Re: [Sursound] Upcoming update to AmbiExplorer
Thanks Mark, F-Droid looks great. I'll try it too. Thank you for offering help. Cheers, Hector On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 10:27 AM Marc Lavallée, <m...@hacklava.net> wrote: > Le 18-04-21 à 10:20, Hector Centeno a écrit : > > Hello Fons, > > > > Thank you for your reply. Those conditions are easy to fulfill and I have > > no problem sticking to them or any other that facilitate access to the > > software. > > > > The source code you found is the latest. There hasn't been any updates > > since then (I'm planning to work on it soon). As for hosting the APK > > outside of Google Play, I can definitely do that. I'll put it on my > > website, unless someone has a suggestion for a centralized repository > that > > doesn't require an account. I'll also look into it. I will also upload > the > > source to GitHub so it's easier to track. > > > > Cheers and thanks again. > > > > Hector > > Hector, > > The F-Droid repo would be ideal: > > https://f-droid.org/ > > I can help you if you are interested. > > -- > > Marc > > > > On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 3:59 AM Fons Adriaensen, <f...@linuxaudio.org> > wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 06:51:50PM +, Hector Centeno wrote: > >> > >>> It all depends > >>> on the source code of the OctoMic version (octofile and octoproc) not > >>> having any licensing restrictions. Fons mentioned that the software's > >>> source will be available only to OctoMic buyers so I'm not sure if that > >>> implies it won't be open source. > >> The precise license terms for Octomic/Octofile have not yet been > decided. > >> > >> Regarding porting to Android, at least the following conditions will > >> have to be satisfied: > >> > >> * The complete and up-to-date source code of the Android version must > >>be available to all. > >> > >> * It must be possible to do a binary install the Android app without > >>involving a Google account, Google Services, or any form of user > >>registration. > >> > >> > >> ATM it's not even clear if these conditions are satisfied for the > >> Android version of Tetrafile. The only source code I found dates > >> from 2014. > >> > >> Ciao, > >> > >> -- > >> FA > >> > >> ___ > >> Sursound mailing list > >> Sursound@music.vt.edu > >> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, > >> edit account or options, view archives and so on. > >> > > -- next part -- > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > URL: < > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20180421/0ee3b73a/attachment.html > > > > ___ > > Sursound mailing list > > Sursound@music.vt.edu > > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, > edit account or options, view archives and so on. > > ___ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, > edit account or options, view archives and so on. > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20180421/d1518e5e/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
Re: [Sursound] Upcoming update to AmbiExplorer
I guess if I'm uploading the code to GitHub I could just put the APK there too. On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 10:20 AM Hector Centeno, <hcen...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Fons, > > Thank you for your reply. Those conditions are easy to fulfill and I have > no problem sticking to them or any other that facilitate access to the > software. > > The source code you found is the latest. There hasn't been any updates > since then (I'm planning to work on it soon). As for hosting the APK > outside of Google Play, I can definitely do that. I'll put it on my > website, unless someone has a suggestion for a centralized repository that > doesn't require an account. I'll also look into it. I will also upload the > source to GitHub so it's easier to track. > > Cheers and thanks again. > > Hector > > On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 3:59 AM Fons Adriaensen, <f...@linuxaudio.org> > wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 06:51:50PM +, Hector Centeno wrote: >> >> > It all depends >> > on the source code of the OctoMic version (octofile and octoproc) not >> > having any licensing restrictions. Fons mentioned that the software's >> > source will be available only to OctoMic buyers so I'm not sure if that >> > implies it won't be open source. >> >> The precise license terms for Octomic/Octofile have not yet been decided. >> >> Regarding porting to Android, at least the following conditions will >> have to be satisfied: >> >> * The complete and up-to-date source code of the Android version must >> be available to all. >> >> * It must be possible to do a binary install the Android app without >> involving a Google account, Google Services, or any form of user >> registration. >> >> >> ATM it's not even clear if these conditions are satisfied for the >> Android version of Tetrafile. The only source code I found dates >> from 2014. >> >> Ciao, >> >> -- >> FA >> >> ___ >> Sursound mailing list >> Sursound@music.vt.edu >> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, >> edit account or options, view archives and so on. >> > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20180421/c08d01f3/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
Re: [Sursound] Upcoming update to AmbiExplorer
Le 18-04-21 à 10:20, Hector Centeno a écrit : Hello Fons, Thank you for your reply. Those conditions are easy to fulfill and I have no problem sticking to them or any other that facilitate access to the software. The source code you found is the latest. There hasn't been any updates since then (I'm planning to work on it soon). As for hosting the APK outside of Google Play, I can definitely do that. I'll put it on my website, unless someone has a suggestion for a centralized repository that doesn't require an account. I'll also look into it. I will also upload the source to GitHub so it's easier to track. Cheers and thanks again. Hector Hector, The F-Droid repo would be ideal: https://f-droid.org/ I can help you if you are interested. -- Marc On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 3:59 AM Fons Adriaensen, <f...@linuxaudio.org> wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 06:51:50PM +, Hector Centeno wrote: It all depends on the source code of the OctoMic version (octofile and octoproc) not having any licensing restrictions. Fons mentioned that the software's source will be available only to OctoMic buyers so I'm not sure if that implies it won't be open source. The precise license terms for Octomic/Octofile have not yet been decided. Regarding porting to Android, at least the following conditions will have to be satisfied: * The complete and up-to-date source code of the Android version must be available to all. * It must be possible to do a binary install the Android app without involving a Google account, Google Services, or any form of user registration. ATM it's not even clear if these conditions are satisfied for the Android version of Tetrafile. The only source code I found dates from 2014. Ciao, -- FA ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20180421/0ee3b73a/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on. ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
Re: [Sursound] Upcoming update to AmbiExplorer
Hello Fons, Thank you for your reply. Those conditions are easy to fulfill and I have no problem sticking to them or any other that facilitate access to the software. The source code you found is the latest. There hasn't been any updates since then (I'm planning to work on it soon). As for hosting the APK outside of Google Play, I can definitely do that. I'll put it on my website, unless someone has a suggestion for a centralized repository that doesn't require an account. I'll also look into it. I will also upload the source to GitHub so it's easier to track. Cheers and thanks again. Hector On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 3:59 AM Fons Adriaensen, <f...@linuxaudio.org> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 06:51:50PM +, Hector Centeno wrote: > > > It all depends > > on the source code of the OctoMic version (octofile and octoproc) not > > having any licensing restrictions. Fons mentioned that the software's > > source will be available only to OctoMic buyers so I'm not sure if that > > implies it won't be open source. > > The precise license terms for Octomic/Octofile have not yet been decided. > > Regarding porting to Android, at least the following conditions will > have to be satisfied: > > * The complete and up-to-date source code of the Android version must > be available to all. > > * It must be possible to do a binary install the Android app without > involving a Google account, Google Services, or any form of user > registration. > > > ATM it's not even clear if these conditions are satisfied for the > Android version of Tetrafile. The only source code I found dates > from 2014. > > Ciao, > > -- > FA > > ___ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, > edit account or options, view archives and so on. > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20180421/0ee3b73a/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
Re: [Sursound] Upcoming update to AmbiExplorer
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 06:51:50PM +, Hector Centeno wrote: > It all depends > on the source code of the OctoMic version (octofile and octoproc) not > having any licensing restrictions. Fons mentioned that the software's > source will be available only to OctoMic buyers so I'm not sure if that > implies it won't be open source. The precise license terms for Octomic/Octofile have not yet been decided. Regarding porting to Android, at least the following conditions will have to be satisfied: * The complete and up-to-date source code of the Android version must be available to all. * It must be possible to do a binary install the Android app without involving a Google account, Google Services, or any form of user registration. ATM it's not even clear if these conditions are satisfied for the Android version of Tetrafile. The only source code I found dates from 2014. Ciao, -- FA ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
