Re: Message list --
On 10/25/18 11:29, WaltS48 wrote: Bob Goodwin wrote: . I have just replaced Thunderbird in Fedora29 with SeaMonkey 2.49.4 and the result is generally an improvement for me. However the the addresses in the From, To, etc. listing at the top of the message text page uses colored text. I use white text on a black background and the addresses appearing dark blue, virtually fading into the black background unless I put the cursor on the line, then it becomes red text which is a little better. I would like to make that white. Is there a line in about:config that will change that and what is the name. Thank you, Bob Are you referring to the Message Header? Subject: From: Date: To: etc. . Yes That is very light grey or blue for me in SM 2.49.4 on Ubuntu 18.04. If I change my Ubuntu theme from the default Adwaita to Adwaita-dark I can reproduce your problem. . That is my problem, all the themes available with a dark background look like that. I have tried all the themes listed and nothing with a dark background displays those addresses properly. It must be set somewhere in the SeaMonkey program. I have something in my notes for Thunderbird that suggests creating a css file but even then I would not know what to put in it to fix the font color in those lines without messing up everything else which is good. I am using SeaMonkey because I can get white text on black and use some of the old extensions such as ToneQuilla which permits me to create filters with voice announcements for different received messages. I suggest trying different Fedora themes. I would gladly use any theme, Fedora or SeaMonkey, that fixes the problem but there are many themes listed in XFCE Appearance, none of them provide the needed font color, preferably white as in Thunderbird, for those address lines with a dark background. That is why I inquired of this list. Thank you for responding, Bob <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/User_Guide/sect-User_Guide-Customizing_the_desktop-Changing_the_theme_.html> ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Message list --
. I have just replaced Thunderbird in Fedora29 with SeaMonkey 2.49.4 and the result is generally an improvement for me. However the the addresses in the From, To, etc. listing at the top of the message text page uses colored text. I use white text on a black background and the addresses appearing dark blue, virtually fading into the black background unless I put the cursor on the line, then it becomes red text which is a little better. I would like to make that white. Is there a line in about:config that will change that and what is the name. Thank you, Bob -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 FEDORA-27/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Amazon & AVG Pop Ups - Trojans ?
On 02/13/2014 10:43 AM, MR ZenWiz wrote: That would be easier if the group weren't set to default to individual replies, vs. automatic replies to the group, but what the hey. you obviously don't understand newsgroups... (And your (at)example.invalid is perfect, right?:-) He never said anything was right or wrong - he was saying why an email bounced. -- Jeff G. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey Stays Active Although Closed
On 01/14/2014 08:24 AM, A Williams wrote: goodwin wrote: On 01/13/2014 05:50 PM, MR ZenWiz wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:43 PM, goodwin wrote: On 01/13/2014 10:16 AM, MR ZenWiz wrote: I just wrote a simple shell script that clobbers whichever one is giving me trouble: #!/bin/bash # A shell script to kill that annoying runaway seamonkey/firefox/npviewer that won't die case `basename $0` in "seakill") cmd=seamonkey;; "foxkill") cmd=firefox;; "npvkill") cmd=npviewer;; *) echo "Unrecognized command."; exit 1;; esac /usr/bin/pkill -9 $cmd /bin/ps -fC $cmd what the heck is npviewer and how did it get into this thread? Collateral damage. After I found the problem with SeaMonkey, it began to occur occasioinally in Firefox, then later with npviewer, which is part of the Adobe flash player systems that used to cause hangs, similar to these (GIYF). I haven't needed npvkill in about two years, but why remove it if it may ever cause problems again? Maybe so but hardly on point here - though, thinking about it, maybe I'm all wet - /anything/ would be on point since it seems to have turned into a discussion of .lock files - I have no idea where the original poster stands. Nice script, good exercise, but better to discover what the cause actually is. Yes - that is why I tried to drag the thread back On Topic, but it seems clear that no-one knows what is causing this or even how to find out what Seamonkey is silently doing. I have been away and have not looked at Bugzilla for this, there should be a new level coming soon and maybe this has been fixed. Have you looked at the knowledgebase on this? I'd look at the Firefox pages - I know there have been such issues before and SM isn't all that different. http://kb.mozillazine.org/Category:Issues_%28Firefox%29 -- Jeff G. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey Stays Active Although Closed
