Re: UTF-7 in SM-2.* for reading postings
Frank-Rainer Grahl: >Hartmut Figge wrote: >> a discussion in de.test showed that postings in UTF-7 could be read >> properly in current TBs but not in SM-2.53.1. Achim Peters pointed to >> the bug in which the reading support for UTF-7 was reestablished in TB. >> >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1402813 >> >> It would be nice if SM could also benefit from that patch. :) > >If you promise to test it. But not today. There were a lot of changes in >jsmime between 56 and 61. I am not sure if it is only this one change. If it >is not a smooth sailing I will let you know. Seems to work OK in my new SM-2.53. Thanks. Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: UTF-7 in SM-2.* for reading postings
Hartmut Figge wrote: Greetings, a discussion in de.test showed that postings in UTF-7 could be read properly in current TBs but not in SM-2.53.1. Achim Peters pointed to the bug in which the reading support for UTF-7 was reestablished in TB. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1402813 It would be nice if SM could also benefit from that patch. :) Hartmut If you promise to test it. But not today. There were a lot of changes in jsmime between 56 and 61. I am not sure if it is only this one change. If it is not a smooth sailing I will let you know. FRG ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
UTF-7 in SM-2.* for reading postings
Greetings, a discussion in de.test showed that postings in UTF-7 could be read properly in current TBs but not in SM-2.53.1. Achim Peters pointed to the bug in which the reading support for UTF-7 was reestablished in TB. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1402813 It would be nice if SM could also benefit from that patch. :) Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
