Re: svn commit: r344648 - in head: . sys/kern sys/sys

[Alexey Dokuchaev]

On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 03:11:40PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 07:47:51AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:56:55PM +, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > New Revision: 344648
> > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/344648
> > > 
> > > Log:
> > >   Rename seq to seqc to avoid namespace clashes with Linux
> > >   
> > > ...
> > > Added:
> > >   head/sys/sys/seqc.h   (contents, props changed)
> > > Deleted:
> > >   head/sys/sys/seq.h
> > 
> > Why it was deleted and added as new file instead of being repocopied?
> 
> Retransmit.

Retransmit.

./danfe


___
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: svn commit: r344648 - in head: . sys/kern sys/sys

[Ian Lepore]

On Sat, 2019-06-01 at 11:02 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> On 01/06/2019 03:46, Warner Losh wrote:
> > When we move to git, stuff like this just won't matter. So it's
> > hard to get
> > worked up about it now... and even if we weren't heading that way,
> > the history
> > preserved is so small as to say more than "meh" here. There is too
> > little ROI to
> > get worked up about.
> 
> Still, even a token reply would have been nice.  Much better than
> starting to
> ignore *everything* that a fellow developer writes.
> "Yeah, looks like I screwed up.  But fixing it is more work than it's
> worth.
> Sorry about that.  Thanks."
> 

The point is, a few people in the project have proven themselves to be
noise generators with annoying whinging and nagging about tiny
insigificant issues.  That earns them a mail rule that simply discards
all incoming mail from them.  So, unsurprisingly: no reply.

There are 3 project memembers I've written such rules for, although two
of those rules are currently disabled (but I didn't delete them because
I have a feeling I'm going to use them again some day).

-- Ian

> > On Fri, May 31, 2019, 4:56 PM Kevin Bowling <
> > kevin.bowl...@kev009.com
> > > wrote:
> > 
> > The vast majority of contributors don't enjoy nit-picking on
> > these
> > trivialities. If the broader developer community is not
> > rallying for
> > the revert and some core conspiracy doesn't care about it
> > either, that
> > forms the de facto opinion of the FreeBSD community of today
> > that this
> > is trivial and irrelevant.
> > 
> > Yes, there is vocal absolutism on the fringes about SHALLS and
> > MUSTS
> > about all sorts of things aside from modernizing FreeBSD and
> > making it
> > viable on current generation hardware.  These parties might be
> > happier
> > and better aligned with OpenBSD ideologically as well as
> > personalities.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Kevin
> > 
> > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 3:17 PM Rodney W. Grimes
> > mailto:free...@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I know of several people that have blocked your mail. 
> > Maybe a moment
> > > > for reflection on your attitude and approach if you want to
> > be taken
> > > > seriously.
> > >
> > > I would consider repository damange and abuse to be VERY
> > serious.
> > > I would also consider the treatmeant I am seeing of danfe
> > boarder
> > > line on contempt.
> > > But then I also know there are probably some that have
> > blocked me.
> > > The project, sadly is spiraling around a toilet, and someone
> > is about to
> > flush
> > >
> > > It is not what you hear, it is what you are not hearing that
> > makes me say
> > these things...
> > > And espcially what core seams to not be willing to hear, and
> > is literly (I
> > can proove this)
> > > paying lip service to "solicited feedback".
> > >
> > > I asked about some of my solicited feedback, and a core
> > member said he
> > > could not find it in his inbox and that I needed to locate
> > and provide
> > > him a pointer to it.  THAT my friends is not solicited
> > feedback, that is
> > > /dev/null of feedback and just plain out right unexcusable.
> > >
> > > And note above all else the "product" of the FreeBSD project
> > is NOT
> > > releases, it IS the repository, and if we get sloppy with
> > that product
> > > it makes life harder for our consumers.  If you have ever
> > tried to
> > > find the history of a deleted object (which is what the
> > process being
> > > complained about here creaetes) it is a royal PITA.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Rod
> > >
> > > > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 8:50 AM Alexey Dokuchaev <
> > da...@freebsd.org
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 03:20:50PM +, Brooks Davis
> > wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 09:11:36AM +, Alexey
> > Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 03:11:40PM +, Alexey
> > Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 07:47:51AM +, Alexey
> > Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:56:55PM +, Mateusz
> > Guzik wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > New Revision: 344648
> > > > > > > > > > URL: 
> > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/344648
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Log:
> > > > > > > > > >   Rename seq to seqc to avoid namespace clashes
> > with Linux
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ...
> > > > > > > > > > Added:
> > > > > > > > > >   head/sys/sys/seqc.h   (contents, props
> > changed)
> > > > > > > > > > Deleted:
> > > > > > > > > >   head/sys/sys/seq.h
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Why it was deleted and added as new file instead
> > of being
> > repocopied?
> > > > > > > >
> >  

Re: svn commit: r344648 - in head: . sys/kern sys/sys

[Andriy Gapon]

On 01/06/2019 03:46, Warner Losh wrote:
> When we move to git, stuff like this just won't matter. So it's hard to get
> worked up about it now... and even if we weren't heading that way, the history
> preserved is so small as to say more than "meh" here. There is too little ROI 
> to
> get worked up about.

Still, even a token reply would have been nice.  Much better than starting to
ignore *everything* that a fellow developer writes.
"Yeah, looks like I screwed up.  But fixing it is more work than it's worth.
Sorry about that.  Thanks."

> On Fri, May 31, 2019, 4:56 PM Kevin Bowling  > wrote:
> 
> The vast majority of contributors don't enjoy nit-picking on these
> trivialities. If the broader developer community is not rallying for
> the revert and some core conspiracy doesn't care about it either, that
> forms the de facto opinion of the FreeBSD community of today that this
> is trivial and irrelevant.
> 
> Yes, there is vocal absolutism on the fringes about SHALLS and MUSTS
> about all sorts of things aside from modernizing FreeBSD and making it
> viable on current generation hardware.  These parties might be happier
> and better aligned with OpenBSD ideologically as well as
> personalities.
> 
> Regards,
> Kevin
> 
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 3:17 PM Rodney W. Grimes
> mailto:free...@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>> wrote:
> >
> > > I know of several people that have blocked your mail.  Maybe a moment
> > > for reflection on your attitude and approach if you want to be taken
> > > seriously.
> >
> > I would consider repository damange and abuse to be VERY serious.
> > I would also consider the treatmeant I am seeing of danfe boarder
> > line on contempt.
> > But then I also know there are probably some that have blocked me.
> > The project, sadly is spiraling around a toilet, and someone is about to
> flush
> >
> > It is not what you hear, it is what you are not hearing that makes me 
> say
> these things...
> > And espcially what core seams to not be willing to hear, and is literly 
> (I
> can proove this)
> > paying lip service to "solicited feedback".
> >
> > I asked about some of my solicited feedback, and a core member said he
> > could not find it in his inbox and that I needed to locate and provide
> > him a pointer to it.  THAT my friends is not solicited feedback, that is
> > /dev/null of feedback and just plain out right unexcusable.
> >
> > And note above all else the "product" of the FreeBSD project is NOT
> > releases, it IS the repository, and if we get sloppy with that product
> > it makes life harder for our consumers.  If you have ever tried to
> > find the history of a deleted object (which is what the process being
> > complained about here creaetes) it is a royal PITA.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rod
> >
> > > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 8:50 AM Alexey Dokuchaev  > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 03:20:50PM +, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 09:11:36AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > > > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 03:11:40PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev 
> wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 07:47:51AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev 
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:56:55PM +, Mateusz Guzik 
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > New Revision: 344648
> > > > > > > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/344648
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Log:
> > > > > > > > >   Rename seq to seqc to avoid namespace clashes with Linux
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ...
> > > > > > > > > Added:
> > > > > > > > >   head/sys/sys/seqc.h   (contents, props changed)
> > > > > > > > > Deleted:
> > > > > > > > >   head/sys/sys/seq.h
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Why it was deleted and added as new file instead of being
> repocopied?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Retransmit.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ping!
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you have nothing better to do?
> > > >
> > > > Oh, I have a lot on my plate, thanks for asking.  Now, back to the
> subject:
> > > >
> > > > - I think that this commit was executed badly (not via repocopy)
> > > > - I've been trying to contact mjg@ for several weeks, to no avail :(
> > > > - All I get in return is an email from a fellow committer asking me
> > > >   if I have anything better to do
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, I don't understand this.  I don't understand why we ignore 
> email
> > > > from our own community.  I don't understand why we do not correct 
> or at
> > > > least explain why what looks like a mistake is actually not(?).  I 
> don't
> > > > understand why I'm being ridiculed, not those who make dubious 
> commits

