[Biofuel] Boeing aims to quit fossil fuel habit with tobacco-based jet fuel | GreenBiz

2015-04-24 Thread Darryl McMahon

http://www.greenbiz.com/article/boeing-aims-quit-fossil-fuel-habit-tobacco-based-jet-fuel

Boeing aims to quit fossil fuel habit with tobacco-based jet fuel

Will Nichols

Wednesday, April 15, 2015 - 12:30am

The scientific consensus around smoking being bad for your health is 
famously as solid as that which demonstrates how human activity is 
contributing to climate change. Now Boeing and partner South African 
Airways (SAA) may have found a way to tackle both problems by producing 
renewable jet fuel from a special type of tobacco plant.


The two companies have teamed up for a pilot project that has seen about 
120 acres (50 hectares) in Limpopo province planted with Solaris, a 
nicotine-free, energy-rich tobacco plant. Oil from the plant's seeds 
will be converted into jet fuel that Boeing says can reduce carbon 
emissions by as much as 80 percent.


In the next few years, SAA will conduct a test flight using the fuel, 
taking the next step on its drive to be the world's most 
environmentally sustainable airline. In doing so, it will follow in the 
footsteps of a range of carriers, including BA, Lufthansa, Virgin 
Atlantic and most recently China's Hainan Airlines, in experimenting 
with greener fuels. In fact, more than 1,600 passenger flights using 
sustainable aviation biofuel have been completed since the fuel was 
approved for commercial use in 2011.

Aviation industry embraces biofuels

Two years later, the industry committed to carbon neutral growth from 
2020 (PDF), but is still struggling to work out exactly how to achieve 
that goal.


Darrin Morgan, director of Boeing Commercial Airplanes' sustainable 
biofuel strategy, said airlines increasingly are turning to biofuels to 
reduce their emissions as the industry lacks other realistic options.


Ground transport is electrifying as we speak. Power generation — they 
have many options to go towards renewables and decarbonize, he told 
BusinessGreen. Aviation doesn't. We're going to have to have liquid 
hydrocarbons for a very long time.


The challenge for the industry is that the oil majors who supply them 
have made limited progress in delivering the lower-carbon fuels the 
sector craves. Aviation uses only about 6 or 7 percent of total oil 
barrel use, so most of the oil companies view aviation as a very small 
player and it's hard for them to justify the extra effort to supply our 
needs, Morgan explained. So part of why we realized we had to be so 
active in shaping the fuel landscape for ourselves is because we don't 
have other options to diversify.


Biofuels in South Africa

Biofuels plantations have been blamed for deforestation and other 
land-use change. Campaigners have warned these problems will get worse 
if airlines start demanding large quantities of alternative fuels.


Morgan suggests that in South Africa, at least, this should not be a 
problem. About 14 percent of the arable land in South Africa is 
under-utilized or unutilized, he said. If just a small percentage of 
that 14 percent were used for Solaris or other similar feedstocks, you 
would provide enough fuel for all of SAA's needs. It's not displacing 
essential food crops [and] it's a drop in the bucket in terms of total 
land footprint to produce quite a bit of what is needed.


If Solaris reaches a critical mass in South Africa, Morgan can see the 
potential for investing in refineries in the country, churning out not 
just jet fuel, but also road transport fuel and renewable chemicals. 
This could revolutionize a country that as Morgan puts it, failed to 
win the oil lottery and, like many others in the region, relies on 
expensive imports of already refined petroleum.


Solaris is still in its early stages, so we will have to wait to get a 
picture of its true potential among the huge range of alternate fuels 
that will be needed to successfully decarbonize an aviation industry 
responsible for around 3 percent of global emissions.


Biofuels around the globe

Boeing is looking at a number of other options, including fuel from 
plants grown in the desert using saltwater, and it is optimistic that a 
range of bio-kerosenes promising to be both cleaner than standard fuels 
and with a greater energy density — essentially offering more power for 
less weight, a crucial property for aviation — soon will be certified 
for aviation use.


