[swinog] trillian & IRC
Hi, Anybody using trillian for irc? I've been having problems recently and therefore I haven't been in the swinog channel for a while ... Any hints and tips are therefore very welcome ;-) Cheers Robert ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] trillian & IRC
I guess my best advice would be to use something else than trillian, as irssi for *nix system ... I'm not too aware anymore of what still exists on w32, I'd say mirc or xchat are still around ... Good luck ;) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Anybody using trillian for irc? I've been having problems recently and therefore I haven't been in the swinog channel for a while ... Any hints and tips are therefore very welcome ;-) Cheers Robert ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] SwissIX goes 10Gig!
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 01:02:30AM +0200, Daniel G. Kluge wrote: >> Can you send us a trace from your location and probably an ip-address >> close to you we may ping/trace? >> >> Followup please to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Because this is of general interest, I'll keep swinog looped in; When I try to reach www.swissix.ch from the internet, it seems that I do make it into AS13030, hitting r9.ipv6.init7.net (2001:1620::9). But the pollux.swissix.ch machine doesn't seem to have a route back to me (AS12859 for example). I noticed that you are using an IXP prefix for your webserver. Looking at SixXS' distributed looking glass[1], I see that still many ISPs are not accepting this /48 into their routing tables (and in my opinion, rightfully so). The IXP prefixes were not meant to host services in, rather only to make sure switch fabric is using a globally unique prefix (which comes in handy with stuff like DNS and ICMP unreachables and the like). I think that RIPE NCC has mentioned something to that effect when 2001:7f8:24::/48 was allocated. It might make more sense to host the webserver from a prefix that is visible in the DFZ everywhere, but I don't think that's the problem here. [1] shows that many people do not have a route for your /48 groet, Pim [1] http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/lg/?when=now&year=2007&month=10&day=14&hour=19&show=allpaths&format=html&report_grhwork=on&report_grhfail=on&findtype=prefix&find=2001%3A7f8%3A24%3A%3A%2F48 -- -- - -- - -+- - -- - -- Pim van Pelt Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ipng.nl/ IPv6 Deployment --- ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] SwissIX goes 10Gig!
Hello Pim >>> Followup please to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Because this is of general interest, I'll keep swinog looped in; > > But the pollux.swissix.ch machine doesn't seem to have a route back > to me (AS12859 for example). As I explained in another mail already we are probably hit by a kernel-bug which is corrupting the ipv6 kernel-routingtable altough the bgpd-routingtable has a correct view of the world. We are working on this issue and will keep you posted. > I noticed that you are using an IXP prefix for your webserver. Yes, that's correct. > Looking at SixXS' distributed looking glass[1], I see that still many > ISPs are not accepting this /48 into their routing tables (and in my > opinion, rightfully so). The IXP prefixes were not meant to host > services in, rather only to make sure switch fabric is using a > globally unique prefix (which comes in handy with stuff like DNS and > ICMP unreachables and the like). I think that RIPE NCC has mentioned > something to that effect when 2001:7f8:24::/48 was allocated. RIPE's policy to this topic is clear: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-256.html --snip 4.0 Warning Networks assigned under this policy may not be globally routable. --snap So, yes, you're right, there might be some networks that will not route our ipv6-prefix. Thank you for pointing this out. OTOH we had, have and most probably will operate some services for our members running in that ip-space (also reachable via ipv4). Running these services in another ip-space would afford some entity to sponsor the service and hardware or housing while, at the moment, some peers are generously sponsoring some upstream and we can take care of the rest. Since the later option is a very short amount of work for the sponsors I guess it will stay this way. I think the board maybe will have to consider to stop running the services on IPv6 for the sake of availability. OTOH I'd be interested to hear if any of our peers is blocking our prefix since they are the main audience for our services... -- Best regards, Roman Hochuli Operations Manager nexellent ag Saegereistrasse 29 CH-8152 Glattbrugg Phone: +41 44 562 30 40 Fax: +41 44 562 30 41 URL: www.nexellent.ch X-NCC-RegID: ch.nexellent Imagination is the one weapon in the war against reality. -- Jules de Gaultier ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] SwissIX goes 10Gig!
Roman Hochuli wrote: [..] > OTOH I'd be interested to hear if any of our peers is > blocking our prefix since they are the main audience for our services... According to http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/dfp/ripe/ : 2001:7f8:24::/48 SWISSIX-20031113 AS20612 72% As such only 72% of the BGP peers of GRH actually have that prefix. Then peek at http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/lg/?find=2001:7f8:24::/48 and you will find the active peers who are not seeing the prefix. Of course, more ISP's are always welcome to donate their prefixes to the system with the little cost of a EBGP connection to GRH, but as can be seen above this allows one to very easily see what is going on and where. Telia seems to be your only transit btw, you might want to checkup if filters really allow the IX prefix out from their network. Greets, Jeroen signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
AW: [swinog] trillian & IRC
Iam quite happy with Trillian and irc. I just use it now and then. it works good, even with the Trillian Astra alpha -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Sonntag, 14. Oktober 2007 19:02 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [swinog] trillian & IRC Hi, Anybody using trillian for irc? I've been having problems recently and therefore I haven't been in the swinog channel for a while ... Any hints and tips are therefore very welcome ;-) Cheers Robert ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ «Effizient suchen, finden und nutzen» Wie lange suchen Sie nach Ihren Informationen? An unserem kostenlosen Frühstücks-Event vom 15. November 2007 in St. Gallen informieren wir Sie ausführlich zu den Themen Enterprise Search und Urheberrecht. Weitere Informationen und das Online-Anmeldeformular finden Sie auf: www.online.ch/veranstaltungen ___ ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
