Re: News Videos Loading
David E. Ross wrote: On 8/29/2015 2:11 PM, Brian Mailman wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 8/22/2015 4:13 PM, Brian Mailman wrote: I like to open CNN http://www.cnn.com first thing, read the headlines of the stories I want to read later and right-click on them. "Open New Tab" I pick. Then I read the stories I've selected. Problem is, CNN doesn't believe the readers know how to read and that they want to watch videos. I don't. I want to read the stories. I wind up with a cacophony of videos, and I have to find them one by one before I can find peace. Is there a way of shutting down the videos unless/until I want to see them? Thanks. B/ If the videos are Flash (which fewer and fewer are, these days), they can be blocked with the FlashBlock extension. If the videos are HTML5 media, they can be blocked with a preference variable. In either case, unblocking them is easy. If you are interested in details, reply here in this newsgroup. Certainly. I don't know the difference between HTML5 and Flash. It's not that I want to block them entirely... I just want to block the videos until I want to see them. B/ The FlashBlock extension sets up a box on the Web page where the Flash video would play. In the middle of the box is a circle with a lower-case Italic f. If you hover your cursor over the box, the f changes to a right-pointing triangle. Select the triangle to play the video. FlashBlock also has an option to treat HTML5 Media videos the same way as it treats Flash videos. It also has a pull-down context menu; right-click when you hover your cursor over the box. Among other actions, the menu allows you to delete the video's box; in this case, you must reload the Web page if you change you mind and want to view the video. Thus, FlashBlock blocks videos until you want to view them. Thanks for your help! I can "google" and probably find the FlashBlock extension. B/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.35
zeroleft wrote: Just by taking a look at https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/, you could think that Adrian Kalla will not provide any more binaries for SeaMonkey on Linux 32-bits... Have you looked at https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/2.35-candidates/build3/ ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Help with DNSunlocker
I gotten a bad case of DNSunlocker and I can't figure out how to get rid of it. I've tried all of the methods in the internet and run tw i virus scans AVG and Clamwin. Nothing seems to work. Some of the procedure for Firefox call for deleting extensions but I'm not seeing any extensions I haven't loaded my self. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: News Videos Loading
Brian Mailman wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 8/29/2015 2:11 PM, Brian Mailman wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 8/22/2015 4:13 PM, Brian Mailman wrote: I like to open CNN http://www.cnn.com first thing, read the headlines of the stories I want to read later and right-click on them. "Open New Tab" I pick. Then I read the stories I've selected. Problem is, CNN doesn't believe the readers know how to read and that they want to watch videos. I don't. I want to read the stories. I wind up with a cacophony of videos, and I have to find them one by one before I can find peace. Is there a way of shutting down the videos unless/until I want to see them? Thanks. B/ If the videos are Flash (which fewer and fewer are, these days), they can be blocked with the FlashBlock extension. If the videos are HTML5 media, they can be blocked with a preference variable. In either case, unblocking them is easy. If you are interested in details, reply here in this newsgroup. Certainly. I don't know the difference between HTML5 and Flash. It's not that I want to block them entirely... I just want to block the videos until I want to see them. B/ The FlashBlock extension sets up a box on the Web page where the Flash video would play. In the middle of the box is a circle with a lower-case Italic f. If you hover your cursor over the box, the f changes to a right-pointing triangle. Select the triangle to play the video. FlashBlock also has an option to treat HTML5 Media videos the same way as it treats Flash videos. It also has a pull-down context menu; right-click when you hover your cursor over the box. Among other actions, the menu allows you to delete the video's box; in this case, you must reload the Web page if you change you mind and want to view the video. Thus, FlashBlock blocks videos until you want to view them. Thanks for your help! I can "google" and probably find the FlashBlock extension. Doh! ... ne-ferr mid Sorry, I just reread the thread and EE was kind enough to tell me. B/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.35
On 9/1/2015 2:38 PM, NoOp wrote: > On 9/1/2015 8:13 AM, Jonathan N. Little wrote: >> Gordon Weast wrote: >>> By default, Ubuntu 64 bit doesn't install the 32 bit runtime. Now, even >>> after trying to find all the libraries in 32 bit form through the Ubuntu >>> installer, I can't run the 32 bit Seamonkey. There is a library it >>> attempts to load that I can't find in 32 bit form for Ubuntu. I hope >>> we'll see a 64 bit build of 2.35 soon after the 32 bit mainline. I have >>> the machine setup to use the same profile on both Win7 and Linux. >>> Having Windows using 2.35 and Linux use 2.33 will keep showing me the >>> Seamonkey welcome to new version screen. >> >> >> Generally when installing a 32-bit application on 64-bit Ubuntu all you >> have to do to install the missing 32-bit library dependancies is >> >> sudo apt-get install -f >> > > Actually it is no longer that easy... > > > I already had i386 multiarch installed on Ubuntu 15.04 64bit, I still > ended up having to install the bits mentioned in here: > > libxul.so: > libXrender.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory > Couldn't load XPCOM > > You can see some of the work here: > http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/12248722/ > > Thanks again Adrian for your 64bit builds!! > > G > > > Sorry forgot to add the 32bit UI: User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/36.0 SeaMonkey/2.33.1 Build identifier: 20150321194732 vs the 64bit version on the same machine: User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/36.0 SeaMonkey/2.33.1 Build identifier: 20150321194827 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.35