Currently, these fuels are sold for transport by Finland's Neste Oil and 
Italian company ENI, but Morgan is convinced of the potential for 
aviation — he said the three refineries already open in Italy, Rotterdam 
and near Helsinki currently produce around 4 billion liters of bio-kerosene.


Now on the global scale, that's not very much, but for aviation that's 
almost 2 percent of our fuels use with just these initial, 
first-of-their-kind renewable fuel plants, he added.


The age of greener aviation may not have taken off just yet, but there 
are encouraging signs it is edging towards the runway.


[Biofuel] The English Bay oil spill: Unseen damage puts ecosystem at risk

2015-04-24 Thread Darryl McMahon

http://www.bowenislandundercurrent.com/news/the-english-bay-oil-spill-unseen-damage-puts-ecosystem-at-risk-1.1824167

The English Bay oil spill: Unseen damage puts ecosystem at risk

MERIBETH DEEN / Bowen Island Undercurrent
April 15, 2015 09:08 AM

The English Bay oil spill: Unseen damage puts ecosystem at risk

On Thursday morning, when Bowen Belle water taxi pulled in to English 
Bay to drop commuters off at Granville Island, English Bay Launch owner 
and operator Mike Shannon says he didn’t see anything that indicated 
that there might be a problem in the water.


“There were Coast Guard boats out, but they do drills fairly regularly, 
so I figured that was what was happening,” says Shannon. “I couldn’t 
actually see an oil slick at that point.”


For biologist Ramona DeGraaf, what the average person cannot see in 
spill-affected waters and beaches is of primary concern. DeGraaf, who 
was on Bowen conducting a shoreline survey in October, says that the 
embryo of forage fish that spawn on the shores of English Bay will 
suffocate and die if the gravelly beaches where they lay their eggs are 
contaminated with oil.


“When I talk about forage fish, I am talking about a very specific group 
of fish that run the marine food chain – herring, surf smelt, sand lance 
– without these, the whole Straight of Georgia ecosystem is at risk. A 
reduction in the biomass of these fish is going to have a major impact 
on all predators, and that includes killer whales,” says DeGraaf. “And 
English Bay is super-smelt land.”


She says that this time of year, there are surf smelt embryos in the 
beaches, larvae feeding in the water, and adults coming into Burrard 
Inlet and English Bay to spawn.


“Right now, and for however many years that oil is going to be caught in 
the sediment of those beaches, any embryo deposited is going to 
suffocate. Even micro-amounts of oil will cause the effect similar to 
covering your head in a plastic bag full of fumes.”


She adds that the shoreline of the Lower Mainland used to be prime 
spawning habitat for surf smelt and sand lance, but most of it has been 
destroyed by sea walls and marinas.


“Discovering a beach that is intact and suitable for spawning is so 
rare, it’s like finding dinosaur bones,” says DeGraaf. “But in my 
shoreline surveys I’ve found good spawning beaches around Dundarave 
Pier, John Lawson Creek, Totem Beach in Stanley Park and Rec Beach. I am 
just so glad that at least that there are good spawning grounds up on 
the Sunshine Coast and near Powell River that should be safe from damage.”


Starting this Friday, De Graaf is going to conduct an initial assessment 
of the impacts of any hydrocarbons at the beach at Sandy Cove in West 
Vancouver, which has been identified as an important smelt spawning 
site. From there, she says she will decide where to go in order to 
expand her study on the toxicity rates within smelt embryos on affected 
beaches.


“I am trying to be hopeful that I’ll find the level of contamination in 
the beach sediment to be low,” says DeGraaf. “But when you look at that 
oil sheen on the surface, and if we get some high winds come in, that 
will likely do the job of mixing it in with the sediment.”


Bowen Islander Karen Wristen, executive director of the Living Oceans 
Society, shares DeGraaf’s concerns about the long-term and less visible 
impacts of this oil spill.


“This weekend, I went down to Seymour Bay and Arbutus Cove because I 
thought that if oil were to wash up anywhere on Bowen’s shoreline, it 
would likely be there,” says Wristen. “I didn’t see any evidence of oil, 
but as I watched the herons feeding, I thought about the impact a 
contaminated population of fish is likely to have on our local heron 
population.”


Wristen adds that recent research conducted for the Living Oceans 
Society by Dr. Jeffrey Short, a chemist who worked for the US government 
assessing damage to caused by the Exxon Valdez oil spill, shows that oil 
is deadly to virtually all fish while they are in their larval forms.


“Certain compounds in bitumen or bunker oil can dissolve into water and 
then be absorbed by the translucent embryos,” says Wristen. “When 
exposed to sunlight, these compounds promote the oxidization of tissues 
within the embryos – in effect, burning them. This effect was 
demonstrated in herring embryos on the shorelines of San Francisco Bay 
after the 2009 Cosco Busan oil spill.”


Wristen says that the wider impacts of the oil spill in English Bay may 
be difficult to monitor, but doing so is crucial.


“If we don’t start doing it immediately, we won’t have any hope of 
linking the cause and effect of this in the future,” she says.


The report Wristen sites when discussing fish embryos and oil was 
written for submission to the Kinder Morgan pipeline hearings, and 
focuses largely on oil spill response-preparedness.


“This event shows the risks, and that really, there is no intention on 
the part of the Coast Guard to 

[Biofuel] Professor pioneers research on repurposing biodiesel waste

2015-04-24 Thread Darryl McMahon

http://theorion.com/blog/2015/04/15/professor-pioneers-research-on-repurposing-biodiesel-waste/

Professor pioneers research on repurposing biodiesel waste

April 15, 2015 7:00 AM

With more than 200 million gallons of glycerol waste produced each year 
from manufacturing biodiesel, the process of disposing of this hazardous 
byproduct can be a sticky business.


Lisa Ott, a Chico State chemistry professor, has been engaging in 
innovative research to turn the glycerol waste into a substance that can 
in turn be sold for profits.


With her method, Ott is going to be taking hazardous material out of the 
the waste system and making the glycerol into a useful tool for the 
chemistry department as well as a profitable substance for biodiesel 
manufacturers, she said.


Ott has been studying biodiesel since her postdoctoral education.

“We were doing a lot of fuel chemistry work and working with rocket 
fuels and jet fuels and things like that,” Ott said. “And so that’s 
where I sort of started thinking about fuel chemistry and got into 
biodiesel. Since I’ve come here, we have always done some sort of 
biofuels type (of) research.”


Biodiesel is a clean-burning, renewable alternative to traditional 
diesel, which is minimizing the United States’ dependence on foreign 
oil. Recycled cooking oil, soybean oil and animal fats just barely 
scratch the surface of what biodiesel can be made from.


Ott’s research is focusing mainly on what to do with the glycerin waste 
produced from manufacturing biodiesel. For every 10 gallons of biodiesel 
produced there is one gallon of glycerol byproduct, she said.


To put things into perspective, Ott spoke about the waste on a larger scale.

“If you’re making two billion gallons of biodiesel, that means in the 
U.S. and EU there’s about 200 million gallons of waste,” Ott said.


Biodiesel companies have either been burning this waste, landfilling it 
or using it as a dust suppressant. Burning the waste is bad for the 
environment, using it as a dust suppressant seems wasteful and 
landfilling it is expensive, Ott said.


“There’s a local biodiesel company called Springboard Biodiesel,” Ott 
said, “and if they have to get rid of a barrel of it, it’s like $400 a 
barrel because it’s hazardous waste.”


To fix this problem, Ott involved her chemistry students in doing 
research on turning the glycerol into another substance that could be 
sold for profits. Through her research, she found that glycerol waste 
can be transformed into a deep eutectic solvent.


A deep eutectic solvent is an ionic liquid with a very low boiling point 
that can be used in chemical reactions for scientific research.


“If you’re tying to make a new molecule, you have to dissolve your 
reactants in a solvent,” Ott said, “and we are proposing this as a 
reaction solvent.”


A reaction solvent serves as a medium for chemical reactions, the main 
purpose of which is to dissolve the reactants in the liquid.


Ott, along with other faculty members, Chico State students and two high 
school students submitted a paper about their research to the journal 
Fuel Processing Technology. Chico State is the first university to 
submit a scholarly paper about this subject, she said.


“I’ve been looking at the literature, and I haven’t seen anything else,” 
Ott said. “That doesn’t mean someone else isn’t working on it, but we 
submitted our paper so hopefully it will come out first.”


When the paper is approved and published, Chico State will be the first 
university to create a way to turn biodiesel waste into a profitable 
deep eutectic solvent. Curiosity surrounds every problem we have, Ott 
said, and this is what drove her to create a clean way of reusing 
hazardous waste.


“I think that’s the best kind of chemistry,” Ott said. “(The kind) that 
comes about from natural curiosity or wanting to solve a problem you have.”

___
Sustainablelorgbiofuel mailing list
Sustainablelorgbiofuel@lists.sustainablelists.org
http://lists.eruditium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel


[Biofuel] 10 vessels in Vancouver Island fleet could tackle oil spill

2015-04-24 Thread Darryl McMahon

http://www.timescolonist.com/news/local/10-vessels-in-vancouver-island-fleet-could-tackle-oil-spill-1.1824127

[The City and Port of Vancouver, including English Bay and the Burrard 
Inlet are not on Vancouver Island.  They are separated by the Strait of 
Georgia.  I'm guessing it's about 150 km on the water from Esquimalt 
(mentioned in the article) to English Bay.  The Burrard Cleaner No. 9 
can manage 11 knots in calm waters and winds, which puts it 8 hours away 
in best case scenario.  Oil can spread pretty quickly on tide water, so 
8 hours is a long time. ]


10 vessels in Vancouver Island fleet could tackle oil spill

Katie DeRosa / Times Colonist

April 15, 2015 08:27 AM

The company hired to clean up the oil spill in Vancouver’s English Bay 
has vessels stationed around Vancouver Island — including the largest 
ship at CFB Esquimalt — that would be ready to respond if a spill 
happened in our waters.


One of the six vessels involved in last week’s cleanup, after grain 
carrier MV Marathassa spilled about 2,700 litres of bunker fuel, was 
sent from Cowichan Bay.


Western Canada Marine Response Corp. operates a fleet of 31 vessels 
across the province, including about 10 around Vancouver Island.


The largest oil skimmer in Canada, the Burrard cleaner No. 9, is located 
at Canadian Forces Base Esquimalt.


The company is responsible for responding to cleanups after an oil spill 
has been detected by either the ship responsible or the Canadian Coast 
Guard, said Michael Lowry, a spokesman for the corporation.


In the English Bay case, the company was notified at 6:08 p.m. April 8 
to be on standby after a recreational boater notified the coast guard 
about a spill an hour earlier. The company was officially dispatched at 
8:06 p.m. and several vessels arrived on scene at 9:25 p.m.


One vessel has an infrared camera designed to track oil, which was used 
to determine that the oil was coming from Marathassa. The vessel was 
surrounded by a boom by 5:25 a.m., Lowry said.


“I just want to dispel the notion that the length of time for the vessel 
to be boomed was a response-time issue,” Lowry said.


“It was a need to identify the source of the spill. That entire time, 
that oil was being cleaned up.”


Lowry said the 2013 closure of the Kitsilano coast guard station had no 
impact on the company’s ability to respond.


Fred Moxy, the former commander of that coast guard station, said over 
the weekend the response time would have been minutes instead of hours 
if the station was still open.


The Marine Response company, which has offices in Burnaby, Duncan and 
Prince Rupert, is called to clean up spills about 20 times a year, 
mostly minor spills around the Burrard Inlet. It collects membership 
fees from oil companies, float plane companies, the commercial shipping 
industry, ferries, cruise ships and fishing lodges.


Next week in Nanaimo, company employees as well as provincial and 
federal agencies involved in spill cleanup will participate in a 
certification exercise, which will involve a simulated spill.


Western Canada Marine Response Corp. has 50 full-time employees and an 
additional 150 contractors trained and ready to respond to a spill.


“It’s not feasible having 200 people waiting around for a spill,” Lowry 
said.


“The contractors we train in that location can operate the skimming and 
the boom until we get there.”


Canadian Coast Guard commissioner Jody Thomas said 80 per cent of the 
spill had been cleaned up within 24 hours of the spill being reported. 
Lowry said some employees remain on site cleaning the hulls of other 
vessels and monitoring the beaches.


The company will bill the ship’s owner for the cost of the cleanup, but 
Lowry said it’s too early to determine what that is.


Investigators said Monday the spill was a result of mechanical problems 
that caused oil to leak into the ship’s duct keel, a tunnel carrying 
pipes that run along the centre line of the vessel.


There was also an unrelated problem on Marathassa that contributed to 
the spill, but Transport Canada declined to provide details because of 
the ongoing investigation.

___
Sustainablelorgbiofuel mailing list
Sustainablelorgbiofuel@lists.sustainablelists.org
http://lists.eruditium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel


[Biofuel] NEB spill map takes a step toward pipeline transparency - Canada - CBC News

2015-04-24 Thread Darryl McMahon

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/neb-spill-map-takes-a-step-toward-pipeline-transparency-1.3032260

[links and images in on-line article]

NEB spill map takes a step toward pipeline transparency
Canada still lags behind U.S. in making complete spill data public

By Amber Hildebrandt, CBC News Posted: Apr 15, 2015 12:32 PM ET

The NEB says the interactive map of pipeline incidents is part of its 
effort to be more transparent with the public. (Courtesy of NEB)


Canada's pipeline regulator took a big step forward on a promise to be 
more transparent with the release of a map of spills and other 
incidents. But gaps in the data still exist.


On Monday, the National Energy Board launched the interactive pipeline 
incident map to showcase 692 spills, fires, injuries and other events 
over the past eight years.


The incident map comes a year and a half after CBC News mapped the data 
— using data obtained under the Access to Information Act that contained 
numerous blank fields — and nearly two years after a Senate report 
called for the NEB to create such a tool for Canadians.


The NEB developed the map because Canadians deserve to have access to 
information about incidents where they live and work, said NEB 
spokesman Darin Barter. It reflects the NEB's new direction, and a 
commitment to openness and transparency.


Nathan Lemphers, a former senior policy analyst with the Alberta-based 
Pembina Institute and a specialist in pipeline safety, commended the 
national regulator for creating the tool.


It's very encouraging to see that the National Energy Board is wanting 
to disclose this information in a format that's easily accessible by the 
public, said Lemphers. That's a big step forward.


But there's still more we can do when it comes to quality of the data 
and how accessible it is, he said.


For example, Lemphers noted that a number of incidents lack details on 
the type of substance or volume leaked, some figures in the map don't 
reflect previously published data and the descriptions of the 
terminology used are still mired in jargon.


The map is also missing a description of what happened in each incident 
— something the regulator does collect and can be pretty important for 
understanding context, said Lemphers.


The Calgary-based NEB says some data is missing in the map because it 
won't include any information that they haven't investigated and verified.


Canada still lags behind U.S.

A U.S. pipeline transparency advocacy group also applauded the Canadian 
effort to be more transparent with the public.


But, Carl Weimer, executive director of the Washington State-based 
Pipeline Safety Trust, said the NEB still lags well behind the federal 
regulator in the United States that makes easily available a good deal 
more information about individual incidents.


South of the border, citizens have access to such details as the cause 
of the incident, information on property damage, the age of the 
component that failed, pressure the pipeline was operating at and other 
information that help tell the full story of the failure, said Weimer.'


The NEB said it does plan to refine its map based on feedback. If we 
can improve the system or increase the amount of data, we will do so, 
said Barter. Also, new incident data will be uploaded on a quarterly 
basis, with the next round slated for July.


However, the board is also planning a 15 per cent cutback of its 
workforce in the next two years as a temporary pool of money dedicated 
in 2012 to safety oversight runs out, according to a report released 
earlier this month.


Those cuts come despite increased public scrutiny of pipeline safety and 
a rise in large projects set to get underway.


If we want the data to be reliable, we need people who can give it a 
critical eye on behalf of our public regulator, said Lemphers.


The federal regulator oversees 73,000 kilometres of pipeline that cross 
international and provincial borders and are operated by more than 100 
companies. Together, these companies ship more than $160 billion worth 
of crude oil, petroleum products, natural gas and natural gas liquids 
through these federally regulated conduits.


The Canadian Energy Pipeline Association, which represents some of the 
country's largest operators of both federally and provincially regulated 
pipelines, says NEB's mapping effort responds to the public's call for 
greater transparency, according to vice-president of external relations 
Philippe Reicher.


The industry group says it, too, plans to heed that call — with a 
similar tool to showcase its own members' data.


___
Sustainablelorgbiofuel mailing list
Sustainablelorgbiofuel@lists.sustainablelists.org
http://lists.eruditium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel


[Biofuel] Proposed oil pipeline needs better spill detection | Pembroke Daily Observer

2015-04-24 Thread Darryl McMahon

http://www.thedailyobserver.ca/2015/04/15/proposed-oil-pipeline-needs-better-spill-detection

[image (map) in on-line article]

Proposed oil pipeline needs better spill detection

By Sean Chase, Daily Observer

Wednesday, April 15, 2015 7:04:52 EDT PM

SEAN CHASE/DAILY OBSERVER Dr. Alan Hepburn, with Ontario Rivers 
Alliance, told Petawawa council this week that TransCanada will need to 
use better spill detection equipment on its Energy East Pipeline, which 
will run through the Upper Ottawa Valley past all major centres 
including Deep River, Petawawa, Pembroke, Renfrew and Arnprior.


PETAWAWA - The company converting an existing natural gas pipeline so it 
can transport oil must institute better spill detection equipment and 
protocols says a local environment protection group.


Representing Ontario Rivers Alliance, Dr. Alan Hepburn told council they 
should be concerned about sections of the proposed TransCanada Energy 
East pipeline that will run in close proximity to Petawawa. He noted the 
pipe slated for conversion has been in the ground for 20 to 40 years and 
is subject to metal fatigue and degrading of the interior coating.


The Energy East pipeline is an ambitious $12 billion project which would 
see a 4,500-kilometre pipeline built to carry 1.1 million barrels of 
crude oil per day from Alberta and Saskatchewan to refineries in Eastern 
Canada. This would be a combination of 1,400 kilometres of new pipeline 
construction linking up with 3,000 kilometres of existing natural gas 
pipeline, including the line which runs through the Ottawa Valley, which 
will be converted to carry crude oil.


In his assessment of the condition of the pipeline, Hepburn explained 
that a 10-metre section the pipeline would have to accommodate 8,700 
kilograms of oil, an increase 17 times more than the gas it currently 
carries. His largest concerns, however, were confined to the potential 
for leaks. As an example, he said there were nine spills involving 5,200 
kilometres of large crude oil pipelines in Alberta over a period of 22 
years that saw the release of more than 10 cubic metres of oil.


The average release in a pipeline spill was 1,400 cubic metres of crude 
oil. Considering there is 2,000 kilometres of pipeline in Ontario, he 
estimated a major release involving pipelines in this province once 
every seven years. Further he added there could be one leak every ten 
years for the converted line in Ontario.


Hepburn was also critical of the standard leak detection instrumentation 
employed by companies which he said appears to be designed to detect 
economically significant leaks only. For example, the 48-year-old 
Rainbow pipeline at cracked in 2011 releasing 4.5 million litres of oil 
into low-lying marshlands near the northern Alberta community of Little 
Buffalo. It had released 4,500 cubic metres before the leak was detected.


Hepburn stressed that the maximum size of an environmentally 
insignificant leak should be determined and then proponents should be 
required to install systems that can detect any leak above this 
threshold. In addition, he said regulators should take into 
consideration the pipeline runs along an earthquake zone and that an 
independent seismic analysis should be conducted.


They have to represent themselves to the National Energy Board to make 
sure that steps are taken to reduce the potential for leaks throughout 
the entire length of the pipeline, Hepburn said later. Right now the 
minimum size of leaks they can detect are quite massive.


Councillor James Carmody said that municipal oversight of the project is 
essential, however, he anticipated their voices would not be heard.


Something that's in the national interest would have a tendency to 
dilute the municipal interest, he said. It's incumbent upon us to 
protect our own water supplies.


Deputy Mayor Tom Mohns agreed that the municipalities have a bigger 
stake adding he is concerned about the response time by the company to 
shut down a line once a leak has been discovered.


If we have a mess in this area, they could care less, said Mohns. It 
will be up to us to clean it up in the end.


TransCanada hopes to receive final regulatory approval by the end of 
2015. It is anticipated the project will be completed and operational by 
2018.

___
Sustainablelorgbiofuel mailing list
Sustainablelorgbiofuel@lists.sustainablelists.org
http://lists.eruditium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel


[Biofuel] Oil spill expert denies Coast Guard's claim about Vancouver fuel leak - The Globe and Mail

2015-04-24 Thread Darryl McMahon

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-columbia/oil-spill-expert-denies-coast-guard-claim-about-vancouver-fuel-leak/article24094846/

Oil spill expert denies Coast Guard's claim about Vancouver fuel leak

SUNNY DHILLON

VANCOUVER — The Globe and Mail

Published Friday, Apr. 24 2015, 8:00 AM EDT

Last updated Thursday, Apr. 23 2015, 9:48 PM EDT

A U.S. oil spill expert says he never described the Canadian Coast 
Guard’s response to a fuel leak on Vancouver’s English Bay as 
“exceptional,” despite the Coast Guard’s claim.


In fact, Steven Candito, president of the National Response Corporation, 
one of the largest oil-spill removal operations in the world, says the 
Coast Guard’s response may have been too slow.


The fuel spill was reported around 5 p.m. on April 8 by a person on a 
sailboat. The Coast Guard has said it did not recognize the seriousness 
of the spill until 8 p.m. It has said a boom was secured around the 
leaking vessel, the MV Marathassa, by 5:53 a.m.


The Coast Guard’s response has been criticized by Vancouver Mayor Gregor 
Robertson, B.C. Premier Christy Clark, and some area residents. Mr. 
Robertson has said it took too long for the boom to be put in place, and 
has also taken issue with the fact the city wasn’t notified about the 
spill for more than 12 hours after the original report.


The Coast Guard has vigorously defended its efforts. In a lengthy 
statement April 12, Commissioner Jody Thomas said: “The Canadian Coast 
Guard’s response to the Marathassa spill was exceptional by 
international standards, a fact corroborated by a U.S. oil spill expert.”


The Twitter account for Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s Pacific region 
also referenced an unidentified U.S. oil spill expert. It initially said 
the expert called the response “adequate.” It later said the expert 
deemed the response “quick and effective.”


A request to the Canadian Coast Guard last week for more information on 
the U.S. expert was referred to Transport Canada. A Transport Canada 
spokeswoman then said the question should be redirected to the Coast 
Guard. A Coast Guard spokesman this week identified Mr. Candito as the 
expert.


Mr. Candito, in a phone interview, said he has not followed the 
Vancouver spill very closely, though he did conduct an interview with 
CBC on April 10. He said he was surprised his comments had been 
referenced by the Coast Guard.


Mr. Candito noted that at the time of the CBC interview the Coast Guard 
said the boom had been in place by midnight, a response he then 
characterized as “fairly good.” The Coast Guard later revised the 
containment time to just before 6 a.m., which Mr. Candito told The Globe 
seemed slow for a spill that took place so close to a major city.


“It sounds like it took too long,” he said.

“… These are obviously very difficult things to evaluate if you don’t 
have all the facts. In that context, yeah, I would say to get [the] boom 
in the water around a vessel that’s berthed in a harbour like Vancouver 
where there’s presumably a lot of resources, it shouldn’t take 12 hours, 
right?”


Mr. Candito said the public is always concerned when a spill occurs, and 
rightly so. But he said each spill is different and sometimes the public 
outcry can go too far. He said mystery spills, in which neither the 
source of the leak nor the material involved is immediately known, can 
prove a challenge.


Frank Stanek, a Fisheries and Oceans Canada spokesperson, in an e-mail 
Thursday said it still considers the Coast Guard’s response 
“exceptional, as evidenced by the trace amounts of oil remaining on the 
shores.”


