Re: SeaMonkey 2.25?
Daniel wrote: On 31/03/2014 6:03 PM, Misak Khachatryan wrote: David E. Ross wrote: The US-CERT announced: Original release date: March 18, 2014 The Mozilla Foundation has released security updates to address multiple vulnerabilities in Firefox, Thunderbird, and Seamonkey. Exploitation of these vulnerabilities may allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information, cause a denial-of-service condition, execute arbitrary code, or operate with elevated privileges on an affected system. The following updates are available: Firefox 28 Firefox ESR 24.4 Thunderbird 24.4 Seamonkey 2.25 Users and administrators are encouraged to review the Security Advisories for Firefox, Firefox ESR, Thunderbird, and Seamonkey to determine which updates should be applied to mitigate these risks. Will Seamonkey 2.25 be released soon? It's neither on the http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ Web site nor on the ftp.mozilla.org FTP server. 2.25 is unusable on at least Linux 64 bit, because of bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=964182 Don't upgrade, or it will crash every time. However, I've been using SM2.25b2 for the last several weeks (didn't upgrade to 2.25b3) without any crashes!! Misak, is it possible that one of your extension is causing the problem?? Do you see any messages in the Error Console?? Or have a look at Crash Reports for the Last 3 Days under Help-Troubleshooting Information No, It's not extension. I'm testing any everyday build since October on clean profile, and it's crashing. Official Fedora 20 SM 2.25 package too. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.25?
NFN Smith wrote: Misak Khachatryan wrote: 2.25 is unusable on at least Linux 64 bit, because of bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=964182 Don't upgrade, or it will crash every time. What distro are you running, and where are you getting your updates from? Are you downloading directly from Mozilla, or getting updates through your distro's repository, or are you using a third-party repository, such as Ubuntuzilla? Also, what tool are you using for subscribing to RSS? I'm not seeing any issues on a copy installed from Ubuntuzilla, but I also don't do RSS in that installation. I don't know if it's significant, but I notice that the Ubuntuzilla release of 2.25 was a little slower than normal, on this release cycle. If Firefox normally releases on Tuesday, it seems that windows versions of Seamonkey normally turn up on Wednesday or Thursday, and Ubuntuzilla has it by sometime on Friday. I don't remember the exact release time, but on this cycle, I didn't see the Seamonkey update from Ubuntuzilla offered until Monday, although I didn't make any checks over the weekend. Smith Fedora 20, official packages. Also my builds since October. You should use RSS in mailnews to catch that bug. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.25?
David E. Ross wrote: The US-CERT announced: Original release date: March 18, 2014 The Mozilla Foundation has released security updates to address multiple vulnerabilities in Firefox, Thunderbird, and Seamonkey. Exploitation of these vulnerabilities may allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information, cause a denial-of-service condition, execute arbitrary code, or operate with elevated privileges on an affected system. The following updates are available: Firefox 28 Firefox ESR 24.4 Thunderbird 24.4 Seamonkey 2.25 Users and administrators are encouraged to review the Security Advisories for Firefox, Firefox ESR, Thunderbird, and Seamonkey to determine which updates should be applied to mitigate these risks. Will Seamonkey 2.25 be released soon? It's neither on the http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ Web site nor on the ftp.mozilla.org FTP server. 2.25 is unusable on at least Linux 64 bit, because of bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=964182 Don't upgrade, or it will crash every time. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF
oppiman wrote: Hello, I've been using TB and FF for a long time. Recently I found myself using Chrome more and more. //yeah, shame on me But I don't want to get rid of FF completely. So know I'm thinking about installing Seamonkey to replace TB and FF with one tool. What functionality would I loose? In addition SM don't have Private browsing mode and some developer tools. What would I win? SM uses less memory than FF+TB. And suite is more logical and feels as one program. Can I import all settings and data from TB? Yes. Can Seamonkey browser sync with FF online data? Yes. Thanks ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF
oppiman wrote: Hello, I've been using TB and FF for a long time. Recently I found myself using Chrome more and more. //yeah, shame on me But I don't want to get rid of FF completely. So know I'm thinking about installing Seamonkey to replace TB and FF with one tool. What functionality would I loose? In addition SM don't have Private browsing mode and some developer tools. What would I win? SM uses less memory than FF+TB. And suite is more logical and feels as one program. Can I import all settings and data from TB? Yes. Can Seamonkey browser sync with FF online data? Yes. Thanks ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF
Jay Garcia wrote: On 12.02.2012 08:27, Misak Khachatryan wrote: --- Original Message --- SM uses less memory than FF+TB. And suite is more logical and feels as one program. The problem with an all-in-one browser+mail application is that if one component crashes then so does the other one. If the browser component crashes then so does mail. This IMHO of course. YMMV I didn't see crashes years, even i'm on alpha builds 3 year or more. Plugin crashes are isolated, they can't crash suite. Also even if you crash SM will restore your last state for browser, and there is nothing to restore in mail window usually. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: LASTPASS Addon with Seamonkey
Mr. Cheese wrote: Anyone know of or tried this FF addon with SM? Me. Working. Misak. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.1
Ant wrote: On 6/11/2011 12:36 PM PT, David E. Ross typed: There were a number of bugs associated with the old design of the Bookmarks Manager. The developers chose to resolve those problems by putting bookmarks into places.sqlite, a database instead of an HTML file. Is this file portable among different OS' like Mac OS X, Windows, and Linux/Debian? That is how I updated my SM2's bookmarks manually. With integrated Sync, You shouldn't bother about that. Simply set up Your sync account and add devices, and they all will have all You cookie, passwords, history and bookmarks in place. Misak. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1
Philip Chee wrote: Hi! SeaMonkey 2.1 is almost out of the gate. We need to make sure that the Lightning version targetting SM 2.1 works well with it. So I need volunteers to smoke test Lightning 1.04b on SeaMonkey 2.1 Lightning 1.0b4pre builds are here: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/latest-comm-miramar/ SeaMonkey 2.1pre builds are here: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-2.0/ Lightning will integrate into the MailNews window and you can open new Calendar and Task tabs via the mini buttons in the tabbar. Phil (also posted to Mozillazine http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=6t=2210021) There is a long standing bug with Lighning - some RSS feeds stopping to work for me. Disabling Lightning helps. Anyone have similar behavior ? Misak ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: WebGl
question wrote: When will seamonkey be supported ? The Story http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/12/17/google-expands-human-body-browser/?test=latestnews The Link http://bodybrowser.googlelabs.com/ Current trunk builds already support it. Grab it when 2.1 version arrives. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .
Jay Garcia wrote: On 30.11.2009 08:58, J. Weaver Jr. wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 30.11.2009 08:35, Benoit Renard wrote: --- Original Message --- John Boyle wrote: My evaluation of 2.0 is that it is somewhat faster as a browser, but, as with all the others, the email and newsgroups stink, still! I did NOT want to even download it, but was persuaded by a couple of people, however, nobody seems to want to tackle the FACT that version 2.0 IS TERRIBLY DEFICIENT IN THE EMAIL AND NEWSGROUPS DEPARTMENTS, as people have been saying, CONSTANTLY, and the developers JUST SIMPLY REFUSE TO LISTEN TO ANY CRITICISM, EVEN IF BASED ON FACT! Please don't confuse Robert Kaiser, the most prominent developer, with the developers. I'm a developer, even if I don't contribute all that often, and I will tell you this: SeaMonkey 2.0's mailnews part is based on a beta version of Thunderbird 3.0. When Thunderbird 3.0 is done, the next release of SeaMonkey 2.0 will incorporate all the fixes, and hopefully be more reliable in that department. Why is a release based on a beta ? Yeah - seems like a bad decision on somebody's part... -JW Well, I realize it was an incomplete question as ALL releases are based on betas but I think the meaning was transmitted - why is a SM release based on a TB beta where there are as yet unresolved bugs? There is not too much or no Gecko mailnews bugs, which SM and TB sharing. TB is beta because of it's UI bugs or parts of mailnews that SM not uses, so it's pretty safe to go gold. It's a good decision, some open source software take years in beta or even alpha, which doesn't prevent them to be as stable as releases. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