Re: svn commit: r344648 - in head: . sys/kern sys/sys

[Warner Losh]

When we move to git, stuff like this just won't matter. So it's hard to get
worked up about it now... and even if we weren't heading that way, the
history preserved is so small as to say more than "meh" here. There is too
little ROI to get worked up about.

Warner

On Fri, May 31, 2019, 4:56 PM Kevin Bowling 
wrote:

> The vast majority of contributors don't enjoy nit-picking on these
> trivialities. If the broader developer community is not rallying for
> the revert and some core conspiracy doesn't care about it either, that
> forms the de facto opinion of the FreeBSD community of today that this
> is trivial and irrelevant.
>
> Yes, there is vocal absolutism on the fringes about SHALLS and MUSTS
> about all sorts of things aside from modernizing FreeBSD and making it
> viable on current generation hardware.  These parties might be happier
> and better aligned with OpenBSD ideologically as well as
> personalities.
>
> Regards,
> Kevin
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 3:17 PM Rodney W. Grimes
>  wrote:
> >
> > > I know of several people that have blocked your mail.  Maybe a moment
> > > for reflection on your attitude and approach if you want to be taken
> > > seriously.
> >
> > I would consider repository damange and abuse to be VERY serious.
> > I would also consider the treatmeant I am seeing of danfe boarder
> > line on contempt.
> > But then I also know there are probably some that have blocked me.
> > The project, sadly is spiraling around a toilet, and someone is about to
> flush
> >
> > It is not what you hear, it is what you are not hearing that makes me
> say these things...
> > And espcially what core seams to not be willing to hear, and is literly
> (I can proove this)
> > paying lip service to "solicited feedback".
> >
> > I asked about some of my solicited feedback, and a core member said he
> > could not find it in his inbox and that I needed to locate and provide
> > him a pointer to it.  THAT my friends is not solicited feedback, that is
> > /dev/null of feedback and just plain out right unexcusable.
> >
> > And note above all else the "product" of the FreeBSD project is NOT
> > releases, it IS the repository, and if we get sloppy with that product
> > it makes life harder for our consumers.  If you have ever tried to
> > find the history of a deleted object (which is what the process being
> > complained about here creaetes) it is a royal PITA.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rod
> >
> > > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 8:50 AM Alexey Dokuchaev 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 03:20:50PM +, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 09:11:36AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > > > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 03:11:40PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 07:47:51AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:56:55PM +, Mateusz Guzik
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > New Revision: 344648
> > > > > > > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/344648
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Log:
> > > > > > > > >   Rename seq to seqc to avoid namespace clashes with Linux
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ...
> > > > > > > > > Added:
> > > > > > > > >   head/sys/sys/seqc.h   (contents, props changed)
> > > > > > > > > Deleted:
> > > > > > > > >   head/sys/sys/seq.h
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Why it was deleted and added as new file instead of being
> repocopied?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Retransmit.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ping!
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you have nothing better to do?
> > > >
> > > > Oh, I have a lot on my plate, thanks for asking.  Now, back to the
> subject:
> > > >
> > > > - I think that this commit was executed badly (not via repocopy)
> > > > - I've been trying to contact mjg@ for several weeks, to no avail :(
> > > > - All I get in return is an email from a fellow committer asking me
> > > >   if I have anything better to do
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, I don't understand this.  I don't understand why we ignore
> email
> > > > from our own community.  I don't understand why we do not correct or
> at
> > > > least explain why what looks like a mistake is actually not(?).  I
> don't
> > > > understand why I'm being ridiculed, not those who make dubious
> commits
> > > > and fail to defend them.
> > > >
> > > > ./danfe
> > > > ___
> > > > svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
> > > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
> > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Rod Grimes
> rgri...@freebsd.org
>
>
___
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: svn commit: r344648 - in head: . sys/kern sys/sys

