Re: YouTube Problems: Blank page shown instead of preview and suggestions list.

[Thomas Pamin]

Thomas Pamin wrote:

Rainer Bielefeld wrote:

Thomas Pamin schrieb:
Lots of blank pages and no video 


Hi,

REPRODUCIBLE with installation of unofficial (by wg9s) De SeaMonkey 
2.53.2 beta 1 pre Mozilla/5.0  (NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:60.0) 
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0 Build 20200222130008 (Default Classic 
Theme, newly created User Profile) on German WIN7 64bit AND: Modified 
User String "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:75.0) 
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/75.0". See 


But it's ok for me with default user string:


@Thomas:
Can you please try that page with newly created User Profile? That 
should work for YouTube without any problems.


Best regards

Rainer

So to use the default user string do you just delete the agent override 
string totally?
I reset the user override string to make it blank. And, now YouTube 
works, and also Instagram, which also was giving me blank pages!

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: YouTube Problems: Blank page shown instead of preview and suggestions list.

[Thomas Pamin]

Rainer Bielefeld wrote:

Thomas Pamin schrieb:
Lots of blank pages and no video 


Hi,

REPRODUCIBLE with installation of unofficial (by wg9s) De SeaMonkey 
2.53.2 beta 1 pre Mozilla/5.0  (NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:60.0) 
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0 Build 20200222130008 (Default Classic Theme, 
newly created User Profile) on German WIN7 64bit AND: Modified User 
String "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:75.0) Gecko/20100101 
Firefox/75.0". See 


But it's ok for me with default user string:


@Thomas:
Can you please try that page with newly created User Profile? That 
should work for YouTube without any problems.


Best regards

Rainer

So to use the default user string do you just delete the agent override 
string totally?

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: YouTube Problems: Blank page shown instead of preview and suggestions list.

[Rainer Bielefeld]

Thomas Pamin schrieb:
Lots of blank pages and no video 


Hi,

REPRODUCIBLE with installation of unofficial (by wg9s) De SeaMonkey 
2.53.2 beta 1 pre Mozilla/5.0  (NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:60.0) 
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0 Build 20200222130008 (Default Classic Theme, 
newly created User Profile) on German WIN7 64bit AND: Modified User 
String "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:75.0) Gecko/20100101 
Firefox/75.0". See 


But it's ok for me with default user string:


@Thomas:
Can you please try that page with newly created User Profile? That 
should work for YouTube without any problems.


Best regards

Rainer

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Feedback (Suggestions for improvement): Search Engine & Webbrowser (Summary inkl. Bonus Parts)

[Albert Fischer]

 

look pdf. file (Feedback)

 

 

 

 




___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

suggestions

[David flores]

My proposal is to take the free browser to android would be perfect if this
browser was available

David
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Costco Website Photos Not Fully Rendering.... Suggestions?

[SamuelS]

SamuelS wrote:

Hello all,

Whenever I go to www.costco.com I find that the photos are not fully 
rendering. There are photos just under the search bar to the right of 
'Shop All Departments' which will only render for four (4) seconds 
before disappearing.


This happens using SM 2.4 and either W 7pro or W 10 pro or Vista pro 
and not in any other browser I have tried.


Suggestions about settings?

TIA - bo1953

Thank you one and all for the input!
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Costco Website Photos Not Fully Rendering.... Suggestions?

[Stanimir Stamenkov]

Tue, 3 May 2016 07:43:19 -0400, /SamuelS/:


Whenever I go to www.costco.com I find that the photos are not fully
rendering. There are photos just under the search bar to the right
of 'Shop All Departments' which will only render for four (4)
seconds before disappearing.

This happens using SM 2.4 and either W 7pro or W 10 pro or Vista pro
and not in any other browser I have tried.

Suggestions about settings?


