Re: Vote (Was: Re: [SWCollect] MobyScale, version 0.2)

2000-09-12 Thread Jim Leonard

"Lee K. Seitz" wrote:
> 
> Jim Leonard boldly stated:
> >
> >:)  I'm trying to stay away from the term "Mint" since it's so
> >overused/misused.  Let's take a vote:  Who here would like to see
> >"Factory-Sealed" on the scale be renamed to "Mint Sealed"?  A yay or nay from
> >everyone will be enough.
> 
> Yay.

It's decided then:  Sealed will be an additional modifier to a grade, and not a
grade itself.  I'll make this (fairly significant) change to the scale tonight
and send it out.
-- 
http://www.MobyGames.com/
The world's most comprehensive historical PC gaming database project.



--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: Vote (Was: Re: [SWCollect] MobyScale, version 0.2)

2000-08-30 Thread Lee K. Seitz

Jim Leonard boldly stated:
>
>:)  I'm trying to stay away from the term "Mint" since it's so
>overused/misused.  Let's take a vote:  Who here would like to see
>"Factory-Sealed" on the scale be renamed to "Mint Sealed"?  A yay or nay from
>everyone will be enough.

Yay.

-- 
Lee K. Seitz  *  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  *  http://home.hiwaay.net/~lkseitz/
Wanted: |   Visit the Classic Video Games Nexus
 Vintage Pac-M*n necktie| for all your classic link & news needs!
 Lib*rator T-shirt  |http://start.at/cvgnexus

--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: Vote (Was: Re: [SWCollect] MobyScale, version 0.2)

2000-08-30 Thread C.E. Forman

I second Hugh's opinion.

- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 10:22 PM
Subject: RE: Vote (Was: Re: [SWCollect] MobyScale, version 0.2)


> Yay.
>
> Mint Sealed should be as close to perfect as possible.  Anything less
(crushing, etc.) should be dropped to a lower level...even if sealed (i.e.
Fine Sealed).
>
> Sealed can be added to any grade: VG Sealed, G Sealed, etc.  Since Sealed
is really just additional information and not a grade on its own.
>
> Another note is that Mint should never be used on its own (without Sealed)
since a game by definition is not Mint unless it is still sealed.  The best
grade for an opened package should be NM.
>
> Hugh
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Leonard [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 11:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Vote (Was: Re: [SWCollect] MobyScale, version 0.2)
>
> "C.E. Forman" wrote:
> >
> > > Now that I think about it, if I were doing such a scale (and I've been
> > > thinking about formalizing my personal scale for video game cartridges
> > > for a long time), I would not make "factory sealed" a condition, but
> > > rather something that should be noted separately.  (Partially as an
> > > explanation for why the contents weren't graded.)
> >
> > Hmm, would "Mint Sealed" be a better term?  That would clarify that
> > it's shrinkwrapped *and* mint (as opposed to "shrinkwrapped but my
> > big fat uncle accidentally sat on it" B-).
>
> :)  I'm trying to stay away from the term "Mint" since it's so
> overused/misused.  Let's take a vote:  Who here would like to see
> "Factory-Sealed" on the scale be renamed to "Mint Sealed"?  A yay or nay
from
> everyone will be enough.
> --
> http://www.MobyGames.com/
> The world's most comprehensive historical PC gaming database project.
>
>
>
> --
> This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
> the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
> Archives are available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/
>
> --
> This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
> the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
> Archives are available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/
>
>


--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: Vote (Was: Re: [SWCollect] MobyScale, version 0.2)

2000-08-30 Thread Chris Newman

Yea -- a sealed item can be both mint or utterly destroyed. "Mint sealed" adds a
level of refinement to the grade.

Chris

Jim Leonard wrote:

> "C.E. Forman" wrote:
> >
> > > Now that I think about it, if I were doing such a scale (and I've been
> > > thinking about formalizing my personal scale for video game cartridges
> > > for a long time), I would not make "factory sealed" a condition, but
> > > rather something that should be noted separately.  (Partially as an
> > > explanation for why the contents weren't graded.)
> >
> > Hmm, would "Mint Sealed" be a better term?  That would clarify that
> > it's shrinkwrapped *and* mint (as opposed to "shrinkwrapped but my
> > big fat uncle accidentally sat on it" B-).
>
> :)  I'm trying to stay away from the term "Mint" since it's so
> overused/misused.  Let's take a vote:  Who here would like to see
> "Factory-Sealed" on the scale be renamed to "Mint Sealed"?  A yay or nay from
> everyone will be enough.
> --
> http://www.MobyGames.com/
> The world's most comprehensive historical PC gaming database project.
>
> --
> This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
> the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
> Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/


--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




RE: Vote (Was: Re: [SWCollect] MobyScale, version 0.2)

2000-08-29 Thread hughfalk

Yay.

Mint Sealed should be as close to perfect as possible.  Anything less (crushing, etc.) 
should be dropped to a lower level...even if sealed (i.e. Fine Sealed).  

Sealed can be added to any grade: VG Sealed, G Sealed, etc.  Since Sealed is really 
just additional information and not a grade on its own.  

Another note is that Mint should never be used on its own (without Sealed) since a 
game by definition is not Mint unless it is still sealed.  The best grade for an 
opened package should be NM. 

Hugh

-Original Message-
From:   Jim Leonard [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Tuesday, August 29, 2000 11:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Vote (Was: Re: [SWCollect] MobyScale, version 0.2)

"C.E. Forman" wrote:
> 
> > Now that I think about it, if I were doing such a scale (and I've been
> > thinking about formalizing my personal scale for video game cartridges
> > for a long time), I would not make "factory sealed" a condition, but
> > rather something that should be noted separately.  (Partially as an
> > explanation for why the contents weren't graded.)
> 
> Hmm, would "Mint Sealed" be a better term?  That would clarify that
> it's shrinkwrapped *and* mint (as opposed to "shrinkwrapped but my
> big fat uncle accidentally sat on it" B-).

:)  I'm trying to stay away from the term "Mint" since it's so
overused/misused.  Let's take a vote:  Who here would like to see
"Factory-Sealed" on the scale be renamed to "Mint Sealed"?  A yay or nay from
everyone will be enough.
-- 
http://www.MobyGames.com/
The world's most comprehensive historical PC gaming database project.



--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/

--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Vote (Was: Re: [SWCollect] MobyScale, version 0.2)

2000-08-29 Thread Jim Leonard

"C.E. Forman" wrote:
> 
> > Now that I think about it, if I were doing such a scale (and I've been
> > thinking about formalizing my personal scale for video game cartridges
> > for a long time), I would not make "factory sealed" a condition, but
> > rather something that should be noted separately.  (Partially as an
> > explanation for why the contents weren't graded.)
> 
> Hmm, would "Mint Sealed" be a better term?  That would clarify that
> it's shrinkwrapped *and* mint (as opposed to "shrinkwrapped but my
> big fat uncle accidentally sat on it" B-).

:)  I'm trying to stay away from the term "Mint" since it's so
overused/misused.  Let's take a vote:  Who here would like to see
"Factory-Sealed" on the scale be renamed to "Mint Sealed"?  A yay or nay from
everyone will be enough.
-- 
http://www.MobyGames.com/
The world's most comprehensive historical PC gaming database project.



--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/