[biofuel] Re: Another methos for drying biodiesel/biogas

2001-01-30 Thread Ask me

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "terry calmes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--
It is used to dry some high-altitude scientific radio controlled 
aircraft glowfuels, to prevent icing, the trouble is, anhydrous 
methanol attacked the aluminium engines.
But it can remove very small amounts of water.


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980780884/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [biofuel] Re: Biodiesel/brake fluid etc

2001-01-30 Thread NBT - E. Beggs

Terry - Biodiesel does not clog the wick of lamps designed for olive oil,
because the wick is kept so low (close to the level of the oil) so it can
overcome gravity.  See www.lehmans.com (lots of other cool stuff from Amish
country in US). Ironically, the "non-electric catalog" is avail. via the
internet (must have a server powered by bottled gas). Anyway I bought one of
the little oil lamps and it works well on biodiesel so far.

;-)

Ed


- Original Message -
From: "biofuels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 1:32 PM
Subject: [biofuel] Re: Biodiesel/brake fluid etc


> Oh dear - here we go!
>
> 1.  Using biodiesel (even when properly made) in a wick powered lamp is
not
> a good idea - the higher fractions vapourise and burn happily for a bit,
but
> leave behind the lower fractions, which clog the wick up thereby rendering
> it useless for the purpose.  It goes out.
>
> 2.  Once upon a time, there were two types of brake fluid - one mineral
and
> one vegetable.  The two were not compatible, as the mineral oil used
rubber
> grommets and the vegetable one used man-made ones.  Now there is one -
> mineral.  Ergo, using biodiesel - a vegetable oil - in a braking system
> could cause the system to fail.  You have been warned.
>
> 3. Biodiesel is not hygroscopic, although it may contain a small amount of
> water.  To make it into a hydrated fuel, a surfactant is required in order
> to prevent emulsification, which clogs fuel filters.
>
> 4.. A very interesting recipe for biodiesel, which will not work
> particularly well.  Both the meths and washing soda have water in them,
> which both inhibits the transesterification process and causes the
formation
> of soap.  Look up Mike Pelly's recipe and try that. All ingredients are
> costly, when bought in small quantities - methanol is about £240 a tonne
in
> the UK at present.
>
> 5.  Mixing kero with your petrol may seem like a good idea, until such
times
> as either (a) Customs & Excise catch on, or (b) your piston rings seize up
> with the carbon residue.  Seems a shame, for the sake of a few pence a
> litre.
>
> 6.  I haven't heard of anyone using Hydrosource as a drying agent -
probably
> because it should not be needed, if the proper recipe and procedures are
> used to produce biodiesel.  After washing, drying should not be required -
> any suspended solids containing traces of water should be filtered out.
If
> you have any results, don't forget to share them!
>
> Terry (UK)
>
>
>
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980781405/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [biofuel] Another methos for drying biodiesel/biogas

2001-01-30 Thread Tee


I have some and they will air dry ok.
Air dry time is about a week in a dry climate.
But I have never used them in the process of making Biodiesel.


At 06:48 PM 01/28/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>do you suppose these could be reused by drying in an oven?
>anton
>
>
> > General Performance: One pound of Hydrosource will absorb up to 48
> >gallons of rainwater or snowmelt, and 20-35 gallons of water, depending on
> >the salt content of the water.
> > Hydrosource can be applied wet or dry. Dry granules are usually
> >easier to use, but soak them thoroughly to fully fill them with water
> >(hydrate). When hydrated, the granules look like chunks of clear gelatin
> >about 1/2 inch in diameter.
> >
>
>
>Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
>http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
>To unsubscribe, send an email to:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980782667/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [biofuel] Re: Biodiesel/brake fluid etc

2001-01-30 Thread NBT - E. Beggs

I did read one study somewhere along the line that suggested damage to the
rubber was not nearly what they anticipated, based on the research of others
that the investigators had read before they began. Perhaps they were using
properly neutralised and washed biodiesel and/or two stage method.


- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 5:36 AM
Subject: [biofuel] Re: Biodiesel/brake fluid etc


> After researching both methods(Mike's & Two stage), I decided to try
> the two stage method. I plan on using the biod in a Mercedes. Am
> concerned about damage to the rubber hoses and had talked with
> someone who is using biod in a Mercedes today.
>
> His comment was that by switching to the two stage method, the damage
> to the rubber was nil. Appears that the rubber damage is due to the
> methanol and that by removing it in the drying process it eliminates
> the rubber damage.
>
> Comments?
>
> JV
>
>
>
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980788069/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [biofuel] Re: Biodiesel/brake fluid etc

2001-01-30 Thread CONNIE LEJEUNE

PLEASE DO NOT E-MAIL ME ANYMORE

"NBT - E. Beggs" wrote:

> I did read one study somewhere along the line that suggested damage to the
> rubber was not nearly what they anticipated, based on the research of others
> that the investigators had read before they began. Perhaps they were using
> properly neutralised and washed biodiesel and/or two stage method.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 5:36 AM
> Subject: [biofuel] Re: Biodiesel/brake fluid etc
>
> > After researching both methods(Mike's & Two stage), I decided to try
> > the two stage method. I plan on using the biod in a Mercedes. Am
> > concerned about damage to the rubber hoses and had talked with
> > someone who is using biod in a Mercedes today.
> >
> > His comment was that by switching to the two stage method, the damage
> > to the rubber was nil. Appears that the rubber damage is due to the
> > methanol and that by removing it in the drying process it eliminates
> > the rubber damage.
> >
> > Comments?
> >
> > JV
> >
> >
> >
> > Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> > http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> > To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980793161/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[biofuel] Re: Biodiesel/brake fluid etc

2001-01-30 Thread Ask me

biofuels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh dear - here we go!

> 5.  Mixing kero with your petrol may seem like a good idea, until 
such times
> as either (a) Customs & Excise catch on, or (b) your piston 
rings seize up
> with the carbon residue.  Seems a shame, for the sake of a 
few pence a
> litre.
--
A month or so ago,  C&E changed the rules and you can add 
Kero to your tank to lower octane, but you cannot mix it with petrol 
before adding it - dont know why.

The injection system fuel return will mix it for you.


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980793766/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [biofuel] Re: Biodiesel/brake fluid etc

2001-01-30 Thread Steve Spence

I would suggest, Connie, that you remove yourself from the newsgroup, and
not subscribe to any new ones until you figure out that no one emailed you.


Steve Spence
Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter:
http://www.webconx.com/subscribe.htm

Renewable Energy Pages - http://www.webconx.com
Palm Pilot Pages - http://www.webconx.com/palm
X10 Home Automation - http://www.webconx.com/x10
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(212) 894-3704 x3154 - voicemail/fax
It is not money or dreams that will sustain you,
but practical knowledge about the basic
systems that sustain you.
--

- Original Message -
From: "CONNIE LEJEUNE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: Biodiesel/brake fluid etc


PLEASE DO NOT E-MAIL ME ANYMORE

"NBT - E. Beggs" wrote:

> I did read one study somewhere along the line that suggested damage to the
> rubber was not nearly what they anticipated, based on the research of
others
> that the investigators had read before they began. Perhaps they were using
> properly neutralised and washed biodiesel and/or two stage method.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 5:36 AM
> Subject: [biofuel] Re: Biodiesel/brake fluid etc
>
> > After researching both methods(Mike's & Two stage), I decided to try
> > the two stage method. I plan on using the biod in a Mercedes. Am
> > concerned about damage to the rubber hoses and had talked with
> > someone who is using biod in a Mercedes today.
> >
> > His comment was that by switching to the two stage method, the damage
> > to the rubber was nil. Appears that the rubber damage is due to the
> > methanol and that by removing it in the drying process it eliminates
> > the rubber damage.
> >
> > Comments?
> >
> > JV
> >
> >
> >
> > Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> > http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> > To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980793900/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [biofuel] Re: Biodiesel/brake fluid etc

2001-01-30 Thread NBT - E. Beggs

> > To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]





> >
- Original Message -
From: "CONNIE LEJEUNE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: Biodiesel/brake fluid etc


