2.0.10 Seamonkey - printers not seen

2010-12-11 Thread Fred James
I have upgraded to Seamonkey 2.0.10 on my Mandriva 2008.0 desktop and 
now the printers are not available (Navigate: File->Print).  They were 
available on the older version of Seamonkey, and they are working from 
the CLI as well as other applications such as OpenOffice.  Thank you for 
any help you may be able to offer

Regards
Fred James

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


seamonkey printer question

2010-12-13 Thread Fred James
In Seamonkey (and Firefox, as it happens), in the file 'run-mozilla.sh' 
there is a variable "$MOZILLA_POSTSCRIPT_PRINTER_LIST"... can anyone 
help me to determine where that variable is set, or what the value might 
actually be, please?


Reason for interest ... the latest version installed on my box (Mandriva 
2008.0) does not seem to be able to find the printers.  I am thinking 
that perhaps a sym-link might be a workaround?

Thanks
Regards
Fred James

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


downgrade [Was: Re: seamonkey printer question]

2010-12-13 Thread Fred James
Suppose I cannot get the printers to be seen by Seamonkey 2.0.10 on my 
Mandriva 2008.0 box ... how do I return to Seamonkey 1.1.10 without 
losing my bookmarks, history, mail, etc?  Or is that possible?


By the way ... someone on another list suggested going to 2.0.11 might 
fix the printer issue ... how likely is that, do you think?

Thanks
Regards
Fred James

Fred James wrote:
In Seamonkey (and Firefox, as it happens), in the file 
'run-mozilla.sh' there is a variable 
"$MOZILLA_POSTSCRIPT_PRINTER_LIST"... can anyone help me to determine 
where that variable is set, or what the value might actually be, please?


Reason for interest ... the latest version installed on my box 
(Mandriva 2008.0) does not seem to be able to find the printers.  I am 
thinking that perhaps a sym-link might be a workaround?

Thanks
Regards
Fred James



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: OT Re: seamonkey printer question

2010-12-14 Thread Fred James

Jay Garcia wrote:

On 14.12.2010 13:49, hawker wrote:

 --- Original Message ---

  

On 12/14/2010 1:33 PM, JeffM wrote:


Fred James wrote:
  

[...]PRINTER[...]



Starting a new thread with each new post
seems very stupid and selfish to me.
Try keeping it all in one thread from now on.
  

Nit picking every post with unnecessary criticism seems very stupid and
self centered to me. It tells me you probably spend your life in your
bedroom of your parents house jacking off with nothing better to do but
troll.
Try keeping your posts to the subject and hand and ignore minor
grievances that do not really matter.



There is nothing "nit picking" about maintaining a single thread with
nested replies posted in chronological order as it is much easier and
productive for those marking as read and then returning to followup the
new replies.

Followup set to .general for any further OT discussion.
  
But in the meantime, may I assume you don't have an answer to either 
question?

Regards
Fred James

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: OT Re: seamonkey printer question

2010-12-14 Thread Fred James

Jay Garcia wrote:

(omissions for brevity)

But in the meantime, may I assume you don't have an answer to either
question?
Regards
Fred James




That is correct, no answer, don't run Linux and that's why I marked it
OT and set the followup to .genera
Are you saying this is a MS Windows discussion group?  My apologies ... 
I didn't know ... I thought it was a SM discussion group ... sorry, my bad.

Regards
Fred James

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey