Re: Is there a Java library for request/response validation that is framework agnostic?

[Tom Akehurst]

Hey James,

I'm trying to raise a PR (from 
https://bitbucket.org/tom_akehurst/swagger-request-validator) to add the 
missing parameter constraints, but I'm getting 500s from Bitbucket. Any 
idea what's happening?

Cheers,
Tom

On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 8:34:39 AM UTC+1, Tom Akehurst wrote:
>
> Duh! Yeah, it would help if I looked in the right group!
>
> Will take a look at the CLA, but I wouldn't have thought it'd be a problem.
>
> Cheers,
> Tom
>
> On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 11:52:08 PM UTC+1, James Navin wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tom - glad to hear it might be useful to you.
>>
>> I've noticed that only the POMs are published on Maven central, not the 
>>> full artifacts. Is this deliberate?
>>
>>
>> The full artifacts are there - they're just under the sub-modules (e.g. 
>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/atlassian/oai/swagger-request-validator-core/1.0.4/).
>>  
>> I'll update the README so its a bit easier to find.
>>
>>  I also noticed there's some work left to do validating specific string 
>>> formats. Would you be happy to accept a PR or two to add these?
>>
>>  
>> Please do - I would be more than happy to accept PRs (string format 
>> validation has been on my TODO list for a while). The only requirement is 
>> you'll need to sign a CLA (company policy) - details are in the project 
>> README. If that's not an option for you raise a ticket in the issue tracker 
>> and I'll try to find the time this week to look at it.
>>
>> Finally, any objection to me bumping up to the latest WireMock version 
>>> while I'm at it?
>>
>>
>> None at all.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> James 
>>
>> On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 11:47:56 PM UTC+10, Tom Akehurst wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks, this is exactly the kind of thing I'm looking for. Wish I'd 
>>> found this a week ago, as I've nearly finished writing my own impl :-(
>>>
>>> I've noticed that only the POMs are published on Maven central, not the 
>>> full artifacts. Is this deliberate?
>>>
>>> I also noticed there's some work left to do validating specific string 
>>> formats. Would you be happy to accept a PR or two to add these?
>>>
>>> Finally, any objection to me bumping up to the latest WireMock version 
>>> while I'm at it?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Tom
>>>
>>> On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 1:03:57 AM UTC+1, James Navin wrote:

 I faced a similar situation and ended up writing my own. Its open 
 source and available at 
 https://bitbucket.org/atlassian/swagger-request-validator

 Its framework agnostic and has adapters for WireMock (as well as Rest 
 Assured and Pact).

 Feel free to raise any issues you find on the issue tracker attached to 
 the repo.

 On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 9:08:10 PM UTC+10, Tom Akehurst wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I'm trying to find a good way to implement the following use case:
> I'm building a WireMock-based mock of a 3rd party API my project 
> depends on. I'd like to be able to write a suite of tests that can be run 
> against either the real API or the mock, where each HTTP request/response 
> is captured and validated against a Swagger spec.
>
> I realise swagger-inflector is capable of validating exchanges, but it 
> appears to be tied to a specific server-side stack (please correct me if 
> I'm wrong!). I'd like a library with a similar architecture to this one 
> for 
> RAML, which works against its own HTTP model and has adapters for various 
> HTTP clients: https://github.com/nidi3/raml-tester. That way I can 
> run it client or server, pick my own client and adapt it to WireMock's 
> request log API.
>
> If such a library exists, please can somebody point me to it?
>
> If it doesn't there's a good chance I'll end up writing it, so my next 
> question (for core community members) is: Would this would be of interest 
> for community adoption?
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Swagger" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to swagger-swaggersocket+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Is there a Java library for request/response validation that is framework agnostic?

[Tom Akehurst]

Duh! Yeah, it would help if I looked in the right group!

Will take a look at the CLA, but I wouldn't have thought it'd be a problem.

