Re: [swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0124: `Int.init(ObjectIdentifier)` and `UInt.init(ObjectIdentifier)` should have a `bitPattern:` label

2016-07-19 Thread David Rönnqvist via swift-evolution 
+1. Agreed. A minor but a clear improvement for clarity and consistency.

- David

On 16 Jul 2016, at 07:54, Jacob Bandes-Storch via swift-evolution 
 wrote:

>> * What is your evaluation of the proposal?
> 
> +1
>  
>> * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a 
>> change to Swift?
> 
> Yes, minor but important.
>  
>> * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
> 
> Yes, it's consistent with other existing APIs, and it's intuitive.
> 
>  
>> * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar 
>> feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
> 
> N/A
>  
>> * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick 
>> reading, or an in-depth study?
> 
> Quick reading of the proposal. 
> ___
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution@swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
___
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Re: [swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0124: `Int.init(ObjectIdentifier)` and `UInt.init(ObjectIdentifier)` should have a `bitPattern:` label

2016-07-16 Thread Hooman Mehr via swift-evolution 
+1 

Same answers.

> On Jul 15, 2016, at 10:54 PM, Jacob Bandes-Storch via swift-evolution 
>  wrote:
> 
> * What is your evaluation of the proposal?
> 
> +1
>  
> * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a 
> change to Swift?
> 
> Yes, minor but important.
>  
> * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
> 
> Yes, it's consistent with other existing APIs, and it's intuitive.
> 
>  
> * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar 
> feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
> 
> N/A
>  
> * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick 
> reading, or an in-depth study?
> 
> Quick reading of the proposal. 
> ___
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution@swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

___
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Re: [swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0124: `Int.init(ObjectIdentifier)` and `UInt.init(ObjectIdentifier)` should have a `bitPattern:` label

2016-07-15 Thread Jacob Bandes-Storch via swift-evolution 
>
> * What is your evaluation of the proposal?
>

+1


> * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a
> change to Swift?
>

Yes, minor but important.


> * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
>

Yes, it's consistent with other existing APIs, and it's intuitive.



> * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar
> feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
>

N/A


> * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick
> reading, or an in-depth study?
>

Quick reading of the proposal.
___
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution