Re: [biofuel] Re: Make plans to shut O'Hare down long-term

2004-02-24 Thread Alan Petrillo

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 In a message dated 2/23/2004 12:07:36 PM Central Standard Time, 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  Perhaps.  But don't forget that the particulates in question are soot, 
  which tends to absorb heat rather than reflecting it.
 That's the point.  The soot absorbs heat that would otherwise reach the 
 ground and increases the emissivity of the upper atmosphere, radiating more 
 heat 
 into space.

Ah.  Now I understand the mechanism.

 I realize they went to a lot of effort to eliminate smoke from jets; when I 
 was young almost all jets were smoky.  However, given that the airlines fly 
 under government regulation, a mandatory smoky engine could be imposed by any 
 dumb non-elected FAA administrator, as long as the scientifically trained 
 lawyers 
 in congress would permit it.  Quite possibly, it could be achieved without 
 any engine modifications -- don't want to void the warranty -- by additives 
 to 
 the fuel (easy to enforce) or by injecting something into the exhaust.  

I know there's no shortage of morons in Congress, but, fortunately, I 
don't think any of them are quite _that_ dumb.

 If they 
 could seed cloud formation at high altitude (big if), the clouds would be 
 more effective than soot. 

Funny you should mention that.

One time, while I was living in Germany, on my way to work this one 
morning I watched an airliner fly across the sky.  It was a bright, 
clear morning with a brilliant blue sky.  The airliner left a bright 
white contrail across the sky.  My office was in a corner of an upper 
floor of a large hangar, with big windows so I had a good view of the 
sky.  Over the course of the next couple of hours I watched that 
contrail expand until it had become a thin overcast of cirrus clouds 
covering almost the entire sky.

There is no doubt in my mind that under the right conditions airplanes 
can indeed seed high altitude cloud formation.


AP



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] Re: Make plans to shut O'Hare down long-term

2004-02-24 Thread Hakan Falk


Alan,

The soot layer is more likely to be on the ground, combined with large 
areas of misc. constructions and clearance of land mass. This would give a 
larger emission factor of the ground and a warming of the lower atmosphere. 
Maybe the global waring have a contribution from this also. The upper 
atmosphere would not only radiate more heat to space, but also to earth, 
with different wave length. You would also get a significant warming of the 
upper atmosphere and what we talk about is global warming of the lower 
atmosphere. I do belive that the changes in emission factors do play an 
important part in climate change.

Hakan

At 06:23 24/02/2004, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  In a message dated 2/23/2004 12:07:36 PM Central Standard Time,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
   Perhaps.  But don't forget that the particulates in question are soot,
   which tends to absorb heat rather than reflecting it.
  That's the point.  The soot absorbs heat that would otherwise reach the
  ground and increases the emissivity of the upper atmosphere, radiating 
 more heat
  into space.

Ah.  Now I understand the mechanism.

  I realize they went to a lot of effort to eliminate smoke from jets; 
 when I
  was young almost all jets were smoky.  However, given that the airlines 
 fly
  under government regulation, a mandatory smoky engine could be imposed 
 by any
  dumb non-elected FAA administrator, as long as the scientifically 
 trained lawyers
  in congress would permit it.  Quite possibly, it could be achieved without
  any engine modifications -- don't want to void the warranty -- by 
 additives to
  the fuel (easy to enforce) or by injecting something into the exhaust.

I know there's no shortage of morons in Congress, but, fortunately, I
don't think any of them are quite _that_ dumb.

  If they
  could seed cloud formation at high altitude (big if), the clouds would be
  more effective than soot.

Funny you should mention that.

One time, while I was living in Germany, on my way to work this one
morning I watched an airliner fly across the sky.  It was a bright,
clear morning with a brilliant blue sky.  The airliner left a bright
white contrail across the sky.  My office was in a corner of an upper
floor of a large hangar, with big windows so I had a good view of the
sky.  Over the course of the next couple of hours I watched that
contrail expand until it had become a thin overcast of cirrus clouds
covering almost the entire sky.

There is no doubt in my mind that under the right conditions airplanes
can indeed seed high altitude cloud formation.


AP




Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] Re: Make plans to shut O'Hare down long-term

2004-02-23 Thread Alan Petrillo

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Much simpler.  Readjust the aircraft fuel controls to make a smokier exhaust. 

It'd take more than readjusting the aircraft fuel controls.  You'd have 
to replace the fuel injectors with less efficient designs.  But if you 
do that you have to worry about turbine inlet temperatures, and turbine 
coking and other nasty stuff.  Best to just leave them alone.

  It will only cost 1-2% in additional fuel, and the particles wil be very 
 small, practically invisible.  

Do you have any idea how much money airlines are willing to spend to 
save 1-2% on their fuel burns?

 The result, however, will be reflected sunlight 
 and increased emission of IR radiation, thus cooling the earth, a sort of 
 small 
 scale nuclear winter.  

Perhaps.  But don't forget that the particulates in question are soot, 
which tends to absorb heat rather than reflecting it.

 Then the Greens can feel good about flying out of 
 O'Hare. 

Indeed.


AP



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] Re: Make plans to shut O'Hare down long-term

2004-02-23 Thread esbuck

In a message dated 2/23/2004 12:07:36 PM Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perhaps.  But don't forget that the particulates in question are soot, 
which tends to absorb heat rather than reflecting it.
That's the point.  The soot absorbs heat that would otherwise reach the 
ground and increases the emissivity of the upper atmosphere, radiating more 
heat 
into space.

I realize they went to a lot of effort to eliminate smoke from jets; when I 
was young almost all jets were smoky.  However, given that the airlines fly 
under government regulation, a mandatory smoky engine could be imposed by any 
dumb non-elected FAA administrator, as long as the scientifically trained 
lawyers 
in congress would permit it.  Quite possibly, it could be achieved without 
any engine modifications -- don't want to void the warranty -- by additives to 
the fuel (easy to enforce) or by injecting something into the exhaust.  If they 
could seed cloud formation at high altitude (big if), the clouds would be 
more effective than soot. 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] Re: Make plans to shut O'Hare down long-term

2004-02-21 Thread Alan Petrillo

Tim wrote:

 Flying off to a warmer climate:
 Click on the map to calculate the greenhouse warming effect of any 
 flight! Plus information on aircraft emissions, travel alternatives, 
 dilemmas etc. 

OK, I'll disclaim myself here as having a vested interest, because I'm a 
pilot.

This site is full of errors.  The author needs to do some more homework. 
  Many of the author's points may be true wherever he lives, but they 
are most decidedly NOT true worldwide.


AP



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US  Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] Re: Make plans to shut O'Hare down long-term

2004-02-21 Thread esbuck

Much simpler.  Readjust the aircraft fuel controls to make a smokier exhaust. 
 It will only cost 1-2% in additional fuel, and the particles wil be very 
small, practically invisible.  The result, however, will be reflected sunlight 
and increased emission of IR radiation, thus cooling the earth, a sort of small 
scale nuclear winter.  Then the Greens can feel good about flying out of 
O'Hare. 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/