[Sursound] Ambisonic.info - new page on SPS200
I am doing some work on my perpetually unfinished ambisonic.info web site. The first outcome of this is a page on the SoundField SPS200 which I bought a couple of years ago for a special project. I had this calibrated by Core Sound for use with Dave McGriffy's software, and I have made an attempt to analyse the differences from the TetraMic and the use of SurroundZone which this exposes. https://ambisonic.info/sps200.html There will be more updates in coming weeks. Paul -- Paul Hodges ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
Re: [Sursound] Ambix to FuMa conversion
https://xkcd.com/927/ -Original Message- From: Jon Honeyball To: Surround Sound discussion group Sent: Mon, Apr 16, 2018 4:19 am Subject: Re: [Sursound] Ambix to FuMa conversion The wonderful thing about standards is the opportunity to have lots of them jon > On 14 Apr 2018, at 09:55, Jack Reynolds wrote: > > FuMa is WXYZ and ambiX is WYZX with SN3D normalisation. > I forget the gains off the top of my head, but will have a look and get back > if no one else has chipped in. > J > ___ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit > account or options, view archives and so on. ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20180416/b568f1fb/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
Re: [Sursound] Steinberg and Multichannel files
At 10:18 16-04-18, Jon Honeyball wrote: > >On 14 Apr 2018, at 16:42, David Pickett >mailto:d...@fugato.com>> wrote: > >Incidentally, one of the drawbacks of multichannel wavfiles for HOA is >their large size for any reasonable length of musical composition. At >48kHz, a 9-channel 2nd order file takes c. 74MB for 1 minute of music. >Alternatively, 1GB lasts about 13.5 minutes in 2nd order or about 30.4 >mins in 1st order > >It doesnât help when some equipment fails to play back more than one >file in sequence. The latest deeply cute Sound Devices will only play >one file, and not continue on to the next one. So your playback time >is limited to some 15 minutes (at best resolution) and it only records polywav. > >Talk about gun/foot/shoot > >(confirmed with SSD tech support staff at NAB last week in vegas) > Indeed. The latest Oppo box has the same problem. But perhaps people only listen to 4 minute singles these days. I quite understand that the demands made by one file per track recordings on writing to storage in real time are currently too great to handle, whereas boxes like the Alesis HD24 and RME UFX will store between 24 and 60 hi res tracks using multitrack files and proprietary storage formats; but on the other hand, why not either write soft/firm-ware that will link these together, or separate them into single files, for playback? David ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
Re: [Sursound] Steinberg and Multichannel files
On 14 Apr 2018, at 16:42, David Pickett mailto:d...@fugato.com>> wrote: Incidentally, one of the drawbacks of multichannel wavfiles for HOA is their large size for any reasonable length of musical composition. At 48kHz, a 9-channel 2nd order file takes c. 74MB for 1 minute of music. Alternatively, 1GB lasts about 13.5 minutes in 2nd order or about 30.4 mins in 1st order It doesn’t help when some equipment fails to play back more than one file in sequence. The latest deeply cute Sound Devices will only play one file, and not continue on to the next one. So your playback time is limited to some 15 minutes (at best resolution) and it only records polywav. Talk about gun/foot/shoot… (confirmed with SD tech support staff at NAB last week in vegas) Jon -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20180416/8b7d2bc4/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
Re: [Sursound] Ambix to FuMa conversion
The wonderful thing about standards is the opportunity to have lots of them jon > On 14 Apr 2018, at 09:55, Jack Reynolds wrote: > > FuMa is WXYZ and ambiX is WYZX with SN3D normalisation. > I forget the gains off the top of my head, but will have a look and get back > if no one else has chipped in. > J > ___ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit > account or options, view archives and so on. ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
