Re: [swfmill] pixel fonts wrong rendering
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (on Wed, 20 Sep 2006 02:21:25 -0700): > I'm having the same issue someone faced in the past, I found the threads > googling. Basically, with swfmill, pixel fonts seem to be wrongly rendered (they > go offset orizzontaly) getting blurred. Based on the threads it seems no one > sorted this issue so far. And, considering that the last version of the software > is dated 2005, I'm a bit worried there isn't a solution yet. > > Can anyone bring me some optimism with good news? :) hey chr, seeing that you worked around the problem already you're probably fine. i would nevertheless like to ask you if you used the latest prerelease (0.2.11.18) to do the import, or a plain 0.2.11. i am not quite sure, but something might have changed. if the problem persists, could you send me the font in question so i can try to fix? i really want pixelfonts to render nicely (there is a "problem" with swfmill and "non-antialiased" mode which wont be fixed, but proper pixelfonts should render fine. i had the problem you described with a font of a friend of mine, but i cannot remember if i fixed swfmill or he fixed the font :) -dan -- http://0xDF.com/ http://iterative.org/ ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
Re: [swfmill] Inkscape SVG
"Gerrit Karius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (on Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:24:07 +): > my compromise for the xslt is now that it checks > whether an original node actually has a transform or is simply placed at the > origin. if it's placed at the origin, the wrapper can safely be omitted. > that way, everyone should be happy. :) hey gerrit, and thanks for the update. it'll linger around until i find the time to apply it. regarding the problem though, do you agree that the proper way to fix it would be to apply the transformation to all of the contained elements (say, s and s? It might be a bit of an effort in xslt, but maybe with the help of another xpath function...? -dan -- http://0xDF.com/ http://iterative.org/ ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
Re: [swfmill] 0.2.11-18 meta not work
"Romain Ecarnot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (on Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:29:46 +0200): > I open result in ActionScriptViewer and..SWF meta is incorrect, this is > the error message : Hey Romain, your problem, AFAICS, lies with as2ant. swfml-s syntax within ant files has to be understood by as2ant and converted to a standalone file for swfmill to process, and obviously, as2ant doesnt understand the new tags (yet). As a workaround, use a standalone xml file for swfmill. @Steve, i've closed bug submission for the time being in fear of trac-spam. bug reports have to be sent to me, i'll add them there. if circumstances require, i could appoint a "bug manager" to do that :) -dan -- http://0xDF.com/ http://iterative.org/ ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
Re: [swfmill] Bug with various letter spacings in static textfield.
Quentin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (on Fri, 8 Sep 2006 17:25:32 +0200): > And I've noticed it's the same with various fonts... > Hope someone will find the bug, and smash it! Quentin, i've added a bug in the tracker ( http://www.swfmill.org/trac/ticket/11 ) until i get around to investigate. -dan -- http://0xDF.com/ http://iterative.org/ ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
Re: [swfmill] Bug with various letter spacings in static textfield.
Thanks!Have a nice day...On 9/27/06, daniel fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Quentin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (on Fri, 8 Sep 2006 17:25:32 +0200): > And I've noticed it's the same with various fonts... > Hope someone will find the bug, and smash it! Quentin,i've added a bug in the tracker ( http://www.swfmill.org/trac/ticket/11 ) until i get around to investigate.-dan-- http://0xDF.com/http://iterative.org/___swfmill mailing listswfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
Re: [swfmill] 0.2.11-18 meta not work
I'll do the test asap; thanks very much for standalone xml file solution... ;)Cheers,Romain. ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
Re: [swfmill] 0.2.11-18 meta not work
> your problem, AFAICS, lies with as2ant. swfml-s syntax within ant > files has to be understood by as2ant and converted to a standalone > file for swfmill to process, and obviously, as2ant doesnt understand > the new tags (yet). As a workaround, use a standalone xml file for > swfmill. No, Dan. Romain has contacted me and I've tested directly from the bin, with bash… unfortunatly, the bug is there. This is not a matter of as2ant. I'll look in your ticket to precise it. Sorry for the inconvenience ;) --- Eric Priou (aka erixtekila) In progress tech blog : http://blog.v-i-a.net/ Oregano XML Socket forum : http://forum.v-i-a.net/ ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
Re: [swfmill] 0.2.11-18 meta not work
Eric Priou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (on Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:30:10 +0200): > Romain has contacted me and I've tested directly from the bin, with > bash… unfortunatly, the bug is there. > This is not a matter of as2ant. oi, sorry then. i see the CDATA takes care of as2ant not handling everything i (or steve) happen to add to swfml. it's a real bug then, affirmed. the rdf namespace is not properly included in the text written to the swf. i'll look into it when time (namespace handling is a bit messed up since we did the meta stuff). as for the FileAttributes problem- reviewing the simple xslt, it should be set automatically if version>=8, hasMetaData will be 1 (true) as soon as the contains a element, and useNetwork can be set with or respectively. -dan -- http://0xDF.com/ http://iterative.org/ ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
[swfmill] prerelease 0.2.11.19 'meta-informations' (was: Re: 0.2.11-18 meta not work)
hey, i've managed to properly preserve namespaces in the metadata output, and correctly transform the title and description. also, you can define additional contents in the meta tag a la: blah disclaimer: for this example, you have to correctly define the dc: namespace ( a la xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"; in some parent element), and dc:something is not a dublin-core-approved metadata name. also, the plural of information is information :) the fix is available in 0.2.11.19 on http://swfmill.org/pre/ . There's no mac version (yet), as my compile server is down (again). i need a better place to compile for OSX. -dan -- http://0xDF.com/ http://iterative.org/ ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
Re: [swfmill] prerelease 0.2.11.19 'meta-informations' (was: Re: 0.2.11-18 meta not work)
> i've managed to properly preserve namespaces in the metadata output, and > correctly transform the title and description. Nice one Dan. Except that the meta information should be elements and not attributes, since the description can be multi-line. myTitle Informations ...which would be why the information wasn't coming through. Steve -- Steve Webster http://dynamicflash.com ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