> PLEASE DO NOT E-MAIL ME ANYMORE
>
> "NBT - E. Beggs" wrote:
>
> > I did read one study somewhere along the line that suggested damage to
the
> > rubber was not nearly what they anticipated, based on the research of
others
> > that the investigators had read before they began. Perhaps they were
using
> > properly neutralised and washed biodiesel and/or two stage method.
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: 
> > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 5:36 AM
> > Subject: [biofuel] Re: Biodiesel/brake fluid etc
> >
> > > After researching both methods(Mike's & Two stage), I decided to try
> > > the two stage method. I plan on using the biod in a Mercedes. Am
> > > concerned about damage to the rubber hoses and had talked with
> > > someone who is using biod in a Mercedes today.
> > >
> > > His comment was that by switching to the two stage method, the damage
> > > to the rubber was nil. Appears that the rubber damage is due to the
> > > methanol and that by removing it in the drying process it eliminates
> > > the rubber damage.
> > >
> > > Comments?
> > >
> > > JV
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> > > http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> > > To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> >
> > Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> > http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> > To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980794828/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [biofuel] Re: Biodiesel/brake fluid etc

2001-01-30 Thread biofuels

Cloudy biod may be a bit of soap left in, suspended solids or, if cold,
tallow esters.
I have used an in-line car fuel filter (paper sort) before - takes ages, but
the filter may be back-washed with warm water.  It also filters out any
glycerine left around after washing.
The filter cost me all of £1.50 - $2.50
Terry


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980796535/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [biofuel] Re: Biodiesel/brake fluid etc

2001-01-30 Thread biofuels

All post-1990 Mercs should be biodiesel-proof
Terry


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980796369/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [biofuel] Re: Biodiesel/brake fluid etc

2001-01-30 Thread biofuels

Look at www.biofuels.fsnet.co.uk/challenge.htm
They hit you harder if you use homebrew ethanol - otherwise known as poteen,
taxed at about £18 a litre
Terry


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980796598/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [biofuel] Re: Biodiesel/brake fluid etc

2001-01-30 Thread biofuels

OK - it did when I tried it!
Mind you, I did light the lamp
Will try again and see what happens
Terry


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980796962/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [biofuel] Re: Biodiesel/brake fluid etc

2001-01-30 Thread biofuels

Please send me chapter and verse of amendment or your authority - I am
currently negotiating deal for UK biod producers and I haven't heard of this
one
Thanks
Terry


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980797105/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[biofuel] Re: Biodiesel/brake fluid etc

2001-01-30 Thread Ask me

Yes, the usual standards in the world for automobile brake fluid 
are from the American DOT, there are no EU, ISO, or BS.

DOT3Glycol Esters
DOT4Glycol Esters
DOT5  Silicone
DOT 5.1Glycol Esters HBP
Mineral LHM Liquid d' Hydraulique MineralŽ?

I didn't mean people should use biodiesel as brake fluid, I just 
note brake fluid is very very hygroscopic and the chemical 
compound it is made from sounds related to biodiesel, so I 
wondered if biodiesel was hygroscopic.

Regards, Richard
-

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "John Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In Australia our usual brake fluid(Grade 3 Super D.O.T.4) SAE 
j1703 is
> definitely not a mineral
> oil and should not be contaminated with mineral oils or used 
in brake
> systems requiring mineral oils.
> Mineral oils will ruin rubber brake parts quick smart but we can 
wash them
> in methanol or ethanol.
> I don't advocate using bioD in brakes here because the boiling 
point is a
> bit low BUT MINERAL OIL BRAKE FLUID IS NOT THE NORM 
WORLD WIDE.
> Regards
> John
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: biofuels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Monday, 29 January 2001 4:05
> Subject: [biofuel] Re: Biodiesel/brake fluid etc
> 
> 
> >Oh dear - here we go!
> Snip
> >2.  Once upon a time, there were two types of brake fluid - one 
mineral and
> >one vegetable.  The two were not compatible, as the mineral 
oil used rubber
> >grommets and the vegetable one used man-made ones.  
Now there is one -
> >mineral.  Ergo, using biodiesel - a vegetable oil - in a braking 
system
> >could cause the system to fail.  You have been warned.
> Snip


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980798206/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[biofuel] Re: Biodiesel/brake fluid etc

2001-01-30 Thread Ask me

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "biofuels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please send me chapter and verse of amendment or your 
authority - I am
> currently negotiating deal for UK biod producers and I haven't 
heard of this
> one
---
Do you mean me with the Kero??

I read it in a classic car mag, just searched the web, and found 
reference here...
http://www.classicmotor.co.uk/unlead3.htm


I have searched www.open.gov.uk
but the search comes up with too many red herrings.

Regards, Richard



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980799177/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[biofuel] Re: lamps

2001-01-30 Thread NBT - E. Beggs

Lit it, did you. Ha!  That's where you went wrong. I shone a flashlight at
it and thought it was the lamp that was throwing light.

Seriously,  did you use an "olive oil" lamp or a kerosene-type lamp? The
lamp I indicated works ok because it was designed for the higher viscosity
of olive oil.  I have not tried with regular "kerosene" lamps at all. I
think the pressurised ones might work, like the Coleman kerosene.

Ed
- Original Message -
From: "biofuels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 11:35 AM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: Biodiesel/brake fluid etc


> OK - it did when I tried it!
> Mind you, I did light the lamp
> Will try again and see what happens
> Terry
>
>
>
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980802495/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [biofuel] glycerin

2001-01-30 Thread Geoff Pritchard

I think that our local treatment plant just wants to know when, how much
per flushing, and what is it (glycerine in this case).  I don't think
that it qualifies as "toxic waste" just waste.


geoff

anton and federica wrote:
> 
> I know i should look in the website index, but i have never been able to
> make it work...
> What is everyone doing with their glyc erin? Is it O.K. to put it in the
> drain after one has made sure that all the methanol is out of ti? Is there
> some place that will take it as toxic waste, for not much money?
> I know that you can compost it, use it as parts cleaner, purify it to make
> soap, etc., but I live in the city, can't comp[ost, can't get rid of 30lbs
> of soap every month or two, and I don't really wash many parts, and besides,
> doesn't all that stuff eventually equal going down the drain anyway? does a
> standard sewage treatment plant take care of that sort of thing easily?
>  I talked to a local hand soap place, but they were not interested, and
> figure with all of our great brains working toghether, we should be able to
> come up with a relatively easy, e-friendly solution.
> anton
> 
> 
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980805977/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [biofuel] My first biodiesel batch

2001-01-30 Thread Chuck


- Original Message - 
From: "Ask me" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 10:16 AM
Subject: [biofuel] My first biodiesel batch


I have just left my first batch of biodiesel to react, I used...

150ml of Methlylated spirits (40pence!)
1000ml of ASDA Farm Stores vegetable Oil (39pence)
2 spoonfuls of SURF Sodabright  washing powder (neg.)

Why is anything good so expensive in the UK? 


Because England is a socialist country!


Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980807769/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[biofuel] air

2001-01-30 Thread stephen lakios

You can make an arguement either way,pushed in or drawn in.Or using logic, 
argue there is no air.Whatever,stephen


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980809045/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [biofuel] Re: Another methos for drying biodiesel/biogas

2001-01-30 Thread Geoff Pritchard

I am sure I don't need to remind you all that ETOH fumes and meth for
that matter will explode if not properly vented.  I speak as one who has
seen.  A Nimrod using the drying oven at work reset it to 135C and then
placed some cobalt-EDTA crystals in to dry.  They had been rinsed with
large amounts of 100% ethanol and NOT allowed to let the vapors "blow
off" under the hood for awhile.  The oven had a SMALL vent opening at
the top but quickly the fumes accumulated at the top of the oven and
BANG the roof of the oven buckled.  Just be careful what you try in an
attempt to save time.  SERMON OVER!


Ciao,

Geoff  

Keith Addison wrote:
> 
> >do you suppose these could be reused by drying in an oven?
> >anton
> >
> >
> > > General Performance: One pound of Hydrosource will absorb up to 48
> > >gallons of rainwater or snowmelt, and 20-35 gallons of water, depending on
> > >the salt content of the water.
> > > Hydrosource can be applied wet or dry. Dry granules are usually
> > >easier to use, but soak them thoroughly to fully fill them with water
> > >(hydrate). When hydrated, the granules look like chunks of clear gelatin
> > >about 1/2 inch in diameter.
> 
> Drying this stuff in the oven is probably more trouble and will most
> likely take more energy than the usual way of drying biodiesel, which
> is not at all a difficult matter. It might be useful for drying
> ethanol though.
> 
> Keith Addison
> Journey to Forever
> Handmade Projects
> Tokyo
> http://journeytoforever.org/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980809472/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[biofuel] methane

2001-01-30 Thread stephen lakios

I have the book, Producing your own power,by rodale press,inc  1974. The New 
Alchemy institute. Do you want me to send the chapter about methane power? Or 
do you have it?  The contents,Wind power,Water power,Wood power,Methane 
power,and Solar power.Stephen


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980810737/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[biofuel] Digital pH meter

2001-01-30 Thread Dave Rygmyr

Hello everyone. My name is David Rygmyr and I live in 
Washington State, USA. I am very interested in trying 
my hand at biodiesel and have been busy doing my 
homework; I've purchased the book "From the Fryer to 
the Fuel Tank" and have been all over the 
journeytoforever.org, veggievan.org, homepower.com, and 
have gone to many linked sites for more info. (Great 
stuff by the way, and my thanks to you on this list who 
were involved with these!)

