Re: Cache in 2.35?
A Williams wrote on 16/09/2015 17:39: Ray_Net wrote: A Williams wrote on 14/09/2015 18:21: Ray_Net wrote: Philip Chee wrote on 11/09/2015 20:32: On 10/09/2015 18:27, Tom Pamin wrote: Is cache once again handled differently in 2.35? Instaed of cache2, is it back to using just the cache folder? I also have a cache.trash4895 folder now too? Yes we switched back to the old cache code. You can delete everything in /cache2/ directory now. Phil I am still under 2.32 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32 And i cannot see the /cache/ nor the /cache2/ directory - Is it normal ? (Edit) -> Preferences -> Advanced -> Cache and then look for "Cache Folder Location". It was not what I expected to see. I'm still running 2.33.1 because Opensuse have not put the new 2.35 in the repository yet, 2.33.1 still uses /cache2. Thanks ! All the stuff is hereunder C:\Users\RZ\AppData\Local\Mozilla\SeaMonkey What happens if I delete the complete directory C:\Users\RZ\AppData\Local\Mozilla\SeaMonkey ? Look what else is there, my guess would be your entire profile including mails, bookmarks and everything else. Deleting that could be said to be a bad move. You speak about C:\Users\RZ\AppData\Roaming\Mozilla\SeaMonkey I speak about C:\Users\RZ\AppData\Local\Mozilla\SeaMonkey ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cache in 2.35?
Ray_Net wrote: A Williams wrote on 14/09/2015 18:21: Ray_Net wrote: Philip Chee wrote on 11/09/2015 20:32: On 10/09/2015 18:27, Tom Pamin wrote: Is cache once again handled differently in 2.35? Instaed of cache2, is it back to using just the cache folder? I also have a cache.trash4895 folder now too? Yes we switched back to the old cache code. You can delete everything in /cache2/ directory now. Phil I am still under 2.32 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32 And i cannot see the /cache/ nor the /cache2/ directory - Is it normal ? (Edit) -> Preferences -> Advanced -> Cache and then look for "Cache Folder Location". It was not what I expected to see. I'm still running 2.33.1 because Opensuse have not put the new 2.35 in the repository yet, 2.33.1 still uses /cache2. Thanks ! All the stuff is hereunder C:\Users\RZ\AppData\Local\Mozilla\SeaMonkey What happens if I delete the complete directory C:\Users\RZ\AppData\Local\Mozilla\SeaMonkey ? Look what else is there, my guess would be your entire profile including mails, bookmarks and everything else. Deleting that could be said to be a bad move. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cache in 2.35?
A Williams wrote on 14/09/2015 18:21: Ray_Net wrote: Philip Chee wrote on 11/09/2015 20:32: On 10/09/2015 18:27, Tom Pamin wrote: Is cache once again handled differently in 2.35? Instaed of cache2, is it back to using just the cache folder? I also have a cache.trash4895 folder now too? Yes we switched back to the old cache code. You can delete everything in /cache2/ directory now. Phil I am still under 2.32 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32 And i cannot see the /cache/ nor the /cache2/ directory - Is it normal ? (Edit) -> Preferences -> Advanced -> Cache and then look for "Cache Folder Location". It was not what I expected to see. I'm still running 2.33.1 because Opensuse have not put the new 2.35 in the repository yet, 2.33.1 still uses /cache2. Thanks ! All the stuff is hereunder C:\Users\RZ\AppData\Local\Mozilla\SeaMonkey What happens if I delete the complete directory C:\Users\RZ\AppData\Local\Mozilla\SeaMonkey ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cache in 2.35?
Ray_Net wrote: Philip Chee wrote on 11/09/2015 20:32: On 10/09/2015 18:27, Tom Pamin wrote: Is cache once again handled differently in 2.35? Instaed of cache2, is it back to using just the cache folder? I also have a cache.trash4895 folder now too? Yes we switched back to the old cache code. You can delete everything in /cache2/ directory now. Phil I am still under 2.32 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32 And i cannot see the /cache/ nor the /cache2/ directory - Is it normal ? (Edit) -> Preferences -> Advanced -> Cache and then look for "Cache Folder Location". It was not what I expected to see. I'm still running 2.33.1 because Opensuse have not put the new 2.35 in the repository yet, 2.33.1 still uses /cache2. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cache in 2.35?
Mason83 wrote on 12/09/15 10:42: On 11/09/2015 20:32, Philip Chee wrote: On 10/09/2015 18:27, Tom Pamin wrote: Is cache once again handled differently in 2.35? Instaed of cache2, is it back to using just the cache folder? I also have a cache.trash4895 folder now too? Yes we switched back to the old cache code. You can delete everything in /cache2/ directory now. So compacting IMAP folders should no longer crash? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1158578 For me it is still crashing, even with 2.38: User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/41.0 SeaMonkey/2.38 Build identifier: 20150903213426 https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/74d1200f-459f-4bac-94b7-425932150908 I have reverted browser.cache.use_new_backend to default = 0 Is that appropriate? I'm interested in knowing that too :) G. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cache in 2.35?
On 11/09/2015 20:32, Philip Chee wrote: > On 10/09/2015 18:27, Tom Pamin wrote: >> Is cache once again handled differently in 2.35? Instaed of cache2, is >> it back to using just the cache folder? I also have a cache.trash4895 >> folder now too? > > Yes we switched back to the old cache code. You can delete everything in > /cache2/ directory now. So compacting IMAP folders should no longer crash? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1158578 I have reverted browser.cache.use_new_backend to default = 0 Is that appropriate? Regards. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cache in 2.35?
Philip Chee wrote on 11/09/2015 20:32: On 10/09/2015 18:27, Tom Pamin wrote: Is cache once again handled differently in 2.35? Instaed of cache2, is it back to using just the cache folder? I also have a cache.trash4895 folder now too? Yes we switched back to the old cache code. You can delete everything in /cache2/ directory now. Phil I am still under 2.32 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32 And i cannot see the /cache/ nor the /cache2/ directory - Is it normal ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cache in 2.35?
On 10/09/2015 18:27, Tom Pamin wrote: > Is cache once again handled differently in 2.35? Instaed of cache2, is > it back to using just the cache folder? I also have a cache.trash4895 > folder now too? Yes we switched back to the old cache code. You can delete everything in /cache2/ directory now. Phil -- Philip Chee , http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
