[biofuel] NBB and small producers

2003-08-26 Thread Keith Addison

As requested by Mark, I'm reposting this summary of the NBB and EPA 
hassle for small producers in the US, first posted in May this 
year, previously called NBB and health effects data.

Best

Keith Addison



There's been a lot of discussion here and elsewhere about 
small-producer certification, and a lot of confusion too, it seems. 
On the one hand there's been quite a lot of talk of conspiracies to 
exclude the small guys, which I don't think is warranted, and on the 
other the EPA has said different things at different times.

The EPA requires registration of all fuel producers for non-standard 
fuels used on-road, which includes biodiesel, and the fuels must be 
tested. The NBB put a sample of soy biodiesel through the required 
Clean Air Act Tier I and Tier II Health Effects tests, and it passed 
(the only alternative fuel so far to do so). The tests also covered 
biodiesel made from other feedstocks, such as corn oil, lard, tallow, 
WVO, etc., as the differences between them are not significant. The 
Tier II tests were federally funded and are thus in the public 
domain, anyone can use them. The Tier I tests were funded by the 
Soybean Councils and largely paid for with soy check-off dollars. The 
non-profit NBB was created by the Soybean Councils, which are still 
the major force within the NBB. The check-off money used for the 
biodiesel Tier I tests could have been used elsewhere, and the 
NBB/Soybean Councils want it back.

To gain access to the data you'd either have to join the NBB and pay 
a $5,000 per annum  membership fee plus a production tax - or - pay a 
$100,000 bond to the NBB for non-member access to the Health Effects 
Data (to be returned at face value, without interest, in 2015, if the 
NBB has recovered the costs of the tests by then) - or - pay more 
than $1 million for your own Tier I health effects tests, which will 
take a few years - or - be prepared to face EPA fines of $25,000 per 
day, which could be retroactive.

The issue is whether small producers are or are not exempt from 
paying for access to the health effects data. There are supposed to 
be exemptions for small producers, but it's been said they didn't 
apply, and one small producer - Tom Leue's Yellow Biodiesel - was 
apparently closed down on this account, or at least stopped from 
selling his fuel for on-road use.

The small business exemptions depend on which family/category the 
fuel/additive falls into. If the product is considered baseline or 
non-baseline, then manufacturers with total annual sales of less than 
$50 million are not required to meet Tier I or Tier II. If the 
product is considered atypical, then manufacturers with total 
annual sales of less than $10 mil are not required to meet Tier II 
(Tier I still applies). There are three diesel categories in the 
Diesel Family: Baseline Diesel, Non-Baseline Diesel, and Atypical 
[diesel].

Baseline Diesel is comprised of diesel fuels and associated additives 
which satisfy ALL of the following criteria: shall contain no 
elements other than carbon, hydrogen, oxygen (1%), nitrogen and 
sulfur (no more than the legal limit for highway diesel). Baseline 
Diesel must possess the characteristics of ASTM D 975-93. Baseline 
Diesel must be derived from conventional petroleum sources only. 
(40CFR79.56(e)3(ii)A)

Non-baseline Diesel must meet all the criteria of baseline diesel 
except: oxygen can be 1% or higher (no specified limit) and it can 
include diesel fuel and additives which may be derived from synthetic 
crudes, such as those prepared from coal, shale, tar sands, heavy oil 
deposits, and other non-conventional petroleum sources.

Atypical Diesel comprises diesel and additives which contain one or 
more elements other than carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, and 
sulfur. (40CFR79.56(e)3(ii)C) No mention of source.

According to this, biodiesel (either as a fuel or an additive) 
doesn't meet Baseline or Non-Baseline because its made from 
non-petroleum sources.

Joe Sopata of the EPA has stated that any blend of 6% biodiesel or 
less was considered a non-baseline fuel, and anything over 6% was 
considered atypical, and therefore not subject to the Tier 1 
exemption. But we could not find these definitions in any EPA 
documents.

What we did find in an EPA document is this: An exception is 
biodiesel, which is one group, even though it consists of mixed alkyl 
esters of plant and/or animal origin.
http://www.epa.gov/icr/icrs/icrpages/1696ss03.htm

This makes biodiesel a non-baseline diesel group, and thus exempt 
from Tier I and Tier II testing for producers with total annual sales 
of less than $50 million.

For more on this, see Thor Skov's post below.

Joe Sopata has since said, in answer to enquiries, that producers who 
sell less than $10,000,000 annually are exempt from Tier I and Tier 
II as long as their fuel meets the ASTM standard (ASTM D-6751).

This is what I was told:

Joe Sopata again stated that fuels meeting all ASTM standards for 

Re: [biofuel] NBB and small producers

2003-08-26 Thread Greg and April

There should not be any tax on BioDiesel at all, until it's use equals or
exceeds that of DinoDiesel and gasoline, and even then none at all unless a
threshold amount is produced / used, this way the household producer/user
would not get reamed.

Greg H.

- Original Message - 
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 Beyond that, you'll still have to pay federal and state road taxes.
 That's something that needs some pressure perhaps - should there be
 any taxes on biodiesel?

 Regards

 Keith


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for Your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at Myinks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US  Canada. 
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/l.m7sD/LIdGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] NBB and small producers

2003-08-26 Thread Hakan Falk


Greg and Keith,

Fuel taxation must have some goals and be designed to further
those, without having serious ramifications on the economy.

Vehicles and taxation for biofuels in developing countries.
http://energy.saving.nu/vehicles/taxes.shtml

Hakan


At 04:12 PM 8/26/2003 -0600, you wrote:
There should not be any tax on BioDiesel at all, until it's use equals or
exceeds that of DinoDiesel and gasoline, and even then none at all unless a
threshold amount is produced / used, this way the household producer/user
would not get reamed.

Greg H.

- Original Message -
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 
  Beyond that, you'll still have to pay federal and state road taxes.
  That's something that needs some pressure perhaps - should there be
  any taxes on biodiesel?
 
  Regards
 
  Keith



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for Your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at Myinks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US  Canada. 
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/l.m7sD/LIdGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/