I'm building my "lab" now; the great scavenger hunt 
begins. I'm a big fan of doing it once and doing it 
right. I already know that I don't want to mess around 
with pH strips or dye. The source listings in the book 
and websites didn't offer any specific brands or 
models, so I'm wondering if anyone here has a hands-
down recommendation for a specific unit. Believe me, 
I'm not eager to spend a lot, but I've also learned the 
hard way that you get what you pay for. My guess is 
that I'm after a middle-of-the-road unit that's 
reliable and easy to clean. (One source listed was 
Edmund Scientific although it looks like their unit 
requires an ongoing purchase of consumables?)

Thanks!
--Dave

 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980811612/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[biofuel] Re: Kerosene additive!

2001-01-30 Thread biofuels

Gotcha - thanks for the link
Yes, you could add paraffin to the petrol to reduce octane level, but there
is no dispensation in HMG regs to allow for this that I know of - the tax
must be paid at the LRP rate for it to be legal.
Unless anybody knows different .
Terry


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980811438/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [biofuel] Re: lamps

2001-01-30 Thread biofuels

You may well be right, that the wick was the wrong sort - I must admit to
not having checked it out thoroughly.
Silly Daddy!
Terry


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980812086/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [biofuel] My first biodiesel batch

2001-01-30 Thread biofuels

England a socialist country - with a Labour government?
Catch yourself on, wee laddie!
As the Peruvian President said to his driver - "Do as we always do - signal
left and turn right!"


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980811654/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[biofuel] Re: My first biodiesel batch

2001-01-30 Thread physkid

LOL!!!
hadn't heard that one, very nice :)

> England a socialist country - with a Labour government?
> Catch yourself on, wee laddie!
> As the Peruvian President said to his driver - "Do as we always do -
> signal left and turn right!"


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980813068/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [biofuel] methane

2001-01-30 Thread Steve Spence

I too have that book. Great resource. AL Rutan, author of many methane
articles in those days is still around. http://www.webconx.com/methane.htm



Steve Spence
Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter:
http://www.webconx.com/subscribe.htm

Renewable Energy Pages - http://www.webconx.com
Palm Pilot Pages - http://www.webconx.com/palm
X10 Home Automation - http://www.webconx.com/x10
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(212) 894-3704 x3154 - voicemail/fax
It is not money or dreams that will sustain you,
but practical knowledge about the basic
systems that sustain you.
--

- Original Message -
From: "stephen lakios" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 6:10 PM
Subject: [biofuel] methane


I have the book, Producing your own power,by rodale press,inc  1974. The New
Alchemy institute. Do you want me to send the chapter about methane power?
Or do you have it?  The contents,Wind power,Water power,Wood power,Methane
power,and Solar power.Stephen


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980815066/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[biofuel] Keith

2001-01-30 Thread stephen lakios

I was thinking,If you can purify the glycerin or get someone to do it,and get 
as many of the people on the list who are making bio to ship it to the person 
purifying it,you can make and sell your own lotions and creams. You have a 
great name,perfect for a cosmetic line. Journey to forever, is mystical and 
subliminal.Have a colorful label,appealing to women.Add 
coloring,perfumes,lanolin,teas,mineral oil,ect.Hand and skin lotions,hand and 
skin creams,body gels,body washes,ect.Or contract it out to a cosmetic company 
if you do not want all the work.I know it is expensive to ship anything,and it 
may be cheaper to buy bulk pure glycerine. But hey' a 2oz. jar of handcream 
sells for $5+.My wife has one which cost $9.98. Thats $160 a pound.Stephen


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980819056/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [biofuel]Hydrosorb

2001-01-30 Thread anton and federica

yes, that sounds great, i asked specifcally to know if it would be possible
to dry ethanol enough to make biodiesel with, or for that matter, save a
batch of methanol that hasd gotten wet. I also have been told by my pet
chemist that when you mix methanol and sodium hydroxide you get a small
amount of water, and although it is not significant, judging byt the success
of my methanol biodiesel, that also might occur in a ethanol/potassium
hydroxide batch, where it might be more significant...
anton
--
>From: "John Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: 
>Subject: Re: [biofuel]Hydrosorb
>Date: Jan 29, 2001, 6:14 AM
>

>Tried some watersorb and metho
>with straight metho 30 gm and watersorb 30 gm
>poured off 22 gm metho - didnt have any way of checking if it had
>selectively absorbed the water.
>added another 30 gm water with the 22 gm of metho back in and it absorbed
>the whole lot
>am trying to dry it now in a solar drier and will let you know the result.
>Seems like it might be worth playing with anyway because it didn't lap up
>the alcohol straight away like it does with straight water. - unfortunatly I
>didnt have enough on hand to get my hydrometer to float.
>If I can get some more in town I will fill up the drying column on my still
>and see if it will absorb the water out of alcohol vapour or break down at
>that temp. - I've been using wool in the drying column for a little while
>but haven't got any consistant results yet. will have to set up an
>experiment with a known Alc/water ratio and vaporize it through just the
>drying column. If I can find the time to set it up!!
>
>Regards
>John
>
>

 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980825344/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [biofuel]Hydrosorb

2001-01-30 Thread skaar

i've contacted multisorb technologies, inc. they make desiccants as
well.

anton and federica wrote:

> yes, that sounds great, i asked specifcally to know if it would be
> possible
> to dry ethanol enough to make biodiesel with, or for that matter, save
> a
> batch of methanol that hasd gotten wet. I also have been told by my
> pet
> chemist that when you mix methanol and sodium hydroxide you get a
> small
> amount of water, and although it is not significant, judging byt the
> success
> of my methanol biodiesel, that also might occur in a ethanol/potassium
>
> hydroxide batch, where it might be more significant...
> anton
> --
> >From: "John Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: 
> >Subject: Re: [biofuel]Hydrosorb
> >Date: Jan 29, 2001, 6:14 AM
> >
>
> >Tried some watersorb and metho
> >with straight metho 30 gm and watersorb 30 gm
> >poured off 22 gm metho - didnt have any way of checking if it had
> >selectively absorbed the water.
> >added another 30 gm water with the 22 gm of metho back in and it
> absorbed
> >the whole lot
> >am trying to dry it now in a solar drier and will let you know the
> result.
> >Seems like it might be worth playing with anyway because it didn't
> lap up
> >the alcohol straight away like it does with straight water. -
> unfortunatly I
> >didnt have enough on hand to get my hydrometer to float.
> >If I can get some more in town I will fill up the drying column on my
> still
> >and see if it will absorb the water out of alcohol vapour or break
> down at
> >that temp. - I've been using wool in the drying column for a little
> while
> >but haven't got any consistant results yet. will have to set up an
> >experiment with a known Alc/water ratio and vaporize it through just
> the
> >drying column. If I can find the time to set it up!!
> >
> >Regards
> >John
> >
> >
>
>Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


www. .com


>
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980828214/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[biofuel] Re: lamps

2001-01-30 Thread Keith Addison

http://www.britelyt.com/
BriteLyt - Home of the World Famous Petromax Multi-Fuel Products

Keith Addison
Journey to Forever
Handmade Projects
Tokyo
http://journeytoforever.org/


>Lit it, did you. Ha!  That's where you went wrong. I shone a flashlight at
>it and thought it was the lamp that was throwing light.
>
>Seriously,  did you use an "olive oil" lamp or a kerosene-type lamp? The
>lamp I indicated works ok because it was designed for the higher viscosity
>of olive oil.  I have not tried with regular "kerosene" lamps at all. I
>think the pressurised ones might work, like the Coleman kerosene.
>
>Ed
>- Original Message -
>From: "biofuels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: 
>Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 11:35 AM
>Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: Biodiesel/brake fluid etc
>
>
> > OK - it did when I tried it!
> > Mind you, I did light the lamp
> > Will try again and see what happens
> > Terry


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980828241/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[biofuel] Re: Another methos for drying biodiesel/biogas

2001-01-30 Thread Keith Addison

Thanks Geoff, that can't be said often enough. I've often warned 
people with stills about that: How would you feel heating putting 
gasoline fumes under pressure near an open fire? Same difference. 
Anyone who put Hydrosource soaked in ethanol in an oven to dry it 
would deserve what he got, but the rest of the biofuels movement 
wouldn't deserve the damage such an accident could do us. Can you see 
the headlines? It'd set us back years.