Have you checked by any chance:

   Preferences / Privacy & Security

  [x] Prevent tracking activities by known sites

I have it and I observe the problem you describe.  With the given 
setting enabled I observe the following in the Error Console:


Warning: The resource at 
"http://www.hlserve.com/Delivery/ClientPaths/Library/hook.js?apiKey=1cd76670-4aa6-4bbd-b654-60d9862728b5=web; 
was blocked because tracking protection is enabled.

Source File: http://www.costco.com/
Line: 0

Error: ReferenceError: HLLibrary is not defined
Source File: http://www.costco.com/
Line: 1531

Unfortunately selecting "Unblock" from the track blocking 
notification bar doesn't appear to have any effect.  Unchecking:


  [ ] Prevent tracking activities by known sites

appears to fix the problem on my side.

--
Stanimir
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Costco Website Photos Not Fully Rendering.... Suggestions?

[Jonathan N. Little]

SamuelS wrote:

Hello all,

Whenever I go to www.costco.com I find that the photos are not fully
rendering. There are photos just under the search bar to the right of
'Shop All Departments' which will only render for four (4) seconds
before disappearing.

This happens using SM 2.4 and either W 7pro or W 10 pro or Vista pro and
not in any other browser I have tried.

Suggestions about settings?



WFM, SM2.40 Win7, SM2.40 Ubuntu 16.04. Now it has carousel JavaScript 
that pulls data from richrelavance.com which stalled once and took some 
time for the slideshow to load. I might suggest your either with ad 
blocking on that domain or server/routing issue.



--
Take care,

Jonathan
---
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Costco Website Photos Not Fully Rendering.... Suggestions?

[Richard Owlett]

On 5/3/2016 8:12 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:

On 5/3/2016 at 7:43 AM, SamuelS's fingers rattled off:

Hello all,

Whenever I go to www.costco.com I find that the photos are not
fully
rendering. There are photos just under the search bar to the
right of
'Shop All Departments' which will only render for four (4) seconds
before disappearing.

This happens using SM 2.4 and either W 7pro or W 10 pro or
Vista pro and
not in any other browser I have tried.

Suggestions about settings?

TIA - bo1953


Same here with W10 Pro and SM 2.40. I allow all cookies on Costco
and popups.  No idea what's wrong.



*MULTIPLE HTML ERRORS* to start with.
https://validator.w3.org/ reports 325 errors/warnings
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Costco Website Photos Not Fully Rendering.... Suggestions?

[WaltS48]

On 05/03/2016 09:12 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:

On 5/3/2016 at 7:43 AM, SamuelS's fingers rattled off:

Hello all,

Whenever I go to www.costco.com I find that the photos are not fully
rendering. There are photos just under the search bar to the right of
'Shop All Departments' which will only render for four (4) seconds
before disappearing.

This happens using SM 2.4 and either W 7pro or W 10 pro or Vista pro and
not in any other browser I have tried.

Suggestions about settings?

TIA - bo1953


Same here with W10 Pro and SM 2.40. I allow all cookies on Costco and 
popups.  No idea what's wrong.




It's a slideshow of 6 images, that has a pause button at the end of the 
number buttons.


That's what I see in my SM 2.49a1.

--
Linux Mint 17.3
Go Pens! Go Bucs!
Visit Pittsburgh <http://www.visitpittsburgh.com/>
Coexist · Understanding Across Divides <https://www.coexist.org/>
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Costco Website Photos Not Fully Rendering.... Suggestions?

[Ed Mullen]

On 5/3/2016 at 7:43 AM, SamuelS's fingers rattled off:

Hello all,

Whenever I go to www.costco.com I find that the photos are not fully
rendering. There are photos just under the search bar to the right of
'Shop All Departments' which will only render for four (4) seconds
before disappearing.

This happens using SM 2.4 and either W 7pro or W 10 pro or Vista pro and
not in any other browser I have tried.

Suggestions about settings?

TIA - bo1953


Same here with W10 Pro and SM 2.40. I allow all cookies on Costco and 
popups.  No idea what's wrong.


--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
"A conscience is like a boat or a car. If you feel you need one, rent 
it." - J.R. Ewing

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [Suggestions]

[gjikkl]

Philip Chee wrote:

On Fri, 11 May 2012 18:59:12 -0400, gjikkl wrote:


* Include SunBird in SeaMonkey.


Lightning (Sunbird as an extension) is available for SeaMonkey:
https://addons.mozilla.org/seamonkey/addon/lightning/
(And has been for quite a while.

Phil

I know but I don't want it that way, that's OK for FireFox which is only 
a Navigator/Browser and it needs everything else to be attached to it in 
ways of plug-ins or JavaScript scripts, but SeaMonkey is a suit and as 
such it should integrate as much tools as the Internet user needs, at 
least that's the approach Mozilla has led me to believe.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [Suggestions]

[Philip Chee]

On Fri, 11 May 2012 18:59:12 -0400, gjikkl wrote:

 * Include SunBird in SeaMonkey.

Lightning (Sunbird as an extension) is available for SeaMonkey:
https://addons.mozilla.org/seamonkey/addon/lightning/
(And has been for quite a while.

Phil

-- 
Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org
Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief,
oh Night, and so be good for us to pass.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [Suggestions]

[gjikkl]

errata:

* Make 'Scriptish' part of SeaMonkey/FireFox, since them can't run
USER JavaScript scripts. Why don't you add the guy that makes it to Mozilla
team?


Yes user scripts to be installed and ran are only possible with Scriptish.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Suggestions on moving from 2.0.14 to 2.5

[MCBastos]

Interviewed by CNN on 01/12/2011 02:59, Mike C told the world:
 Philip TAYLOR wrote:


 MCBastos wrote:

 Focusing on startup speed is like saying, Wow, that car is fast! Just
 0.3 seconds from unlocking the door to putting the engine in gear!

 Hang on, hang on : if this is going to go viral, let's get our
 facts straight : it is the /car/ that is put in gear, not the
 engine !

 ** P.
 Actually, it's the transmission that is put in gear (smile).

OK, what about this? It's car/engine/transmission neutral (pun not
intended):

Focusing too much on startup speed is like saying, Wow, that car is
fast! Just 0.3 seconds from unlocking the door to engaging first gear!

-- 
MCBastos

This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized
use will be prosecuted under the DMCA.

-=-=-
... Sent from my table at Ten Forward.
* Added by TagZilla 0.066.2 running on Seamonkey 2.5 *
Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Suggestions on moving from 2.0.14 to 2.5

[MCBastos]

Interviewed by CNN on 29/11/2011 22:03, NoOp told the world:
 On 11/29/2011 03:59 PM, MCBastos wrote:

 I agree with you. The sad thing, though, is for the average joe shmoe
 the perceived speed in opening the first page seems more important
 than actual speed. It's like saying, wow, that car is fast! Just 0.3
 seconds from unlocking the door to putting the engine in gear!
 
 That should be turned into a sig quote :-)

Feel free to adopt/adapt it. Well, let me provide a more sig-friendly
variation:

Focusing on startup speed is like saying, Wow, that car is fast! Just
0.3 seconds from unlocking the door to putting the engine in gear!


-- 
MCBastos

This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized
use will be prosecuted under the DMCA.

-=-=-
... Sent from my Blueberry.
* Added by TagZilla 0.066.2 running on Seamonkey 2.5 *
Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Suggestions on moving from 2.0.14 to 2.5

[Philip TAYLOR]

MCBastos wrote:


Focusing on startup speed is like saying, Wow, that car is fast! Just
0.3 seconds from unlocking the door to putting the engine in gear!


Hang on, hang on : if this is going to go viral, let's get our
facts straight : it is the /car/ that is put in gear, not the
engine !

** P.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Suggestions on moving from 2.0.14 to 2.5

[Jens Hatlak]

WLS wrote:

On 11/29/2011 06:05 PM, Jens Hatlak wrote:

Ray Davison wrote:

[Stand-alone profile manager]
So, just what are they trying to fix?


Startup performance. This is key to the FF guys (who are the driving
force behind this) since Chrome started pulling away.


Well, I guess I'm not getting faster startup using the stand alone
profile manager.


No, but you'll get faster startup times for FF when *not* 
starting/initializing any profile manager at all. That's the point.


HTH

Jens

--
Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/
SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Suggestions on moving from 2.0.14 to 2.5

[Mike C]

Philip TAYLOR wrote:



MCBastos wrote:


Focusing on startup speed is like saying, Wow, that car is fast! Just
0.3 seconds from unlocking the door to putting the engine in gear!


Hang on, hang on : if this is going to go viral, let's get our
facts straight : it is the /car/ that is put in gear, not the
engine !

** P.

Actually, it's the transmission that is put in gear (smile).
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Suggestions on moving from 2.0.14 to 2.5

[Tom Pamin]

I think I'm finally ready to upgrade from 2.0.14 to 2.5. I'd like to 
keep 2.0.14 on my PC for now, and just test 2.5. I'd appreciate any 
suggestions on how to do this with the fewest problems. I'm especially 
concerned with keeping my bookmarks and addons working on both versions.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Suggestions on moving from 2.0.14 to 2.5

[Daniel]

Tom Pamin wrote:

I think I'm finally ready to upgrade from 2.0.14 to 2.5. I'd like to
keep 2.0.14 on my PC for now, and just test 2.5. I'd appreciate any
suggestions on how to do this with the fewest problems. I'm especially
concerned with keeping my bookmarks and addons working on both versions.


Tom, do a custom install and put SM 2.5 wherever you want it (somewhere 
different to your SM 2.0.14 of course.


I think is was suggested that you upgrade to SM 2.1 first, so that the 
changes to bookmarks, etc., occur, then you should be able to install 
(full install) SM 2.5 over the top of SM 2.1 and all will be well.


When you have SM 2,5 installed, you will then have to go looking for 
your addons, most of which have been upgraded for later versions of SM.


--
Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Suggestions on moving from 2.0.14 to 2.5

[Francesco Presel]

Tom Pamin ha scritto:

I think I'm finally ready to upgrade from 2.0.14 to 2.5. I'd like to
keep 2.0.14 on my PC for now, and just test 2.5. I'd appreciate any
suggestions on how to do this with the fewest problems. I'm especially
concerned with keeping my bookmarks and addons working on both versions.


It's not possible to use a single profile for both versions together. If 
you share the profile, every time you change version of SM the profile 
will be updated and you'll have problems with your bookmarks.
First, you should duplicate your profile. Then, you should force the 
browser to always ask for the profile at startup.
Only then, it's safe to install the new version, but remember to always 
be careful to open the right profile.

--
Francesco
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Suggestions on moving from 2.0.14 to 2.5

[WLS]

On 11/29/2011 10:20 AM, Francesco Presel wrote:
 Tom Pamin ha scritto:
 I think I'm finally ready to upgrade from 2.0.14 to 2.5. I'd like to
 keep 2.0.14 on my PC for now, and just test 2.5. I'd appreciate any
 suggestions on how to do this with the fewest problems. I'm especially
 concerned with keeping my bookmarks and addons working on both versions.
 
 It's not possible to use a single profile for both versions together. If
 you share the profile, every time you change version of SM the profile
 will be updated and you'll have problems with your bookmarks.
 First, you should duplicate your profile. Then, you should force the
 browser to always ask for the profile at startup.
 Only then, it's safe to install the new version, but remember to always
 be careful to open the right profile.


The stand alone profile manager is an excellent tool for managing
profiles that way.

The link is in my signature.

