Re: svn commit: r222084 - head/contrib/gperf/src
On Tue, 31 May 2011, Steve Kargl wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 03:28:45PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: On 18/05/2011 22:16, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 09:06:20PM +, Ben Laurie wrote: Author: benl Date: Wed May 18 21:06:20 2011 New Revision: 222084 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/222084 Log: Fix clang warnings. Approved by: philip (mentor) [...] -fprintf (stderr, by changing asso_value['%c'] (char #%d) to %d\n, +fprintf (stderr, by changing asso_value['%c'] (char #%zd) to %d\n, *p, p - union_set + 1, asso_values[(unsigned char)(*p)]); Hmm, both 'p' and 'union_set' are 'char *' and %zd is for ssize_t. It is a bit strange that it fixes the warning. Why? The difference between two pointers is ssize_t, surely? From n1256.pdf, When two pointers are subtracted, both shall point to elements of the same array object, or one past the last element of the array object; the result is the difference of the subscripts of the two array elements. The size of the result is implementation-defined, and its type (a signed integer type) is ptrdiff_t defined in the stddef.h header. ptrdiff_t is not necessarily that same as ssize_t. ssize_t doesn't even exist in Standard C. It is a POSIX thing, mainly for the (broken for historical reasons) return type of read(2) and similar functions. Bruce ___ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: svn commit: r222084 - head/contrib/gperf/src
On Wed, 18 May 2011 m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2011-05-18 23:16, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 09:06:20PM +, Ben Laurie wrote:
Author: benl
Date: Wed May 18 21:06:20 2011
New Revision: 222084
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/222084
Log:
? Fix clang warnings.
? Approved by: philip (mentor)
[...]
- ? ? ? ? ? ?fprintf (stderr, by changing asso_value['%c'] (char #%d)
to %d\n,
+ ? ? ? ? ? ?fprintf (stderr, by changing asso_value['%c'] (char #%zd)
to %d\n,
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? *p, p - union_set + 1, asso_values[(unsigned
char)(*p)]);
Hmm, both 'p' and 'union_set' are 'char *' and %zd is for ssize_t. It is
a bit strange that it fixes the warning.
If you subtract two pointers, such as in this case, you get a ptrdiff_t.
Strictly, this doesn't have to be exactly the same type as ssize_t, but
in practice it will almost always be.
You can also cast the result to intmax_t, and use %jd, then it will
always be correct, but possibly have some small overhead.
Or you can use %td which is the C99 conversion specifier for ptrdiff_t.
Of course this is the only correct fix.
All the changes are wrong IMO. Apart from being unmaintainable since they
are in dusty contrib code:
% Modified: head/contrib/gperf/src/gen-perf.cc
% ==
% --- head/contrib/gperf/src/gen-perf.ccWed May 18 21:04:29 2011
(r222083)
% +++ head/contrib/gperf/src/gen-perf.ccWed May 18 21:06:20 2011
(r222084)
% @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ Gen_Perf::change (List_Node *prior, List
%{
% if (option[DEBUG])
%{
% -fprintf (stderr, by changing asso_value['%c'] (char #%d) to
%d\n,
% +fprintf (stderr, by changing asso_value['%c'] (char #%zd) to
%d\n,
% *p, p - union_set + 1, asso_values[(unsigned
char)(*p)]);
% fflush (stderr);
%}
%
%td
% Modified: head/contrib/gperf/src/key-list.cc
% ==
% --- head/contrib/gperf/src/key-list.ccWed May 18 21:04:29 2011
(r222083)
% +++ head/contrib/gperf/src/key-list.ccWed May 18 21:06:20 2011
(r222084)
% @@ -497,8 +497,8 @@ Key_List::merge (List_Node *list1, List_
%*resultp = list1;
%break;
% }
% - if (occurrence_sort list1-occurrence list2-occurrence
% - || hash_sort list1-hash_value list2-hash_value)
% + if ((occurrence_sort list1-occurrence list2-occurrence)
% + || (hash_sort list1-hash_value list2-hash_value))
% {
%*resultp = list2;
%resultp = list2-next; list2 = list1; list1 = *resultp;
It is a compiler bug to warn about precedence when there is no problem
with precedence, as here for vs ||. clang recently became even
more broken than gcc for this -- it now warns even without -Wparentheses
(or -Wall, which implies -Wparentheses) in CFLAGS, so it issues broken
warning at very low WARNS levels (for WARNS=1, maybe even with no
WARNS).