Best wishes

Keith Addison
Journey to Forever
Handmade Projects
Tokyo
http://journeytoforever.org/

 

>I am sure I don't need to remind you all that ETOH fumes and meth for
>that matter will explode if not properly vented.  I speak as one who has
>seen.  A Nimrod using the drying oven at work reset it to 135C and then
>placed some cobalt-EDTA crystals in to dry.  They had been rinsed with
>large amounts of 100% ethanol and NOT allowed to let the vapors "blow
>off" under the hood for awhile.  The oven had a SMALL vent opening at
>the top but quickly the fumes accumulated at the top of the oven and
>BANG the roof of the oven buckled.  Just be careful what you try in an
>attempt to save time.  SERMON OVER!
>
>
>Ciao,
>
>Geoff
>
>Keith Addison wrote:
> >
> > >do you suppose these could be reused by drying in an oven?
> > >anton
> > >
> > >
> > > > General Performance: One pound of Hydrosource will 
>absorb up to 48
> > > >gallons of rainwater or snowmelt, and 20-35 gallons of water, 
>depending on
> > > >the salt content of the water.
> > > > Hydrosource can be applied wet or dry. Dry granules are usually
> > > >easier to use, but soak them thoroughly to fully fill them with water
> > > >(hydrate). When hydrated, the granules look like chunks of clear gelatin
> > > >about 1/2 inch in diameter.
> >
> > Drying this stuff in the oven is probably more trouble and will most
> > likely take more energy than the usual way of drying biodiesel, which
> > is not at all a difficult matter. It might be useful for drying
> > ethanol though.
> >
> > Keith Addison
> > Journey to Forever
> > Handmade Projects
> > Tokyo
> > http://journeytoforever.org/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> > http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> > To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
>http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
>To unsubscribe, send an email to:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980828468/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[biofuel] Re: Digital pH meter

2001-01-30 Thread Keith Addison

Hello Dave

See: Biofuels supplies and suppliers: Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_supply.html#pH

You don't mention Webconx, have you been there too?
http://www.webconx.com/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm

Keith Addison
Journey to Forever
Handmade Projects
Tokyo
http://journeytoforever.org/

 

>Hello everyone. My name is David Rygmyr and I live in
>Washington State, USA. I am very interested in trying
>my hand at biodiesel and have been busy doing my
>homework; I've purchased the book "From the Fryer to
>the Fuel Tank" and have been all over the
>journeytoforever.org, veggievan.org, homepower.com, and
>have gone to many linked sites for more info. (Great
>stuff by the way, and my thanks to you on this list who
>were involved with these!)
>
>I'm building my "lab" now; the great scavenger hunt
>begins. I'm a big fan of doing it once and doing it
>right. I already know that I don't want to mess around
>with pH strips or dye. The source listings in the book
>and websites didn't offer any specific brands or
>models, so I'm wondering if anyone here has a hands-
>down recommendation for a specific unit. Believe me,
>I'm not eager to spend a lot, but I've also learned the
>hard way that you get what you pay for. My guess is
>that I'm after a middle-of-the-road unit that's
>reliable and easy to clean. (One source listed was
>Edmund Scientific although it looks like their unit
>requires an ongoing purchase of consumables?)
>
>Thanks!
>--Dave
>
>
>Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
>http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
>To unsubscribe, send an email to:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980829143/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[biofuel] Re: My first biodiesel batch

2001-01-30 Thread Keith Addison

"biofuels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>England a socialist country - with a Labour government?
>Catch yourself on, wee laddie!

:-) I wondered if you might have something to say about that!

>As the Peruvian President said to his driver - "Do as we always do - signal
>left and turn right!"

Not sure if Mr Fujimori can afford a driver here in Tokyo as it's all 
a pack of lies about the $18 million and so on. :-) Anyway, though a 
"Japanese citizen", he can't speak Japanese. Quite easy though: Heddo 
raito, sutoppu raito, teru raito, bakku mira, saido mira, rajieta, 
shokku abusoba, taiya, supeya taiya, waipa, giya shifuto, and, my 
favourite, no kuratchi (automatic transmission).

Keith Addison
Journey to Forever
Handmade Projects
Tokyo
http://journeytoforever.org/


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980830385/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [biofuel] Re: Digital pH meter

2001-01-30 Thread Geoff Pritchard

Dave,

Hey, I live in N. Idaho (Moscow/Pullman area).  Where're you at? 
Regarding pH meters, try Fisher Scientific (800)766-7000; they carry
name brands like Orion, Corning, ...  Also, probes (what ya stick in
soln') can be purchased as sealed (as opposed to refillable) units
cheaply from a company called Lasar or Lazar (I'll check on that one if
you're interested).  We bought a digital meter thru Fisher advertised as
one that the water quality guys use - they "throw it" (not recommended)
into the back of their pickup.  Pretty tough with a rubber case for
protection.  Anyway, good luck.  Perhaps check out an Internet lab
equipment auction site - seriously they exist.


Ciao,


Geoff  

Keith Addison wrote:
> 
> Hello Dave
> 
> See: Biofuels supplies and suppliers: Journey to Forever
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_supply.html#pH
> 
> You don't mention Webconx, have you been there too?
> http://www.webconx.com/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
> 
> Keith Addison
> Journey to Forever
> Handmade Projects
> Tokyo
> http://journeytoforever.org/
> 
> 
> 
> >Hello everyone. My name is David Rygmyr and I live in
> >Washington State, USA. I am very interested in trying
> >my hand at biodiesel and have been busy doing my
> >homework; I've purchased the book "From the Fryer to
> >the Fuel Tank" and have been all over the
> >journeytoforever.org, veggievan.org, homepower.com, and
> >have gone to many linked sites for more info. (Great
> >stuff by the way, and my thanks to you on this list who
> >were involved with these!)
> >
> >I'm building my "lab" now; the great scavenger hunt
> >begins. I'm a big fan of doing it once and doing it
> >right. I already know that I don't want to mess around
> >with pH strips or dye. The source listings in the book
> >and websites didn't offer any specific brands or
> >models, so I'm wondering if anyone here has a hands-
> >down recommendation for a specific unit. Believe me,
> >I'm not eager to spend a lot, but I've also learned the
> >hard way that you get what you pay for. My guess is
> >that I'm after a middle-of-the-road unit that's
> >reliable and easy to clean. (One source listed was
> >Edmund Scientific although it looks like their unit
> >requires an ongoing purchase of consumables?)
> >
> >Thanks!
> >--Dave
> >
> >
> >Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> >http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> >To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980834422/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [biofuel] Digital pH meter

2001-01-30 Thread David Sanz

Dave,

Try this:
 
http://www.benmeadows.com/cgi-bin/SoftCart.exe/scstore/p-222500.html?L+scstore+mxie7232+980865595

David

Dave Rygmyr escribi—:

> Hello everyone. My name is David Rygmyr and I live in
> Washington State, USA. I am very interested in trying
> my hand at biodiesel and have been busy doing my
> homework; I've purchased the book "From the Fryer to
> the Fuel Tank" and have been all over the
> journeytoforever.org, veggievan.org, homepower.com, and
> have gone to many linked sites for more info. (Great
> stuff by the way, and my thanks to you on this list who
> were involved with these!)
>
> I'm building my "lab" now; the great scavenger hunt
> begins. I'm a big fan of doing it once and doing it
> right. I already know that I don't want to mess around
> with pH strips or dye. The source listings in the book
> and websites didn't offer any specific brands or
> models, so I'm wondering if anyone here has a hands-
> down recommendation for a specific unit. Believe me,
> I'm not eager to spend a lot, but I've also learned the
> hard way that you get what you pay for. My guess is
> that I'm after a middle-of-the-road unit that's
> reliable and easy to clean. (One source listed was
> Edmund Scientific although it looks like their unit
> requires an ongoing purchase of consumables?)
>
> Thanks!
> --Dave
>
>
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[biofuel] Greenhouse

2001-01-30 Thread Karl D JŠrnhammer

Could it be this simple?
Talking to a friend yesterday he described a setup he had seen in a
greenhouse. He claimed that the greenhouse was heated with filtered fry oil.
The heater was half an oil drum with metal lathe shavings in the bottom,
onto this dripped the fry oil from a bent pipe with a nozzle and a tap, the
pipe was connected to the oil tank sveral meters away.
The fire was started with a hand held propane burner and my friend claimed
that if needed the drip would be increased to a dribble to increase the
heat.
Does this sound feasable - I would love this for my workshop. 

 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980847301/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[biofuel] Damn

2001-01-30 Thread David Teal

What's all the fuss about?
I get my e-group emails just as ever.  Totally seamless transition with no
action at all on my part.  The only noticable difference is to the sponsor
messages at the bottom.

David Teal


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980866743/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[biofuel] Bush Sucks

2001-01-30 Thread Keith Addison

http://www.gristmagazine.com/grist/imho/imho012601-b.stm
Grist | IMHO | Bush sucks | 26 Jan 2001
Bush Sucks

Meet the Bush team, brought to you by ExxonMobil, Chevron, and Texaco

by Jim Motavalli
26 Jan 2001

To an extraordinary degree, the administration assembled by George W. 
Bush is made up of men and women with experience in the automobile 
and oil industries. With the energy crisis in California, such energy 
expertise at the helm, it would seem, must be a good thing.

Would that it were so. In reality, the Bush team is so tilted toward 
Big Oil that it will never give a thought to the only possible 
lasting solutions to our deepening problems: mass transit and energy 
conservation.

We Americans must really love our cars; we spend an hour a day in 
them. The average family takes 10 car trips a day, mostly for 
shopping, socializing, and recreation. For every 10 transit miles in 
the U.S., more than nine are taken in a car. Every year, we use up 
100 billion gallons of oil, more than half of it (56 percent) 
imported. If present trends continue, we'll be importing two-thirds 
of our oil in 20 years. That isn't love -- it's addiction.


Living in an SUV-owner's paradise.

If every American drove a 70-mile-per-gallon hybrid Honda Insight 
instead of a gas-guzzling sport utility vehicle, we could stop 
importing oil tomorrow, but that kind of thinking is not on the 
agenda. Both President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney have 
backgrounds as oil executives -- in fact, Cheney was plucked into the 
campaign directly from the helm of the Texas-based oil services giant 
Halliburton, which helped rebuild Iraq's petroleum industry after the 
Persian Gulf War. And both Bush and Cheney support increased domestic 
drilling, most radically in the highly sensitive coastal plain of the 
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska.

Bush raised a huge percentage of his campaign cash from oil and gas 
interests, including a record $21.3 million at a single fundraiser 
hosted by Kenneth Lay, chief executive of Enron, the largest natural 
gas dealer in the U.S. The industry's giving followed the pattern of 
the 1998 election cycle, when 76 percent of the $22 million donated 
by oil interests went to Republican candidates.

They've Got So Much Energy!

The Bush administration is likely to adopt a hostile stance toward 
energy conservation in general and tax subsidies for clean vehicles 
in particular. Speaking at a recreational-vehicle plant in Washington 
state during the campaign, Cheney scored points with the audience 
when he mocked Democratic nominee Al Gore's proposed tax credits for 
buyers of energy-efficient technologies: "You have a solar panel on 
your house, you get tax relief. If you drive a solar-powered car, you 
get tax relief. That's goofy."


Remember these?

During a Los Angeles stop in the early days of the 2000 presidential 
campaign, Bush listened to the complaints of a man who rode two slow 
buses to work every day and was seeking transit improvements. "My 
hope is that you will be able to find good enough work, so you'll be 
able to afford a car," offered a helpful Bush.

The auto industry has a direct pipeline to the Bush administration in 
the person of White House Chief of Staff Andrew H. Card, Jr. From 
1993 to 1998, Card was the president of the American Automobile 
Manufacturers Association; in this position, according to the New 
York Times, "he oversaw the lobbying against tighter fuel-economy and 
air pollution regulations for automobiles." From there, it was on to 
a vice presidency at General Motors.

And Card is only the beginning. National Security Adviser Condoleezza 
Rice, a former Chevron board member, has an oil tanker named after 
her. Commerce Secretary Donald Evans is another oil man. Energy 
Secretary Spencer Abraham, defeated this past November in his bid for 
re-election to the U.S. Senate from Michigan, twice co-sponsored 
Senate bills calling for drilling in the Arctic Refuge; voted against 
$62 million for solar and other renewable energy sources in the 
Energy Department budget; consistently opposed raising corporate 
average fuel economy standards for the auto industry; and, most 
famously, tried to abolish the Energy Department itself. Interior 
Secretary-designate Gale Norton is a protege of James Watt, the 
fierce foe of the environment who held the job under Ronald Reagan.

The list goes on. These are the foxes guarding the hen house of 
American energy and transportation policy. Meantime, we fight to the 
death for the last drop of imported oil, and our highways continue to 
gridlock with bumper-to-bumper SUVs.

- - - - - - - - -

Jim Motavalli is editor of E Magazine and author of the forthcoming 
Transportation That Works (Sierra Club Books).

 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980863417/

[biofuel] Calif. forges ahead with low-emissions auto rules

2001-01-30 Thread Keith Addison

http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.cfm?newsid=9618
Planet Ark
Calif. forges ahead with low-emissions auto rules

USA: January 28, 2001

SAN FRANCISCO - Rolling over objections from the auto industry, 
California officials have approved the nation's first-ever mandate 
requiring car makers to send fleets of electric and low-pollution 
vehicles purring down state highways.

The California Air Resources Board (CARB), after a marathon meeting 
that heard testimony from both auto industry executives and 
environmentalists, unanimously approved a measure on Thursday night 
requiring major automakers to offer as many as three million electric 
and low-polluting cars for sale in California over the next decade.

Environmental activists hailed the decision as the start of a 
national clean air revolution, saying that New York, Vermont and 
Massachusetts were all set to follow California's lead by setting 
their own requirements for low-pollution or "zero emissions vehicles" 
(ZEVs).

"We look forward to a strong market launch and a steady increase in 
the number of ZEVs on the road in order to achieve price reductions 
and stability for suppliers," Cecile Martin, deputy director of the 
California Electric Transportation Coalition, said in a statement.

But automakers said the move was short-sighted, and would force them 
to bring to market expensive, experimental vehicles that the public 
would probably not accept.

"We were disappointed that the board chose to increase numbers of 
electric vehicles, without any evidence to support the decision," 
Steve Douglas, environmental affairs director for the Association of 
Automobile Manufacturers, an industry lobbying group, said on Friday.

ARGUMENTS END

The decision by the politically appointed Air Resources Board marked 
the the end of more than a decade of wrangling over electric cars and 
California's clean air goals.

In 1990, the board jolted the automobile industry by announcing plans 
to require a full 10 percent of the new cars sold in California in 
2003 to be ZEVs - a goal which auto producers quickly and repeatedly 
attacked as unreasonable.

Last year, the board's own staff proposed dramatically scaling back 
the ZEV requirement, noting that other, low-pollution technologies 
such as gas-electric "hybrids", fuel cell vehicles and super-clean 
gasoline engine-powered cars were all cheaper and more efficient ways 
to cut auto smog.

While auto makers continued to resist California's ZEV program, the 
board signaled Thursday that it would not step back from the overall 
low pollution strategy.

Its decision, while setting goals lower than the 10 percent "pure 
ZEV" requirement originally suggested, still sets the stage for a 
major roll-out of electric and low pollution vehicles in California 
between 2003 and 2018.

Initially, major automakers must offer 4,650 electric cars for sale 
as well as some 100,000 other "clean air" alternatives such as 
hybrids, fuel cell and clean engine vehicles. These numbers increase 
over time and gradually expand to include sports utility vehicles, 
officials said on Friday.

"As the years go on, the number of pure ZEVS actually grows larger 
than what the original (1990) mandate had required," board spokesman 
Richard Varenchik said.

"This is what the automakers are going to have to deal with. It is 
here, deal with it."

Many already are. Ford Motor Co., DaimlerChrysler AG and Toyota Motor 
Corp. are all experimenting with fuel cell vehicles while Toyota and 
Honda Motor Co. Ltd. are moving forward with gas-electric hybrid 
vehicles.

A MISTAKE?

But the Association of Automobile Manufacturers, a coalition of the 
world's 13 largest car and truck makers which has taken the lead in 
opposing California's ZEV program, said the official state mandate 
was a mistake.

"The problem is technology," Douglas said. "A battery-powered car 
costs $20,000 more than a similar size gasoline-powered car. It goes 
73 miles (117 km) (per charge), and requires three to four hours to 
recharge. We're concerned that a market doesn't exist."

But the board plugged ahead, rejecting an industry suggestion that it 
delay the final order pending completion of a suggested three year 
test market study.

"Zero-emission vehicles have such potential to address so many 
problems: public health concerns, global climate change, energy 
diversity," board chairman Alan C. Lloyd said. "Clean vehicle 
technology is advancing on a number of fronts. The program is 
designed to take advantage of those advances."

Story by Andrew Quinn

REUTERS NEWS SERVICE

 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980863408/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[biofuel] DaimlerChrysler To Cut 26,000 Jobs

2001-01-30 Thread Keith Addison

http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20010129/bs/daimlerchrysler_job_cuts_4.html

Monday January 29 8:23 AM ET
DaimlerChrysler To Cut 26,000 Jobs

AP Photo

By JIM SUHR, Associated Press Writer

AUBURN HILLS, Mich. (AP) - DaimlerChrysler AG on Monday announced it 
will cut 26,000 jobs over three years at its U.S.-based Chrysler 
division.

As part of the restructuring plan designed to pull Chrysler out of 
the red, the company announced it would cut about 20 percent of its 
North American work force.

The plan also calls for six manufacturing plants to be idled through 
2002. Chrysler said it expects a large part of the job-cutting to be 
done through retirement programs, achieved within the framework of 
existing union contracts.

``To be competitive, the Chrysler group needs to be a more nimble 
company,'' Chrysler group president and chief executive Dieter 
Zetsche said in a statement. ``Along with exciting products, this 
will establish a sound basis for future growth.''

Chrysler said the job cuts will include 19,000 hourly workers and 
6,800 salaried employees.

The job cuts will be through a combination of retirements, special 
programs, layoffs and attrition.

Chrysler expects that three-quarters of the overall reduction will be 
achieved this year.

``Today's actions will help remove the uncertainty many of our 
employees have been feeling,'' Zetsche said. ``Part of this process 
may be painful for many people. However, to be truly competitive in 
today's auto industry environment, we need to be a more nimble 
company, more closely aligned with current and future market 
conditions.''

Zetsche said Chrysler will unveil its complete plan to turn around 
the loss-making division on Feb. 26.

Chrysler posted a third-quarter loss of $512 million and has warned 
that its fourth-quarter loss could more than double that, given a 
soft U.S. auto market.

On Saturday, Germany's Stuttgarter Zeitung newspaper reported the 
Chrysler unit could have lost as much as $1.3 billion in the fourth 
quarter.

DaimlerChrysler has insisted it has no plans to spin off or sell 
Chrysler, which it bought in 1998 as part of its plan to extend the 
company's global reach.

 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980863382/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[biofuel] Detroit Sucks

2001-01-30 Thread Keith Addison

http://www.gristmagazine.com/grist/imho/imho012601.stm
Grist | IMHO | Detroit sucks | 26 Jan 2001
Detroit Sucks

The Big Three are talking a good game, but reality does not match the rhetoric

by Roland Hwang
26 Jan 2001

Judging by the media hype over Ford's and General Motors' early 
January announcements on "hybrid" vehicles at the North American 
International Auto Show, one would think that automakers have seen 
the light and are finally matching their professed concern for the 
environment with deeds.

Hybrid cars deliver better fuel efficiency by using two power sources 
-- a gasoline engine and an electric motor. But true environmental 
gains are not measured in press releases. Detroit's paltry commitment 
to sell a few tens of thousands of cleaner cars four years from now 
will hardly make a dent in reducing the emission of greenhouse gases 
that cause global climate change. Sadly, the Big Three automakers 
(Ford, GM, and Chrysler) are also the Big Three polluters. They sell 
more vehicles that are more polluting than almost all other 
automakers. Indeed, the average greenhouse gas emissions of their 
passenger vehicles have actually increased since 1989.

A Dash Here, a Pinch There

So what exactly did Detroit commit to at the hometown Auto Show? Ford 
announced that it will offer a new fuel-saving technology in 2004 on 
its best-selling Explorer SUV; the technology, which has the 
potential to improve fuel economy by 10 to 15 percent, will be 
available as an option for about $1,000. (Ford had previously 
announced that it will sell a hybrid version of its new SUV, the 
Escape, starting in 2003; the hybrid version will get up to 40 miles 
per gallon and cost about $3,000 extra.) GM, in its most sweeping 
announcement to date on hybrid vehicles, said its "ParadiGM" hybrid 
system will be offered on a number of different models starting in 
2004.


An Insight gets out it's can of whoop-ass in Detroit.
Photo: John E. Johnson (a.k.a. Insight Man).

These commitments to move greener auto technology from blackboard to 
blacktop are a promising sign. While Detroit is still well behind 
Toyota and Honda in bringing hybrid cars to market, it does appear 
that the Big Three are at least heeding the call from 
environmentalists -- and increasingly from consumers -- to build cars 
that tread more lightly on the planet. Interestingly, Ford's and GM's 
announcements came a day after Greencar.org -- developed by a 
coalition of environmental groups including the Natural Resources 
Defense Council -- culminated a year-long petition drive, delivering 
to automakers 150,000 letters demanding substantially cleaner 
automobiles.

Detroit, then, has not turned a completely deaf ear to the call for 
cleaner cars. But a few greener vehicles, aimed at a boutique market, 
will not save the planet. One might well suspect that the real reason 
Detroit is getting into the green vehicle market is to burnish its 
corporate logos and assuage consumer guilt over SUV purchases.

Automakers sold 17 million passenger vehicles last year, almost half 
of which were polluting and fuel-inefficient SUVs, pickups, and 
minivans. GM reportedly believes it will be able to sell 20,000 
hybrids in 2004 and as many as 100,000 by 2010. But GM sold almost 5 
million vehicles last year, nearly half of them SUVs and other light 
trucks. So the impact of the anticipated hybrid sales would be to 
raise GM's overall average fuel economy by about 0.1 percent in 2004 
and 0.5 percent by 2010. The latter figure amounts to an increase in 
fuel efficiency of a mere 0.1 miles per gallon across the GM fleet. 
Hardly the stuff of heady environmentalism.

The internal combustion engine is a 19th-century invention. In 
announcing their intention to manufacture and sell hybrids, the Big 
Three automakers have taken an important step forward. But this is 
only the first step of a journey into the 21st century, a time when 
new technologies promise to help solve environmental problems. To 
survive, hybrids and other alternative technologies must become more 
than a "green halo" used to polish the automakers' public image. If 
Detroit does not fundamentally restructure itself around 
fuel-efficient, pollution-reducing technologies, the automakers may 
find themselves going the way of the horse-and-buggy. And they may 
take the planet with them.

- - - - - - - - -

Roland Hwang works on transportation energy issues in the San 
Francisco office of the Natural Resources Defense Council. His areas 
of expertise include the energy, environmental, and equity impacts of 
alternative transportation technologies and fuels, and innovative 
market incentive policies.

 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980863494/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeyt

[biofuel] Enviros Suck

2001-01-30 Thread Keith Addison

http://www.gristmagazine.com/grist/imho/imho012601-c.stm
Grist | IMHO | Enviros suck | 26 Jan 2001
Enviros Suck

"Clean cars" are the devil's tools, diverting attention from truly 
green solutions

by Jane Holtz Kay
26 Jan 2001

The "clean car" is cool this season. "Is your car an energy hog? Get 
a new one," a web ad bombards me before I have finished the morning's 
second cup of coffee. "Your vote counts here," says the flashing ad 
that rates the energy efficiency of the web surfer's car, luring 
owners to buy a scrubbed-up replacement.

The shock to my system from the vehicular hype notwithstanding, this 
environmental ruse -- a green-gimmick sales pitch -- is 
understandable from the manufacturer's perspective. "The industry is 
in crisis," says even the nightly French television news, showing an 
empty Chrysler lot. With automobile sales slowing, Detroit seems 
conflicted -- Ford is going retro with a new/old Thunderbird, while 
General Motors is burying the Oldsmobile.