Cheers,
Tom

On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 11:52:08 PM UTC+1, James Navin wrote:
>
> Hi Tom - glad to hear it might be useful to you.
>
> I've noticed that only the POMs are published on Maven central, not the 
>> full artifacts. Is this deliberate?
>
>
> The full artifacts are there - they're just under the sub-modules (e.g. 
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/atlassian/oai/swagger-request-validator-core/1.0.4/).
>  
> I'll update the README so its a bit easier to find.
>
>  I also noticed there's some work left to do validating specific string 
>> formats. Would you be happy to accept a PR or two to add these?
>
>  
> Please do - I would be more than happy to accept PRs (string format 
> validation has been on my TODO list for a while). The only requirement is 
> you'll need to sign a CLA (company policy) - details are in the project 
> README. If that's not an option for you raise a ticket in the issue tracker 
> and I'll try to find the time this week to look at it.
>
> Finally, any objection to me bumping up to the latest WireMock version 
>> while I'm at it?
>
>
> None at all.
>
> Cheers,
>
> James 
>
> On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 11:47:56 PM UTC+10, Tom Akehurst wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, this is exactly the kind of thing I'm looking for. Wish I'd found 
>> this a week ago, as I've nearly finished writing my own impl :-(
>>
>> I've noticed that only the POMs are published on Maven central, not the 
>> full artifacts. Is this deliberate?
>>
>> I also noticed there's some work left to do validating specific string 
>> formats. Would you be happy to accept a PR or two to add these?
>>
>> Finally, any objection to me bumping up to the latest WireMock version 
>> while I'm at it?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Tom
>>
>> On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 1:03:57 AM UTC+1, James Navin wrote:
>>>
>>> I faced a similar situation and ended up writing my own. Its open source 
>>> and available at 
>>> https://bitbucket.org/atlassian/swagger-request-validator
>>>
>>> Its framework agnostic and has adapters for WireMock (as well as Rest 
>>> Assured and Pact).
>>>
>>> Feel free to raise any issues you find on the issue tracker attached to 
>>> the repo.
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 9:08:10 PM UTC+10, Tom Akehurst wrote:

 Hello!

 I'm trying to find a good way to implement the following use case:
 I'm building a WireMock-based mock of a 3rd party API my project 
 depends on. I'd like to be able to write a suite of tests that can be run 
 against either the real API or the mock, where each HTTP request/response 
 is captured and validated against a Swagger spec.

 I realise swagger-inflector is capable of validating exchanges, but it 
 appears to be tied to a specific server-side stack (please correct me if 
 I'm wrong!). I'd like a library with a similar architecture to this one 
 for 
 RAML, which works against its own HTTP model and has adapters for various 
 HTTP clients: https://github.com/nidi3/raml-tester. That way I can run 
 it client or server, pick my own client and adapt it to WireMock's request 
 log API.

 If such a library exists, please can somebody point me to it?

 If it doesn't there's a good chance I'll end up writing it, so my next 
 question (for core community members) is: Would this would be of interest 
 for community adoption?

 Thanks,
 Tom

>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Swagger" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to swagger-swaggersocket+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Is there a Java library for request/response validation that is framework agnostic?

[James Navin]

Hi Tom - glad to hear it might be useful to you.

I've noticed that only the POMs are published on Maven central, not the 
> full artifacts. Is this deliberate?


The full artifacts are there - they're just under the sub-modules (e.g. 
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/atlassian/oai/swagger-request-validator-core/1.0.4/).
 
I'll update the README so its a bit easier to find.

 I also noticed there's some work left to do validating specific string 
> formats. Would you be happy to accept a PR or two to add these?

 
Please do - I would be more than happy to accept PRs (string format 
validation has been on my TODO list for a while). The only requirement is 
you'll need to sign a CLA (company policy) - details are in the project 
README. If that's not an option for you raise a ticket in the issue tracker 
and I'll try to find the time this week to look at it.

Finally, any objection to me bumping up to the latest WireMock version 
> while I'm at it?


None at all.