On 01/13/2014 05:50 PM, MR ZenWiz wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:43 PM, goodwin wrote: On 01/13/2014 10:16 AM, MR ZenWiz wrote: I just wrote a simple shell script that clobbers whichever one is giving me trouble: #!/bin/bash # A shell script to kill that annoying runaway seamonkey/firefox/npviewer that won't die case `basename $0` in "seakill") cmd=seamonkey;; "foxkill") cmd=firefox;; "npvkill") cmd=npviewer;; *) echo "Unrecognized command."; exit 1;; esac /usr/bin/pkill -9 $cmd /bin/ps -fC $cmd what the heck is npviewer and how did it get into this thread? Collateral damage. After I found the problem with SeaMonkey, it began to occur occasioinally in Firefox, then later with npviewer, which is part of the Adobe flash player systems that used to cause hangs, similar to these (GIYF). I haven't needed npvkill in about two years, but why remove it if it may ever cause problems again? Maybe so but hardly on point here - though, thinking about it, maybe I'm all wet - /anything/ would be on point since it seems to have turned into a discussion of .lock files - I have no idea where the original poster stands. Nice script, good exercise, but better to discover what the cause actually is. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey Stays Active Although Closed
On 01/13/2014 10:16 AM, MR ZenWiz wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:17 AM, A Williams wrote: Chuck wrote: I am having a problem with Seamonkey clearing out of memory after closing. I have a CPU monitor and can see it using 100% for over 2 minutes after closing. I cannot restart it without going to Task Manager and killing it during those 2+ minutes. Any suggestions? Thanks, Chuck Leaving the entire theoretical discussion of semaphores and file-rights aside, I have a similar problem on this Linux machine since the upgrade to 2.23. I have had this problem occasionally with Firefox, SeaMonkey, and even just the npviewer, since way back when I was using CentOS 5 (now on Xubuntu 12.04/3.8 kernel). I just wrote a simple shell script that clobbers whichever one is giving me trouble: #!/bin/bash # A shell script to kill that annoying runaway seamonkey/firefox/npviewer that won't die case `basename $0` in "seakill") cmd=seamonkey;; "foxkill") cmd=firefox;; "npvkill") cmd=npviewer;; *) echo "Unrecognized command."; exit 1;; esac /usr/bin/pkill -9 $cmd /bin/ps -fC $cmd what the heck is npviewer and how did it get into this thread? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Inter-play between OS's
On 01/04/2014 04:50 AM, Daniel wrote: I found thirteen panacea.dat's, one on my Linux Hume mount and twelve spread over the Windows drives You have that many profiles? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Focus goes away from web page
On 11/30/2013 08:22 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: Hence, explicitly stating the info in his message would guarntee we know what's going on. guarantee? helpful, no doubt, but I'd be loath to say guarantee in computer assistance... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [Resolved] Re: Flash (Linux) again...
On 11/22/2013 03:42 PM, NoOp wrote: and the plugin check works correctly. thats an oops for sure... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Funding and Bug Fixes....
On 11/19/2013 09:01 AM, Larry S. wrote: one person's bug is ofter another person's feature. I've said that in the past - nice to know I'm not alone. And it is a huge stumbling block... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: does SM 2.22 work on OS X Mavericks?
On 11/11/2013 03:43 PM, Trane Francks wrote: On 11/12/13 8:10 AM +0900, goodwin wrote: On 11/11/2013 09:54 AM, HilsB wrote: HilsB wrote: Yes it does - if anything a little faster. A few bits of advice - 1) backup everything 2)Close down all programmes 3) allow a few hours. academic question only - what does allowing a few hours do and where does it do it? not a mac user nor SM... Backing up your system and then doing an in-place upgrade will take "a few hours", same as with Windows or Linux. Maybe you should let the original poster answer the question - you are off the mark by a mile or so... That is, if Linux has evolved enough to actually do in-place upgrades. Who brought this into the subject? For me, an in-place upgrade takes me 1/2 hour or so total and has been so for at least 8-10 years, (Not that I'd do one; I always do a clean install and then migrate my profile from the existing backup. That takes even longer.) I don't think you know what you are talking about. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: does SM 2.22 work on OS X Mavericks?
