Re: running Seamonkey 2.49.3 Windows 64 bit

2018-02-23 Thread surferjoefra
Any patched 32 bit 2.53 available?

Thanks



Il giorno giovedì 22 febbraio 2018 17:44:35 UTC+1, Frank-Rainer Grahl ha 
scritto:
> Bill just put an experimental 2.53 up with patches I provided. It is not 
> fully 
> up to date wrt security fixes but the worst offenders are included. Please 
> back up your profile if you use it. There is no go back to 2.49.x after using 
> it. This is at latest Fx 56 level with additional fixes.
> 
> FRG
> 
> 
> Dirk Munk wrote:
> > Yes indeed!
> > 
> > Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
> >> > 2.49.3?
> >> >
> >> > Where did you get this 64bit package from?
> >>
> >> Probably from here:
> >>
> >> https://www.wg9s.com/comm-esr/
> >>
> >> FRG
> >>
> >>
> >> Edmund Wong wrote:
> >>> Dirk Munk wrote:
> 
>  I really wish the developers would start producing official 64 bit
>  versions of Seamonkey. How many people are still using a 32 bit version
>  of Windows? Since Windows 7, 64 bit has become the standard Windows
>  version, older Windows versions are becoming obsolete now. I would guess
>  that the majority of Seamonkey users has a 64 bit version of Windows on
>  their computer.
> >>>
> >>> 2.49.3?
> >>>
> >>> Where did you get this 64bit package from?
> >>>
> >>> I am working on making official packages for both Linux64 and Windows64.
> >>> It is unfortunately going slow as there are a lot of stuff happening
> >>> at the same time.
> >>>
> >>> Edmund
> >>>
> >

Hello,
just
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: running Seamonkey 2.49.3 Windows 64 bit

2018-02-22 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl
Bill just put an experimental 2.53 up with patches I provided. It is not fully 
up to date wrt security fixes but the worst offenders are included. Please 
back up your profile if you use it. There is no go back to 2.49.x after using 
it. This is at latest Fx 56 level with additional fixes.


FRG


Dirk Munk wrote:

Yes indeed!

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:

> 2.49.3?
>
> Where did you get this 64bit package from?

Probably from here:

https://www.wg9s.com/comm-esr/

FRG


Edmund Wong wrote:

Dirk Munk wrote:


I really wish the developers would start producing official 64 bit
versions of Seamonkey. How many people are still using a 32 bit version
of Windows? Since Windows 7, 64 bit has become the standard Windows
version, older Windows versions are becoming obsolete now. I would guess
that the majority of Seamonkey users has a 64 bit version of Windows on
their computer.


2.49.3?

Where did you get this 64bit package from?

I am working on making official packages for both Linux64 and Windows64.
It is unfortunately going slow as there are a lot of stuff happening
at the same time.

Edmund




___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: running Seamonkey 2.49.3 Windows 64 bit

2018-02-22 Thread Dirk Munk

Yes indeed!

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:

> 2.49.3?
>
> Where did you get this 64bit package from?

Probably from here:

https://www.wg9s.com/comm-esr/

FRG


Edmund Wong wrote:

Dirk Munk wrote:


I really wish the developers would start producing official 64 bit
versions of Seamonkey. How many people are still using a 32 bit version
of Windows? Since Windows 7, 64 bit has become the standard Windows
version, older Windows versions are becoming obsolete now. I would 
guess

that the majority of Seamonkey users has a 64 bit version of Windows on
their computer.


2.49.3?

Where did you get this 64bit package from?

I am working on making official packages for both Linux64 and Windows64.
It is unfortunately going slow as there are a lot of stuff happening
at the same time.

Edmund



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: running Seamonkey 2.49.3 Windows 64 bit

2018-02-21 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl

> 2.49.3?
>
> Where did you get this 64bit package from?

Probably from here:

https://www.wg9s.com/comm-esr/

FRG


Edmund Wong wrote:

Dirk Munk wrote:


I really wish the developers would start producing official 64 bit
versions of Seamonkey. How many people are still using a 32 bit version
of Windows? Since Windows 7, 64 bit has become the standard Windows
version, older Windows versions are becoming obsolete now. I would guess
that the majority of Seamonkey users has a 64 bit version of Windows on
their computer.


2.49.3?

Where did you get this 64bit package from?

I am working on making official packages for both Linux64 and Windows64.
It is unfortunately going slow as there are a lot of stuff happening
at the same time.

Edmund


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: running Seamonkey 2.49.3 Windows 64 bit

2018-02-20 Thread Edmund Wong
Dirk Munk wrote:
> 
> I really wish the developers would start producing official 64 bit
> versions of Seamonkey. How many people are still using a 32 bit version
> of Windows? Since Windows 7, 64 bit has become the standard Windows
> version, older Windows versions are becoming obsolete now. I would guess
> that the majority of Seamonkey users has a 64 bit version of Windows on
> their computer.

2.49.3?

Where did you get this 64bit package from?

I am working on making official packages for both Linux64 and Windows64.
It is unfortunately going slow as there are a lot of stuff happening
at the same time.

Edmund
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: running Seamonkey 2.49.3 Windows 64 bit

2018-02-20 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl
We are working on it. It is just a matter of resource allocation. If you don't 
have any you don't tackle new stuff :)


FRG

Dirk Munk wrote:

At the moment I'm running Seamonkey 2.49.3 Windows 64 bit.

I've been using 64 bit versions of Seamonkey quite some time now, and I hardly 
ever had any problems with them.
The only problem is to find them, so many people seem to be producing their 
own version (thanks for doing so by the way).


I really wish the developers would start producing official 64 bit versions of 
Seamonkey. How many people are still using a 32 bit version of Windows? Since 
Windows 7, 64 bit has become the standard Windows version, older Windows 
versions are becoming obsolete now. I would guess that the majority of 
Seamonkey users has a 64 bit version of Windows on their computer.


At the moment my Seamonkey instance has a memory footprint of almost 6 GB, 
that is 50% than available with a 32 bit version.




___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


running Seamonkey 2.49.3 Windows 64 bit

2018-02-20 Thread Dirk Munk

At the moment I'm running Seamonkey 2.49.3 Windows 64 bit.

I've been using 64 bit versions of Seamonkey quite some time now, and I 
hardly ever had any problems with them.
The only problem is to find them, so many people seem to be producing 
their own version (thanks for doing so by the way).


I really wish the developers would start producing official 64 bit 
versions of Seamonkey. How many people are still using a 32 bit version 
of Windows? Since Windows 7, 64 bit has become the standard Windows 
version, older Windows versions are becoming obsolete now. I would guess 
that the majority of Seamonkey users has a 64 bit version of Windows on 
their computer.


At the moment my Seamonkey instance has a memory footprint of almost 6 
GB, that is 50% than available with a 32 bit version.



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey