Re: [Biofuel] It's imperialism, stupid

2005-07-08 Thread Jerry Turner
...struck a nerve did I.  :)

 Okay, mission accomplished :)   :):)

 Jerry Turner



- Original Message - 
From: Appal Energy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] It's imperialism, stupid


Jill,

Should you be able to rationalize within some degree of reason how Mr.
Turner's remarks were not due to lack of and disjointed reasoning, and
how the malodorous stink generated by such ill ferment is spread to the
four winds as seed to bespoil whatever fertile ground on which it may
land, then I would surely consider modifying or perhaps even retracting
one or two of my remarks.

On the other hand, as Mr. Turner's remarks are aggregiously in error and
his purpose is blatantly apparent as one to politicize and malign in the
effort to diminutize and dissassociate truth from reality, he opens
himself up for the full gell coat that his foolishness affords him, no
matter whether it be in a public forum or not. Preferable that it be
public for the entire world to see.

Life is too short to molly coddle persons who feign to be adults in the
effort to not offend their delicate sensibilities.

And if you don't believe that such myopic mindsets don't have anything
to do with biofuels, just examine the wrong-mindedness of the present US
administration accross the board. The same disjointed, erroneous and
fabricated reasoning that has been applied to Iraq is being applied to
fuel efficiency, conservation, natural resources, global warming,
nuclear power, proliferation and trade - all of which are, were and will
be connected long before and long after Dubbya is gone.

As for your complaints about talk show chatter? You bitch about
opposing view point and then go on to read a full page, chapter and
verse, as to the opinions of your favorite, radical, right-wing,
so-ultra-'conservative'-as-to-have-long-since-fallen-off-the-edge-of-the-flat-Earth
talk show host yesterday. What's up with that?

You say that differing opinions are what's beautiful about this
country. (The US.) But you denegrate not only differing opinons from
your own, but others who tend to rely more upon fact than opinion.

Perhaps you'd care to explain away your own inconsistancy and doble
standards on those two accounts?  Such incongruities are okay when they
suit your purpose and anything that doesn't suit your purpose or opinion
is apparently not okay? Apparently differing opinions are what make your
world so beautiful, because without them you wouldn't have a podium from
which to bitch?

Oh..., by the by, if you have the time (doubtful, but if) pulling up
but a few installments of Limbaughtomized archives (much less the past
thirteen) will reveal that your favorite talk show host is far more of a
war-monger than the peace maker that you romatacize him to be. And he's
always been that way. Most folks find that a continual diet of such
showmanship peppered swill leaves them so socially emaciated - at all
levels - that they must find a more balanced diet lest they starve
themselves.

Death by nationalism. It's happened before and is returning to a theatre
near you.

Todd Swearingen

Have you been Limbaughtomized yet?



Jill Mello wrote:

Okay,

I joined this list to talk about how to create  run engines on biofuel, 
now
I find I'm bombarded with talk show chatter in my e-mail box?  This debate
runs into our daily lives and affects our thoughts and pocketbooks
tremendously.  However, it would be nice if we were respectful by not
stating that people have lack of and disjointed reasoning and stating to
get their head out of their own stink.  In doing this, you insult all of
us who have the view that the war in Irag is essential to our security.

Baghdad, for the past 30 years, was THE hotbed of terrorist support.  If 
YOU
look at the information out there, you will find the basis for the war.
Most people I know, and I'm from the New England, next to California, the
most liberal minded area of the country, have found that once they've
reviewed ALL the information out there, not just what they hear on the news
and in the newspapers (God help us with the Boston Globe!) that the reality
is that Hussein PAID, in thousands of US dollars, people to blow themselves
up, encouraged the terrorist training camps, supplied Bin Laden with safe
have, worked with Syria to provide comfort to our enemy and threatened us
with creating nuclear arms.

Does this mean that Iran and N. Korea should be ignored?  No, as Iran is a
complicated mess and N. Korea has a leader who is varifiably insane.  Both
would love to wipe us off the map.  But, Iraq being a healthy country will
help us in influencing other countries to discourage terrorists.

You do not have to agree with me, that's what is beautiful about this
country.  I have friends fighting and training Iraqi troops, their culture
is one of fear, they don't dare disagree with a leader, it's been ingrained
in them from birth.  It will take some

Re: [Biofuel] It's imperialism, stupid

2005-07-07 Thread Jerry Turner
NOWHERE in Mr. Noam Chomsky post is mentioned that over 2600 AMERICANS lost 
their lives and did so on AMERICAN soil!!

IMO you would have to be a total moron to even think that the terrorist 
would have been satisfied taking down the WTC!  Hell no they would have kept 
on killing AMERICANS at every opportunity.

  If Clinton would have had the guts to run this country instead of getting 
blows jobs in the oval office, 9/11 would have never happenedyou know it 
and I know it.

Jerry Turner

- Original Message - 
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 2:44 PM
Subject: [Biofuel] It's imperialism, stupid


See also:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article9394.htm
Terror Attacks Near 3,200 in 2004 Count



http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article9387.htm

It's imperialism, stupid

By Noam Chomsky

07/05/05 ICH - - IN his June 28 speech, President Bush asserted
that the invasion of Iraq was undertaken as part of a global war
against terror that the United States is waging. In reality, as
anticipated, the invasion increased the threat of terror, perhaps
significantly.

Half-truths, misinformation and hidden agendas have characterised
official pronouncements about US war motives in Iraq from the very
beginning. The recent revelations about the rush to war in Iraq stand
out all the more starkly amid the chaos that ravages the country and
threatens the region and indeed the world.

In 2002 the US and United Kingdom proclaimed the right to invade Iraq
because it was developing weapons of mass destruction. That was the
single question, as stressed constantly by Bush, Prime Minister
Blair and associates. It was also the sole basis on which Bush
received congressional authorisation to resort to force.

The answer to the single question was given shortly after the
invasion, and reluctantly conceded: The WMD didn't exist. Scarcely
missing a beat, the government and media doctrinal system concocted
new pretexts and justifications for going to war.

Americans do not like to think of themselves as aggressors, but raw
aggression is what took place in Iraq, national security and
intelligence analyst John Prados concluded after his careful,
extensive review of the documentary record in his 2004 book
Hoodwinked.

Prados describes the Bush scheme to convince America and the world
that war with Iraq was necessary and urgent as a case study in
government dishonesty ... that required patently untrue public
statements and egregious manipulation of intelligence. The Downing
Street memo, published on May 1 in The Sunday Times of London, along
with other newly available confidential documents, have deepened the
record of deceit.

The memo came from a meeting of Blair's war cabinet on July 23, 2002,
in which Sir Richard Dearlove, head of British foreign intelligence,
made the now-notorious assertion that the intelligence and facts
were being fixed around the policy of going to war in Iraq.

The memo also quotes British Defence Secretary Geoff Hoon as saying
that the US had already begun 'spikes of activity' to put pressure
on the regime.

British journalist Michael Smith, who broke the story of the memo,
has elaborated on its context and contents in subsequent articles.
The spikes of activity apparently included a coalition air campaign
meant to provoke Iraq into some act that could be portrayed as what
the memo calls a casus belli.

Warplanes began bombing in southern Iraq in May 2002 - 10 tons that
month, according to British government figures. A special spike
started in late August (for a September total of 54.6 tons).

In other words, Bush and Blair began their war not in March 2003, as
everyone believed, but at the end of August 2002, six weeks before
Congress approved military action against Iraq, Smith wrote.

The bombing was presented as defensive action to protect coalition
planes in the no-fly zone. Iraq protested to the United Nations but
didn't fall into the trap of retaliating. For US-UK planners,
invading Iraq was a far higher priority than the war on terror.
That much is revealed by the reports of their own intelligence
agencies. On the eve of the allied invasion, a classified report by
the National Intelligence Council, the intelligence community's
center for strategic thinking, predicted that an American-led
invasion of Iraq would increase support for political Islam and would
result in a deeply divided Iraqi society prone to violent internal
conflict, Douglas Jehl and David E. Sanger reported in The New York
Times last September. In December 2004, Jehl reported a few weeks
later, the NIC warned that Iraq and other possible conflicts in the
future could provide recruitment, training grounds, technical skills
and language proficiency for a new class of terrorists who are
'professionalised' and for whom political violence becomes an end in
itself. The willingness of top planners to risk increase of
terrorism does not of course

Re: [Biofuel] (no subject)

2005-07-04 Thread Jerry Turner



Alex,

I would think you could find a number of 
website forums that deal strictly with the LR. If you got the owners 
manual it should give you that information. Check with a LR 
dealership??

Good luck,
Jerry

- Original Message - 
From: alex 
burton 
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org 

Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 8:08 PM
Subject: [Biofuel] (no subject)


Hello All 

Thanks for 
all the advice in the past.

After a 
year of making Biodiesel and not being able to use it i purchased a 1994 
Discovery (at the Right price )
I wanted 
somthing after 1996 but couldnt afford it so 1994 is it.I have checked for all 
the normal stuff eg cracked head ,transmission etc and it all seems ok.only some 
bushes have to be changed and tyres.

1. My question is about the fuel lines 
(what seems like hard plastic of a unknow kind )and fuel system the two pumps. 
Dose any one know what type of rubber is in the 1994 Landrover TDI 300 fuel 
system.Is it safe to use 100% Biodiesel if not what parts should i change??? 


(I am 
slowly introducing biodiesl at around 5---10% so far )but i dont want to go any 
higher till i get some advice about the fuel lines etc.I am just cleaning out 
the system slowly.but dont want to do any damage.

2. Also what is the effect of using a 
Petrol fuel filter but with a mix of Diesel/Biodiesel is it safeI am driving 
around with a 2nd new landrover filter incase my filter gets blocked but i 
havent found a in line filter for diesel so i am unsure if it is safe to us a 
Petrol filter.

Thanks in 
advance for any adviceAlex.




___Biofuel mailing 
listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel 
at Journey to Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch 
the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Re: was Robin's solution... was: DA Drops...

2005-06-05 Thread Jerry Turner
Doesn't make a damn to me who said itits just plain good ole advise.

Jerry



- Original Message - 
From: Alt.EnergyNetwork [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 12:42 PM
Subject: [Biofuel] Re: was Robin's solution... was: DA Drops...


What a load of bull.
I sincerely doubt that the Robin Williams
was the author of the xenophobic rant below.
tallex





---Original Message---
 From: Jerry Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Robin's solution... was: DA Drops...
 Sent: 05 Jun 2005 03:42:17

  AMEN

  - Original Message -
  FROM: Michael Redler
  TO: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
  SENT: Saturday, June 04, 2005 8:27 PM
  SUBJECT: Re: [Biofuel] Robin's solution... was: DA Drops...

  Why do all the xenophobic emails end with:

  If you agree with the above forward it to a
  friend...If not, and I would be amazed, DELETE it !

  as if the third choice (spreading this email with a description of 
 what it really is) is not an option.

  After watching Patch Adams, I have to believe that there is another 
 Robin Williams who wrote this trash.

  Be amazed Lisa...be very amazed!

  Mike

  _LISA SIMPSON _ wrote:
  You   gotta love Robin Williams... Leave it to Robin
  Williams to come up with the   perfect plan .. what we
  need now is for our UN Ambassador to stand up   and
  repeat this message.

  Robin William's plan. (Hard to argue with   this
  logic!)

  I see a lot of people yelling for peace but I   have
  not heard of a plan for peace. So, here's one plan.

  1.) The US   will apologize to the world for our
  interference in their affairs, past   present. You
  know, Hitler, Mussolini, Tojo, Noriega, Milosevic   and
  the rest of those 'good ole boys,' We will never
  interfere   again.

  2.) We will withdraw our troops from all over the
  world,   starting with Germany, South Korea and the
  Philippines. They don't want us   there. We would
  station troops at our borders. No one sneaking   through
  holes in the fence.

  3.) All illegal aliens have 90 da! ys to   get their
  affairs together and leave. We'll give them a free
  trip home.   After 90 days the remainder will be
  gathered up and deported immediately,   regardless of
  who or where they are. France would welcome them.

  4.)   All future visitors will be thoroughly checked
  and limited to 90 days   unless given a special permit.
  No one from a terrorist nation would be   allowed in.
  If you don't like it there, change it yourself and
  don't   hide here. Asylum would never be available to
  anyone. We don't need any   more cab drivers or 7-11
  cashiers.

  5.) No foreign students over   age 21. The older ones
  are the bombers. If they don't attend classes,   they
  get a D and it's back home baby.

  6.) The US will make a   strong effort to become
  self-sufficient energy wise.
  This will include   developing nonpolluting sources of
  energy but will require a temporary   drilling of oil
  in the Alaskan wilderness. The caribou will have to
  cope   for a while.

  7.) Offer Saudi Arabia and other oil   producing
  countries $10 a barrel for their oil. If they don't
  like it,   we go some place else. They can go somewhere
  else to sell their production.   (About a week of the
  wells filling up the storage sites would be   enough.)

  8.) If there is a famine or other natural catastrophe
  in   the world, we will not interfere, They can pray
  to Allah or whomever, for   seeds, rain, cement or
  whatever they need. Besides most of what we give   them
  is stolen or given to the army. The people who need
  it most get   very little, if anything.

  9.) Ship the UN Headquarters to an isolated   island
  some place. We don't need the spies and fair weather
  friends   here. Besides, the building would make a good
  homeless shelter or lockup   for illegal aliens.

  10.) All Americans must go to charm and   beauty
  school. That way, no one can call us Ugly Americans
  any longer.   The Language we speak is
  ENGLISH.learn it...or LEAVE...Now, isn't that   a
  winner of a plan.

  The Statue of Liberty is no longer saying 'Give   me
  your poor, your tired, your huddled masses.' She's
  got a baseball bat   and she's yelling, 'You want a
  piece of me?'

  ~~~If you agree with   the above forward it to
  friend...

  If not, and I would be amazed,   DELETE it   !

  __
  Do   You Yahoo!?
  Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
  http://mail.yahoo.com

  ___
  Biofuel mailing   list
  Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
  http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

  Biofuel   at Journey to   Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

  Search the   combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
 messages):
  http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org

Re: [Biofuel] Robin's solution... was: DA Drops...

2005-06-04 Thread Jerry Turner



AMEN


- Original Message - 
From: Michael Redler 

To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org 

Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 8:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Robin's solution... was: DA 
Drops...


Why do all the xenophobic emails end with:

"If you agree with the above forward it to afriend...If not, and I 
would be amazed, DELETE it !"

as if the third choice (spreading this email with a description of what 
it really is) is not an option.

After watching "Patch Adams", I have to believe that there is another Robin 
Williams who wrote this trash.

Be amazed Lisa...be very amazed!

Mike
lisa simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You 
  gotta love Robin Williams... Leave it to RobinWilliams to come up with the 
  perfect plan .. what weneed now is for our UN Ambassador to stand up 
  andrepeat this message.Robin William's plan. (Hard to argue with 
  thislogic!)I see a lot of people yelling for peace but I 
  havenot heard of a plan for peace. So, here's one plan.1.) The US 
  will apologize to the world for our"interference" in their affairs, past 
  present. Youknow, Hitler, Mussolini, Tojo, Noriega, Milosevic 
  andthe rest of those 'good ole boys,' We will never"interfere" 
  again.2.) We will withdraw our troops from all over theworld, 
  starting with Germany, South Korea and thePhilippines. They don't want us 
  there. We wouldstation troops at our borders. No one sneaking 
  throughholes in the fence.3.) All illegal aliens have 90 da! ys to 
  get theiraffairs together and leave. We'll give them a freetrip home. 
  After 90 days the remainder will begathered up and deported immediately, 
  regardless ofwho or where they are. France would welcome them.4.) 
  All future visitors will be thoroughly checkedand limited to 90 days 
  unless given a special permit.No one from a terrorist nation would be 
  allowed in.If you don't like it there, change it yourself and don't 
  hide here. Asylum would never be available toanyone. We don't need any 
  more cab drivers or 7-11cashiers.5.) No foreign "students" over 
  age 21. The older onesare the bombers. If they don't attend classes, 
  theyget a "D" and it's back home baby. 6.) The US will make a 
  strong effort to becomeself-sufficient energy wise.This will include 
  developing nonpolluting sources ofenergy but will require a temporary 
  drilling of oilin the Alaskan wilderness. The caribou will have tocope 
  for a while.7.) Offer Saudi Arabia and other oil 
  producingcountries $10 a barrel for their oil. If they don'tlike it, 
  we go some place else. They can go somewhereelse to sell their production. 
  (About a week of thewells filling up the storage sites would be 
  enough.)8.) If there is a famine or other natural catastrophein 
  the world, we will not "interfere," They can prayto Allah or whomever, for 
  seeds, rain, cement orwhatever they need. Besides most of what we give 
  themis stolen or given to the army. The people who needit most get 
  very little, if anything.9.) Ship the UN Headquarters to an isolated 
  islandsome place. We don't need the spies and fair weatherfriends 
  here. Besides, the building would make a goodhomeless shelter or lockup 
  for illegal aliens.10.) All Americans must go to charm and 
  beautyschool. That way, no one can call us "Ugly Americans"any longer. 
  The Language we speak is ENGLISH.learn it...or LEAVE...Now, isn't that 
  awinner of a plan."The Statue of Liberty is no longer saying 'Give 
  meyour poor, your tired, your huddled masses.' She'sgot a baseball bat 
  and she's yelling, 'You want apiece of me?'"~~~If you agree with 
  the above forward it tofriend...If not, and I would be amazed, 
  DELETE it 
  !__Do 
  You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
  http://mail.yahoo.com 
  ___Biofuel mailing 
  listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel 
  at Journey to 
  Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the 
  combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
  messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



___Biofuel mailing 
listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel 
at Journey to Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch 
the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):