On 11/11/2013 09:54 AM, HilsB wrote: HilsB wrote: Yes it does - if anything a little faster. A few bits of advice - 1) backup everything 2)Close down all programmes 3) allow a few hours. academic question only - what does allowing a few hours do and where does it do it? not a mac user nor SM... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey Inbox Hijacked! Test EOM
On 07/23/2013 08:56 PM, Ed Mullen wrote: Louis Toscano wrote: Louis Toscano wrote: Fellow SeaMonkey Users I am using the newsgroup because I could not access MozillaZine through its URL, Google Search or other established links. My inbox between 8:33 and 3:35 PM had more identified Junk messages than I could count. They mostly had blank subject lines and no body. One had a garbage subject line. How could this have happened? Louis Toscano (908) 459-8227 Hmm, I wonder, should I call Louis? And ask him WTFO? I mean, the number seems valid. Wow, what an interesting conversation that would be! :-D Every post seems less ... err ... uh ... sensible? Logical? Valid? Sane? ... than the last. Haven't seen this in a while. Not in this day and age, Ed. Let sleeping etc., etc.,,, ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey Inbox Hijacked!
On 07/22/2013 07:43 PM, Paul wrote: Louis T. wrote: Fellow SeaMonkey Users I am using the newsgroup because I could not access MozillaZine through its URL, Google Search or other established links. My inbox between 8:33 and 3:35 PM had more identified Junk messages than I could count. They mostly had blank subject lines and no body. One had a garbage subject line. How could this have happened? Louis T. (908) 459- This has got to be fake, an attack on someone, or a phishing attempt. Nobody posts their real name, email addy, or phone number on line. Where have you been - the world is full of stupid people... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Since two days I cannot open a new tab in the Browser
On 07/21/2013 03:53 PM, Geoff Welsh wrote: goodwin wrote: On 07/21/2013 01:12 PM, Geoff Welsh wrote: maybe he could post "try disabling add-ons for any NEW problem" once a day he does now more than that - I see where you're going, though, and /anyone/ could post a "try it in safe mode" post daily. :) True, and although I have personally considered it, I'm on Mac, with no non-standard add-ons, and never know if someone actually did discover a real problem. I was, also, thinking of the golden days of Usenet in the 80's when moderators would post an FAQ. Could that be automated? I suppose those are on the web now. But yet even today, in 2013, typing "I updated seamonkey and now it's broken" in Google gets you nothing useful. GW was it usenet in the 80s? don't remember - I remember BBs... But newsgroups still do that. Chris I. has a useful site but its existence isn't advertised save in his sig - dunno why no FAQ put out regularly - maybe since mozilla's current release policies would involve too much maintenance? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Since two days I cannot open a new tab in the Browser
On 07/21/2013 01:12 PM, Geoff Welsh wrote: maybe he could post "try disabling add-ons for any NEW problem" once a day he does now more than that - I see where you're going, though, and /anyone/ could post a "try it in safe mode" post daily. :) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Browser has just become unuseable
On 07/20/2013 06:38 AM, A Williams wrote: goodwin wrote: On 07/20/2013 02:09 AM, Ray_Net wrote: goodwin wrote, On 20/07/2013 03:54: WTF is O'Reilly? http://shop.oreilly.com/product/9780596007607.do $45 for a book that hasn't been updated in 8 years ($39 for ebook)! Guys don't think too much of themselves... If one reads all there is to see there, one would think O'Neil invented the internet, the web browser, and everything in between. Barnum was correct - there is a sucker born every minute (that doesn't apply to your buying the book back then - that applies to $45 today). I bought it back in the 90's. What *is* your problem? I don't have a "problem" but your communication skills do. You posted only vague descriptions of your issues and half the original post was irrelevant. The bug you cited was totally irrelevant as well and a waste of anyone's time that took the time to look at it. The solution to your problem which you posted in another thread (which effectively did nothing) is totally different than the one you posted here (which was to revert to backup). Glad you got it fixed anyway. Try man rsync sometime... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Browser has just become unuseable
On 07/20/2013 02:09 AM, Ray_Net wrote: goodwin wrote, On 20/07/2013 03:54: WTF is O'Reilly? http://shop.oreilly.com/product/9780596007607.do $45 for a book that hasn't been updated in 8 years ($39 for ebook)! Guys don't think too much of themselves... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Browser has just become unuseable
On 07/19/2013 01:07 PM, A Williams wrote: that is simply the way I copy directories around its hardly simple, it gives one more chances of breaking something, and I haven't a clue what you are referring to with permissions and links - there are much simpler commands but aside from that, you are just adding to the "linux is too geeky" parade of windoze users. WTF is O'Reilly? Maybe /he/ can tell you how to use your browser - that should be fun. F/U set to moz gen ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Browser has just become unuseable
On 07/19/2013 10:14 AM, A Williams wrote: Copying was done by going to "screwed" and then: tar cf - . | (cd ../xxx.default ; tar xf - ) why did you do it with tar - thats an archive utility? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey is crashing my computer
On 07/17/2013 03:28 PM, Craig McCluskey wrote: goodwin wrote: On 07/15/2013 09:33 PM, Craig McCluskey wrote: > I was browsing on a web page, clicked a link, and my monitor went black. A few seconds later the BIOS boot screen started up. I had this about a week ago, but I think I was running 2.17.1 then. At any rate, I am not a happy camper. Any suggestions on how to fix this? I don't like having to take the time to recover my computer and check that the files have not been corrupted by the unceremonious shutdown. Also, anyone know why e2fsck clears orphaned inodes instead of attaching them to the appropriate lost+found directory? This question is beyond the scope of this group - judging from the responses so far, you may want to check this in a linux group or SM dev ng. what makes you think this is a SM issue? Twice having a crash the instant I clicked on a web browser link. This doesn't indicate SM necessarily. I've dropped gnome some time ago and currently use e17. It crashes on its own when it feels like it in whatever app. It recovers itself quite nicely as well. I just haven't had the time to ferret this out and it is infrequent enough I don't feel the need. Point being, what you describe can be caused by any number of things - s/w or hardware - and you haven't provided any useful information as of yet to aid in diagnosis. Distro? video card? using compiz? what desktop you using? Gnome what do your logs say? There is no information in /var/log/messages about the crash. then .xsession-errors? The entry at Jul 15 16:43:51 is a message about the firewall rejecting a connection. this certainly isn't directly SM related... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey is crashing my computer
On 07/15/2013 09:33 PM, Craig McCluskey wrote: Seamonkey 2.19 on CentOS 5.9 Linux. Plugins: Shockwave Flash File: libflashplayer.so Path: /usr/local/seamonkey.2.19/plugins/libflashplayer.so Version: 11,2,202,297 State: Enabled Shockwave Flash 11.2 r202 Adobe Reader 9.5 File: nppdf.so,nppdf.so Path: /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/nppdf.so,/usr/local/seamonkey.2.19/plugins/nppdf.so Version: State: Disabled The Adobe Reader plugin is used to enable viewing of PDF and FDF files from within the browser. Helix DNA Plugin: RealPlayer G2 Plug-In Compatible File: nphelix.so,nphelix.so Path: /usr/local/RealPlayer/mozilla/nphelix.so,/usr/local/seamonkey.2.19/plugins/nphelix.so Version: State: Enabled Helix DNA Plugin: RealPlayer G2 Plug-In Compatible version 0.4.0.5745 built with gcc 3.4.6 on Nov 17 2010 I was browsing on a web page, clicked a link, and my monitor went black. A few seconds later the BIOS boot screen started up. I had this about a week ago, but I think I was running 2.17.1 then. At any rate, I am not a happy camper. Any suggestions on how to fix this? I don't like having to take the time to recover my computer and check that the files have not been corrupted by the unceremonious shutdown. Also, anyone know why e2fsck clears orphaned inodes instead of attaching them to the appropriate lost+found directory? what makes you think this is a SM issue? what desktop you using? what do your logs say? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Password Doesn't Appear?
On 07/12/2013 05:48 AM, Tom Pamin wrote: Daniel wrote: Tom Pamin wrote: I have a password stored for a site with SM, but it doesn't show up each time I visit the site. I have to re-enter it each time. How do I fix this? Tom, when you re-enter the password, do you get the option to save it?? You can check what passwords you have stored under Tools->Password Manager->Manage Stored Passwords. Is it possible that your passwords file is marked as Read Only?? Check in File Manager. It only asked the first time, and the password is listed in Password Manager. How do I access file manager? probably windows explorer to you... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: I get: SeaMonkey is already running
On 06/24/2013 09:35 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote: Mike C wrote: When I try to open SM I get: SeaMonkey is already running, but is not responding. To open a new window, you must first close the existing SeaMonkey process, or restart your system. BUT, It's NOT running! This even happens in safe mode. And with a fresh re-boot. Anyone know the answer? No, but I know a new (related) question, why doesn't "-new-instance" make it ignore the problem. Acording to help that's exactly what it should do. And I believe I've used command line options to open a new remote version as well, but don't have time to research it for you. Take a look at the "-remote" command values, see if that gives you a workaround if you ever really do have a running process. I don't use SN (yet) but am curious here - does SM use the parentlock file as TB and FF do? Might that be in play here? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Ubuntuzilla PPA
On 07/06/2013 05:57 AM, Cruz, Jaime wrote: Does anyone know when Daniel will have the latest Seamonkey build up on Ubuntuzilla? FWIW, when I "check for updates" from Seamonkey, it still tells me that there aren't any updates available. Running Ubuntu Precise, 64-bit. http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/releases/2.19/contrib/ try the tar - easy manual install... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Outgoing Email Message Failed Due to Lost Connection to Server
On 07/05/2013 06:02 PM, Marc Claypool wrote: I get this (paraphrased) message fairly regularly. It's mostly a nuisance because I can usually try to resend a couple of times and it will go. I have been experiencing it a long time and not really worrying about it because it is mostly a nuisance. However, last Friday I sent an email just before I left home for the weekend and did not discover the failure until I got back Sunday night. Is there a setting I need to change? I am running SeaMonkey 2.17.1. (I just saw a few minutes ago that 2.19 is out.) I experienced it both with my former desktop running Windows XP Home and my current laptop running Windows 7 for which I have automatic updates running. I'm getting that from AT&T - you with Bell South? You could try and get them on the phone - ha! Just been a pita this past week - dunno if its a bell thing or what. yahoo could be involved as well. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: I get: SeaMonkey is already running
On 06/24/2013 11:54 AM, goodwin wrote: On 06/24/2013 09:35 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote: Mike C wrote: When I try to open SM I get: SeaMonkey is already running, but is not responding. To open a new window, you must first close the existing SeaMonkey process, or restart your system. BUT, It's NOT running! This even happens in safe mode. And with a fresh re-boot. Anyone know the answer? No, but I know a new (related) question, why doesn't "-new-instance" make it ignore the problem. Acording to help that's exactly what it should do. And I believe I've used command line options to open a new remote version as well, but don't have time to research it for you. Take a look at the "-remote" command values, see if that gives you a workaround if you ever really do have a running process. I don't use SN (yet) but am curious here - does SM use the parentlock file as TB and FF do? Might that be in play here? /SN/ /SM/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: multi-touch support?
On 06/16/2013 10:56 AM, Rufus wrote: even I have a hard time seeing what this all has to do with the Profile Manager but there's clearly a code path that PM has something to do with that is broken. so what is it - a bug or a guess? How does PM have anything to do with the file path? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Fwd: Stop watching us
On 06/15/2013 09:11 AM, may12.newsgroup wrote: On 6/15/2013 8:37 AM, M.Ross wrote: Fwd: Stop watching us Scam? Maybe, just as likely delusion.. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: multi-touch support?