Cheers,

James 

On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 11:47:56 PM UTC+10, Tom Akehurst wrote:
>
> Thanks, this is exactly the kind of thing I'm looking for. Wish I'd found 
> this a week ago, as I've nearly finished writing my own impl :-(
>
> I've noticed that only the POMs are published on Maven central, not the 
> full artifacts. Is this deliberate?
>
> I also noticed there's some work left to do validating specific string 
> formats. Would you be happy to accept a PR or two to add these?
>
> Finally, any objection to me bumping up to the latest WireMock version 
> while I'm at it?
>
> Cheers,
> Tom
>
> On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 1:03:57 AM UTC+1, James Navin wrote:
>>
>> I faced a similar situation and ended up writing my own. Its open source 
>> and available at 
>> https://bitbucket.org/atlassian/swagger-request-validator
>>
>> Its framework agnostic and has adapters for WireMock (as well as Rest 
>> Assured and Pact).
>>
>> Feel free to raise any issues you find on the issue tracker attached to 
>> the repo.
>>
>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 9:08:10 PM UTC+10, Tom Akehurst wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> I'm trying to find a good way to implement the following use case:
>>> I'm building a WireMock-based mock of a 3rd party API my project depends 
>>> on. I'd like to be able to write a suite of tests that can be run against 
>>> either the real API or the mock, where each HTTP request/response is 
>>> captured and validated against a Swagger spec.
>>>
>>> I realise swagger-inflector is capable of validating exchanges, but it 
>>> appears to be tied to a specific server-side stack (please correct me if 
>>> I'm wrong!). I'd like a library with a similar architecture to this one for 
>>> RAML, which works against its own HTTP model and has adapters for various 
>>> HTTP clients: https://github.com/nidi3/raml-tester. That way I can run 
>>> it client or server, pick my own client and adapt it to WireMock's request 
>>> log API.
>>>
>>> If such a library exists, please can somebody point me to it?
>>>
>>> If it doesn't there's a good chance I'll end up writing it, so my next 
>>> question (for core community members) is: Would this would be of interest 
>>> for community adoption?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Tom
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Swagger" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to swagger-swaggersocket+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Is there a Java library for request/response validation that is framework agnostic?

[Tom Akehurst]

Thanks, this is exactly the kind of thing I'm looking for. Wish I'd found 
this a week ago, as I've nearly finished writing my own impl :-(

I've noticed that only the POMs are published on Maven central, not the 
full artifacts. Is this deliberate?

I also noticed there's some work left to do validating specific string 
formats. Would you be happy to accept a PR or two to add these?

Finally, any objection to me bumping up to the latest WireMock version 
while I'm at it?

Cheers,
Tom

On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 1:03:57 AM UTC+1, James Navin wrote:
>
> I faced a similar situation and ended up writing my own. Its open source 
> and available at https://bitbucket.org/atlassian/swagger-request-validator
>
> Its framework agnostic and has adapters for WireMock (as well as Rest 
> Assured and Pact).
>
> Feel free to raise any issues you find on the issue tracker attached to 
> the repo.
>
> On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 9:08:10 PM UTC+10, Tom Akehurst wrote:
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I'm trying to find a good way to implement the following use case:
>> I'm building a WireMock-based mock of a 3rd party API my project depends 
>> on. I'd like to be able to write a suite of tests that can be run against 
>> either the real API or the mock, where each HTTP request/response is 
>> captured and validated against a Swagger spec.
>>
>> I realise swagger-inflector is capable of validating exchanges, but it 
>> appears to be tied to a specific server-side stack (please correct me if 
>> I'm wrong!). I'd like a library with a similar architecture to this one for 
>> RAML, which works against its own HTTP model and has adapters for various 
>> HTTP clients: https://github.com/nidi3/raml-tester. That way I can run 
>> it client or server, pick my own client and adapt it to WireMock's request 
>> log API.
>>
>> If such a library exists, please can somebody point me to it?
>>
>> If it doesn't there's a good chance I'll end up writing it, so my next 
>> question (for core community members) is: Would this would be of interest 
>> for community adoption?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tom
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Swagger" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to swagger-swaggersocket+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Is there a Java library for request/response validation that is framework agnostic?

[James Navin]

I faced a similar situation and ended up writing my own. Its open source 
and available at https://bitbucket.org/atlassian/swagger-request-validator

Its framework agnostic and has adapters for WireMock (as well as Rest 
Assured and Pact).

Feel free to raise any issues you find on the issue tracker attached to the 
repo.

On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 9:08:10 PM UTC+10, Tom Akehurst wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I'm trying to find a good way to implement the following use case:
> I'm building a WireMock-based mock of a 3rd party API my project depends 
> on. I'd like to be able to write a suite of tests that can be run against 
> either the real API or the mock, where each HTTP request/response is 
> captured and validated against a Swagger spec.
>
> I realise swagger-inflector is capable of validating exchanges, but it 
> appears to be tied to a specific server-side stack (please correct me if 
> I'm wrong!). I'd like a library with a similar architecture to this one for 
> RAML, which works against its own HTTP model and has adapters for various 
> HTTP clients: https://github.com/nidi3/raml-tester. That way I can run it 
> client or server, pick my own client and adapt it to WireMock's request log 
> API.
>
> If such a library exists, please can somebody point me to it?
>
> If it doesn't there's a good chance I'll end up writing it, so my next 
> question (for core community members) is: Would this would be of interest 
> for community adoption?
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Swagger" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to swagger-swaggersocket+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Is there a Java library for request/response validation that is framework agnostic?

[Tom Akehurst]

Thanks, that's very useful.

I'm working on writing a validator now. Hopefully I should be able to open 
source it in the next few days.

On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 5:23:50 PM UTC+1, tony tam wrote:
>
> Yes, there is a JSON schema to describe the swagger specification, and 
> also the definitions are a *subset* of JSON schema.  Please take a look 
> here for all the gory details:
>
> https://github.com/OAI/OpenAPI-Specification/blob/master/versions/2.0.md
>
> On Sep 20, 2016, at 8:54 AM, Tom Akehurst > 
> wrote:
>
> Haha, showing my ignorance here. Hadn't realised that the definitions part 
> of a Swagger doc was actually JSON schema.
>
> On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 4:49:37 PM UTC+1, tony tam wrote:
>>
>> What do you mean?
>>
>> On Sep 20, 2016, at 8:48 AM, Tom Akehurst  wrote:
>>
>> Is there a way to adapt a Swagger spec to JSON schema?
>>
>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 3:38:03 PM UTC+1, Max Goldstein wrote:
>>>
>>> Not only is the inflector tied to a specific stack, it seems to not be 
>>> feature-complete. My best idea is to validate incoming requests (and 
>>> outgoing responses) using this json schema validator 
>>> , adding a custom 
>>> pass to check for the discriminator, readOnly, and other properties that 
>>> get added if you use them. That's what I'm planning to do for my project 
>>> anyway, I haven't actually tried it, so take this with a grain of salt.
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Swagger" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to swagger-swaggersocket+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Swagger" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to swagger-swaggersocket+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Swagger" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to swagger-swaggersocket+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Is there a Java library for request/response validation that is framework agnostic?

[tony tam]

Yes, there is a JSON schema to describe the swagger specification, and also the 
definitions are a subset of JSON schema.  Please take a look here for all the 
gory details:

https://github.com/OAI/OpenAPI-Specification/blob/master/versions/2.0.md 


> On Sep 20, 2016, at 8:54 AM, Tom Akehurst  wrote:
> 
> Haha, showing my ignorance here. Hadn't realised that the definitions part of 
> a Swagger doc was actually JSON schema.
> 
> On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 4:49:37 PM UTC+1, tony tam wrote:
> What do you mean?
> 
>> On Sep 20, 2016, at 8:48 AM, Tom Akehurst > 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Is there a way to adapt a Swagger spec to JSON schema?
>> 
>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 3:38:03 PM UTC+1, Max Goldstein wrote:
>> Not only is the inflector tied to a specific stack, it seems to not be 
>> feature-complete. My best idea is to validate incoming requests (and 
>> outgoing responses) using this json schema validator 
>> , adding a custom pass 
>> to check for the discriminator, readOnly, and other properties that get 
>> added if you use them. That's what I'm planning to do for my project anyway, 
>> I haven't actually tried it, so take this with a grain of salt.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Swagger" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to swagger-swaggersocket+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>> .
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Swagger" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to swagger-swaggersocket+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Swagger" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to swagger-swaggersocket+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Is there a Java library for request/response validation that is framework agnostic?

[Tom Akehurst]

Haha, showing my ignorance here. Hadn't realised that the definitions part 
of a Swagger doc was actually JSON schema.

On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 4:49:37 PM UTC+1, tony tam wrote:
>
> What do you mean?
>
> On Sep 20, 2016, at 8:48 AM, Tom Akehurst > 
> wrote:
>
> Is there a way to adapt a Swagger spec to JSON schema?
>
> On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 3:38:03 PM UTC+1, Max Goldstein wrote:
>>
>> Not only is the inflector tied to a specific stack, it seems to not be 
>> feature-complete. My best idea is to validate incoming requests (and 
>> outgoing responses) using this json schema validator 
>> , adding a custom 
>> pass to check for the discriminator, readOnly, and other properties that 
>> get added if you use them. That's what I'm planning to do for my project 
>> anyway, I haven't actually tried it, so take this with a grain of salt.
>>
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Swagger" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to swagger-swaggersocket+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Swagger" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to swagger-swaggersocket+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Is there a Java library for request/response validation that is framework agnostic?

[Tom Akehurst]

Is there a way to adapt a Swagger spec to JSON schema?

On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 3:38:03 PM UTC+1, Max Goldstein wrote:
>
> Not only is the inflector tied to a specific stack, it seems to not be 
> feature-complete. My best idea is to validate incoming requests (and 
> outgoing responses) using this json schema validator 
> , adding a custom 
> pass to check for the discriminator, readOnly, and other properties that 
> get added if you use them. That's what I'm planning to do for my project 
> anyway, I haven't actually tried it, so take this with a grain of salt.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Swagger" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to swagger-swaggersocket+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Is there a Java library for request/response validation that is framework agnostic?

[tony tam]

What do you mean?

> On Sep 20, 2016, at 8:48 AM, Tom Akehurst  wrote:
> 
> Is there a way to adapt a Swagger spec to JSON schema?
> 
> On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 3:38:03 PM UTC+1, Max Goldstein wrote:
> Not only is the inflector tied to a specific stack, it seems to not be 
> feature-complete. My best idea is to validate incoming requests (and outgoing 
> responses) using this json schema validator 
> , adding a custom pass 
> to check for the discriminator, readOnly, and other properties that get added 
> if you use them. That's what I'm planning to do for my project anyway, I 
> haven't actually tried it, so take this with a grain of salt.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Swagger" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to swagger-swaggersocket+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Swagger" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to swagger-swaggersocket+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Is there a Java library for request/response validation that is framework agnostic?

[Max Goldstein]

Not only is the inflector tied to a specific stack, it seems to not be 
feature-complete. My best idea is to validate incoming requests (and 
outgoing responses) using this json schema validator 
, adding a custom 
pass to check for the discriminator, readOnly, and other properties that 
get added if you use them. That's what I'm planning to do for my project 
anyway, I haven't actually tried it, so take this with a grain of salt.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Swagger" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to swagger-swaggersocket+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Is there a Java library for request/response validation that is framework agnostic?

[Tom Akehurst]

Hello!

I'm trying to find a good way to implement the following use case:
I'm building a WireMock-based mock of a 3rd party API my project depends 
on. I'd like to be able to write a suite of tests that can be run against 
either the real API or the mock, where each HTTP request/response is 
captured and validated against a Swagger spec.

I realise swagger-inflector is capable of validating exchanges, but it 
appears to be tied to a specific server-side stack (please correct me if 
I'm wrong!). I'd like a library with a similar architecture to this one for 
RAML, which works against its own HTTP model and has adapters for various 
HTTP clients: https://github.com/nidi3/raml-tester. That way I can run it 
client or server, pick my own client and adapt it to WireMock's request log 
API.

If such a library exists, please can somebody point me to it?

If it doesn't there's a good chance I'll end up writing it, so my next 
question (for core community members) is: Would this would be of interest 
for community adoption?

Thanks,
Tom

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Swagger" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to swagger-swaggersocket+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.