The Coast Guard has said 80 per cent of the spill was recovered within 
36 hours. Mr. Candito, when asked about that figure during the CBC 
interview, said he would expect a better recovery rate in an enclosed 
harbour but 80 per cent was still “very good.”


Mr. Stanek did not provide a response to a question about Mr. Candito 
now indicating the response time may have been too slow.

___
Sustainablelorgbiofuel mailing list
Sustainablelorgbiofuel@lists.sustainablelists.org
http://lists.eruditium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel


Re: [Biofuel] Plug-In Hybrid HUMMERs Headed For The South Pole On Biodiesel

2015-04-24 Thread Juan Boveda

Hello Darryl.
I think they need for that trip is to choose a biodiesel ready for low 
temperatures like the used by jet planes, a winterized fuel prior it 
is used in Antartica; that proccess is to expose fuel to freezing 
temperatures equivalent to artantic conditions, give time to cristalize 
and after that, pass it throught a filter the fuel to be used by 
vehicles to avoid a thick mass of partly frozen biodiesel. The fraction 
of longer carbon saturated fatty acid methyl esther will be separated by 
cristalization and filtration and use only the liquid fraction.

Best Regards.

Juan Bóveda

El 24/04/2015 12:50, Darryl McMahon escribió:
http://www.greencarreports.com/news/1097982_plug-in-hybrid-hummers-headed-for-the-south-pole-on-biodiesel 



[My son has a personal connection with these vehicles and the team 
which built them.  The original prototype battery pack and chargers 
are scattered through my garage just now, awaiting new uses.


images in on-line article]

Plug-In Hybrid HUMMERs Headed For The South Pole On Biodiesel

Stephen Edelstein

Apr 24, 2015

If you were going to drive to the South Pole, what vehicle would you 
choose?


There's a team gearing up right now to undertake that very 
adventure--using a pair of plug-in hybrid Hummers.


The mission is called Zero South, signifying the group's goal of being 
the first to reach the South Pole without using any fossil fuels.


And the team's choice of vehicle wasn't an accident.

The intentional irony of converting a Hummer into a plug-in hybrid 
had a certain appeal, according to a Zero South statement.


Zero South hopes to promote awareness of environmental issues, and 
believes electrified Hummers will make excellent conversation starters.


We shall draft a symbol of military defense for the front lines of 
environmental defense, expedition organizer Nick Baggarly declared.


There's a practical element to the choice of vehicle, too.

To tackle Antarctic ice and snow, the Zero South team needed a vehicle 
with a wide track.


Each Hummer is equipped with a 3.2-liter six-cylinder turbodiesel 
engine that will run on biofuel during the expedition.


There's also an electric motor for each axle, retaining the Hummer's 
four-wheel drive capability.


Electricity is supplied by a 24-kilowatt-hour lithium-ion battery 
pack, mounted in an insulated battery box to maintain consistent 
temperature.


Green powertrains weren't the only modifications made to the pair of 
Hummers.


The expedition vehicles features reinforced drivetrain and suspension 
components, as well as upgrades allowing them to operate in 
temperatures as low as -60 degress Fahrenheit.


Then there are those tank treads.

They're supplied by a company called Mattracks, which sells them as an 
aftermarket add-on for Hummers and other SUVs and trucks.


On road tires, the plug-in Hummers are capable of an estimated 32 
miles of electric range, although Zero South hasn't yet determined how 
far they'll be able to go on the tracks.


It's also unclear where they would recharge while traversing Antarctica.

One of the vehicles is designated to tow a modified Airstream trailer, 
nicknamed the Snowstream.


The entire journey is expected to span 1,200 miles; if successful, 
Zero South says its vehicles will be the first hybrids driven to the 
South Pole.


The group plans to document its journey on camera, and produce a 
10-episode television miniseries and feature-length film for maximum 
exposure of their proposed exploit.

___
Sustainablelorgbiofuel mailing list
Sustainablelorgbiofuel@lists.sustainablelists.org
http://lists.eruditium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel 




-


___
Sustainablelorgbiofuel mailing list
Sustainablelorgbiofuel@lists.sustainablelists.org
http://lists.eruditium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel