Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-17 Thread GerardJan

Libertarian Lilly wrote:

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj urj...@bellsouth.net  wrote :


GerardJan wrote:

Libertarian Lilly wrote:

Come to think of it, if SM is using about 41 megs of RAM per open tab,
isn't that WAY excessive?


good enough for me, i have 4Mbyte physical memory

sincerely,


Huh?  41megs  4Mbyte



No, 41 megabytes per open tab.

12 tabs uses 440 megs, right?


[root@gershwin ~]# fdisk /dev/sda

Command (m for help): p

Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders, total 976773168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x827c953a

   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   *2048  206847  1024007  HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda2  20684897861631488273927  HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda39786163298885631  512000   83  Linux
/dev/sda498885632   976773167   4389437685  Extended
/dev/sda598887680   976773119   438942720   8e  Linux LVM

Command (m for help): q

[root@gershwin ~]#


--
~Vink
GerardJan Vinkesteijn VRI
http://vinkesteijn.info
mailto://g.j.f.vinkeste...@hotmail.es
http://ciudadpatricia.com
on Linux


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: View of the mailbox has changed with 2.9.1

2012-05-17 Thread Daniel

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Daniel wrote:


Maciej, what you have to do is set SM up as you want it and then get SM
to save that setting.

Click on the little SeaMonkey icon up in the top left of the SM screen
and there should be an option there to save settings or similar.

HTH


You mean the one that offers
Restore
Move
Size
Minimize
Maximize
Close
as for every Windows program?

I used to know where to set SM to save/not save the layout, but I can't
seem to find it anymore.



O.K., you caught me!!

I'm sure it used to be there, and as I was not on my Windows 7 install, 
I just assumed it was still up there!!


Sorry!

--
Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Verizon Connection...

2012-05-17 Thread NO

Hello all, I Am using SM 2.91 on Vista Business in a Lenovo T61 Laptop.

Starting last week I began having challenges connecting to get or send 
email through VZ. Timing out before sending or receiving is the issue.


My yahoo and gmail accounts are all fine and responsive.

I have made all of the changes 'required' by vz to no avail. Webmail 
does work, sporadically from the several computers I have used to check 
that through.


Any ideas or suggestions?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-17 Thread Rostyslaw Lewyckyj

Libertarian Lilly wrote:

Rostyslaw Lewyckyjurj...@bellsouth.net   wrote :


GerardJan wrote:

Libertarian Lilly wrote:

Come to think of it, if SM is using about 41 megs of RAM per open tab,
isn't that WAY excessive?


good enough for me, i have 4Mbyte physical memory

sincerely,


Huh?  41megs  4Mbyte



No, 41 megabytes per open tab.

12 tabs uses 440 megs, right?


My calculator reports that 41 times 12 equals 492.

But if GerardJan has (only) 4Mbytes of physical memory,
how does he fit that 41 meg tab into it?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Verizon Connection...

2012-05-17 Thread hawker

On 5/17/2012 7:29 AM, NO wrote:

Hello all, I Am using SM 2.91 on Vista Business in a Lenovo T61 Laptop.

Starting last week I began having challenges connecting to get or send
email through VZ. Timing out before sending or receiving is the issue.

My yahoo and gmail accounts are all fine and responsive.

I have made all of the changes 'required' by vz to no avail. Webmail
does work, sporadically from the several computers I have used to check
that through.

Any ideas or suggestions?


What port are you sending or receiving from?  What type of mail (POP? 
IMAP?) What security settings?  What servers are you sending to and from?

All this is factors in trouble shooting.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-17 Thread Ed Mullen

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:

Libertarian Lilly wrote:

Rostyslaw Lewyckyjurj...@bellsouth.net wrote :


GerardJan wrote:

Libertarian Lilly wrote:

Come to think of it, if SM is using about 41 megs of RAM per open tab,
isn't that WAY excessive?


good enough for me, i have 4Mbyte physical memory

sincerely,


Huh? 41megs 4Mbyte



No, 41 megabytes per open tab.

12 tabs uses 440 megs, right?


My calculator reports that 41 times 12 equals 492.

But if GerardJan has (only) 4Mbytes of physical memory,
how does he fit that 41 meg tab into it?


Win 7 32-bit, 4Gb RAM, SM 2.9.1.  12 tabs open.  155,740 Kb of RAM used.

--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
What's another word for thesaurus?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


SM 2.9.1 color scheme

2012-05-17 Thread W3BNR
I accomplished two things this last week:
1.  New Computer - now running Windows 7
2.  Installed SM 2.9.1 on new computer

Using the SM Default Theme when I 'hover' over an item, either the icon for a
drop-down menu or an item in the drop-down menu the text changes to white and
the background is the same as the existing background except lighter..  Very
hard to read what is selected.

If I switch to SM Modern Theme this hovering action shows black text on a light
blue background.  Easy to read.

Also on my Linux Mint machine running SM 2.9.1 Default theme the background is
black and the text is white. Also easy to read.

This would seem be be a change in SM 2.9.1 not Win 7.  Anyone else seeing this?