On 9/1/2015 8:13 AM, Jonathan N. Little wrote: > Gordon Weast wrote: >> By default, Ubuntu 64 bit doesn't install the 32 bit runtime. Now, even >> after trying to find all the libraries in 32 bit form through the Ubuntu >> installer, I can't run the 32 bit Seamonkey. There is a library it >> attempts to load that I can't find in 32 bit form for Ubuntu. I hope >> we'll see a 64 bit build of 2.35 soon after the 32 bit mainline. I have >> the machine setup to use the same profile on both Win7 and Linux. >> Having Windows using 2.35 and Linux use 2.33 will keep showing me the >> Seamonkey welcome to new version screen. > > > Generally when installing a 32-bit application on 64-bit Ubuntu all you > have to do to install the missing 32-bit library dependancies is > > sudo apt-get install -f > Actually it is no longer that easy... I already had i386 multiarch installed on Ubuntu 15.04 64bit, I still ended up having to install the bits mentioned in here: libxul.so: libXrender.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Couldn't load XPCOM You can see some of the work here: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/12248722/ Thanks again Adrian for your 64bit builds!! G ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: 2.35 update
Edmund Wong wrote: EE wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Hi, Another update on 2.35. 1) build3 was 'somewhat' done but needs to be rebuilt due to some misconfiguration on my part. It doesn't mean that build3 is a bust. It isn't. It's just that it's uploading the files to the wrong places. (First time it uploaded was to the nightlies tree. :P ) 2) l10n repacks needs fixing. I've been told it won't require a build4(read: Callek's gonna do his cset magic), but I guess we shall see. 3) Once the repacks are done, the *real* work is on getting the CVS-based-system-now-migrated-to-Mercurial part of the release process working. But thankfully, this part is automated, so I won't be the reason for the slow down. Again, thanks for your patience while I work on this. Edmund I am using build 3 already. I noticed that it is much smaller than the Tinderbox build (which was over 90 MB). Why the difference in size? Where did you get the tinderbox build? All the 'real' builds are in the candidates/ area. If 2.35 is found anywhere else(as of this writing), it's most likely a mistake on my part. I'm wondering if I screwed something up, as there seems to be some 2.35 release stuff in : http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/tinderbox-builds/ Edmund That was where I got the build. I am now using the candidate build. I really missed the en-GB version. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: HELP!!!!!!
On 1/09/2015 7:25 PM, Daniel wrote: On 30/08/2015 6:46 AM, Sandy wrote: Can someone PLEASE tell me WHY all of a sudden when I try to download or save .exe and .psp files the box comes up as BLOCKED??? I have changed NOTHING!!! This is very frustrating!!! Thank you...I am running 2.33.1 The box that comes up is it a SeaMonkey branded box or is it from your anti-virus or ... (brain fade!! What's the program thingee that stops your computer making unauthorised downloads/phoning home??) brain fade!! What's the program thingee that stops your computer making unauthorised downloads/phoning home?? A Router is what I was trying to remember!! -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.33 Build identifier: 20150223174142 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.33 Build identifier: 20150215202114 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.35
W dniu 09/01/2015 o 12:11 AM, zeroleft pisze: > But, and I believe it's something similar for others, is because when a > machine has only 2GB of ram, (and life circumstances do not allow, at > this time, for memory upgrade or for simply buy a new PC), it probably > would be counterproductive try to run a 64-bit system in such modest > hardware. I think it is unlikely you would loose perceived performance when switching to 64 bit. But of course you would also not gain any. On the other hand, your system would be compatible with all 32 and 64 bit applications. W dniu 08/31/2015 o 10:10 PM, zeroleft pisze: > Just by taking a look at > https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/, you > could think that Adrian Kalla will not provide any more binaries for > SeaMonkey on Linux 32-bits... You are right. There are four reasons why I needed to abandon 32 bit Linux builds: 1. My CentOS 6 32bit virtual machine did get corrupted, and as I found out, I had no backup of it. 2. My builds were taking too much space on the L10n server. 3. I needed CPU and RAM resources for Windows builds. 4. And the ultimate reason is Mozilla's switch to GTK3: there is no GTK3 for CentOS6 available (Mozilla seems to have produced own packages, but afaics, they can't be found anywhere publicly - which is BTW a really big shame, since there is now also no way to build an exact one-to-one build to check, if Mozilla did have to include something in their builds because of a National Security Letter...). And there is no 32 bit version of RHEL7/CentOS7, which needs to be used for SM 2.39+ builds (and my cross compile tries failed, and I have no more time to invest into this issue). -> 32 bit is dead. Long live 64 bit. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: HELP!!!!!!
On 30/08/2015 6:46 AM, Sandy wrote: Can someone PLEASE tell me WHY all of a sudden when I try to download or save .exe and .psp files the box comes up as BLOCKED??? I have changed NOTHING!!! This is very frustrating!!! Thank you...I am running 2.33.1 The box that comes up is it a SeaMonkey branded box or is it from your anti-virus or ... (brain fade!! What's the program thingee that stops your computer making unauthorised downloads/phoning home??) -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.33 Build identifier: 20150223174142 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.33 Build identifier: 20150215202114 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: HELP!!!!!!
Daniel пишет: brain fade!! What's the program thingee that stops your computer making unauthorised downloads/phoning home?? A Router is what I was trying to remember!! It was probably firewall. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.35
Gordon Weast wrote: By default, Ubuntu 64 bit doesn't install the 32 bit runtime. Now, even after trying to find all the libraries in 32 bit form through the Ubuntu installer, I can't run the 32 bit Seamonkey. There is a library it attempts to load that I can't find in 32 bit form for Ubuntu. I hope we'll see a 64 bit build of 2.35 soon after the 32 bit mainline. I have the machine setup to use the same profile on both Win7 and Linux. Having Windows using 2.35 and Linux use 2.33 will keep showing me the Seamonkey welcome to new version screen. Generally when installing a 32-bit application on 64-bit Ubuntu all you have to do to install the missing 32-bit library dependancies is sudo apt-get install -f -- Take care, Jonathan --- LITTLE WORKS STUDIO http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey installation instruktions do not work
Frank Markmann wrote: There is no script ./seamonkey after extraction of the package, as discribed. http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/2.0/install-and-uninstall Sorry, but this way you can't propagate the use of seamonkey. All the best Frank There is script ./seamonkey after extraction of the package; may be you can not find the scrip because you are looking for it into an no-correct directory. For your reference: I download the tar file in the "Downloads" directory; and moves it to the "seamonkey2" directory (created previously at my home directory). From the terminal: - change to this directory (cd ~/seamonkey2), - run the tar command, this create a "seamonkey" directory, - change to this directory (cd seamonkey) - and run the script (./seamonkey). I hope this help you ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
strange spell check issue
Using 2.31 (different computer) on Win 7-64 a recent strange spell check issue has come up. When I right mouse on a misspelled word and select the correction it scrambles it between other words. For example if I say "this shud not happen" and correct shud I would get this happen noshouldt. Rebooting fixes for a bit then it goes back Any ideas? Is this SM or something else? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.35
Adrian Kalla wrote: W dniu 09/01/2015 o 12:11 AM, zeroleft pisze: But, and I believe it's something similar for others, is because when a machine has only 2GB of ram, (and life circumstances do not allow, at this time, for memory upgrade or for simply buy a new PC), it probably would be counterproductive try to run a 64-bit system in such modest hardware. I think it is unlikely you would loose perceived performance when switching to 64 bit. But of course you would also not gain any. On the other hand, your system would be compatible with all 32 and 64 bit applications. W dniu 08/31/2015 o 10:10 PM, zeroleft pisze: Just by taking a look at https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/, you could think that Adrian Kalla will not provide any more binaries for SeaMonkey on Linux 32-bits... You are right. There are four reasons why I needed to abandon 32 bit Linux builds: 1. My CentOS 6 32bit virtual machine did get corrupted, and as I found out, I had no backup of it. 2. My builds were taking too much space on the L10n server. 3. I needed CPU and RAM resources for Windows builds. 4. And the ultimate reason is Mozilla's switch to GTK3: there is no GTK3 for CentOS6 available (Mozilla seems to have produced own packages, but afaics, they can't be found anywhere publicly - which is BTW a really big shame, since there is now also no way to build an exact one-to-one build to check, if Mozilla did have to include something in their builds because of a National Security Letter...). And there is no 32 bit version of RHEL7/CentOS7, which needs to be used for SM 2.39+ builds (and my cross compile tries failed, and I have no more time to invest into this issue). -> 32 bit is dead. Long live 64 bit. One reason I have for still wanting a 32 bit version is on an auxiliary machine I use in my ham shack. That one is still a 32 bit hyper-threaded machine. Quite adequate for the purpose and I can't justify the cost of a newer machine. I only boot Linux on it, for the most part, even though there is still an XP partition that rarely gets used. I have the XP marked as a POS terminal, so it does still get some security updates! On the other hand, on my main machine which is 64 bit, I dual boot between Windows 7/64 and Ubuntu 14.04/64. By default, Ubuntu 64 bit doesn't install the 32 bit runtime. Now, even after trying to find all the libraries in 32 bit form through the Ubuntu installer, I can't run the 32 bit Seamonkey. There is a library it attempts to load that I can't find in 32 bit form for Ubuntu. I hope we'll see a 64 bit build of 2.35 soon after the 32 bit mainline. I have the machine setup to use the same profile on both Win7 and Linux. Having Windows using 2.35 and Linux use 2.33 will keep showing me the Seamonkey welcome to new version screen. So, I still have a desire to see both 32 and 64 bit versions. Gordon ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