Disturbingly, however, it isn't only the Big Three heirs or the 
online peddlers who are pushing us to purchase a new vehicle, through 
their consume to conserve come-on. It's the greens who are buying -- 
and buying plenty. The new hybrid Toyota Prius is backlisted with the 
names of enviro buyers, while eco-leaders like Amory Lovins preach 
that the fuel cell will solve all our transportation ills. Praise for 
new technology vehicles dominated even the plenary session at the 
fall meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists, set two 
hours north of Motown, in Lansing, Mich., last fall.


Is the Prius drawing enviros to the Dark Side?

The attempt to solve our mobility and environmental problems through 
the same-old same-old came through especially loud and clear recently 
as two petitions came my way. Scarcely had the first -- a plea to 
stop despoiling the Arctic wilderness -- entered my inbox, when the 
second, a call for a "clean car," popped up. "Please provide 
affordable clean green cars for consumers like me as soon as 
possible," said the green petitioners' message.

Why are enviros offering such fractionalized, automated, 
anti-environmental solutions to our mobility woes?, I wondered. Why 
weren't they calling for walkable communities? or public transit? or 
smaller oil and auto subsidies? Instead of gathering signatures of 
advocates for clean-car alternatives, why weren't green activists 
attacking the $58 billion federal transportation bill skewed to the 
automobile? Instead of obeying the Toyota Prius plea to buy because 
"obviously nature approves," why weren't they considering the 
automobile's larger mistreatment of the natural world?

To be sure, in the shadow of The Hague's climate-treaty meetings, 
where America derailed talks to mandate lower greenhouse gas 
emissions, the so-called clean car might seem palatable. Who wouldn't 
prefer it to unregulated, low-mileage, dirt engines from the SUV 
energy hogs that crowd our roads and contribute mightily to 
environmental malaise?

Wake Up!

But the "clean car" alternative is a pernicious palliative from the 
get-go. Behind the camouflage lies this truth: One-third of the 
energy and resources consumed in the lifetime of each automobile are 
consumed in production. And the problems don't end there.


A breath of fresh air?
Photo: NREL/PIX.

A "clean car" does not ameliorate the damage done by our paving the 
planet. Clean car or no, highways and their runoff remain the primary 
contributor to habitat disruption and species loss. Clean car or no, 
sprawl consumes 1.2 million acres of farmland a year and 60,000 acres 
of wetland, eroding our urban and suburban cores in the process.

And a low-emissions vehicle provides no answer to the problems of 55 
million school-age children (and more than that number of elderly 
people) immobilized by a car-oriented, unwalkable world. Nor does it 
do anything for the 9 percent of the population, most of them 
minorities and women, who lack an automobile in a car-bound society 
that deprives them of decent public transportation. Nor, for that 
matter, does the clean car help the overworked Americans who log 
two-thirds of their auto miles for errands and shopping -- a ton or 
two of steel-and-wheel for a gallon of milk.

In the end, buying into pseudo-clean consumption undermines any real 
possibility that politics and planning will solve the land use and 
environmental problems bred by car dependency. As the millennium 
begins, such planning offers us a chance to do better. New light-rail 
lines combined with plans for transit-oriented development have 
proved effective even in live-free-or-die Dallas, Amtrak use is on 
the rise, and the misery of traffic congestion and environmental 
destruction is winning daily converts to the cause.

Environmentalists must see through the faux green contrivances of the 
car guys and plan a truly green mobility.

- - - - - - - - -

Jane Holtz Kay is architecture critic of The Nation an

[biofuel] Fedex To Deliver Cleaner Vehicles

2001-01-30 Thread Keith Addison

http://ens.lycos.com/ens/jan2001/2001L-01-29-09.html
Environment News Service: AmeriScan: January 29, 2001
Fedex To Deliver Cleaner Vehicles

WASHINGTON, DC, January 29, 2001 (ENS) - FedEx Express and the 
conservation group Environmental Defense have committed to work 
together to develop the environmental standards for a diesel electric 
hybrid truck.

The vehicles could cut delivery truck emissions by 90 per cent and 
fuel costs by 50 percent. FedEx, the world's largest express 
transportation company, runs a fleet of 45,000 trucks.

"Together, we want to see a truck on the road that will set the 
standard for environmental efficiency," said Elizabeth Sturcken, 
project manager for the Alliance for Environmental Innovation, a 
project of Environmental Defense and The Pew Charitable Trusts. "We 
have announced an aggressive goal."

Cleaner trucks may soon speed into FedEx fleets (Photo courtesy 
Federal Express Corporation)
Creating such a low polluting truck will be "Difficult, yes, but 
achievable," said Jim Steffen, FedEx's chief engineer for vehicles. 
"We're very enthusiastic."

Much of the hybrid technology is already in hand. Hybrid diesel 
electric buses using regenerative braking which recaptures the energy 
that conventional vehicles lose in braking - are already running in 
Boston and New York City.

Drivers "won't notice the difference," Steffen said. Manufacturing 
costs will be higher at first, but "I fully expect pre-production 
hybrids to be on the road within four years," he said.


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980863421/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[biofuel] Group Sues Over Calif. MTBE Ban

2001-01-30 Thread Keith Addison

http://news.excite.com:80/news/ap/010124/23/mtbe-lawsuit

Group Sues Over Calif. MTBE Ban

Updated 11:10 PM ET January 24, 2001SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) - A trade 
group filed a federal suit Wednesday seeking to block a California 
ban on the fuel additive MTBE, which reduces air pollution but is 
blamed for fouling groundwater.

Gov. Gray Davis ordered a ban on MTBE after Dec. 31, 2002, because 
contamination forced the closure of drinking water wells in Santa 
Monica and South Lake Tahoe. As little as a tablespoon in an 
Olympic-sized pool makes water taste and smell like turpentine.

MTBE, which moves swiftly through groundwater after being spilled or 
leaked, has been found in 10,000 sites in the state. The 
Environmental Protection Agency has labeled it a possible carcinogen.

The Oxygenated Fuels Association filed suit in U.S. District Court in 
Sacramento asking a judge to invalidate the ban. The group said the 
state should tackle the real problem of fixing leaking underground 
fuel tanks that taint water.

A Davis spokesman did not immediately return calls for comment Wednesday.

The federal government requires that gasoline sold in cities with 
smog problems contain 2 percent oxygen to make the fuel burn cleaner.

Two fuel additives, called "oxygenates," are commonly used to comply 
with the requirement. MTBE - methyl tertiary butyl ether, made from 
natural gas - has been used primarily in the Northeast and on the 
West Coast, while ethanol is used primarily in the Midwest.

The association contends that MTBE is cheaper than ethanol and burns 
more cleanly. Ethanol producers say it is safer than MTBE.

The trade group filed a similar lawsuit in July 2000 challenging a 
New York law banning MTBE by 2004.

The Clinton administration considered for months whether to grant 
California a waiver to the requirement for oxygenates in gasoline, 
but did not act before President Bush took office Jan. 20. The Bush 
administration has not taken a position on waiver requests.

A Senate committee approved a ban last year on MTBE, but the bill 
went no further.

---

On the Net:

The Oxygenated Fuels Association is at http://www.ofa.net

American Coalition for Ethanol site: http://www.ethanol.org

EPA site:

 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980863382/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[biofuel] Indonesia forces buses, taxis to use natural gas

2001-01-30 Thread Keith Addison

http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.cfm?newsid=9624
Planet Ark
Indonesia forces buses, taxis to use natural gas

INDONESIA: January 28, 2001

JAKARTA - Indonesia will force new public buses and taxis to use 
compressed natural gas to cut down on pollution, a Mines and Energy 
Ministry official said on Thursday.

"We need fuel that is good for the environment," the official told 
Reuters. "The government will gradually force buses and taxis to use 
gas and will start with the capital city of Jakarta and surrounding 
cities."

He gave no timetable.

Buses and taxis already in operation would not be forced to change, 
the official added.

Jakarta is one of the world's most polluted cities. Most of its more 
than 10 million people rely on fleets of poorly maintained, 
smoke-spewing public buses for transport.

REUTERS NEWS SERVICE

 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/837408/_/980863441/
-_->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[biofuel] Little "easy" US oil and gas left up for grabs

2001-01-30 Thread Keith Addison

http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.cfm?newsid=9650
Planet Ark
Little "easy" US oil and gas left up for grabs

USA: January 29, 2001

HOUSTON - Oilmen have always been fond of telling the rest of us that 
all the easy oil and gas was found long ago and that it takes 
increasing amounts of cunning and hard work to persuade the Earth to 
give up additional hydrocarbons.

It's a truism perhaps nowhere more evident than in the United States, 
where the industry has been scouring the landscape for a century and 
a half in search of profitable drilling prospects.

Despite the incentive of historically high oil and natural gas 
prices, a shortage of readily drillable targets has constrained US 
domestic oil and gas production and left it increasingly reliant on 
foreign supply.

Waning domestic supply has spurred the new Bush administration to 
push for opening federal lands, including the northern coastal plain 
of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), to eager oil drillers.

Simmons & Co. energy analyst Mark Meyer notes that US oil production 
by 21 of the biggest publicly traded companies fell more than 5 
percent in the first nine months of 2000 while the same companies' US 
gas production fell 0.7 percent.

"There's not a lot of sweetspot easy-gets any more," Meyer said.

Jeff Kieburtz, an analyst with Salomon Smith Barney, says the aging 
of the world's oil and gas reservoirs is pushing global exploration 
efforts into more remote areas, especially deepwater offshore plays 
such as the Gulf of Mexico.

"Most of the land and shallow-water basins in this country are fairly 
well understood, so that new drilling prospects tend to be step-out 
type of drilling ideas rather than entirely new structures," Kieburtz 
said.

"Deepwater is where the real pure exploration activity is going on in 
this country," he said.

SQUEEZING MORE OUT OF OLD FIELDS

The US Minerals Management Service recently reported that the number 
of rigs drilling in water depths of 1,000 feet or greater in the Gulf 
of Mexico rose to a record 40 at the end of last year from 26 a year 
earlier.

That total included seven rigs working in "ultradeep water" of 5,000 
feet or more and three that were pushing the frontiers of offshore 
exploration in more than 7,500 feet of water.

Back on land, so-called enhanced recovery techniques are being used 
to squeeze more oil and gas out of mature fields.

Marathon Oil Co. and Kinder Morgan Energy Partners recently formed a 
joint venture that will inject carbon dioxide deep into the ground to 
boost production from the historic Yates field in West Texas that was 
discovered in 1926.

Meyer said relatively complex enhanced recovery technology was even 
being deployed from the startup of Phillips Petroleum Co's Alpine 
field in Alaska, the biggest US onshore oil discovery in more than a 
decade.

Alpine, discovered in 1994, contains estimated recoverable reserves 
of 429 million barrels of oil. Production began in November, using a 
mixture of gas and liquids to extract oil from the rock that holds it.

Meyer contrasted Alpine with the big discoveries of the past which 
first underwent a long phase of primary production, making use of the 
field's natural pressure. Later, they were flooded with water to 
prolong production and only toward the end of their life would more 
complex "tertiary" recovery techniques be deployed.

Phillips is also taking pains to protect Alaska's delicate tundra and 
wildlife, minimizing environmental impact by cramming surface 
production facilities for the 40,000-acre field into just 94 acres 
and using temporary ice roads and air transportation to move people 
and supplies, rather than building a new road.

DRILLING DEEPER WELLS

In North Texas, Mitchell Energy & Development Corp. has boosted its 
production of natural gas from a field that it has been working since 
the 1950s by pumping in a mixture of sand and water to crack open the 
tough Barnett Shale formation.

Meyer said that in the near to middle term deeper wells will have to 
meet growing US demand for natural gas. Deeper wells hold out the 
prospect of much bigger reserves, but they are more expensive to 
drill and the risk of failure is much higher.

This month Burlington Resources Inc. completed a well in Wyoming that 
it drilled to 25,855 feet. It is currently conducting tests to 
determine if it contains sufficient reserves to warrant development 
and production.

By contrast, wells drilled in Texas in recent years have had an 
average depth of just over 6,600 feet.

With the new administration of President George W. Bush taking over 
in Washington, the US oil and gas industry is hoping for a more 
sympathetic response to its calls to open up more federal land to 
exploration drilling.

Conoco Inc.'s top exploration and production executive, Rob McKee, 
has noted that the Rocky Mountains alone are estimated to contain 137 
trillion cubic feet of natural gas, equivalent to six times current 
US annua

[biofuel] Mad Cow Disease Called International Threat

2001-01-30 Thread Keith Addison

http://ens.lycos.com/ens/jan2001/2001L-01-29-08.html
Environment News Service:
Mad Cow Disease Called International Threat

ROME, Italy, January 29, 2001 (ENS) - The United Nations Food and 
Agriculture Organization is warning countries around the world - not 
just those in Western Europe - about the risk of mad cow disease. The 
Organization recommends adoption of surveillance and monitoring 
systems to detect the disease in cattle herds, meat industries and 
animal feed operations.

Mad cow disease is officially known as bovine spongiform 
encephalopathy (BSE). This disease has been linked to a fatal brain 
disease in humans called new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease 
(nvCJD).

British cattle at feeding time (Photo by Ian Britton, courtesy Freefoto.com)
An epidemic of BSE in cattle herds in the United Kingdom has been 
followed by between 10 to 15 cases of nvCJD occurring each year. 
Little is known about the actual mechanism for transmission of the 
disease, but the currently held belief is that the disease agent 
jumps to humans who eat infected meat products.

Alarm about the disease's potential has been largely confined to 
Western Europe up to now, but the Food and Agriculture Organization 
(FAO) has issued its warning to all nations.

All countries which have imported cattle or meat and bone meal from 
any Western European countries, particularly the United Kingdom, 
during and since the 1980s, can be considered at risk, the FAO wrote 
in a release on Friday.

"There is an increasingly grave situation developing in the European 
Union, with BSE being identified in cattle in several member states 
of the EU which have, until recently, been regarded as free from the 
disease," the FAO said. "Confirmed and suspected cases of nvCJD are 
occurring in people outside the UK, in various member states. More 
research needs to be conducted into the nature of the agent and its 
modes of transmission. Much remains unknown about the disease and the 
infective agent. There is currently no method of diagnosis at early 
stages of infection and no cure for the disease, neither in animals 
nor in humans."

The FAO said it supports the European Union's actions to control the 
disease, including the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of animals. 
Feeding meat and bone meal to cattle, sheep and goats has been banned 
in the European Union since July 1994, and last November, the EU 
proposed extending the ban to chicken and hogs.

Other animals may also be able spread forms of BSE, the FAO warned, 
and should not be fed meat and bone meal (Photo courtesy U.S. 
Agricultural Research Service)
"There is an urgent need to refine the risk assessment and to extend 
it to other countries and regions," the FAO wrote. "Countries at risk 
should implement effective surveillance for BSE in cattle and 
controls on the animal feed and meat industries. At present, this 
means: laboratory testing of samples from slaughtered cattle, and 
correct disposal of fallen stock and improved processing of offals 
and byproducts."

Within countries, FAO recommended applying the so called Hazard 
Analysis and Critical Control Point system (HACCP) which aims at 
identifying potential problems and taking corrective measures 
throughout the food chain. Some of the issues include the production 
of animal feed, the raw materials used, cross contamination in the 
feed mill, labeling of manufactured feeds, the feed transport system, 
as well as monitoring imported live animals, slaughtering methods, 
the rendering industry and the disposal of waste materials.

"Strict controls have been implemented in the United Kingdom and are 
now being implemented in the rest of the EU," FAO said. "Countries 
outside the EU should adopt appropriate measures to protect their 
herds and to ensure the safety of meat and meat products. Legislation 
to control the industry and its effective implementation is required, 
including capacity building and the training of operatives and 
government officials."

FAO advised countries to adopt a precautionary approach. As an 
immediate measure, countries which have imported animals and meat and 
bone meal from BSE infected trading partners should consider a 
precautionary ban on the feeding of meat and bone meal to cattle, 
sheep and goats, or, to reduce the risk of infection even further, to 
all animals.

Attention should be paid to slaughtering procedures and to the 
processing and use of offal and byproduct parts, FAO said. The 
rendering industry should be scrutinized and appropriate procedures 
adopted everywhere, the organization wrote.

Since 1994, the European Union has banned the feeding of meat and 
bone meal to cattle, sheep and goats (Photo by Larry Rana, courtesy 
U.S. Department of Agriculture)
The FAO, together with the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the 
Organisation Internationale des Epizooties (OIE), will hold an expert 
consultation in the near future to draw up advice for countries, 
particularly de