% @@ -1035,17 +1035,16 @@ Key_List::output_hash_function (void)
%if (option[CPLUSPLUS])
% printf (%s::, option.get_class_name ());
%printf (%s , option.get_hash_name ());
% - printf (option[KRC] ?
% - (str, len)\n
% - register char *str;\n
% - register unsigned int len;\n :
% - option[C] ?
% - (str, len)\n
% - register const char *str;\n
% - register unsigned int len;\n :
% - option[ANSIC] | option[CPLUSPLUS] ?
% - (register const char *str, register unsigned int len)\n :
% - );
% + if (option[KRC] || option[C] || option [ANSIC] || option[CPLUSPLUS])
% +printf (option[KRC] ?
% + (str, len)\n
% + register char *str;\n
% + register unsigned int len;\n :
% + option[C] ?
% + (str, len)\n
% + register const char *str;\n
% + register unsigned int len;\n :
% + (register const char *str, register unsigned int len)\n);
%
%/* Note that when the hash function is called, it has already been verified
% that min_key_len = len = max_key_len. */
Far too invasive, and I can't even see a problem in the original. The
original has an empty format for the default case. This is perfectly valid,
an serves as documentation for the default case. The expression is a
computed switch statement. The change also obfuscates the pseudo-cases
option[ANSIC] and option[CPLUSPLUS] as the default pseudo-case (after
filtering out the actual default case before the pseudo-switch.
% @@ -1442,7 +1441,7 @@ Key_List::output_lookup_array (void)
%
%if (option[DEBUG])
% fprintf (stderr,
% -
svn commit: r222084 - head/contrib/gperf/src
Author: benl
Date: Wed May 18 21:06:20 2011
New Revision: 222084
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/222084
Log:
Fix clang warnings.
Approved by: philip (mentor)
Modified:
head/contrib/gperf/src/gen-perf.cc
head/contrib/gperf/src/key-list.cc
head/contrib/gperf/src/options.cc
Modified: head/contrib/gperf/src/gen-perf.cc
==
--- head/contrib/gperf/src/gen-perf.cc Wed May 18 21:04:29 2011
(r222083)
+++ head/contrib/gperf/src/gen-perf.cc Wed May 18 21:06:20 2011
(r222084)
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ Gen_Perf::change (List_Node *prior, List
{
if (option[DEBUG])
{
-fprintf (stderr, by changing asso_value['%c'] (char #%d) to
%d\n,
+fprintf (stderr, by changing asso_value['%c'] (char #%zd) to
%d\n,
*p, p - union_set + 1, asso_values[(unsigned char)(*p)]);
fflush (stderr);
}
Modified: head/contrib/gperf/src/key-list.cc
==
--- head/contrib/gperf/src/key-list.cc Wed May 18 21:04:29 2011
(r222083)
+++ head/contrib/gperf/src/key-list.cc Wed May 18 21:06:20 2011
(r222084)
@@ -497,8 +497,8 @@ Key_List::merge (List_Node *list1, List_
*resultp = list1;
break;
}
- if (occurrence_sort list1-occurrence list2-occurrence
- || hash_sort list1-hash_value list2-hash_value)
+ if ((occurrence_sort list1-occurrence list2-occurrence)
+ || (hash_sort list1-hash_value list2-hash_value))
{
*resultp = list2;
resultp = list2-next; list2 = list1; list1 = *resultp;
@@ -1035,17 +1035,16 @@ Key_List::output_hash_function (void)
if (option[CPLUSPLUS])
printf (%s::, option.get_class_name ());
printf (%s , option.get_hash_name ());
- printf (option[KRC] ?
- (str, len)\n
- register char *str;\n
- register unsigned int len;\n :
- option[C] ?
- (str, len)\n
- register const char *str;\n
- register unsigned int len;\n :
- option[ANSIC] | option[CPLUSPLUS] ?
- (register const char *str, register unsigned int len)\n :
- );
+ if (option[KRC] || option[C] || option [ANSIC] || option[CPLUSPLUS])
+printf (option[KRC] ?
+ (str, len)\n
+ register char *str;\n
+ register unsigned int len;\n :
+ option[C] ?
+ (str, len)\n
+ register const char *str;\n
+ register unsigned int len;\n :
+ (register const char *str, register unsigned int len)\n);
/* Note that when the hash function is called, it has already been verified
that min_key_len = len = max_key_len. */
@@ -1442,7 +1441,7 @@ Key_List::output_lookup_array (void)
if (option[DEBUG])
fprintf (stderr,
- dup_ptr[%d]: hash_value = %d, index = %d, count = %d\n,
+ dup_ptr[%zd]: hash_value = %d, index = %d, count = %d\n,
dup_ptr - duplicates,
dup_ptr-hash_value, dup_ptr-index, dup_ptr-count);
@@ -1986,17 +1985,16 @@ Key_List::output_lookup_function (void)
if (option[CPLUSPLUS])
printf (%s::, option.get_class_name ());
printf (%s , option.get_function_name ());
- printf (option[KRC] ?
- (str, len)\n
- register char *str;\n
- register unsigned int len;\n :
- option[C] ?
- (str, len)\n
- register const char *str;\n
- register unsigned int len;\n :
- option[ANSIC] | option[CPLUSPLUS] ?
- (register const char *str, register unsigned int len)\n :
- );
+ if (option[KRC] || option[C] || option[ANSIC] || option[CPLUSPLUS])
+printf (option[KRC] ?
+ (str, len)\n
+ register char *str;\n
+ register unsigned int len;\n :
+ option[C] ?
+ (str, len)\n
+ register const char *str;\n
+ register unsigned int len;\n :
+ (register const char *str, register unsigned int len)\n);
/* Output the function's body. */
printf ({\n);
Modified: head/contrib/gperf/src/options.cc
==
--- head/contrib/gperf/src/options.cc Wed May 18 21:04:29 2011
(r222083)
+++ head/contrib/gperf/src/options.cc Wed May 18 21:06:20 2011
(r222084)
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ Options::print_options (void)
{
putchar (*arg);
arg++;
- if (*arg = 'A' *arg = 'Z' || *arg = 'a' *arg = 'z')
+ if ((*arg = 'A' *arg = 'Z') || (*arg = 'a' *arg = 'z'))
{
Re: svn commit: r222084 - head/contrib/gperf/src
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 09:06:20PM +, Ben Laurie wrote: Author: benl Date: Wed May 18 21:06:20 2011 New Revision: 222084 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/222084 Log: Fix clang warnings. Approved by:philip (mentor) [...] -fprintf (stderr, by changing asso_value['%c'] (char #%d) to %d\n, +fprintf (stderr, by changing asso_value['%c'] (char #%zd) to %d\n, *p, p - union_set + 1, asso_values[(unsigned char)(*p)]); Hmm, both 'p' and 'union_set' are 'char *' and %zd is for ssize_t. It is a bit strange that it fixes the warning. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com FreeBSD committer http://www.FreeBSD.org Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! http://yomoli.com pgpXshleDDEUs.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: svn commit: r222084 - head/contrib/gperf/src
On 2011-05-18 23:16, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 09:06:20PM +, Ben Laurie wrote: Author: benl Date: Wed May 18 21:06:20 2011 New Revision: 222084 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/222084 Log: Fix clang warnings. Approved by: philip (mentor) [...] -fprintf (stderr, by changing asso_value['%c'] (char #%d) to %d\n, +fprintf (stderr, by changing asso_value['%c'] (char #%zd) to %d\n, *p, p - union_set + 1, asso_values[(unsigned char)(*p)]); Hmm, both 'p' and 'union_set' are 'char *' and %zd is for ssize_t. It is a bit strange that it fixes the warning. If you subtract two pointers, such as in this case, you get a ptrdiff_t. Strictly, this doesn't have to be exactly the same type as ssize_t, but in practice it will almost always be. You can also cast the result to intmax_t, and use %jd, then it will always be correct, but possibly have some small overhead. ___ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: svn commit: r222084 - head/contrib/gperf/src
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2011-05-18 23:16, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 09:06:20PM +, Ben Laurie wrote: Author: benl Date: Wed May 18 21:06:20 2011 New Revision: 222084 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/222084 Log: Fix clang warnings. Approved by: philip (mentor) [...] - fprintf (stderr, by changing asso_value['%c'] (char #%d) to %d\n, + fprintf (stderr, by changing asso_value['%c'] (char #%zd) to %d\n, *p, p - union_set + 1, asso_values[(unsigned char)(*p)]); Hmm, both 'p' and 'union_set' are 'char *' and %zd is for ssize_t. It is a bit strange that it fixes the warning. If you subtract two pointers, such as in this case, you get a ptrdiff_t. Strictly, this doesn't have to be exactly the same type as ssize_t, but in practice it will almost always be. You can also cast the result to intmax_t, and use %jd, then it will always be correct, but possibly have some small overhead. Or you can use %td which is the C99 conversion specifier for ptrdiff_t. Thanks, matthew ___ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
