Re: [swfmill] pixel fonts wrong rendering

2006-09-27 Thread daniel fischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (on Wed, 20 Sep 2006 02:21:25 -0700):

   I'm having the same issue someone faced in the past, I found the threads
   googling. Basically, with swfmill, pixel fonts seem to be wrongly rendered 
(they
   go offset orizzontaly) getting blurred. Based on the threads it seems no one
   sorted this issue so far. And, considering that the last version of the 
software
   is dated 2005, I'm a bit worried there isn't a solution yet.
   
   Can anyone bring me some optimism with good news? :)

hey chr,

seeing that you worked around the problem already you're probably fine. i would 
nevertheless like to ask you if you used the latest prerelease (0.2.11.18) to 
do the import, or a plain 0.2.11. i am not quite sure, but something might have 
changed. if the problem persists, could you send me the font in question so i 
can try to fix? i really want pixelfonts to render nicely (there is a problem 
with swfmill and non-antialiased mode which wont be fixed, but proper 
pixelfonts should render fine. i had the problem you described with a font of a 
friend of mine, but i cannot remember if i fixed swfmill or he fixed the font :)

-dan


-- 
http://0xDF.com/
http://iterative.org/

___
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org


Re: [swfmill] 0.2.11-18 meta not work

2006-09-27 Thread daniel fischer
Romain Ecarnot [EMAIL PROTECTED] (on Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:29:46 +0200):

   I open result in ActionScriptViewer and..SWF meta is incorrect, this is
   the error message :

Hey Romain,

your problem, AFAICS, lies with as2ant. swfml-s syntax within ant files has to 
be understood by as2ant and converted to a standalone file for swfmill to 
process, and obviously, as2ant doesnt understand the new tags (yet). As a 
workaround, use a standalone xml file for swfmill.

@Steve, i've closed bug submission for the time being in fear of trac-spam. bug 
reports have to be sent to me, i'll add them there. if circumstances require, i 
could appoint a bug manager to do that :)

-dan


-- 
http://0xDF.com/
http://iterative.org/

___
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org


Re: [swfmill] Bug with various letter spacings in static textfield.

2006-09-27 Thread daniel fischer
Quentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (on Fri, 8 Sep 2006 17:25:32 +0200):

   And I've noticed it's the same with various fonts...
   Hope someone will find the bug, and smash it!


Quentin,

i've added a bug in the tracker ( http://www.swfmill.org/trac/ticket/11 ) until 
i get around to investigate.

-dan

-- 
http://0xDF.com/
http://iterative.org/

___
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org


[swfmill] prerelease 0.2.11.19 'meta-informations' (was: Re: 0.2.11-18 meta not work)

2006-09-27 Thread daniel fischer

hey,

i've managed to properly preserve namespaces in the metadata output, and 
correctly transform the title and description. also, you can define additional 
contents in the meta tag a la:

meta title=myTitle description=informations
dc:somethingblah/dc:something
/meta

disclaimer: for this example, you have to correctly define the dc: namespace ( 
a la xmlns:dc=http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/; in some parent element), and 
dc:something is not a dublin-core-approved metadata name. also, the plural of 
information is information :)


the fix is available in 0.2.11.19 on http://swfmill.org/pre/ . There's no mac 
version (yet), as my compile server is down (again). i need a better place to 
compile for OSX.

-dan

-- 
http://0xDF.com/
http://iterative.org/

___
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org


Re: [swfmill] prerelease 0.2.11.19 'meta-informations' (was: Re: 0.2.11-18 meta not work)

2006-09-27 Thread Steve Webster
 i've managed to properly preserve namespaces in the metadata output, and 
 correctly transform the title and description.

Nice one Dan. Except that the meta information should be elements and
not attributes, since the description can be multi-line.

meta
  titlemyTitle/title
  descriptionInformations/description
/meta

...which would be why the information wasn't coming through.

Steve

-- 
Steve Webster
http://dynamicflash.com

___
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org