-- 
Ed, W3BNR
http://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR
Powered by SeaMonkey: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/

Nothing is troublesome that we do willingly.
 -Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Verizon Connection...

2012-05-17 Thread W3BNR
On 5/17/2012 9:59 AM hawker submitted the following:
 On 5/17/2012 7:29 AM, NO wrote:
 Hello all, I Am using SM 2.91 on Vista Business in a Lenovo T61 Laptop.

 Starting last week I began having challenges connecting to get or send
 email through VZ. Timing out before sending or receiving is the issue.

 My yahoo and gmail accounts are all fine and responsive.

 I have made all of the changes 'required' by vz to no avail. Webmail
 does work, sporadically from the several computers I have used to check
 that through.

 Any ideas or suggestions?
 
 What port are you sending or receiving from?  What type of mail (POP? IMAP?)
 What security settings?  What servers are you sending to and from?
 All this is factors in trouble shooting.
 

Are you configured as requested by Verizon?
http://www22.verizon.com/Support/Residential/Internet/fiosinternet/email/setup+and+use/questionsone/124274.htm

-- 

http://JonesFarm.us
Powered by SeaMonkey: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/

Government is like a baby: An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end
and no sense of responsibility at the other.   -Ronald Reagan (1911-2004)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM 2.9.1 color scheme

2012-05-17 Thread Ed Mullen

W3BNR wrote:

I accomplished two things this last week:
1.  New Computer - now running Windows 7
2.  Installed SM 2.9.1 on new computer

Using the SM Default Theme when I 'hover' over an item, either the icon for a
drop-down menu or an item in the drop-down menu the text changes to white and
the background is the same as the existing background except lighter..  Very
hard to read what is selected.

If I switch to SM Modern Theme this hovering action shows black text on a light
blue background.  Easy to read.

Also on my Linux Mint machine running SM 2.9.1 Default theme the background is
black and the text is white. Also easy to read.

This would seem be be a change in SM 2.9.1 not Win 7.  Anyone else seeing this?



Not at all what I'm seeing.

Hover over, e.g., File on the menu and it buttonizes but no color change.

Click File and hover over New and that turns to white text on a black 
background.


You sure you don't have something in your userChrome.css file that is 
doing this?



--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
You must be Daddy's little pumpkin, I can tell by the way you roll. - 
John Prine

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-17 Thread Rufus

Ed Mullen wrote:

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:

Libertarian Lilly wrote:

Rostyslaw Lewyckyjurj...@bellsouth.net wrote :


GerardJan wrote:

Libertarian Lilly wrote:

Come to think of it, if SM is using about 41 megs of RAM per open
tab,
isn't that WAY excessive?


good enough for me, i have 4Mbyte physical memory

sincerely,


Huh? 41megs 4Mbyte



No, 41 megabytes per open tab.

12 tabs uses 440 megs, right?


My calculator reports that 41 times 12 equals 492.

But if GerardJan has (only) 4Mbytes of physical memory,
how does he fit that 41 meg tab into it?


Win 7 32-bit, 4Gb RAM, SM 2.9.1. 12 tabs open. 155,740 Kb of RAM used.



What number on about:memory are you looking at?

Looking at the largest number I see - vsize - on my Mac installation, 2 
tabs open, shows 3,860.13 MB.  Which seems excessive to me...and that's 
with my cashe size set to zero.


Other than that, the number for explicit is 171.98 MB, which seems 
more reasonable.


--
 - Rufus
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Painfully slow graphics rendering

2012-05-17 Thread Craig

NoOp wrote:


I like those prices better than the San Franciso prices :-)


Indeed!



With Opera running at the same time  both browsers on the same page,
Opera register about 0.3 cpu  about 12% memory:

However... I can easily get Opera up to 41/12:
simply by scrolling through the 9 photos here:
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/10360-Ritts-Mill-Rd-Shingletown-CA-96088/69815673_zpid/


OK, but that's not what I spend most of the time doing.

On another note, the graphics driver update has made Google Maps work 
MUCH more quickly -- it's even usable now! :-)



Craig
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM 2.9.1 color scheme

2012-05-17 Thread W3BNR
On 5/17/2012 2:28 PM Ed Mullen submitted the following:
 W3BNR wrote:
 I accomplished two things this last week:
 1.  New Computer - now running Windows 7
 2.  Installed SM 2.9.1 on new computer

 Using the SM Default Theme when I 'hover' over an item, either the icon for a
 drop-down menu or an item in the drop-down menu the text changes to white and
 the background is the same as the existing background except lighter..  Very
 hard to read what is selected.

 If I switch to SM Modern Theme this hovering action shows black text on a 
 light
 blue background.  Easy to read.

 Also on my Linux Mint machine running SM 2.9.1 Default theme the background 
 is
 black and the text is white. Also easy to read.

 This would seem be be a change in SM 2.9.1 not Win 7.  Anyone else seeing 
 this?

 
 Not at all what I'm seeing.
 
 Hover over, e.g., File on the menu and it buttonizes but no color change.
 
 Click File and hover over New and that turns to white text on a black 
 background.
 
 You sure you don't have something in your userChrome.css file that is doing 
 this?
 


If that were the case I would expect both SM Themes to respond alike.  But just
to make sure, I renamed userChrome.css to userChrome.sav.  No difference in
above results.

-- 
Ed, W3BNR
http://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR
Powered by SeaMonkey: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/

Nobody believes a rumor here in Washington until
it's officially denied. ~Edward Cheyfitz
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-17 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:


But if GerardJan has (only) 4Mbytes of physical memory,
how does he fit that 41 meg tab into it?


If he has only 4 MB of RAM, he's running a wristwatch, not a computer. 
He must've meant 4 GB.


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Off-topic : Massive RAM usage

2012-05-17 Thread Philip TAYLOR



Paul B. Gallagher wrote:


If he has only 4 MB of RAM, he's running a wristwatch, not a
computer. He must've meant 4 GB.


4Mb is /massive/, man : the first computer on which
I worked had 8K !  (Clary 404, sequential architecture,
but a very powerful instruction set : one of my 3rd-
year students wrote a chess end-game solver in Clary
assembler).


Philip Taylor.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-17 Thread Rostyslaw Lewyckyj

Ed Mullen wrote:

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:

Libertarian Lilly wrote:

Rostyslaw Lewyckyjurj...@bellsouth.net wrote :


GerardJan wrote:

Libertarian Lilly wrote:

Come to think of it, if SM is using about 41 megs of RAM per open tab,
isn't that WAY excessive?


good enough for me, i have 4Mbyte physical memory

sincerely,


Huh? 41megs 4Mbyte



No, 41 megabytes per open tab.

12 tabs uses 440 megs, right?


My calculator reports that 41 times 12 equals 492.

But if GerardJan has (only) 4Mbytes of physical memory,
how does he fit that 41 meg tab into it?


Win 7 32-bit, 4Gb RAM, SM 2.9.1. 12 tabs open. 155,740 Kb of RAM used.


Now you're trying to confuse me :)
GerardJan wrote 4Mbytes. You write 4Gb Ram!
12 x 41 = 492 megs.  But you write that 12 tabs use 155,740 Kb of RAM!
Are you discussing the same case Ed?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: [Suggestions]

2012-05-17 Thread gjikkl

Philip Chee wrote:

On Fri, 11 May 2012 18:59:12 -0400, gjikkl wrote:


* Include SunBird in SeaMonkey.


Lightning (Sunbird as an extension) is available for SeaMonkey:
https://addons.mozilla.org/seamonkey/addon/lightning/
(And has been for quite a while.

Phil

I know but I don't want it that way, that's OK for FireFox which is only 
a Navigator/Browser and it needs everything else to be attached to it in 
ways of plug-ins or JavaScript scripts, but SeaMonkey is a suit and as 
such it should integrate as much tools as the Internet user needs, at 
least that's the approach Mozilla has led me to believe.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-17 Thread Ed Mullen

Rufus wrote:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:

Libertarian Lilly wrote:

Rostyslaw Lewyckyjurj...@bellsouth.net wrote :


GerardJan wrote:

Libertarian Lilly wrote:

Come to think of it, if SM is using about 41 megs of RAM per open
tab,
isn't that WAY excessive?


good enough for me, i have 4Mbyte physical memory

sincerely,


Huh? 41megs 4Mbyte



No, 41 megabytes per open tab.

12 tabs uses 440 megs, right?


My calculator reports that 41 times 12 equals 492.

But if GerardJan has (only) 4Mbytes of physical memory,
how does he fit that 41 meg tab into it?


Win 7 32-bit, 4Gb RAM, SM 2.9.1. 12 tabs open. 155,740 Kb of RAM used.



What number on about:memory are you looking at?


I'm not, I'm looking at Windows Task Manager.

If I have a chance I'll try about:memory and let you know.

--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
The hilarious thing about self-important self-righteous people is that 
they are so easily baited.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-17 Thread Ed Mullen

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:

Libertarian Lilly wrote:

Rostyslaw Lewyckyjurj...@bellsouth.net wrote :


GerardJan wrote:

Libertarian Lilly wrote:

Come to think of it, if SM is using about 41 megs of RAM per open
tab,
isn't that WAY excessive?


good enough for me, i have 4Mbyte physical memory

sincerely,


Huh? 41megs 4Mbyte



No, 41 megabytes per open tab.

12 tabs uses 440 megs, right?


My calculator reports that 41 times 12 equals 492.

But if GerardJan has (only) 4Mbytes of physical memory,
how does he fit that 41 meg tab into it?


Win 7 32-bit, 4Gb RAM, SM 2.9.1. 12 tabs open. 155,740 Kb of RAM used.


Now you're trying to confuse me :)
GerardJan wrote 4Mbytes. You write 4Gb Ram!
12 x 41 = 492 megs. But you write that 12 tabs use 155,740 Kb of RAM!
Are you discussing the same case Ed?


Gerard had to have mis-typed.  No modern PC has anything less than 512 
Mb to 1 Gb of RAM.


My PC (one of five) has 4 GIGA-bytes of RAM.

--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
42.7 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey