... half a million bushels of soya bean... incinerated. Now why 
didn't it occur to them to incinerate the oil content in people's 
diesel motors? Have to stop thinking of biofuels as nothing more than 
just a useful little sideline for soy and corn farmers, or for Big 
Soy and Big Corn, probably more accurate. And then we get all this 
nonsense (from the same folks?) about "how much land will it take to 
grow enough biofuels?" Sigh.

Keith


http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,865021,00.html
Guardian Unlimited | The Guardian |
Alarm as GM pig vaccine taints US crops

Strict new guidelines planned after contamination

Suzanne Goldenberg in Washington
Tuesday December 24, 2002
The Guardian

US authorities, shaken by a case in which food crops were 
contaminated with an experimental pig vaccine, are preparing to 
impose stringent guidelines on a new generation of experimental GM 
crops.

The department of agriculture and the environmental protection agency 
are encountering growing disquiet from a coalition of farmers and 
food manufacturers about the potential dangers of the next phase of 
GM products - "biopharming", or the implanting of genes in food crops 
to grow drugs and industrial chemicals.

The idea of tightening regulations on GM products represents 
something of a revolution in thinking in the US, where about 70% of 
the processed food on supermarket shelves contains genetically 
engineered ingredients.

But concerns have arisen after a small biotech firm in Texas was 
fined $3m (£2m) for tainting half a million bushels of soya bean with 
a trial vaccine used to prevent stomach upsets in piglets.

Under a settlement reached this month, the first of its kind against 
any biotech company in the US, a firm called Prodigene agreed to pay 
a fine of $250,000 and to repay the government for the cost of 
incinerating the soya bean that had been contaminated with 
genetically altered corn.

US authorities said the corn did not reach food crops or animal feed. 
But the episode has drawn unwelcome attention to an as yet 
experimental area of GM farming.

The premise behind biopharming, or "pharming" for short, is that 
genetic tinkering can turn an ordinary-looking corn or barley field 
into a potential drug factory, producing insulin, chemotherapy drugs, 
and other products for much less than it would cost to set up an 
industrial plant.

At present, two dozen trials of the experimental GM drugs are under 
way across the US.

The biotech firms argue that the new technique can revolutionise 
health care, especially in the developing world where hospitals short 
on syringes can dispense edible drugs. But in the wake of the Texas 
case, questions are being asked.

The latest incident was the worst violation so far of regulations 
intended to keep biopharming out of the food supply. It was also seen 
as the most serious setback to date to the next generation of GM 
farming.

Until now, genetic engineering has been used mainly to make crops 
such as corn and soya bean resistant to insects and disease, and the 
US food industry has been solidly on side.

The Texas alarm has begun to change that. "The incident overall just 
reaffirms our concerns that something could go wrong," Stephanie 
Childs of the Grocery Manufacturers of America, which represents food 
companies such as Kellogg and General Mills, told the Los Angeles 
Times.

Analysts in Washington said yesterday that they expected the 
department of agriculture to impose more stringent guidelines next 
year. Published reports said yesterday that guidelines under 
consideration by the authorities include moving experimental farms 
away from America's grain belt in the mid-west, or requiring growers 
to dye the leaves of the altered crops.

The agriculture department's disciplinary measures against the small 
Texas firm have crystallised concerns among farmers, 
environmentalists and industry about the risks of experimental 
vaccine crops getting into the food supply.

"The department of agriculture wanted to send a signal that the 
companies need to take the obligation to protect the food supply very 
seriously," Michael Rodemeyer, the director of Washington's Pew 
Initiative on Food and Biotechnology, said yesterday.

"The whole issue of growing pharmaceuticals in food crops has 
certainly raised concern within the food industry, as well as among 
environmentalists and others, about genes from these crops getting 
into the food supply."

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


Reply via email to