[Kevin Bowling]

The vast majority of contributors don't enjoy nit-picking on these
trivialities. If the broader developer community is not rallying for
the revert and some core conspiracy doesn't care about it either, that
forms the de facto opinion of the FreeBSD community of today that this
is trivial and irrelevant.

Yes, there is vocal absolutism on the fringes about SHALLS and MUSTS
about all sorts of things aside from modernizing FreeBSD and making it
viable on current generation hardware.  These parties might be happier
and better aligned with OpenBSD ideologically as well as
personalities.

Regards,
Kevin

On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 3:17 PM Rodney W. Grimes
 wrote:
>
> > I know of several people that have blocked your mail.  Maybe a moment
> > for reflection on your attitude and approach if you want to be taken
> > seriously.
>
> I would consider repository damange and abuse to be VERY serious.
> I would also consider the treatmeant I am seeing of danfe boarder
> line on contempt.
> But then I also know there are probably some that have blocked me.
> The project, sadly is spiraling around a toilet, and someone is about to 
> flush
>
> It is not what you hear, it is what you are not hearing that makes me say 
> these things...
> And espcially what core seams to not be willing to hear, and is literly (I 
> can proove this)
> paying lip service to "solicited feedback".
>
> I asked about some of my solicited feedback, and a core member said he
> could not find it in his inbox and that I needed to locate and provide
> him a pointer to it.  THAT my friends is not solicited feedback, that is
> /dev/null of feedback and just plain out right unexcusable.
>
> And note above all else the "product" of the FreeBSD project is NOT
> releases, it IS the repository, and if we get sloppy with that product
> it makes life harder for our consumers.  If you have ever tried to
> find the history of a deleted object (which is what the process being
> complained about here creaetes) it is a royal PITA.
>
> Regards,
> Rod
>
> > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 8:50 AM Alexey Dokuchaev  wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 03:20:50PM +, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 09:11:36AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 03:11:40PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 07:47:51AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:56:55PM +, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > > > > > > New Revision: 344648
> > > > > > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/344648
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Log:
> > > > > > > >   Rename seq to seqc to avoid namespace clashes with Linux
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ...
> > > > > > > > Added:
> > > > > > > >   head/sys/sys/seqc.h   (contents, props changed)
> > > > > > > > Deleted:
> > > > > > > >   head/sys/sys/seq.h
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Why it was deleted and added as new file instead of being 
> > > > > > > repocopied?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Retransmit.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ping!
> > > >
> > > > Do you have nothing better to do?
> > >
> > > Oh, I have a lot on my plate, thanks for asking.  Now, back to the 
> > > subject:
> > >
> > > - I think that this commit was executed badly (not via repocopy)
> > > - I've been trying to contact mjg@ for several weeks, to no avail :(
> > > - All I get in return is an email from a fellow committer asking me
> > >   if I have anything better to do
> > >
> > > Sorry, I don't understand this.  I don't understand why we ignore email
> > > from our own community.  I don't understand why we do not correct or at
> > > least explain why what looks like a mistake is actually not(?).  I don't
> > > understand why I'm being ridiculed, not those who make dubious commits
> > > and fail to defend them.
> > >
> > > ./danfe
> > > ___
> > > svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
> > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
> > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> >
> >
>
> --
> Rod Grimes rgri...@freebsd.org
___
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: svn commit: r344648 - in head: . sys/kern sys/sys

[Rodney W. Grimes]

> I know of several people that have blocked your mail.  Maybe a moment
> for reflection on your attitude and approach if you want to be taken
> seriously.

I would consider repository damange and abuse to be VERY serious.
I would also consider the treatmeant I am seeing of danfe boarder
line on contempt.
But then I also know there are probably some that have blocked me.
The project, sadly is spiraling around a toilet, and someone is about to 
flush

It is not what you hear, it is what you are not hearing that makes me say these 
things...
And espcially what core seams to not be willing to hear, and is literly (I can 
proove this)
paying lip service to "solicited feedback".

I asked about some of my solicited feedback, and a core member said he
could not find it in his inbox and that I needed to locate and provide
him a pointer to it.  THAT my friends is not solicited feedback, that is
/dev/null of feedback and just plain out right unexcusable.

And note above all else the "product" of the FreeBSD project is NOT
releases, it IS the repository, and if we get sloppy with that product
it makes life harder for our consumers.  If you have ever tried to
find the history of a deleted object (which is what the process being
complained about here creaetes) it is a royal PITA.

Regards,
Rod

> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 8:50 AM Alexey Dokuchaev  wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 03:20:50PM +, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 09:11:36AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 03:11:40PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 07:47:51AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:56:55PM +, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > > > > > New Revision: 344648
> > > > > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/344648
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Log:
> > > > > > >   Rename seq to seqc to avoid namespace clashes with Linux
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ...
> > > > > > > Added:
> > > > > > >   head/sys/sys/seqc.h   (contents, props changed)
> > > > > > > Deleted:
> > > > > > >   head/sys/sys/seq.h
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why it was deleted and added as new file instead of being 
> > > > > > repocopied?
> > > > >
> > > > > Retransmit.
> > > >
> > > > Ping!
> > >
> > > Do you have nothing better to do?
> >
> > Oh, I have a lot on my plate, thanks for asking.  Now, back to the subject:
> >
> > - I think that this commit was executed badly (not via repocopy)
> > - I've been trying to contact mjg@ for several weeks, to no avail :(
> > - All I get in return is an email from a fellow committer asking me
> >   if I have anything better to do
> >
> > Sorry, I don't understand this.  I don't understand why we ignore email
> > from our own community.  I don't understand why we do not correct or at
> > least explain why what looks like a mistake is actually not(?).  I don't
> > understand why I'm being ridiculed, not those who make dubious commits
> > and fail to defend them.
> >
> > ./danfe
> > ___
> > svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> 
> 

-- 
Rod Grimes rgri...@freebsd.org
___
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: svn commit: r344648 - in head: . sys/kern sys/sys

[Kevin Bowling]

I know of several people that have blocked your mail.  Maybe a moment
for reflection on your attitude and approach if you want to be taken
seriously.

On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 8:50 AM Alexey Dokuchaev  wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 03:20:50PM +, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 09:11:36AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 03:11:40PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 07:47:51AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:56:55PM +, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > > > > New Revision: 344648
> > > > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/344648
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Log:
> > > > > >   Rename seq to seqc to avoid namespace clashes with Linux
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ...
> > > > > > Added:
> > > > > >   head/sys/sys/seqc.h   (contents, props changed)
> > > > > > Deleted:
> > > > > >   head/sys/sys/seq.h
> > > > >
> > > > > Why it was deleted and added as new file instead of being repocopied?
> > > >
> > > > Retransmit.
> > >
> > > Ping!
> >
> > Do you have nothing better to do?
>
> Oh, I have a lot on my plate, thanks for asking.  Now, back to the subject:
>
> - I think that this commit was executed badly (not via repocopy)
> - I've been trying to contact mjg@ for several weeks, to no avail :(
> - All I get in return is an email from a fellow committer asking me
>   if I have anything better to do
>
> Sorry, I don't understand this.  I don't understand why we ignore email
> from our own community.  I don't understand why we do not correct or at
> least explain why what looks like a mistake is actually not(?).  I don't
> understand why I'm being ridiculed, not those who make dubious commits
> and fail to defend them.
>
> ./danfe
> ___
> svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
___
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: svn commit: r344648 - in head: . sys/kern sys/sys

[Alexey Dokuchaev]

On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 03:20:50PM +, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 09:11:36AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 03:11:40PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 07:47:51AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:56:55PM +, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > > > New Revision: 344648
> > > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/344648
> > > > > 
> > > > > Log:
> > > > >   Rename seq to seqc to avoid namespace clashes with Linux
> > > > >   
> > > > > ...
> > > > > Added:
> > > > >   head/sys/sys/seqc.h   (contents, props changed)
> > > > > Deleted:
> > > > >   head/sys/sys/seq.h
> > > > 
> > > > Why it was deleted and added as new file instead of being repocopied?
> > > 
> > > Retransmit.
> > 
> > Ping!
> 
> Do you have nothing better to do?