On 06/16/2013 05:53 PM, Rufus wrote: goodwin wrote: On 06/16/2013 10:56 AM, Rufus wrote: even I have a hard time seeing what this all has to do with the Profile Manager but there's clearly a code path that PM has something to do with that is broken. so what is it - a bug or a guess? How does PM have anything to do with the file path? It's a real, genuine, formally documented bug - read the bug I cited; I read the bug you cited - itsd still open for assignment. And it isn't "real" - the documenting I saw was all your input, nothing more. You haven't answered the question - what does PM have to do with opening files? I have no knowledge of OS X but every other OS I've seen doesn't work this way... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: multi-touch support?
On 06/13/2013 11:17 AM, Rufus wrote: goodwin wrote: On 06/12/2013 07:09 PM, Rufus wrote: not following URLs when using the Profile Manager ? There's a bug on this - I wrote it. It's been partially fixed since I wrote the initial bug, but it's still a problem. One can half-work around it by simply not invoking the Profile Manager at startup, but even so SM will not open on-disk URLs/Alias for HTML help file like the Epson user manual for example. The SM Profile Manager is broken - and I'm betting that some of the code and code paths associated with it are also broken given that invoking Change Profile from within the Browser presents the old style NS-like graphic for Profile selection vice the new one which is presented on invoke at startup. ...all documented in the bug, no fix delivered. What are you on about? where's the bug? If you wrote it as clearly there as you did here, I wouldn't be surprised nothing is done on the bug. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: multi-touch support?
On 06/12/2013 07:09 PM, Rufus wrote: not following URLs when using the Profile Manager ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Pref to redirect mailto: links?
On 06/10/2013 03:17 AM, Philip Chee wrote: On 10/06/2013 09:26, goodwin wrote: (I'm lurking here to see if SM might be an alternate email/ng client to TB. I'm assuming the browser is a clone of FF.) Only in the sense that all browsers enable you to browse the web. Most of the expected basic features are the same. We don't have some of the more fancier stuff like Panorama (aka Tab Candy) and about:home. We do have Sync, safe browsing, and some experimental private browsing (needs more testing). Out of the box SeaMonkey is more configurable. Phil Thank you for that, Phil - I'll post back with any more questions soon - I don't want to hijack this thread. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Pref to redirect mailto: links?
On 06/09/2013 07:02 PM, Geoff Welsh wrote: Many of us were using this stuff long before FF came out. As was I. Harmet replied that I could test but I don't currently have time to play with it - I'm dealing with bodhi linux with enlightenment on 3 different machines and all are turning out to be different in silly ways. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Pref to redirect mailto: links?
On 06/09/2013 03:51 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
David E. Ross:
I cannot find any user-oriented description of
mailnews.display.show_all_body_parts_menu,
An explanation can be found in omni.ja#defaults->pref->mailnews.js
- mailnews.js -
pref("mailnews.display.show_all_body_parts_menu", false); // Whether the
View > Message body as > All body parts menu item is available
---
Not user-oriented, though, certainly. ;)
Hartmut
This /is/ the SM group but I can say it exists in Tbird 17 ESR via
config editor so I assume its in prefs.js.
(I'm lurking here to see if SM might be an alternate email/ng client to
TB. I'm assuming the browser is a clone of FF.)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How does the cache setups work in the latest stable SeaMonkey and Firefox web browsers?
On 01/08/2013 06:05 AM, Ant wrote: On 1/1/2013 11:34 AM PT, Ant typed: Does the web browsers keep the most used cached files on the disks? Do the least used one get thrown one when more room is needed? Also, how does the automatic disk cache sizes get calculated and set? For an example with my SeaMonkey v2.14.1 web browser, it is 350 MB. Iceweasel/Debian's Firefox v17.0.1 web browser is about 800 MB. type "about:config" (w/o quote marks) in address bar. type "cache" in upper search (called filtering) bar. right click any entry to modify... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Web pages that have click to load more...
On 11/22/2012 02:10 PM, Ron Hunter wrote: the author gave up, or went nuts or both... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
hiw do I get out of
I think I am subscribed to a Mozilla newsgroup but I not sure how it happened. I keep getting emails related to the above address, DO you know how I get out of it. thx S. Goodwin ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Can't play some CollegeHumor videos in old Firefox v2.0.0.20 and SeaMonkey v1.1.17?
On 06/29/2009 07:46 AM Ant scribbled: > > How do I enable safe mode? Start>Run firefox -safe-mode ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