-- 

 Daily | openSUSE 11.4(x86_64) | Gnome 2.32.1 | 1.8GHz CPU | 2GB RAM
 Get openSUSE: http://software.opensuse.org/121/en
 Firefox Support: http://support.mozilla.com
 Profile Manager: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Profile_Manager
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Suggestions on moving from 2.0.14 to 2.5

[Ray Davison]

WLS wrote:


The stand alone profile manager is an excellent tool for managing
profiles that way.


I looked at this;
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Profile_Manager
And also this:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214675

And it all looks like a solution looking for a problem.  My data files 
began life in Netscape and I have brought them along thru various 
versions of Mozilla suite, SM, FF and TB.  And I use all the same data 
files on OS/2 and Win.  I have looked at a few versions of FF and TB but 
never made any serious use of them.  Once when SM was causing me 
problems I setup TB so that clicked links would run FF, but SM now works 
so I haven't used TB/FF lately.


For me the built-in profile manager works fine.  When trying to find the 
insertion date/time of some anomaly I have had as many as twenty 
versions of SM on the HDD and maybe a half dozen profiles.  On every SM, 
TB, and FF shortcut I call profile manager.  And it is available from 
the pull down while the app is running.  And I have never lost data or 
profiles.  But then I have always put them where I wanted, not the 
default locations.


So, just what are they trying to fix?

Ray


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Suggestions on moving from 2.0.14 to 2.5

[Jens Hatlak]

Ray Davison wrote:

[Stand-alone profile manager]
So, just what are they trying to fix?


Startup performance. This is key to the FF guys (who are the driving 
force behind this) since Chrome started pulling away.


HTH

Jens

P.S.: Personally I couldn't care less. If you want faster startup, buy 
an SSD or stop restarting your browser/OS. Hibernation is your friend.


--
Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/
SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Suggestions on moving from 2.0.14 to 2.5

[MCBastos]

Interviewed by CNN on 29/11/2011 21:05, Jens Hatlak told the world:

 P.S.: Personally I couldn't care less. If you want faster startup, buy 
 an SSD or stop restarting your browser/OS. Hibernation is your friend.

I agree with you. The sad thing, though, is for the average joe shmoe
the perceived speed in opening the first page seems more important
than actual speed. It's like saying, wow, that car is fast! Just 0.3
seconds from unlocking the door to putting the engine in gear!

-- 
MCBastos

This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized
use will be prosecuted under the DMCA.

-=-=-
... Sent from my Cranberry.
* Added by TagZilla 0.066.2 running on Seamonkey 2.5 *
Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Suggestions on moving from 2.0.14 to 2.5

[WLS]

On 11/29/2011 06:05 PM, Jens Hatlak wrote:
 Ray Davison wrote:
 [Stand-alone profile manager]
 So, just what are they trying to fix?
 
 Startup performance. This is key to the FF guys (who are the driving
 force behind this) since Chrome started pulling away.
 
 HTH
 
 Jens
 
 P.S.: Personally I couldn't care less. If you want faster startup, buy
 an SSD or stop restarting your browser/OS. Hibernation is your friend.
 


Well, I guess I'm not getting faster startup using the stand alone
profile manager.

Step 1 - Open the profile manager.
Step 2 - Decide which version of Firefox I want to open, Beta or Aurora.
Step 3 - Click the Start Firefox button.

But I love the features. Have separate profile managers configured for
Firefox, SeaMonkey and Thunderbird. Do a backup after every change.

-- 

 Daily | openSUSE 11.4(x86_64) | Gnome 2.32.1 | 1.8GHz CPU | 2GB RAM
 Get openSUSE: http://software.opensuse.org/121/en
 Firefox Support: http://support.mozilla.com
 Profile Manager: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Profile_Manager
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: E-Mail adress suggestions

[Ray_Net]

seam...@taz.de wrote:

Ray_Net schrieb:

Bill Davidsen wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

I did not know if i am dreaming or not, but i have the impression that:
with SM1.1.18 the mail adress suggestions list when begining to type an
adress was a list beginning with/sorted by last recently used.
Now with SM 2.0.2 it looks like a sort of a strange alphabetic order.

