Re: svn commit: r231220 - head/sys/sys
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 11:21:59AM -0800, m...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Konstantin Belousov k...@freebsd.org wrote: Author: kib Date: Wed Feb 8 18:36:07 2012 New Revision: 231220 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/231220 Log: Trim 8 unused bytes from struct vnode on 64-bit architectures. Doesn't this change the KBI? So should __FreeBSD_version be bumped? Definitely, it changes the KBI. This is the reason I did not specified MFC period (but really wanted it). We do not track KBI changes on HEAD with __FreeBSD_version. IMO, __FreeBSD_version is more about KPI, and even for KPI, it is more at the discretion of the committer and usefulness of notification. With this change, all VFS modules must be recompiled. But HEAD had a lot of changes related to VFS interface which went in silently. pgp7Uc4EkZBQQ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: svn commit: r231220 - head/sys/sys
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Konstantin Belousov k...@freebsd.org wrote:
Author: kib
Date: Wed Feb 8 18:36:07 2012
New Revision: 231220
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/231220
Log:
Trim 8 unused bytes from struct vnode on 64-bit architectures.
Doesn't this change the KBI? So should __FreeBSD_version be bumped?
Thanks,
matthew
Modified:
head/sys/sys/vnode.h
Modified: head/sys/sys/vnode.h
==
--- head/sys/sys/vnode.h Wed Feb 8 18:22:10 2012 (r231219)
+++ head/sys/sys/vnode.h Wed Feb 8 18:36:07 2012 (r231220)
@@ -149,8 +149,8 @@ struct vnode {
struct lock *v_vnlock; /* u pointer to vnode lock */
int v_holdcnt; /* i prevents recycling. */
int v_usecount; /* i ref count of users */
- u_long v_iflag; /* i vnode flags (see below)
*/
- u_long v_vflag; /* v vnode flags */
+ u_int v_iflag; /* i vnode flags (see below)
*/
+ u_int v_vflag; /* v vnode flags */
int v_writecount; /* v ref count of writers */
/*
___
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
