Re: Access Denied - CarMax.com
Danny Kile wrote: Going to carmax.com I get the following error: Access Denied You don't have permission to access "http://www.carmax.com/"; on this server. Reference #18.2d891ab8.1596029342.1765be0e I works just fine with Chrome. What is my solution? Thank you! This site works for me using using WG9s build 2.53.b4 using MacOS 10.15.6 I have the preference set to advertise both SeaMonkey and Firefox compatibility (preferences). Maybe the issue has been resolved in later versions? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Access Denied - CarMax.com
Nuno Silva wrote: On 2020-07-29, Danny Kile wrote: Going to carmax.com I get the following error: Access Denied You don't have permission to access "http://www.carmax.com/"; on this server. Reference #18.2d891ab8.1596029342.1765be0e I works just fine with Chrome. What is my solution? Thank you! That is blacklisting by Akamai. I'm afraid I don't know the details of why it might fail with a specific browser/profile and work with others on the same machine - I can only guess cookies, javascript or the user-agent string may be involved, but it could be something else. I doubt that it is any of the above. I blocked cookies and disabled javascript, and I use the normal SeaMonkey user-agent with Firefox compatibility info, and the page works for me. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Access Denied - CarMax.com
On 7/29/2020 7:30 AM, Lemuel Johnson wrote: On 7/29/2020 8:34 AM, Danny Kile wrote: Going to carmax.com I get the following error: Access Denied You don't have permission to access "http://www.carmax.com/"; on this server. Reference #18.2d891ab8.1596029342.1765be0e I works just fine with Chrome. What is my solution? Thank you! Works for me. Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.3 Same here. -- Life's so loco! ..!.. *isms, sins, hates, (d)evil, illnesses (e.g., COVID-19/2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2), deaths (RIP), interruptions, stresses, heat waves, fires, out(r)ages, dramas, unlucky #4, 2020, greeds, bugs (e.g., crashes & female mosquitoes), etc. Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly. /\___/\ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.ma.cx / / /\ /\ \ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org | |o o| | Axe ANT from its address if shown & e-mailing privately. \ _ / Please kindly use :( Ant nickname & URL/link if crediting. ( ) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.53.3 Access Denied
On Sun, 19 Jul 2020 12:28:36 +0100, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: >Doors wrote: >> On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 19:15:39 +0100, "Nuno Silva" >> wrote: >>> Any chance this one said the following?: >>> >>> "Access Denied >>> >>> You don't have permission to access "[address]" on this server. >>> >>> Reference #[number].[number].[number]" >>> >>> >>> >>> That'd be blacklisting by Akamai: >>> >>> https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/197753 >>> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15688362 >> >> That looks correct. >> Confusing part is I could pull up the same page on FF no problem. >> That was annoying. >> Fail on SM, work on FF, same address, same minute. >> Load root of newegg, works. >> Go anywhere on site, fail. >> >> Really started bugging me. > >Do you block JavaScript, or use an extension which blocks it, on >SeaMonkey? I had similar issues some time ago with a couple of sites I >use, with NoScript in my case blocking scripts by default. I think they >turned out to be using Akami. Allowing the domain to run scripts >resolved the problem. > >It was no good loading the site and then temporarily allowing scripting >for it though, as they seemed to decide on loading the first page that I >was going to be blocked for any further requests (even just reloading >the home page I was already looking at lead to access denied). As I >recall, I think I could enable scripting and then delete cookies set for >the domain, so seems something was stored in cookies on that first load, >which caused the problem for subsequent requests even if scripts were >then enabled. But it was easier to just permanently allow JavaScript >for those domains. I rebuilt the profile by creating a clean one, then manually importing pieces one by one. Now it works, but no idea why. My plugins are simple. DOM inspector, epubreader, restart, show password, & umatrix. Everything is the same as it was before, only now it works. Really weird. -- Doors - Dont look at the future in a window. Walk to a door - Open it, and go there. http://www.freedoors.org AntiSpam in effect! doorsremov...@freedoors.org mailto:doorsremov...@freedoors.org ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is anybody else still using Win 7 here?
On Sun, 19 Jul 2020 20:31:55 -0400, meagain wrote: > Original Message >> On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 20:22:44 +1000, Daniel >> wrote: >> >>> Last Monday (so Sunday Evening USA time) when I checked my Windows >>> Update portal, it showed there was an 80.6MB update waiting to be installed. >>> >>> (Note: Last Monday, so not the normal Windows7 update, which, if there >>> is one, I usually get on a Wednesday Afternoon (so Tuesday Evening USA >>> time)) >>> >>> Virtually daily since, I've been having to re-boot my Win7 so it can >>> complete the installation but time after time after time, the >>> update fails, so the system reverts to the previously installed system >>> until next cold boot!! >>> >>> Is anyone else seeing this behaviour?? Can I, somehow, delete the >>> Windows Update from the Control Panel screen and hope things get >>> fixed up/picked up next Update Tuesday?? >>> >>> Any other suggestions APART FROM UPDATING TO WIN10?? >> >> Yes, I am still running Win7, and have no plans to move to Win8, or >> downgrade to W10, the demented cartoon edition of windows. >> W10 is basically a graphics terminal to the M$ cloud, nothing more. >> >> Speaking strictly for myself, I do not reccomend leaving updates on at >> all, or installing them except individually. >> M$ consistently adds undocumented contents, or hides the full >> description behind a summary, or uses misleading language. >> >> Instead, get the yearly security rollups, then run the anti telemetry >> shell scripts so they can't sneak anyting in. >> >> Nearly all security updates for windows itself concern IE, OE, or IIS. >> Do not use any of them and your attackable profile is reduced to a >> miniscule fraction. >> >> For myself, I run Win7 with a few extras. >> Openshell, set as classic as I can make it. >> 7+ taskbar switcher. >> Network activity indicator. >> Explorer++, an open source replacement. >> I get ~90% of a good GUI back. >> >> I also replace windows search with voidtools everything. >> It is faster, more consistent, and supports network searches. >> It also recently began supporting content based searches as well. >> >> This is what I do, do what works for you. >> > >https://www.ag.ndsu.edu/accs/maintenance/windows-7-computers-to-be-blocked-january-14-2020 I understand, but W10 is not securable. While it may not matter to a student only accessing student things. I work with computers every day, and have customers IP, which I have to keep secure, and I can not do that on W10. It leaks by design, plus backs up your user profile to the cloud. No OS that reports what you run, when you run it, and how long you run it, can be considered secure. If you can't control what data it transmits, then it is not your computer, or OS for that matter. With M$ pushing desktop as a service, M$ has killed windows. I await ReactOS going beta. -- Doors - Dont look at the future in a window. Walk to a door - Open it, and go there. http://www.freedoors.org AntiSpam in effect! doorsremov...@freedoors.org mailto:doorsremov...@freedoors.org ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Access Denied - CarMax.com
On 7/29/2020 8:34 AM, Danny Kile wrote: Going to carmax.com I get the following error: Access Denied You don't have permission to access "http://www.carmax.com/"; on this server. Reference #18.2d891ab8.1596029342.1765be0e I works just fine with Chrome. What is my solution? Thank you! Works for me. Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.3 Lem Johnson ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Access Denied - CarMax.com
On 2020-07-29, Danny Kile wrote: > Going to carmax.com I get the following error: > > Access Denied > You don't have permission to access "http://www.carmax.com/"; on this server. > > Reference #18.2d891ab8.1596029342.1765be0e > > I works just fine with Chrome. > > What is my solution? Thank you! That is blacklisting by Akamai. I'm afraid I don't know the details of why it might fail with a specific browser/profile and work with others on the same machine - I can only guess cookies, javascript or the user-agent string may be involved, but it could be something else. -- Nuno Silva ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Access Denied - CarMax.com
Going to carmax.com I get the following error: Access Denied You don't have permission to access "http://www.carmax.com/"; on this server. Reference #18.2d891ab8.1596029342.1765be0e I works just fine with Chrome. What is my solution? Thank you! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