Is a bug already filled ?
Am i wrong ?


Nobody have seen this ?


I think it's some kind of weighted LRU, I get the impression that if you
make the same choice it rises (or something like that). If I email
someone at their home rather than work the order changes at times.


It looks like the LRU mechanism has dissappeared in 2.0.2.

Hi,
Users here experience and complain about exactly the described behavior.
I've not found a filled bug, we should at least add the lru-feature to
the wishlist.
Gerd Ott


Hi Gerd !

Good news .. i just read a solution:
nr wrote:
  Using 2.0.1.  When entering an email address in the To: box, after
  entering a few characters, prior versions of SeaMonkey would have the
  most recently used address at the top of the list (IIRC), but 2.0.1
  brings up the list in alphabetical order.  Is there any way to get the
  most recently used addresses at the top of the lists?
This will be fixed in SM 2.0.3 (to be released in a few days):

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497722

HTH

Jens


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: E-Mail adress suggestions

[seamon2]

Ray_Net schrieb:
 Bill Davidsen wrote:
 Ray_Net wrote:
 Ray_Net wrote:
 I did not know if i am dreaming or not, but i have the impression that:
 with SM1.1.18 the mail adress suggestions list when begining to type an
 adress was a list beginning with/sorted by last recently used.
 Now with SM 2.0.2 it looks like a sort of a strange alphabetic order.

 Is a bug already filled ?
 Am i wrong ?

 Nobody have seen this ?

 I think it's some kind of weighted LRU, I get the impression that if you
 make the same choice it rises (or something like that). If I email
 someone at their home rather than work the order changes at times.

 It looks like the LRU mechanism has dissappeared in 2.0.2.
Hi,
Users here experience and complain about exactly the described behavior.
I've not found a filled bug, we should at least add the lru-feature to
the wishlist.
Gerd Ott
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: E-Mail adress suggestions

[Ray_Net]

Ray_Net wrote:

I did not know if i am dreaming or not, but i have the impression that:
with SM1.1.18 the mail adress suggestions list when begining to type an
adress was a list beginning with/sorted by last recently used.
Now with SM 2.0.2 it looks like a sort of a strange alphabetic order.

Is a bug already filled ?
Am i wrong ?


Nobody have seen this ?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: E-Mail adress suggestions

[Bill Davidsen]

Ray_Net wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

I did not know if i am dreaming or not, but i have the impression that:
with SM1.1.18 the mail adress suggestions list when begining to type an
adress was a list beginning with/sorted by last recently used.
Now with SM 2.0.2 it looks like a sort of a strange alphabetic order.

Is a bug already filled ?
Am i wrong ?


Nobody have seen this ?


I think it's some kind of weighted LRU, I get the impression that if you make 
the same choice it rises (or something like that). If I email someone at their 
home rather than work the order changes at times.


--
Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com
  We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked.  - from Slashdot
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: E-Mail adress suggestions

[Ray_Net]

Bill Davidsen wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

I did not know if i am dreaming or not, but i have the impression that:
with SM1.1.18 the mail adress suggestions list when begining to type an
adress was a list beginning with/sorted by last recently used.
Now with SM 2.0.2 it looks like a sort of a strange alphabetic order.

Is a bug already filled ?
Am i wrong ?


Nobody have seen this ?


I think it's some kind of weighted LRU, I get the impression that if you
make the same choice it rises (or something like that). If I email
someone at their home rather than work the order changes at times.


It looks like the LRU mechanism has dissappeared in 2.0.2.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

E-Mail adress suggestions

[Ray_Net]

I did not know if i am dreaming or not, but i have the impression that:
with SM1.1.18 the mail adress suggestions list when begining to type an 
adress was a list beginning with/sorted by last recently used.

Now with SM 2.0.2 it looks like a sort of a strange alphabetic order.

Is a bug already filled ?
Am i wrong ?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey