited enables syncing of the browser.tabs.loadInBackground pref, i.e. if you have SeaMonkey Sync set up and you change the browser.tabs.loadInBackground pref on one host, the pref will be changed on all other hosts using the same Sync account. If you don't want that behavior, set the pref you cited to false. HTH Jens Thank you--good information! Always learning . . . Larry ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Lost Mail
Test wrote: Daniel wrote, On 5/10/2012 6:20 AM: Test wrote: Larry wrote, On 5/8/2012 10:02 PM: Just upgraded from 2.8 to 2.9.1. I'm using the same profile I had before the change, and all seems well except that I was forced to set up new mail and news accounts, even though the mail folders are right there in my profile but apparently aren't recognized. Consequently, I have no mail history including a few important archives. So, how did that happen? What can I do about it? All advice will be gratefully received! I also had an issue with emails not appearing when I upgraded to 2.9.1 I have done a restore and reinstalled 2.33 and most emails are back but a few are still not there or are a mess. Test, have a look at Tools->Switch Profiles. Do you see any profiles there that you didn't know you had?? If so, switch to them and see if they contain your missing e-mails. If not, report back for more advice!! Deleting the msf file and letting Seamonkey remake it seem to have fixed my lost email problem. That's one way. The other is to right-click the folder and choose Properties. Then click the Repair Folder button. -- Ed Mullen http://edmullen.net/ "Music expresses that which cannot be said and on which it is impossible to be silent." - Victor Hugo ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: http://abilify.com
GerardJan Vinkesteijn wrote: no music,just mesjogge i am not on http://abilify.com any longer but *secrit* from Organon Oss -- ~Vink ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: "Copy completed" pop-up stay visible
Daniel wrote, On 10/05/2012 12:09: Ray_Net wrote: TMitchell wrote, On 09/05/2012 14:23: Ray_Net wrote: Ray_Net wrote, On 07/05/2012 22:54: The "Copy Completed" pop-up windows did not end - We are obliged to click on "cancel" or obliged to close the window. I suppose that this issue was already filled in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ but i cannot find it with the "copy completed" string to search. It occur intermittenly, but when the attachement (10 photos per exemple) is near 10 MB, i am pretty sure that i can reproduce "at will". Is there someone that can correct this bug ? Could someone point me to the related bugzilla entry ? I get this problem when the message being copied is large or has attachments. That's also my case - so the problem is reproductible and can be corrected. However we need a bugzilla entry - and the search tool did not permit me to find it. Should we open a "duplicate" ? (duplicate, because i believe that this issue was already submitted) Ray, I went to Bugzilla, and entered Copy Complete in the search field and got bucket-loads of Bugs which seemed to have nothing to do with Copy or Complete, but one of them was https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724511 which does have to do with Copy complete. Only two entries!! Check it out Thanks ! I had the same problem with the search tool of bugzilla. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: "Copy completed" pop-up stay visible
Daniel wrote, On 10/05/2012 12:09: Ray_Net wrote: TMitchell wrote, On 09/05/2012 14:23: Ray_Net wrote: Ray_Net wrote, On 07/05/2012 22:54: The "Copy Completed" pop-up windows did not end - We are obliged to click on "cancel" or obliged to close the window. I suppose that this issue was already filled in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ but i cannot find it with the "copy completed" string to search. It occur intermittenly, but when the attachement (10 photos per exemple) is near 10 MB, i am pretty sure that i can reproduce "at will". Is there someone that can correct this bug ? Could someone point me to the related bugzilla entry ? I get this problem when the message being copied is large or has attachments. That's also my case - so the problem is reproductible and can be corrected. However we need a bugzilla entry - and the search tool did not permit me to find it. Should we open a "duplicate" ? (duplicate, because i believe that this issue was already submitted) Ray, I went to Bugzilla, and entered Copy Complete in the search field and got bucket-loads of Bugs which seemed to have nothing to do with Copy or Complete, but one of them was https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724511 which does have to do with Copy complete. Only two entries!! Check it out Thanks, but i have searched about the search tool of bugzilla, and i found that i must use for the search string; "summary;copy complete" - So i found the bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413240 which is re-opened. If all persons experiences this bug can vote for it ..perhaps we have a chance for correction. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey & Copernic Desktop Search?
I have done this, MCBastos, with Thunderbird 12.0.1 and it appears to have worked. HOWEVER, your warnings to NEVER open Thunderbird again have me shaking in my boots. Is there any link, such as within Copernic search result preview pain, etc., that would open Thunderbird if I were to click it? If it has found a link on a search that is, say, an attachment of a jpeg, or anything else, or even if I just double-click a found e-mail in the preview pain to open it, will that open Thunderbird? I have backed up my SeaMonkey profile as a safety precaution, but I'm hoping to never need it. Thanks! -George MCBastos wrote: > Interviewed by CNN on 09/02/2012 21:36, George Carden told the world: >> Does Copernic Desktop Search function with SeaMonkey 2.7? > Not directly. But I managed to find a workaround. > > What I did was to install a copy of Thunderbird 3.1.x, run it once > without adding any accounts (so it creates its own profiles), then edit > the Thunderbird profiles.ini (you can find it in %APPDATA%\Thunderbird) > in order to make it point to *Seamonkey's* profile instead of Thunderbirds. > > My Thunderbird profiles.ini looks like this: > > [General] > StartWithLastProfile=1 > > [Profile0] > Name=default > IsRelative=1 > Path=../Mozilla/Seamonkey/Profiles/27kymd3w.default > > Once this is done, you must NEVER open Thunderbird again (well, unless > you turn back the profiles.ini to its original values beforehand). > There's a non-trivial risk of damaging your profile if you do so, since > the structure of Seamonkey's profiles and Thunderbird's profiles is > likely different (Thunderbird 3.1 uses an older version of Gecko, for > instance -- and doesn't include some components Seamonkey has.) > > I tried uninstalling Thunderbird afterwards (for maximum safety and to > free a bit of space), but Copernic stopped scanning my e-mails. So, > there's something in a valid Thunderbird install that it needs. Since I > have a lot of hard disk space and this is a non-shared computer, having > an inactive TB does not cause me problems, so I didn't try to figure out > what is it that Copernic needs. > > I didn't try this with a newer release of Thunderbird, either. Copernic > only claims compatibility with releases up to 3.1, but it *might* work. > If you try it, please report your results. > ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Download Manager - Change Download Location
SeaMonkey 2.9. (Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120422 Firefox/12.0 SeaMonkey/2.9) openSuSE 12.1 latest updates When I do an update the download manager automatically saves to ~/Documents and I want it to go to ~/Downloads. I cannot find a parameter to make the change. When I click a rpm to download I get the windows that asks if up want to open it now or "Save File" but the save file does not have any options to select when it goes. If I click Save File the download manager appears and saves to ~/Documents/ Does anyone know how to change this or the name of the configure file? Thanks in advance, if tis is bug let me know and i will report it. Thanks Russ openSUSE 12.1(3.1.10-1.9-desktop x86_64)|KDE Platform Version 4.8.3 (4.8.3) "release 501"|Intel core2duo 2.5 MHZ,|8GB DDR3|GeForce 8400GS(NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-295.49) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey & Copernic Desktop Search?
Interviewed by CNN on 10/05/2012 20:06, George Carden told the world: > I have done this, MCBastos, with Thunderbird 12.0.1 and it appears to > have worked. HOWEVER, your warnings to NEVER open Thunderbird again have > me shaking in my boots. Is there any link, such as within Copernic > search result preview pain, etc., that would open Thunderbird if I were > to click it? If it has found a link on a search that is, say, an > attachment of a jpeg, or anything else, or even if I just double-click a > found e-mail in the preview pain to open it, will that open Thunderbird? > I have backed up my SeaMonkey profile as a safety precaution, but I'm > hoping to never need it. No, I never had this sort of problem (opening Thunderbird by mistake). Copernic shows the message content on its own without invoking Thunderbird. But then, I don't think I have ever tried extracting an attachment from the Copernic interface. My warning against opening Thunderbird is based on an untested assumption: that there might be enough differences between the two products that could cause problems. But, as I said, I never tested it. It *might* be OK, but I just don't want to risk it. It depends on a few factors, about which we may make assumptions but I have no hard data: 1- Whether TB and SM have profile files with different internal structures yet the same name. I considered that a non-trivial risk if running, say, Seamonkey 1.9 with Thunderbird 3.1, since those are different Gecko versions. I consider the risk to be lowered if you are using a current Thunderbird, with the same Gecko version as SM -- but it might still be possible... 2- How TB and SM deal with unexpected things in their profile folders (unknown config settings, unknown files and such). I *think* they just ignore those (as opposed to, say, deleting them), but I'm not *sure*. 3- Whether either TB or SM aggressively changes any setting on boot (perhaps when detecting an "upgrade"). I don't think it likely -- if SM, say, NEEDS such-and-such values in about:config to run, the obvious way to deal with it would be to *ignore* the value in the config file, instead of changing it. But it's very good knowing that Copernic is still able to find the e-mails using newer versions of TB. Perhaps I'll update mine to either 10.x (LTS) or to the current one, now that 3.1.x was EOL'd... -- MCBastos This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized use will be prosecuted under the DMCA. -=-=- ... Sent from my Apple Lisa. * Added by TagZilla 0.7a1 running on Seamonkey 2.9 * Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey & Copernic Desktop Search?
MCBastos told the world: > No, I never had this sort of problem (opening Thunderbird by mistake). > Copernic shows the message content on its own without invoking > Thunderbird. But then, I don't think I have ever tried extracting an > attachment from the Copernic interface. > > My warning against opening Thunderbird is based on an untested > assumption: that there might be enough differences between the two > products that could cause problems. But, as I said, I never tested it. Addendum: in view of your success, I went on and updated my Thunderbird, taking the necessary precautions (reverting the profiles.ini file to the original settings). It went without a hitch. Then, I decided to get creative, and try a new hypothesis... setting up TB so the Seamonkey profile would be listed on the profiles.ini, but as a SECONDARY profile. Well, it didn't work. It seems Copernic only indexes the default TB profile. Had to set it up again as the primary TB profile... And... while messing with it, I accidentally *DID* start TB with the SM profile. And now I can confirm it: it DID mess my profile a bit, although not seriously -- changed my theme to "Modern" for some reason, triggered that "checking your add-ons after update" thing and such. I didn't notice anything SERIOUS, I was back to normal in a couple minutes. But it may be too early to tell if there were any more important consequences. Anyway, now I have actual data to recommend NOT opening Thunderbird after setting it up for the Copernic workaround. I don't think it will cause dataloss, but it IS a bother. -- MCBastos This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized use will be prosecuted under the DMCA. -=-=- ... Sent from my Daystrom M5 Multitronic System. * Added by TagZilla 0.7a1 running on Seamonkey 2.9 * Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey & Copernic Desktop Search?
MCBastos wrote: MCBastos told the world: No, I never had this sort of problem (opening Thunderbird by mistake). Copernic shows the message content on its own without invoking Thunderbird. But then, I don't think I have ever tried extracting an attachment from the Copernic interface. My warning against opening Thunderbird is based on an untested assumption: that there might be enough differences between the two products that could cause problems. But, as I said, I never tested it. Addendum: in view of your success, I went on and updated my Thunderbird, taking the necessary precautions (reverting the profiles.ini file to the original settings). It went without a hitch. Then, I decided to get creative, and try a new hypothesis... setting up TB so the Seamonkey profile would be listed on the profiles.ini, but as a SECONDARY profile. Well, it didn't work. It seems Copernic only indexes the default TB profile. Had to set it up again as the primary TB profile... And... while messing with it, I accidentally *DID* start TB with the SM profile. And now I can confirm it: it DID mess my profile a bit, although not seriously -- changed my theme to "Modern" for some reason, triggered that "checking your add-ons after update" thing and such. I didn't notice anything SERIOUS, I was back to normal in a couple minutes. But it may be too early to tell if there were any more important consequences. Anyway, now I have actual data to recommend NOT opening Thunderbird after setting it up for the Copernic workaround. I don't think it will cause dataloss, but it IS a bother. Thanks for the info! I'll keep you posted on any adventures (or mis-adventures) I may have in this endeavor. Thanks again for your help! -George ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Download Manager - Change Download Location
upscope wrote: SeaMonkey 2.9. (Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120422 Firefox/12.0 SeaMonkey/2.9) openSuSE 12.1 latest updates When I do an update the download manager automatically saves to ~/Documents and I want it to go to ~/Downloads. I cannot find a parameter to make the change. When I click a rpm to download I get the windows that asks if up want to open it now or "Save File" but the save file does not have any options to select when it goes. If I click Save File the download manager appears and saves to ~/Documents/ Does anyone know how to change this or the name of the configure file? Thanks in advance, if tis is bug let me know and i will report it. Thanks Russ openSUSE 12.1(3.1.10-1.9-desktop x86_64)|KDE Platform Version 4.8.3 (4.8.3) "release 501"|Intel core2duo 2.5 MHZ,|8GB DDR3|GeForce 8400GS(NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-295.49) Russ: Edit / Preferences / Browser / Downloads / When saving a file / choose the option you want (but "Always ask me where to save files" doesn't seem to work) Mark ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Seamonkey installation mystery
This totally mystifies me. A week ago I installed SM 2.9.1, apparently successfully, replacing (I thought) 1.1.19. I noticed right away my computer ran slower. Finally, on Monday or Tuesday of this week, things were so bad I had to give up and reboot. So, imagine my surprise when, after rebooting, I was again running 1.1.19. I went through the process of again installing 2.9.1, again apparently successfully. Then, again this (Thu) evening, my computer was again tied in knots so bad I had to reboot. Again, SM 1.1.19 was running after the reboot. Does anyone have any idea what is going on? How does 1.1.19 survive the installation of 1.9.1? (I actually used an intermediate step, making the actual conversion from 1.1.19 to 2.X.X in SM 2.0.5, my old profile imported ok, then upgrading to 2.9.1.) Win XP3, up to date, 2.5 gb memory. With 1.1.19 running, I could go weeks without rebooting. Something is odd here. Dave ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey & Copernic Desktop Search?
MCBastos wrote: MCBastos told the world: No, I never had this sort of problem (opening Thunderbird by mistake). Copernic shows the message content on its own without invoking Thunderbird. But then, I don't think I have ever tried extracting an attachment from the Copernic interface. My warning against opening Thunderbird is based on an untested assumption: that there might be enough differences between the two products that could cause problems. But, as I said, I never tested it. Addendum: in view of your success, I went on and updated my Thunderbird, taking the necessary precautions (reverting the profiles.ini file to the original settings). It went without a hitch. Then, I decided to get creative, and try a new hypothesis... setting up TB so the Seamonkey profile would be listed on the profiles.ini, but as a SECONDARY profile. Well, it didn't work. It seems Copernic only indexes the default TB profile. Had to set it up again as the primary TB profile... And... while messing with it, I accidentally *DID* start TB with the SM profile. And now I can confirm it: it DID mess my profile a bit, although not seriously -- changed my theme to "Modern" for some reason, triggered that "checking your add-ons after update" thing and such. I didn't notice anything SERIOUS, I was back to normal in a couple minutes. But it may be too early to tell if there were any more important consequences. Anyway, now I have actual data to recommend NOT opening Thunderbird after setting it up for the Copernic workaround. I don't think it will cause dataloss, but it IS a bother. apropos this *is* a seamonkey panel, not *thunderbird* sincerely, -- ~Vink ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey installation mystery
David Lawler wrote, On 11/05/2012 05:58: This totally mystifies me. A week ago I installed SM 2.9.1, apparently successfully, replacing (I thought) 1.1.19. I noticed right away my computer ran slower. Finally, on Monday or Tuesday of this week, things were so bad I had to give up and reboot. So, imagine my surprise when, after rebooting, I was again running 1.1.19. I went through the process of again installing 2.9.1, again apparently successfully. Then, again this (Thu) evening, my computer was again tied in knots so bad I had to reboot. Again, SM 1.1.19 was running after the reboot. Does anyone have any idea what is going on? How does 1.1.19 survive the installation of 1.9.1? (I actually used an intermediate step, making the actual conversion from 1.1.19 to 2.X.X in SM 2.0.5, my old profile imported ok, then upgrading to 2.9.1.) Win XP3, up to date, 2.5 gb memory. With 1.1.19 running, I could go weeks without rebooting. Something is odd here. Dave Are you sure that your old SM was not running when you installed the new version ? You can check it by looking for your list of process running. If semonkey.exe after you stop SM is there, you have to kill it. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
