Fw: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
I wrote; - Original Message - From: Henri Naths [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 April, 2005 12:37 PM Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come Keith, I think it is quite irrelevant who sold what to whom, Hypothetically,I have the all the means at my disposal to kill a very large amount of people, does it mean the people that educated me are responsible? how about my bank? The money will come from them.!? The supply source is irrelevant. I could use anything in my hypothetical backyard and I'm no genius.Anybody can. The world history is full of these people that murder millions. The right person will be in the right place at the right time to take them out. That's a given. Hopefully political b.s. that man orchestrates won't impede the job that has be done before these people go on their murderous rampage. War has it's casualties let's not be one of them. We live in free democratic countries where we can make biodiesel. How cool is that... H. - Original Message - From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 April, 2005 7:54 AM Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come Henri Naths wrote: Hakan, I would like to give a humble option here, ( Hakan wrote;...Criminal, established by the fact that we now know that Iraq were no WMD threat to US. ) We took out Hitler for the same reason, Him and Suddam Hussein were weapons of mass destruction. H. Judging from past posts, I think Hakan and many others here are a little sceptical about claims that the US took out Hitler. As for Saddam, as is very well known and widely established beyond any possibility of doubt or controversy... http://www.progressive.org/0901/anth0498.html The Progressive magazine April 1998 Issue Anthrax for Export U.S. companies sold Iraq the ingredients for a witch's brew by William Blum The United States almost went to war against Iraq in February because of Saddam Hussein's weapons program. In his State of the Union address, President Clinton castigated Hussein for developing nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them. You cannot defy the will of the world, the President proclaimed. You have used weapons of mass destruction before. We are determined to deny you the capacity to use them again. Most Americans listening to the President did not know that the United States supplied Iraq with much of the raw material for creating a chemical and biological warfare program. Nor did the media report that U.S. companies sold Iraq more than $1 billion worth of the components needed to build nuclear weapons and diverse types of missiles, including the infamous Scud. When Iraq engaged in chemical and biological warfare in the 1980s, barely a peep of moral outrage could be heard from Washington, as it kept supplying Saddam with the materials he needed to build weapons. From 1980 to 1988, Iraq and Iran waged a terrible war against each other, a war that might not have begun if President Jimmy Carter had not given the Iraqis a green light to attack Iran, in response to repeated provocations. Throughout much of the war, the United States provided military aid and intelligence information to both sides, hoping that each would inflict severe damage on the other. Noam Chomsky suggests that this strategy is a way for America to keep control of its oil supply: It's been a leading, driving doctrine of U.S. foreign policy since the 1940s that the vast and unparalleled energy resources of the Gulf region will be effectively dominated by the United States and its clients, and, crucially, that no independent indigenous force will be permitted to have a substantial influence on the administration of oil production and price. During the Iran-Iraq war, Iraq received the lion's share of American support because at the time Iran was regarded as the greater threat to U.S. interests. According to a 1994 Senate report, private American suppliers, licensed by the U.S. Department of Commerce, exported a witch's brew of biological and chemical materials to Iraq from 1985 through 1989. Among the biological materials, which often produce slow, agonizing death, were: * Bacillus Anthracis, cause of anthrax. * Clostridium Botulinum, a source of botulinum toxin. * Histoplasma Capsulatam, cause of a disease attacking lungs, brain, spinal cord, and heart. * Brucella Melitensis, a bacteria that can damage major organs. * Clostridium Perfringens, a highly toxic bacteria causing systemic illness. * Clostridium tetani, a highly toxigenic substance. Also on the list: Escherichia coli (E. coli), genetic materials, human and bacterial DNA, and dozens of other pathogenic biological agents. These biological materials were not attenuated or weakened and were capable of reproduction, the Senate report stated. It was later learned that these microorganisms exported by the United States
Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
that were funded and aided by the U.S. national security state. The U.S. national security state has participated in covert actions or proxy mercenary wars against revolutionary governments in Cuba, Angola, Mozambique, Ethiopia, Portugal, Nicaragua, Cambodia, East Timor, Western Sahara, and elsewhere, usually with dreadful devastation and loss of life for the indigenous populations. Hostile actions have been directed against reformist governments in Egypt, Lebanon, Peru, Iran, Syria, Zaire, Jamaica, South Yemen, the Fiji Islands, and elsewhere. Since World War II, U.S. forces have directly invaded or launched aerial attacks against Vietnam, the Dominican Republic, North Korea, Laos, Cambodia, Lebanon, Grenada, Panama, Libya, Iraq, and Somalia, sowing varying degrees of death and destruction. Before World War II, U.S. military forces waged a bloody and protracted war of conquest in the Philippines in 1899-1903. Along with fourteen other capitalist nations, the United States invaded socialist Russia in 1918-21. U.S. expeditionary forces fought in China along with other Western armies to suppress the Boxer Rebellion and keep the Chinese under the heel of European and North American colonizers. U.S. Marines invaded and occupied Nicaragua in 1912 and again in 1926 to 1933; Cuba, 1898 to 1902; Mexico, 1914 and 1916; Honduras, six invasions between 1911 to 1925; Panama, 1903-1914, and Haiti, 1915 to 1934. And so on. From: http://members.aol.com/bblum6/parenti.htm Against Empire by Michael Parenti Chapter 3: Intervention: Whose gain? Whose pain? Best wishes Keith - Original Message - From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 April, 2005 7:54 AM Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come Henri Naths wrote: Hakan, I would like to give a humble option here, ( Hakan wrote;...Criminal, established by the fact that we now know that Iraq were no WMD threat to US. ) We took out Hitler for the same reason, Him and Suddam Hussein were weapons of mass destruction. H. Judging from past posts, I think Hakan and many others here are a little sceptical about claims that the US took out Hitler. As for Saddam, as is very well known and widely established beyond any possibility of doubt or controversy... http://www.progressive.org/0901/anth0498.html The Progressive magazine April 1998 Issue Anthrax for Export U.S. companies sold Iraq the ingredients for a witch's brew by William Blum The United States almost went to war against Iraq in February because of Saddam Hussein's weapons program. In his State of the Union address, President Clinton castigated Hussein for developing nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them. You cannot defy the will of the world, the President proclaimed. You have used weapons of mass destruction before. We are determined to deny you the capacity to use them again. Most Americans listening to the President did not know that the United States supplied Iraq with much of the raw material for creating a chemical and biological warfare program. Nor did the media report that U.S. companies sold Iraq more than $1 billion worth of the components needed to build nuclear weapons and diverse types of missiles, including the infamous Scud. When Iraq engaged in chemical and biological warfare in the 1980s, barely a peep of moral outrage could be heard from Washington, as it kept supplying Saddam with the materials he needed to build weapons. From 1980 to 1988, Iraq and Iran waged a terrible war against each other, a war that might not have begun if President Jimmy Carter had not given the Iraqis a green light to attack Iran, in response to repeated provocations. Throughout much of the war, the United States provided military aid and intelligence information to both sides, hoping that each would inflict severe damage on the other. Noam Chomsky suggests that this strategy is a way for America to keep control of its oil supply: It's been a leading, driving doctrine of U.S. foreign policy since the 1940s that the vast and unparalleled energy resources of the Gulf region will be effectively dominated by the United States and its clients, and, crucially, that no independent indigenous force will be permitted to have a substantial influence on the administration of oil production and price. During the Iran-Iraq war, Iraq received the lion's share of American support because at the time Iran was regarded as the greater threat to U.S. interests. According to a 1994 Senate report, private American suppliers, licensed by the U.S. Department of Commerce, exported a witch's brew of biological and chemical materials to Iraq from 1985 through 1989. Among the biological materials, which often produce slow, agonizing death, were: * Bacillus Anthracis, cause of anthrax. * Clostridium Botulinum, a source of botulinum toxin. * Histoplasma Capsulatam, cause
Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
I'm not American but I'm awful proud of what the American soldiers did.You talk to the average American solider and he knows what he is doing . He's no dummy. As any solider in any war that puts his life on the line for his/her country to fight for life and justice and knows that his /her ultimate sacrifice will be for the better of future generation, my grandfather/mother fought against the oppressing Nazi regime and gave the ultimate sacrifice... that is to be honored.This is not a Michael Moore twisted fantasy/ disneyland film.This is reality. I think anybody that enjoys peace, life and a democratic/freedom of speech society and can sit around bad mouthing everything because someone ,somewhere said this or that is a hypocrite. I wouldn't want George Bush's job, would you? One slip up and someone is launching a nuclear attack on your country because the majority of American are of a certain religious background and infidels. Anybody think they can do better? I didn't think so. H. ps I've read the Koran. - Original Message - From: Michael Redler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 April, 2005 12:17 PM Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come Hi Henry, Hitler and Suddam Hussein were weapons of mass destruction? I agree and sympathies with your statement. But; Boy, does that open Pandora's box. This causes one to ask all kinds of questions about sovereignty, hypocrisy and whether or not to act on what we think a dictator might do (the Bush administration's current policy) in the future. Mike R Henri Naths [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hakan, I would like to give a humble option here, ( Hakan wrote;...Criminal, established by the fact that we now know that Iraq were no WMD threat to US. ) We took out Hitler for the same reason, Him and Suddam Hussein were weapons of mass destruction. H. - Original Message - From: Hakan Falk To: Sent: 31 March, 2005 7:29 PM Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come Bob, You were right and I am wrong and I am glad that I did get a very good explanation on how Hubbert could be so right. It also explains why president Carter was so genuinely worried, when he developed his energy plan. He had the foresight to realize that Hubbert was right. It also explains why we see the surge in the genuine hate of Americans. It is the cost of aggressive and egoistic foreign policies, that resulted in about 10 more years of artificially low oil prices. All of this, ending up in an almost criminal behavior by the Bush administration. I say almost, because I do not want to be too crude. The legal aspect of being criminal, is very clearly established, Criminal, established by the fact that we now know that Iraq were no WMD threat to US. By laying the responsibility at the feet of faulty US intelligence community, the Bush administration is trying deliberately to avoid their legal responsibility. A kind of reversed side of the well known argument it was not my fault, I was ordered to do it. LOL All of this supported by the America people, in a reelection of president Bush. I hear the false argument that only 48% voted him in office. This argument is poor mathematics, I cannot get to this result, when Bush won with a more than 3 million of the populous American vote. It was the first election of Bush, that he did not have a populous majority and he was put in office by the Courts. Hakan At 11:16 PM 3/31/2005, you wrote: All I know is what I read in the brief biography. (and what I recall from hearing about his work many years ago) Hakan Falk wrote: Bob, I stand corrected and the only excuse I have, is that I only brought forward a mistake that I read earlier. I remember that it was an article about the hearings in US congress in mid 70'. Will however not do this mistake again, but do not despair, there are many others I will do and surely in my far from perfect English. -:) What was his field at Berkeley? Hakan At 05:35 PM 3/31/2005, you wrote: Howdy Hakan, calling him a mathematician is a bit short-sighted. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marion_King_Hubbert Hubbert was born in San Saba, Texas in 1903. He attended the University of Chicago, where he received his B.S. in 1926, his M.S. in 1928, and his Ph.D in 1937, studying geology, mathematics, and physics. He worked as an assistant geologist for the Amerada Petroleum Company for two years while pursuing his Ph.D. He joined the Shell Oil Company in 1943, retiring in 1964. After he retired from Shell, he became a senior research geophysicist for the United States Geological Survey until his retirement in 1976. He also held positions as a professor of geology and geophysics at Stanford University from 1963 to 1968, and as a professor at Berkeley from 1973 to 1976. ___ Biofuel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http
Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Hakan, I would like to give a humble option here, ( Hakan wrote;...Criminal, established by the fact that we now know that Iraq were no WMD threat to US. ) We took out Hitler for the same reason, Him and Suddam Hussein were weapons of mass destruction. H. - Original Message - From: Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 March, 2005 7:29 PM Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come Bob, You were right and I am wrong and I am glad that I did get a very good explanation on how Hubbert could be so right. It also explains why president Carter was so genuinely worried, when he developed his energy plan. He had the foresight to realize that Hubbert was right. It also explains why we see the surge in the genuine hate of Americans. It is the cost of aggressive and egoistic foreign policies, that resulted in about 10 more years of artificially low oil prices. All of this, ending up in an almost criminal behavior by the Bush administration. I say almost, because I do not want to be too crude. The legal aspect of being criminal, is very clearly established, Criminal, established by the fact that we now know that Iraq were no WMD threat to US. By laying the responsibility at the feet of faulty US intelligence community, the Bush administration is trying deliberately to avoid their legal responsibility. A kind of reversed side of the well known argument it was not my fault, I was ordered to do it. LOL All of this supported by the America people, in a reelection of president Bush. I hear the false argument that only 48% voted him in office. This argument is poor mathematics, I cannot get to this result, when Bush won with a more than 3 million of the populous American vote. It was the first election of Bush, that he did not have a populous majority and he was put in office by the Courts. Hakan At 11:16 PM 3/31/2005, you wrote: All I know is what I read in the brief biography. (and what I recall from hearing about his work many years ago) Hakan Falk wrote: Bob, I stand corrected and the only excuse I have, is that I only brought forward a mistake that I read earlier. I remember that it was an article about the hearings in US congress in mid 70'. Will however not do this mistake again, but do not despair, there are many others I will do and surely in my far from perfect English. -:) What was his field at Berkeley? Hakan At 05:35 PM 3/31/2005, you wrote: Howdy Hakan, calling him a mathematician is a bit short-sighted. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marion_King_Hubbert Hubbert was born in San Saba, Texas in 1903. He attended the University of Chicago, where he received his B.S. in 1926, his M.S. in 1928, and his Ph.D in 1937, studying geology, mathematics, and physics. He worked as an assistant geologist for the Amerada Petroleum Company for two years while pursuing his Ph.D. He joined the Shell Oil Company in 1943, retiring in 1964. After he retired from Shell, he became a senior research geophysicist for the United States Geological Survey until his retirement in 1976. He also held positions as a professor of geology and geophysics at Stanford University from 1963 to 1968, and as a professor at Berkeley from 1973 to 1976. ___ Biofuel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable): http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/ ___ Biofuel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable): http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
Re: [Biofuel] Re: Lutec
free? H. - Original Message - From: Tomas Juknevicius [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bruno M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 April, 2005 4:46 AM Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: Lutec Bruno M. wrote: snip The only free energy on earth is solar energy ( besides a little cosmic radiation, and we leave fission out ). If you harvest this ( and convert this) in any form you can say you have captured free energy. snip Hehe, I think you also forgot the mechanical energy of the earth-moon system (AKA tidal energy) :-P -- Tomas Juknevicius ___ Biofuel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable): http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/ ___ Biofuel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable): http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
Re: [Biofuel] Methanol backyard manufacturing possible?
- Original Message - From: Thomas Mountain [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 March, 2005 6:20 PM Subject: [Biofuel] Methanol backyard manufacturing possible? As a newcomer to the biodiesel world I was wondering if it was possible to make methanol in your backyard so to speak? And the other question is it possible to make biodiesel with ethanol? I am putting together a proposal for an East African country to follow Brazils lead and have to do some homework first. selam, tom mountain ___ Biofuel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable): http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/ ___ Biofuel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable): http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
I think it is quite irrelevant who sold what to whom, Hypothetically,I have the all the means at my disposal to kill a very large amount of people, does it mean the people that educated me are responsible? how about my bank? The money will come from them.!? The supply source is irrelevant. I could use anything in my hypothetical backyard and I'm no genius.Anybody can. The word history is full of these people that murder millions. The right person will be in the right place at the right time to take them out. That's a given. Hopefully political b.s. that man orchestrates won't impede the job that has be done before these people go on their murderous rampage. War has it's casualties let's not be one of them. We live in free democratic countries where we can make biodiesel. How cool is that... H. - Original Message - From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 April, 2005 7:54 AM Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come Henri Naths wrote: Hakan, I would like to give a humble option here, ( Hakan wrote;...Criminal, established by the fact that we now know that Iraq were no WMD threat to US. ) We took out Hitler for the same reason, Him and Suddam Hussein were weapons of mass destruction. H. Judging from past posts, I think Hakan and many others here are a little sceptical about claims that the US took out Hitler. As for Saddam, as is very well known and widely established beyond any possibility of doubt or controversy... http://www.progressive.org/0901/anth0498.html The Progressive magazine April 1998 Issue Anthrax for Export U.S. companies sold Iraq the ingredients for a witch's brew by William Blum The United States almost went to war against Iraq in February because of Saddam Hussein's weapons program. In his State of the Union address, President Clinton castigated Hussein for developing nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them. You cannot defy the will of the world, the President proclaimed. You have used weapons of mass destruction before. We are determined to deny you the capacity to use them again. Most Americans listening to the President did not know that the United States supplied Iraq with much of the raw material for creating a chemical and biological warfare program. Nor did the media report that U.S. companies sold Iraq more than $1 billion worth of the components needed to build nuclear weapons and diverse types of missiles, including the infamous Scud. When Iraq engaged in chemical and biological warfare in the 1980s, barely a peep of moral outrage could be heard from Washington, as it kept supplying Saddam with the materials he needed to build weapons. From 1980 to 1988, Iraq and Iran waged a terrible war against each other, a war that might not have begun if President Jimmy Carter had not given the Iraqis a green light to attack Iran, in response to repeated provocations. Throughout much of the war, the United States provided military aid and intelligence information to both sides, hoping that each would inflict severe damage on the other. Noam Chomsky suggests that this strategy is a way for America to keep control of its oil supply: It's been a leading, driving doctrine of U.S. foreign policy since the 1940s that the vast and unparalleled energy resources of the Gulf region will be effectively dominated by the United States and its clients, and, crucially, that no independent indigenous force will be permitted to have a substantial influence on the administration of oil production and price. During the Iran-Iraq war, Iraq received the lion's share of American support because at the time Iran was regarded as the greater threat to U.S. interests. According to a 1994 Senate report, private American suppliers, licensed by the U.S. Department of Commerce, exported a witch's brew of biological and chemical materials to Iraq from 1985 through 1989. Among the biological materials, which often produce slow, agonizing death, were: * Bacillus Anthracis, cause of anthrax. * Clostridium Botulinum, a source of botulinum toxin. * Histoplasma Capsulatam, cause of a disease attacking lungs, brain, spinal cord, and heart. * Brucella Melitensis, a bacteria that can damage major organs. * Clostridium Perfringens, a highly toxic bacteria causing systemic illness. * Clostridium tetani, a highly toxigenic substance. Also on the list: Escherichia coli (E. coli), genetic materials, human and bacterial DNA, and dozens of other pathogenic biological agents. These biological materials were not attenuated or weakened and were capable of reproduction, the Senate report stated. It was later learned that these microorganisms exported by the United States were identical to those the United Nations inspectors found and removed from the Iraqi biological warfare program. The report noted further that U.S. exports to Iraq included the precursors
Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
speaks volumes about fair pricing structures. Diesel is cheaper to refine than gasoline! H. PS I think it was shell that said it spent x billions on hydrogen / vehicle research??!! A big tax write off! the hydrogen vehicle has been invented for 60 odd years.( well there's my rant for this morning) ok that was two. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 March, 2005 2:51 PM Subject: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come With oil prices at an all-time high and Big Oil reporting record profits this year has been exceptional. Am I missing something? If prices for a raw input go up then the sale price also goes up. However, provided the prices go up at near the same rate of the inputs then profits should also remain basically stable. However, the oil companies are pulling out profits left and right. Therefore, if they are profiting then the retail price of fuel is artifically high and not high mearly because of crude prices. I know its not this simple and that the theories of supply and demand weigh in, but why are people (ie. the masses) not questioning what appears to be collusion? It might be collusion (and if so, who would we question?), but probably not. Oil company product is crude oil, not gasoline, in many cases. Why do oil companies charge high prices for it? Because they can - there are many buyers who REALLY want that oil, and are willing to pay the price. Oil company profits have increased because their crude oil production costs have not increased that much, and the price they can charge has increased. Also, their exploration costs have decreased, since they are not investing in exploration. And why should they, from a business point of view? Searching for oil costs money, and if found may have the effect of reducing the price, and therefore profits, and stock price, and executive bonuses! A bad idea. And there might not be more to find in any case, so then it would just costs money to look, reducing profits, and so on. Even if they think there MIGHT be more oil to find, why invest in finding it now? Let the price and profits stay hig! h for a while. I hope this is just my cynical view of the oil business... ___ Biofuel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable): http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/ ___ Biofuel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable): http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
Re: [Biofuel] The Lutec over unity device
approximately since man first rubbed two sticks together. HE. - Original Message - From: D. Mindock [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Undisclosed-Recipient:; Sent: 31 March, 2005 1:45 AM Subject: [Biofuel] The Lutec over unity device This device (see attached pic) is due for release, starting in Australia where Lutec Pty Ltd is located, and then to all countries where licensing is completed. This device can furnish the all the electricity needed by the average home and runs on battery power. It produces 15 times more energy than it uses from the battery input. It's installed in the home where it's to be used. See their website at: www.lutec.com.au It appears to be the real deal. Let's hope it is. Peace and light, D. Mindock P.S. It is interesting that the Australian government would not provide any startup help whatsoever. Let's hope nothing stops the release of this new technology. It does seem that every time something like this comes along it is trashed by vested powers. It is not hard to imagine this technology powering cars and trucks, producing zero pollution and unlimited mileage. ___ Biofuel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable): http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/ ___ Biofuel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable): http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
Re: [Biofuel] Biodiesel processor
I just joined the group, and I must say this is a very interesting group from the little that I read. A little about what I'm doing... I've been in welding, construction, researching alternate fuels/ energy, millrighting, etc.etc... for about 30 odd years. As the saying goes I've done so much with so little for so long I can now do anything with nothing lol. Work, family and a host of other diversions has garnered my attention away from what my passion is.. that is alternate energy. We have recently formed a company, Energy7 and have on staff, amongst other professional, a chemical engineer/mathematician. Right now our research, amongst other thing is biomass to methanol Being in Central Alberta that's like trying to sell snowballs to Eskimos..lol..Being busy as always I don't have much time to write but I will try to be on board most of the time. Till later, cheers, Henri - Original Message - From: Craig Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 March, 2005 2:42 PM Subject: [Biofuel] Biodiesel processor I am looking for a processor that I can pull around the Denver area on a trailer promoting biodiesel! Craig Harris ___ Biofuel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable): http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/ ___ Biofuel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable): http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