Oh, I have a lot on my plate, thanks for asking.  Now, back to the subject:

- I think that this commit was executed badly (not via repocopy)
- I've been trying to contact mjg@ for several weeks, to no avail :(
- All I get in return is an email from a fellow committer asking me
  if I have anything better to do

Sorry, I don't understand this.  I don't understand why we ignore email
from our own community.  I don't understand why we do not correct or at
least explain why what looks like a mistake is actually not(?).  I don't
understand why I'm being ridiculed, not those who make dubious commits
and fail to defend them.

./danfe
___
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: svn commit: r344648 - in head: . sys/kern sys/sys

[Brooks Davis]

On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 09:11:36AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 03:11:40PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 07:47:51AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:56:55PM +, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > > New Revision: 344648
> > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/344648
> > > > 
> > > > Log:
> > > >   Rename seq to seqc to avoid namespace clashes with Linux
> > > >   
> > > > ...
> > > > Added:
> > > >   head/sys/sys/seqc.h   (contents, props changed)
> > > > Deleted:
> > > >   head/sys/sys/seq.h
> > > 
> > > Why it was deleted and added as new file instead of being repocopied?
> > 
> > Retransmit.
> 
> Ping!

Do you have nothing better to do?

-- Brooks


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: svn commit: r344648 - in head: . sys/kern sys/sys

[Alexey Dokuchaev]

On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 03:11:40PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 07:47:51AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:56:55PM +, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > New Revision: 344648
> > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/344648
> > > 
> > > Log:
> > >   Rename seq to seqc to avoid namespace clashes with Linux
> > >   
> > > ...
> > > Added:
> > >   head/sys/sys/seqc.h   (contents, props changed)
> > > Deleted:
> > >   head/sys/sys/seq.h
> > 
> > Why it was deleted and added as new file instead of being repocopied?
> 
> Retransmit.

Ping!

./danfe
___
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: svn commit: r344648 - in head: . sys/kern sys/sys

[Alexey Dokuchaev]

On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 03:11:40PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 07:47:51AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:56:55PM +, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > New Revision: 344648
> > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/344648
> > > 
> > > Log:
> > >   Rename seq to seqc to avoid namespace clashes with Linux
> > >   
> > > ...
> > > Added:
> > >   head/sys/sys/seqc.h   (contents, props changed)
> > > Deleted:
> > >   head/sys/sys/seq.h
> > 
> > Why it was deleted and added as new file instead of being repocopied?
> 
> Retransmit.

Retransmit.

./danfe
___
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: svn commit: r344648 - in head: . sys/kern sys/sys

[Alexey Dokuchaev]

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 07:47:51AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:56:55PM +, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > New Revision: 344648
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/344648
> > 
> > Log:
> >   Rename seq to seqc to avoid namespace clashes with Linux
> >   
> > ...
> > Added:
> >   head/sys/sys/seqc.h   (contents, props changed)
> > Deleted:
> >   head/sys/sys/seq.h
> 
> Why it was deleted and added as new file instead of being repocopied?

Retransmit.

./danfe
___
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: svn commit: r344648 - in head: . sys/kern sys/sys

[Alexey Dokuchaev]

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:56:55PM +, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> New Revision: 344648
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/344648
> 
> Log:
>   Rename seq to seqc to avoid namespace clashes with Linux
>   
> ...
> Added:
>   head/sys/sys/seqc.h   (contents, props changed)
> Deleted:
>   head/sys/sys/seq.h

Why it was deleted and added as new file instead of being repocopied?

./danfe
___
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"